failure in the posix/annexc test on 6.9. Glibc-2.12.1 on LFS version?
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:13:23 +0300 Flan Alflani falfl...@gmail.com wrote: is this something i should worry about or it just simple expected (ignored) failure in the posix/annexc test on 6.9. Glibc-2.12.1? root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock6.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock7.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock9.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock11.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock12.out] Error 11 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock14.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock1.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [rt/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/tst-xmmymm.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2 make: *** [check] Error 2 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Glibc-2.12.1 Hi, suggest you start a new thread to talk about this Glibc-2.12.1 related issue :-) -- 开源文化实验室 http://www.learndiary.com/ 孟大兴网站 http://www.openlong.com/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Problem Booting up the new system ?
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:31:50 + dgfhfgh dfghdfgh solo9...@hotmail.com wrote: Sincerely, http://www.Q8h.net Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:04:33 +0800 From: dashing.m...@gmail.com To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: Problem Booting up the new system ? On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:04:05 + dgfhfgh dfghdfgh solo9...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello all, after going thought the book and try to boot the new system, the Bootloader work fine but when i try to boot the root filesystem my screen display alot of color (attached photo) without any message or anything. I try to do the book again it seem to be compiling ok without anything i could find. dont know what i did wrong and or what to do next, therefore, if anyone could help or point me to the right direction. thxbook SVN-20101027host lfcliveCD Maybe, you can attach your .config file to the list, so someone can test it on their machine. Maybe, you can copy your LFS root directory to another machine to test if it is only happen on that machine. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page sorry forget to add the attachment :) here is a link http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/mxmgFkV8 I tested your .config on my LFS6.6 system, I didn't change anything else except my system is vmware i386 machine, so the kernel config program changed some things automatically, see the diff result between the modified .config and yours: http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/DLuCd850 Boot from the new compiled kernel, no any exception happened. After compiled the vmware disk driver(Fusion MPT device support) into kernel, I can boot and login into system with this kernel without error. So, I think maybe your hardware need some special kernel configs or your hardware has run into some new kernel bugs. I think. Good luck. littlebat -- 开源文化实验室 http://www.learndiary.com/ 孟大兴网站 http://www.openlong.com/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Problem Booting up the new system ?
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:34:31 +0300 Flan Alflani falfl...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/11/11 littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com: On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:31:50 + dgfhfgh dfghdfgh solo9...@hotmail.com wrote: Sincerely, http://www.Q8h.net Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:04:33 +0800 From: dashing.m...@gmail.com To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: Problem Booting up the new system ? On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:04:05 + dgfhfgh dfghdfgh solo9...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello all, after going thought the book and try to boot the new system, the Bootloader work fine but when i try to boot the root filesystem my screen display alot of color (attached photo) without any message or anything. I try to do the book again it seem to be compiling ok without anything i could find. dont know what i did wrong and or what to do next, therefore, if anyone could help or point me to the right direction. thxbook SVN-20101027host lfcliveCD Maybe, you can attach your .config file to the list, so someone can test it on their machine. Maybe, you can copy your LFS root directory to another machine to test if it is only happen on that machine. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page sorry forget to add the attachment :) here is a link http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/mxmgFkV8 I tested your .config on my LFS6.6 system, I didn't change anything else except my system is vmware i386 machine, so the kernel config program changed some things automatically, see the diff result between the modified .config and yours: http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/DLuCd850 Boot from the new compiled kernel, no any exception happened. After compiled the vmware disk driver(Fusion MPT device support) into kernel, I can boot and login into system with this kernel without error. So, I think maybe your hardware need some special kernel configs or your hardware has run into some new kernel bugs. I think. Good luck. littlebat -- 开源文化实验室 http://www.learndiary.com/ 孟大兴网站 http://www.openlong.com/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page littlebat, thx for looking into my problem, However i have a question on chapter 6.16. GCC-4.5.1 about the test suite results ? Is this ok : ../gcc-4.5.1/contrib/test_summary cat 'EOF' | LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_1_release revision 162774 Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -Os (test for excess errors) === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 61316 # of unexpected failures 6 # of expected failures165 # of unsupported tests833 /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.5.1 (GCC) === libgomp tests === Running target unix === libgomp Summary === # of expected passes 1029 === libmudflap tests === Running target unix FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors) FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors) FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail31-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors) FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors) FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test === libmudflap Summary === # of expected passes 1414 # of unexpected failures 13 === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes 7071 # of expected failures95 # of unsupported tests339 Compiler version: 4.5.1 (GCC) Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configure flags
Re: Book-5.8_Adjusting the ToolChain (v6.7)
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:35:18 -0700 Nolan 4030...@gmail.com wrote: I have tried everything I could think of to get this command to work... It seems $LFS_TGT is missing in environment. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Book-5.8_Adjusting the ToolChain (v6.7)
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:35:18 -0700
Nolan 4030...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried everything I could think of to get this command to
work...
