Re: [lfs-support] Updates development?
Frans de Boer wrote: > Oeps, how about continuity in case you are not able to extract udev for > any given period of time? It's not particularly hard. Just use the old udev-lfs tarball, see where the problems are and update the Makefile. Generally it's just adding a couple of new files to compile and add to the library. Sometime there's nothing. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Updates development?
On 02/27/2014 04:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Frans de Boer wrote: >>From last week until yesterday - Wednesday - there where several >> updates like linux-3.13.5, grep-2.17 and 18, psmisc-22.21, bash-4.3 and >> readline-6.3 and of course systemd-209. >> >> In todays online documentation update, all mentioned packages are not >> included. It tried to compile all (except the new systemd) and ended >> without any failure. Of course, some patch files needed to be removed. >> Am I that far ahead or is development behind? ;) > > We are in a package freeze until the 7.5 release. We have all of these > as tickets. Note that systemd is now at version 210. > Pff, that's quick. I knew they where preparing for 210, but expected that it would take another 2-3 months. >> By the way, since I use automated tools I no longer need a specific >> version adaption in my scripts, allowing for quicker re-builds. However, >> I still need to add or remove updated package specifics. Given time, I >> will resolve that too. >> >> Is it possible to publish the extraction tool for udev? That way I can >> check that part too. I am also interested in testing the full systemd >> for the systemd branch, but need more time to delve into it. So, that's >> a future goal. > > The udev-lfs tarball is done manually by me for each release. The > package changes too much to automate it. > > -- Bruce Oeps, how about continuity in case you are not able to extract udev for any given period of time? By the way, you just enhanced my former argument 'systemd vs vsysinit' ;) Frans. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Updates development?
Frans de Boer wrote: > From last week until yesterday - Wednesday - there where several > updates like linux-3.13.5, grep-2.17 and 18, psmisc-22.21, bash-4.3 and > readline-6.3 and of course systemd-209. > > In todays online documentation update, all mentioned packages are not > included. It tried to compile all (except the new systemd) and ended > without any failure. Of course, some patch files needed to be removed. > Am I that far ahead or is development behind? ;) We are in a package freeze until the 7.5 release. We have all of these as tickets. Note that systemd is now at version 210. > By the way, since I use automated tools I no longer need a specific > version adaption in my scripts, allowing for quicker re-builds. However, > I still need to add or remove updated package specifics. Given time, I > will resolve that too. > > Is it possible to publish the extraction tool for udev? That way I can > check that part too. I am also interested in testing the full systemd > for the systemd branch, but need more time to delve into it. So, that's > a future goal. The udev-lfs tarball is done manually by me for each release. The package changes too much to automate it. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] How can I fix the following errors which happen after extracting linux 3.10.10 package (chapter 8)
Le 27/02/2014 08:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Yonas Zed wrote: >> i follow the instraction on LFS 7.4 to build my own distro using >> ubuntu 12.4,32 bits ...i run the ubuntu on vmware 9 by allocationg >> 42GB space for storage and 2GB memory ...core-i7 2.20GHz >> processor...is there a different installation process for 32 and >> 64 bit? or different linux 3.10.10 for 32 and 64 bits?.. > You seem to be hijacking the thread. Your comments don't match the > subject. That said, if you use a 32-bit host, you will get a 32-bit > LFS. If you use a 64-bit host, you get a 64-bit LFS. Running in vmware > does not make a lot of difference outside of the kernel configuration. > Coming to the kernel configuration, There could be an explanation. I understand you used an Unbuntu 32 bit distribution on a virtual machine with 64 bit CPU. Doing that, as Bruce says, you get a 32 bit LFS. But the kernel configuration system may have seen the 64 bit CPU, and I think that is the source of the problem (from your original post): - kernel/bounds.c:1:0: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in make[1]: *** [kernel/bounds.s] Error 1 make: *** [prepare0] Error 2 - Can you check that "64-bit kernel" is not ticked when making the configuration of the kernel? Also, if you have run "make defconfig", try instead "make i386_defconfig". Regards Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] Updates development?
From last week until yesterday - Wednesday - there where several updates like linux-3.13.5, grep-2.17 and 18, psmisc-22.21, bash-4.3 and readline-6.3 and of course systemd-209. In todays online documentation update, all mentioned packages are not included. It tried to compile all (except the new systemd) and ended without any failure. Of course, some patch files needed to be removed. Am I that far ahead or is development behind? ;) By the way, since I use automated tools I no longer need a specific version adaption in my scripts, allowing for quicker re-builds. However, I still need to add or remove updated package specifics. Given time, I will resolve that too. Is it possible to publish the extraction tool for udev? That way I can check that part too. I am also interested in testing the full systemd for the systemd branch, but need more time to delve into it. So, that's a future goal. Regards, Frans. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