Code:
SPECS=`dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs
$LFS_TGT-gcc -dumpspecs | sed \
-e 's@/lib\(64\)\?/ld@/tools@g' \
-e /^\*cpp:$/{n;s,$, -isystem /tools/include,} $SPECS
echo New specs file is: $SPECS
unset SPECS
/Code
One thing was taking a section at a time, by copy and paste.
i.e. SPECS=`dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc
-print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs$LFS_TGT-gcc -dumpspecs
^
Tried as is and with a space and also with a / No Joy.
Below is the results after I clicked paste.
It would execute immediately after the paste.
The results are a copy and paste form the terminal.
**
no...@retired:~$ SPECS=`dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc
-print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs
No command '-gcc' found, did you mean:
It's here. If $LFS_TGT is null, then this will appear. So I suppose the
$LFS_TGT isn't working in this instruction.
Command 'cgcc' from package 'sparse' (multiverse)
Command 'gcc' from package 'gcc' (main)
Command 'gcc' from package 'pentium-builder' (universe)
-gcc: command not found
dirname: missing operand
Try `dirname --help' for more information.
no...@retired:~$ $LFS_TGT-gcc -dumpspecs | sed \
-e 's@/lib\(64\)\?/ld@/tools@g' \
-e /^\*cpp:$/{n;s,$, -isystem /tools/include,} $SPECS
bash: /specs: Permission denied
No command '-gcc' found, did you mean:
Command 'cgcc' from package 'sparse' (multiverse)
Command 'gcc' from package 'gcc' (main)
Command 'gcc' from package 'pentium-builder' (universe)
-gcc: command not found
no...@retired:~$ echo New specs file is: $SPECS
New specs file is: /specs
no...@retired:~$ unset SPECS
**
What the key to getting this to work? If I need to do more reading,
please point me in the direction.
And I shall read. :)
Thanks in Advance
Nolan
--
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Maybe a bug still in 7.10. Creating Custom Symlinks to Devices in LFS6.7
In LFS6.6, 7.10. Creating Custom Symlinks sed -i -e 's/write_cd_rules/ mode/' \ /lib/udev/rules.d/75-cd-aliases-generator.rules Because there is write_cd_rules by_id in file /lib/udev/rules.d/75-cd-aliases-generator.rules already, so this command will produce text such as write_cd_rules by_path by_id. I don't know the content of /lib/udev/rules.d/75-cd-aliases-generator.rules in LFS6.7, so, someone can do a check and correct it. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Book-5.8_Adjusting the ToolChain (v6.7)
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:51:48 +0100
Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:22:34 -0700
Nolan 4030...@gmail.com wrote:
This is now the error after I changed to user 'lfs'.
AS: lfs
l...@retired:~$ whoami
lfs
l...@retired:~$ cd /mnt/lfs/sources
l...@retired:/mnt/lfs/sources$ SPECS=`dirname $($LFS_TGT-gcc
-print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs
l...@retired:/mnt/lfs/sources$ $LFS_TGT-gcc -dumpspecs | sed \
-e 's@/lib\(64\)\?/ld@/tools@g' \
-e /^\*cpp:$/{n;s,$, -isystem /tools/include,} $SPECS
bash:[SUDO] /tools/lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.5.1/specs:
Permission denied =
^
l...@retired:/mnt/lfs/sources$ echo New specs file is: $SPECS
New specs file is: /tools/lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.5.1/specs
l...@retired:/mnt/lfs/sources$ unset SPECS
Do I need to include a sudo in the command?
No, never. If you followed the book /tools would be owned (and hence
writable) by the user lfs. I would suggest that you start again.
Andy
Yes, because you have made a very essential mistake, you are working in
a wrong environment without $LFS_TGT working, I think there are lots of
problems in your work from the beginning. So, I think the simplest way
is to start again, follow the instructions exactly. Or, maybe you will
vast much time and still end up with have to start it from beginning :-(
I am using Ubuntu 10.04 in vmware machine as a host, there isn't any
problem until the end of Chapter 7 (LFS6.6) except the one relating the
bash start file setup, see: the issue of environment value $PS1 set
under Ubuntu 10.04
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2010-June/038825.html
But, this issue should can't make you building a wrong LFS even without
to resolve it.
BTW, have you found the reason why your $LFS_TGT
environment variable is missing? I think this is the key of your
problem.
--
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: LFS Dev SVN-20100702 - 5.9. Binutils-2.20.1 - Pass 2 (AR and RANLIB)
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:32:04 +0300 Rebel Yell rebely...@xbox-zone.ro wrote: My $LFS_TGT is i686-pc-linux-gnu You are wrong, it says LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-lfs-linux-gnu in Section: 4.4. Setting Up the Environment . -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Issues with second build of GCC
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:58:16 -0400 Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.edu wrote: On Sunday 11 July 2010 21:33:23 Robert Whitcomb wrote: Thanks very much for your help, the CC value was set wrong. But now I am running into another issue: /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: crti.o: No such file: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc' make[1]: *** [all-target-libgcc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' The crti.o file is is my /tools/lib folder, and I made sure the CC value was set correctly. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! What did you set LFS_TGT to? If you exactly followed the book, the above value (i686-pc-linux-gnu) is incorrect. I checked my gcc pass 2 building log at http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/ni7edwLd , line 60: checking for ld... /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld line 1910: checking what linker to use... /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld So I guess his /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld is right. But, when I restarted build gcc pass 2, I removed that crti.o first, then did the configure as book says, of course, error reported, I checked config.log, it said: quote /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.4.3/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld: crti.o: No such file: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status /quote It seems /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld was working for it, so I am not sure his /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld is right or error now. I am a LFS newbie and is shooting in the dark :-) PS: I am using parellel make introduced in 4.5. About SBUs, so the make * log lines is interleaved in my build log posted above. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Issues with second build of GCC
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 08:48:28 -0400 Robert Whitcomb rwhitc...@acm.org wrote: checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc in Section 5.10. GCC-4.4.3 - Pass 2 of LFS BOOK 6.6, it says: CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc -B/tools/lib/ So I remember the configure output should be something like below: checking for i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc... Maybe, check your environment value: $LFS_TGT --- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Issues with second build of GCC
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:33:23 -0400 Robert Whitcomb rwhitc...@acm.org wrote: Thanks very much for your help, the CC value was set wrong. But now I am running into another issue: /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: crti.o: No such file: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc' make[1]: *** [all-target-libgcc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' The crti.o file is is my /tools/lib folder, and I made sure the CC value was set correctly. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc -B/tools/lib/ Have you missed -B/tools/lib/ in CC value? If still many errors appear, suggest delete the entire tools directory and restart from Chapter 4 again. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Issues with second build of GCC
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:58:16 -0400 Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.edu wrote: On Sunday 11 July 2010 21:33:23 Robert Whitcomb wrote: Thanks very much for your help, the CC value was set wrong. But now I am running into another issue: /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: crti.o: No such file: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc' make[1]: *** [all-target-libgcc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' The crti.o file is is my /tools/lib folder, and I made sure the CC value was set correctly. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! What did you set LFS_TGT to? If you exactly followed the book, the above value (i686-pc-linux-gnu) is incorrect. I check my gcc pass 2 building log, /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld is right. But the C compiler should be i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc . I have posted my log for reference at: http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/ni7edwLd Note, I am using parellel make introduced in 4.5. About SBUs, so the make * log lines is interleaved. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
need an accurate answer: can we build LFS with parallel compiling?
Hi, I am learning LFS BOOK 6.6. I have built all the packages successfully with parallel compiling (I set an environment export MAKEFLAGS='j -2' for user lfs ) according to the instruction in 4.5. About SBUs as book says: quote For many modern systems with multiple processors (or cores) the compilation time for a package can be reduced by performing a parallel make by either setting an environment variable or telling the make program how many processors are available. /quote From my understanding, LFS BOOK 6.6 is implicit to say we can always use MAKEFLAGS='-j 2' or make -j2 to reduce compiling time when using a double cores CPU. If we run into a problem with a build step, revert back to a single processor build to properly analyze the error messages. But, when I read 6.1. Introduction, the book says: quote For the same reason, do not compile packages in parallel. Compiling in parallel may save time (especially on dual-CPU machines), but it could result in a program containing a hard-wired path to /tools, which will cause the program to stop working when that directory is removed. /quote So, I need some accurate answers: 1, Can we build LFS with parallel compiling through the book? 2, Can we build Chapter 5 with parallel compiling but do not use parallel compiling in the rest Chapters (includes Chapter 6 and Chapter 8)? 3, I have finished building Chapter 5 with parallel compiling, if I need rebuild all Chapter 5 without parallel compiling again as section 6.1. Introduction says? I have also had a glance at a hint that was written at 2004: How to build LFS using multiple compiler instances. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/parallelcompiling.txt -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: need an accurate answer: can we build LFS with parallel compiling?
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:15:54 + emte...@gmail.com wrote: I think you're misreading the documentation. There are two ways to parallel compile: 1) Make -j2 will try to compile several .c files from one package at a time, if it can find 2 files with no dependencies. 2) Users could in theory try to compile two packages in parallel. Eg: make glibc make gcc The documentation encourages you to do the first, but not the second. I think I misunderstood the book in section 6.1. Introduction, compile packages in parallel should means compile several packages at the same time and is different from parallel make in section 4.5. About SBUs. Thanks. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: need an accurate answer: can we build LFS with parallel compiling?
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:31:32 +0100 Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/07/10 12:10, littlebat wrote: So, I need some accurate answers: 1, Can we build LFS with parallel compiling through the book? Yes. A few packages won't build in parallel (openssl) and some packages sometimes fail to compile with a parallel build (xmlto) but pretty much everything else is fine with make -j$NUMBER 2, Can we build Chapter 5 with parallel compiling but do not use parallel compiling in the rest Chapters (includes Chapter 6 and Chapter 8)? I use make -j4 all the time. Doesn't give me any problems. I've had some problems in the past with make -j4 install not installing all of glibc's files so I now avoid installing in parallel. make install is mostly limited by disc input/output so I see no benefit in make -j4 install. Consequently I don't set MAKEFLAGS as it risks breaking make install for little benefit. Maybe I am lucky:-), I set MAKEFLAGS='-j 2' on my E7400 double cores CPU, no any exception appeared until I finished all the packages in Chapter 5. But, I think this should depends on the quality of the package itself. Maybe, after the next release of a package, it will refuse to do a parallel make or parallel make install just like you have experienced. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: configure: error: could not find a working compiler
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 11:10:12 +0300 Face falaz...@gmail.com wrote: hostname = lfslivecd uname -m = x86_64 uname -r = 2.6.22.5-64bit uname -s = Linux uname -v = #1 SMP Sun Dec 30 10:37:45 GMT 2007 configure:3203: checking build system type configure:3217: result: pentium2-unknown-linux-gnu configure:3237: checking host system type configure:3250: result: pentium2-unknown-linux-gnu I am just a little confused. Is it a pentiumII CPU? Why can run a 64 bit Linux? How about a 32 bit host OS? -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: configure: error: could not find a working compiler
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 13:24:55 +0300 Face falaz...@gmail.com wrote: i am trying to install it on KVM . On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:17 PM, littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 11:10:12 +0300 Face falaz...@gmail.com wrote: hostname = lfslivecd uname -m = x86_64 uname -r = 2.6.22.5-64bit uname -s = Linux uname -v = #1 SMP Sun Dec 30 10:37:45 GMT 2007 configure:3203: checking build system type configure:3217: result: pentium2-unknown-linux-gnu configure:3237: checking host system type configure:3250: result: pentium2-unknown-linux-gnu I haven't see a pentium2-unknown-linux-gnu before, a pentium2 CPU machine should be a i686-unknown-linux-gnu in my memory. I guess maybe the old lfslivecd hasn't recognized your KVM cpu? Try another lastest livecd (such as Ubuntu) or simply install a Linux into your KVM disk, and see if it is still a pentium2-unknown-linux-gnu, if it isn't, maybe the problem is that old lfslivecd. I am a newbie to LFS and haven't ever used kvm to build a LFS(I am using Vmware Server 2). -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: LFS 6.6 Chapter 2, Preparing a New Partition
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 14:27:17 +0530 shashank kumar er.shashank.ku...@gmail.com wrote: Or I can directly mount it in /mnt/lfs?, as its already mounted in /media. two things... 1. if a partition is already mounted you cant mount it again unless it is first unmounted. According to my experience, we can duplicate to mount a partition on different mount point again and again, but it isn't needed and maybe cause potential problem. Not recommended. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: If SBU measure include test time?
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:07:06 -0500
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
It's just not important enough to fix. If someone creates a patch,
I'll apply it.
Here is a patch, you can apply it if it is helpful. Change the
package into every package base on the last email.
code
#!/bin/bash
# usage: fixa.sh source_top_directory_full_path
# e.g., ./fixa.sh ~/LFS-DEV/BOOK
# For fixing a trivial wording issue about
# clarifying the approximate build SBU number
# and required disk space of the package.
cd $1
# Delete testsuite included from ./packages.ent
cp -u packages.ent{,.orig}
sed 's/ testsuite included//g' \
packages.ent.orig packages.ent
touch packages.ent.orig
# Add note into ./chapter05/binutils-pass1.xml
cp -u chapter05/binutils-pass1.xml{,.orig}
a=paraNow prepare Binutils for compilation:/para
b=noteparaThe approximate build SBU\ \
number and required disk space\n\ \ \ \ \
of every package in Chapter 5 does\ \
not include testsuite./para/note\n\n\ \ \ \
sed s...@$(echo $a)@$(echo $b)@ \
chapter05/binutils-pass1.xml.orig \
chapter05/binutils-pass1.xml
touch chapter05/binutils-pass1.xml.orig
# Add note into ./chapter06/linux-headers.xml
cp -u chapter06/linux-headers.xml{,.orig}
a=titleInstallation of Linux API Headers/title
b=\n\n\ \ \ \ noteparaThe approximate build\ \
SBU number and required disk space\n\ \ \ \ \
of every package which has testsuite in\ \
Chapter 6 includes testsuite./para/note
sed s...@$(echo $a)@$(echo $b)@ \
chapter06/linux-headers.xml.orig \
chapter06/linux-headers.xml
touch chapter06/linux-headers.xml.orig
exit 0
/code
--
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: If SBU measure include test time?
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:41:38 -0500 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: That's a script, not a patch. For an example of a patch, see http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/attachment/ticket/2371/program-list-update.patch Here is a patch, you can apply it if it is helpful. Ticket #2702 (new enhancement) clarifying the approximate build SBU number and required disk space of the package http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2702 patch file: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/attachment/ticket/2702/clarify-sbu-disk_space.patch -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
If SBU measure include test time?
Hi,
I try to measure SBU when installing every package with command
time {} and consider post my measure into
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~sbu .
1, If only those packages marked SBU testsuite included should include
the time spent on test into SBU measure?
2, Or, don't include the test time in SBU measure of any package?
3, Or, include every steps from the configuration, up to and including
the first install just like the description in page
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html;?
If I measure the SBU of
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/tcl.html ,
using:
The first method:
time { ./configure --prefix=/tools make make install; }
The second:
time { ./configure --prefix=/tools make make install; }
The third:
time { ./configure --prefix=/tools make TZ=UTC make test make \
install; }
Which method should I use?
---
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: If SBU measure include test time?
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:44:56 -0500
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
littlebat wrote:
Hi,
I try to measure SBU when installing every package with command
time {} and consider post my measure into
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~sbu .
1, If only those packages marked SBU testsuite included should
include the time spent on test into SBU measure?
2, Or, don't include the test time in SBU measure of any package?
3, Or, include every steps from the configuration, up to and
including the first install just like the description in page
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html;?
If I measure the SBU of
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/tcl.html
, using:
The first method:
time { ./configure --prefix=/tools make make install; }
The second:
time { ./configure --prefix=/tools make make install; }
The third:
time { ./configure --prefix=/tools make TZ=UTC make test
make \ install; }
Which method should I use?
I don't see a difference between 1 and 2. In any case, I recommend
using times without tests in Chapert 5 and with tests in Chapter 6.
I am learning LFS BOOK 6.6.
Do you mean every SBU measure include test time described in the head
of the page of the package in Chapter 6 which has a testsuite and don't
include test time in Chapter 5?
Have a glance at the sections in Chapter 6, I found there are some
packages which have a testsuite but without marked testsuite included
in the head of package section, such as: 6.25. Bison-2.4.1,
6.33. Perl-5.10.1, 6.41. Gettext-0.17, etc... If the SBU number in
these packages don't include test time?
I sugguest adding a note in SBU section such as: the test time should
be included into SBU measure in Chapter 6 if the package has a testsuite
and shouldn't be included into SBU measure in Chapter 5 anyway.
Although it will not affect us to make a working LFS without the
changing on wording.
Until today, I haven't reached the jhalfs. But thanks your information
anyway.
--
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: LFS (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.7 Linux API Headers
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 05:42:03 +0300 Face falaz...@gmail.com wrote: re-download. cannot extract linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2 root:/sources# tar xjvf linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2 tar (child): linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar (child): Error is not recoverable: exiting now tar: Child returned status 2 tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now -- Sincerely, -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Help with Glib-c 2.11.1 Pass 1 (ch 5.7) in LFS 6.6
l...@ubuntu10-clean:/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build$ make I am also new to LFS, the book says we should always work in directory /mnt/lfs/sources and install temporary tools in directory /mnt/lfs/tools. So, the right build place of glibc-build pass1 should be /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
A sed syntax
Hi,
I am learning LFS BOOK:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.6/chapter05/adjusting.html
Below is a sed syntax I can't understand and haven't found a place to
learn it.
code
sed -e /^\*cpp:$/{n;s,$, -isystem /tools/include,}
/code
I read man sed and info sed and googled but can't find this kind of
sed usage, can you give me a reference link on the internet or tell
me which section in info sed?
I knew ^ indicates the begin of a line and $ indicates end of a
line, so ^\*cpp:$ indicates a line includes and only includes a
string *cpp:. And, I also knew the effect of this command is append
string -isystem /tools/include to the end of the next line of line
*cpp: by a test. But what's meaning of the every part in {n;s, $,
-isystem /tools/include,} and how this command to achieve this
effect?
Thanks,
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: A sed syntax
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:57:44 -0400
Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.edu wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:24:51 littlebat wrote:
Hi,
I am learning LFS BOOK:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.6/chapter05/adjusting.html
Below is a sed syntax I can't understand and haven't found a place
to learn it.
code
sed -e /^\*cpp:$/{n;s,$, -isystem /tools/include,}
/code
Basically, '/^\*cpp:$/' is the address that matches lines that
contain exactly '*cpp:'. The braces indicate a 'compound command'.
'n;s' means execute those two commands (n: print the pattern space;
s: substitute the EOL with the 'option'). The effect is, as you know,
to append the option to the end of all lines with just '*cpp:' on
them.
The commas are an unusual selection, but perfectly valid, since the s
command allows pretty much any character to delimit the match and
replace phrases.
This could be rewritten as
sed -e 's=^\(*cpp:\)=\1 -s system /tools/include/='
which would be a little more grokable.
The only thing you need to find in the manual is the definition and
use of the braces.
Good enough?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Thanks. Good answer. Save me much time, with your help.
Always hate read the whole man page (info page) of those big program :-)
Got at least three from this:
1, Sed syntax: sed -e /address/command
2, command can be a 'compound command', it is {}
3, just forgot delimiter can be any character
sed -e 's=^\(*cpp:\)=\1 -s system /tools/include/='
I modified it as below but can't achieve the effect:
sed -e s=^\(*cpp:\)$=\1 -isystem /tools/include=
It only append -isystem /tools/include to the end of the line which
only include string *cpp:. The book needs append the string to the
next line of the line only include string *cpp:.
But, at least I have known more on sed. Thanks.
--
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: A sed syntax
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:22:35 -0500
Mike McCarty mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
So much detailed answer, I can post it into my blog as a detailed
manual. too many thanks.
littlebat wrote:
Hi,
I am learning LFS BOOK:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.6/chapter05/adjusting.html
Below is a sed syntax I can't understand and haven't found a place
to learn it.
code
sed -e /^\*cpp:$/{n;s,$, -isystem /tools/include,}
/code
You already got a good answer, perhaps a little more detail helps...
I'm no sed expert, but this is the way I read that command.
sed the command
-emeans execute this little program which follows
the quotes are necessary to keep the shell from
trying to do stuff with what's here, and to make
what follows all one argument to the program
/ sed looks at the first character, and takes that
to be the delimeter. So, everything from here to
the next / is the address sed will use to select
lines from the file; the program gets executed on lines
which match this pattern, all other lines pass through
unchanged
^ this indicates that the pattern must start at
the beginning of the line
\*we have to escape the *, or the shell will try to
put file names in there, hence the \ to make this
a literal *
cpp: more string to look for
$ this says that when we've matched what went before,
we must next find end of line, so, the entire line
must be *cpp:, so the command gets executed only
on lines which contain *cpp: and nothing else
/ here's the other delimeter / which ends the address
{ this tells sed that what is contained is the script to
execute, when we find a matching line; we do so up to
the closing }
n Read/append the next line of input into the pattern space
IOW, print what has been matched so far (*cpp:) and
then work on the next line
; end of n command, so all we print is just *cpp:
we use ; to put multiple commands together, so this
separates the n command from the s command
s now we start a substitute command
, this is taken by sed to be the delimter of the string
to substitute for; this could be any character, like
the / above; the s command wants
sdelimstring to finddelimstring to subdelim
where delim may be any character you like, but all three
must be the same. In this case, ,
$ the pattern we are going to substitute for is end of line...
, ... and nothing else, the second , matches the one above
and ends the search string
-isystem /tools/include
this is the string to substitute at end of line
, here's the third delimeter
} this marks end-of-command
this is the matching quote for the shell to see
HTH
Mike
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
littlebat
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: A sed syntax
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:23:49 -0500 Mike McCarty mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote: littlebat wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:22:35 -0500 Mike McCarty mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote: So much detailed answer, I can post it into my blog as a detailed manual. too many thanks. It's considered polite to ask the copyright holder before reproducing his work :-) Mike Of course, I will comment the original author is Mike McCarty Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net and original link is http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2010-June/039030.html :-) -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: LFS (Version SVN-20100529) - 5.19. File-5.04
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:10:18 +0300 Face falaz...@gmail.com wrote: hello all, when reach chapter 5.19.1. Installation of File I got this: root:/mnt/lfs/sources/File-5.04# make It seems you have missed something, I remember we should always use non-root user (lfs) to compile LFS in chapter 5 at least. See: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.6/chapter04/addinguser.html -- littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: LFS (Version SVN-20100529) - 5.19. File-5.04
when i add lfs user i get permissions problems You have deviated the book. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter04/addinguser.html As root, issue the following commands to add the new user: groupadd lfs useradd -s /bin/bash -g lfs -m -k /dev/null lfs -- littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: live and learn
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 16:08:18 -0400 In Host system Requirements, the instructions explicitly wants '/bin/sh' to be pointing to bash. Mine was pointing to dash. under Ubuntu, try sudo dpkg-reconfigure dash. Any recommendations on a rescue disk? CDlinux. ( http://cdlinux.info/ ) PS: try virtual machine as your LFS building host. It will keep you real physical machine safe. -- littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: the issue of environment value $PS1 set under Ubuntu 10.04
Ubuntu bash has a bug, even if I specified --rcfile, it still read /etc/bash.bashrc. That's because /etc/profile does it explicitly: I have replaced bash in Ubuntu with the bash comes with LFS6.6. I found there isn't a system-wide .bashrc file(just like /etc/bash.bashrc in Ubuntu 10.04) in LFS6.6 bash. So, when I specified --rcfile append to LFS6.6 bash, it works as its man page describes. But, under Ubuntu 10.04 bash, specified --rcfile ~/mybashrc append to bash, it will read and perform /etc/bash.bashrc and ~/mybashrc but without ~/.bashrc, it acts don't like its man page describes, so it is a bug ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/589496 ). If there isn't this bug in Ubuntu 10.04, specified --rcfile ~lfs/.bashrc will really solved this issue in spite of /etc/profile does it explicitly. Because ~lfs/.bash_profile will be read and be performed after /etc/profile (of course after /etc/bash.bashrc), the env command will set a empty environment, it clear all the environment values include the values set in /etc/bash.bashrc first. There are almost always ways to work around little problems. I think, it isn't everyone know how to solve these lttle problems(just like me), so the best way is give the right guide in the LFS BOOK. No, we really can't instruct for every possible combination of lack of knowledge. Having enough background in Linux to solve simple usage problems like this is really a prerequisite for LFS. No, I don't agree your point. As a book, it should be right at first. But, under my Ubuntu 10.04, It doesn't act right when I did exactly as LFS BOOK 6.6 says without a note such as In some distributions, this instructions should be modified to archive the goal of getting a clear LFS building environment. So, I suggest to add a note like above into LFS BOOK 6.6 or give an all right way to get a clear building environment. I am a LFS newbie but not a Linux newbie, so I think I can solved this issue at last. But, as a LFS BOOK, it really need to make it more wonderful. Thanks for LFS, a Linux distribution that the first goal is education( http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.6/prologue/audience.html In the end, education is by far the most powerful of reasons. ). Thank you. -- littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: the issue of environment value $PS1 set under Ubuntu 10.04
Try adding --noprofile --rc ~lfs/.bashrc to the bash command. Or just Ubuntu bash has a bug, even if I specified --rcfile, it still read /etc/bash.bashrc. add --noprofile --norc and set everything in the env command. Base on my knowledge, I found the env command can't set like set +h or umask 022 those are set in the file .bashrc. There are almost always ways to work around little problems. I think, it isn't everyone know how to solve these lttle problems(just like me), so the best way is give the right guide in the LFS BOOK. -- littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
the issue of environment value $PS1 set under Ubuntu 10.04
This issue was posted onto lfs-support mailing list yesterday (see:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2010-June/038814.html ),
unluckly I disabled the mail delivery of LFS mailing list some days ago, so I
can't continue discuss it on the lfs-support mailing list. And, I consider it
is a bug of LFS6.6 book, so I start a new thread on the lfs-dev list to discuss
it.
I am using Ubuntu 10.04 as the LFS building host. When I set environment with
the instructions at: 4.4. Setting Up the Environment:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.6/chapter04/settingenvironment.html
, I found the commands provided by LFS book can't set $PS1 value under Ubuntu
10.04 host properly. The commands is below:
code
cat ~/.bash_profile EOF
exec env -i HOME=$HOME TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' /bin/bash
EOF
/code
The issue is Ubuntu has a system-wide .bashrc file for interactive bash(1)
shells, it is /etc/bash.bashrc. $PS1 has been set to
PS1='${debian_chroot:+($debian_chroot)}...@\h:\w\$ ' in this file. When the
command above invoke /bin/bash to start a new interactive bash shells,
/etc/bash.bashrc will invoked first, this $PS1 value will be seted. So, $PS1
keep as the format like l...@u1004b2-desktop:~$ , not the format excepted by
LFS6.6 book like lfs:~$ .
And, /etc/bash.bashrc in Ubuntu 10.04 also sets some other bash behavior, such
as: update value of $LINES and $COLUMNS, give sudo hint, give the hint when
can't find a command, etc... I hope these will not affect a clear LFS building
environment :-(
And, /etc/profile will invoke /etc/bash.bashrc in Ubuntu 10.04.
I think, $PS1 is a display style for the user interact with bash, set it in the
~/.bashrc maybe a good idea? Under Ubuntu 10.04, I found the ~/.bashrc also
overwrite the $PS1 value in its /etc/bash.bashrc.
Below is the content of /etc/bash.bashrc in Ubuntu 10.04:
code
# System-wide .bashrc file for interactive bash(1) shells.
# To enable the settings / commands in this file for login shells as well,
# this file has to be sourced in /etc/profile.
# If not running interactively, don't do anything
[ -z $PS1 ] return
# check the window size after each command and, if necessary,
# update the values of LINES and COLUMNS.
shopt -s checkwinsize
# set variable identifying the chroot you work in (used in the prompt below)
if [ -z $debian_chroot ] [ -r /etc/debian_chroot ]; then
debian_chroot=$(cat /etc/debian_chroot)
fi
# set a fancy prompt (non-color, overwrite the one in /etc/profile)
PS1='${debian_chroot:+($debian_chroot)}...@\h:\w\$ '
# Commented out, don't overwrite xterm -T title -n icontitle by default.
# If this is an xterm set the title to user at host:dir
#case $TERM in
#xterm*|rxvt*)
#PROMPT_COMMAND='echo -ne \033]0;${us...@${hostname}: ${PWD}\007'
#;;
#*)
#;;
#esac
# enable bash completion in interactive shells
#if [ -f /etc/bash_completion ] ! shopt -oq posix; then
#. /etc/bash_completion
#fi
# sudo hint
if [ ! -e $HOME/.sudo_as_admin_successful ]; then
case $(groups) in *\ admin\ *)
if [ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]; then
cat -EOF
To run a command as administrator (user root), use sudo command.
See man sudo_root for details.
EOF
fi
esac
fi
# if the command-not-found package is installed, use it
if [ -x /usr/lib/command-not-found -o -x /usr/share/command-not-found ]; then
function command_not_found_handle {
# check because c-n-f could've been removed in the meantime
if [ -x /usr/lib/command-not-found ]; then
/usr/bin/python /usr/lib/command-not-found -- $1
return $?
elif [ -x /usr/share/command-not-found ]; then
/usr/bin/python /usr/share/command-not-found -- $1
return $?
else
return 127
fi
}
fi
/code
--
littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Can't set $PS1 properly under Ubuntu 10.04 host
Hi,
I am learning: 4.4. Setting Up the Environment:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.6/chapter04/settingenvironment.html
. My host system is Ubuntu 10.04.
I found it can't properly to set $PS1 for user lfs with the command below
provided by LFS6.6 book under Ubuntu 10.04 host system.
code
cat ~/.bash_profile EOF
exec env -i HOME=$HOME TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' /bin/bash
EOF
/code
The reason is Ubuntu will setup PS1 in /etc/bash.bashrc, so I think maybe we
should set this value in ~/.bashrc ?
And, my linux skill is poor, I don't know if the setup in /etc/bash.bashrc in
Ubuntu will break something other of LFS building environment.
Below is the content of /etc/bash.bashrc in Ubuntu 10.04:
code
# System-wide .bashrc file for interactive bash(1) shells.
# To enable the settings / commands in this file for login shells as well,
# this file has to be sourced in /etc/profile.
# If not running interactively, don't do anything
[ -z $PS1 ] return
# check the window size after each command and, if necessary,
# update the values of LINES and COLUMNS.
shopt -s checkwinsize
# set variable identifying the chroot you work in (used in the prompt below)
if [ -z $debian_chroot ] [ -r /etc/debian_chroot ]; then
debian_chroot=$(cat /etc/debian_chroot)
fi
# set a fancy prompt (non-color, overwrite the one in /etc/profile)
PS1='${debian_chroot:+($debian_chroot)}...@\h:\w\$ '
# Commented out, don't overwrite xterm -T title -n icontitle by default.
# If this is an xterm set the title to u...@host:dir
#case $TERM in
#xterm*|rxvt*)
#PROMPT_COMMAND='echo -ne \033]0;${us...@${hostname}: ${PWD}\007'
#;;
#*)
#;;
#esac
# enable bash completion in interactive shells
#if [ -f /etc/bash_completion ] ! shopt -oq posix; then
#. /etc/bash_completion
#fi
# sudo hint
if [ ! -e $HOME/.sudo_as_admin_successful ]; then
case $(groups) in *\ admin\ *)
if [ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]; then
cat -EOF
To run a command as administrator (user root), use sudo command.
See man sudo_root for details.
EOF
fi
esac
fi
# if the command-not-found package is installed, use it
if [ -x /usr/lib/command-not-found -o -x /usr/share/command-not-found ]; then
function command_not_found_handle {
# check because c-n-f could've been removed in the meantime
if [ -x /usr/lib/command-not-found ]; then
/usr/bin/python /usr/lib/command-not-found -- $1
return $?
elif [ -x /usr/share/command-not-found ]; then
/usr/bin/python /usr/share/command-not-found -- $1
return $?
else
return 127
fi
}
fi
/code
--
littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: LFS on USB?
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:08:18 +0100 Hans Kaper spaky...@xs4all.nl wrote: My grub entry for my LFS6.4 stick is: title Linux From Scratch 6.4 Kernel 2.6.30.2 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/lfskernel-2.6.30.2 root=/dev/uba1 Omit the root=/dev/uba1-option. root (hd0,0) points already to the device you want to boot from. It should can't be omited, root (hd0,0) is the prefix location of your kernel or image file, and root=/dev/* indicates your device that / directory on it. For example, when your kernel file is (hd0,0)/boot/kernelfile, your root directory / can be root=/dev/hdc2 . -- littlebat dashing.m...@gmail.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
