Re: [lfs-support] Booting LFS with systemd
First of all I apologize for the initial flood of messages. They where the result of multiple tries to get the message to the list in the first place. Only yesterday I found that LFS is - still - not handling TLS while my server had the line that is must encrypt messages. Of the many subjects I exchange messages with, LFS is the only one not supporting TLS covered traffic. Now on subject: I will look into that matter, but normal production systems have the same message and do not fail. I'll keep you informed. Regards, Frans. On 29-05-18 06:43, Michael Shell wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2018 16:21:53 +0200 Frans de Boer wrote: Attached is a picture with a repeatably failing boot when I build LFS with systemd support. Any suggestion where I screwed-up? Frans, A few lines before the crash, your systemd errored with: "failed to insert module 'autofs4': No such file or directory" That might have triggered the abort a few lines later. Here: https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/boot-problem-failed-to-insert-module-%27autofs4%27-4175485121/ they suggest recompiling the kernel with CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS=y (under "Kernel automounter version 4 support (also supports v3)" in the File systems config section) i.e., built-in rather than as a module. If that does not fix it, see here for how to use gdb on the systemd core dump to see the sequence of events that led to the downfall: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883690 and post the bt output for us to see. In anycase, if you resolve the problem, do post to the list what the answer turned out to be. Cheers, Mike Shell -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] Booting LFS with systemd
On Thu, 24 May 2018 16:21:53 +0200 Frans de Boer wrote: > Attached is a picture with a repeatably failing boot when I build LFS > with systemd support. Any suggestion where I screwed-up? Frans, A few lines before the crash, your systemd errored with: "failed to insert module 'autofs4': No such file or directory" That might have triggered the abort a few lines later. Here: https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/boot-problem-failed-to-insert-module-%27autofs4%27-4175485121/ they suggest recompiling the kernel with CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS=y (under "Kernel automounter version 4 support (also supports v3)" in the File systems config section) i.e., built-in rather than as a module. If that does not fix it, see here for how to use gdb on the systemd core dump to see the sequence of events that led to the downfall: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883690 and post the bt output for us to see. In anycase, if you resolve the problem, do post to the list what the answer turned out to be. Cheers, Mike Shell -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] Booting LFS with systemd
Dear all, Attached was a picture with a repeatably failing boot when I build LFS with systemd support. Any suggestion where I screwed-up? This is already like the introduction of systemd-238. Regards, Frans. Since pictures are not allowed: The output ends with: systemd[1]: Detected virtualization vw-other systemd[1]: Detected architecture x86_64 systemd[1]: Caught , dumped core at pid 39 systemd[1}: Freezing execution it then continues with three lines about the clocksource and it is frozen. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] Booting LFS with systemd
Dear all, Attached was a picture with a repeatably failing boot when I build LFS with systemd support. Any suggestion where I screwed-up? This is already like the introduction of systemd-238. Regards, Frans. Since pictures are not allowed: The output ends with: systemd[1]: Detected virtualization vw-other systemd[1]: Detected architecture x86_64 systemd[1]: Caught , dumped core at pid 39 systemd[1}: Freezing execution it then continues with three lines about the clocksource and it is frozen. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] Booting LFS with systemd
On 5/25/2018 4:35 AM, Frans de Boer wrote: Dear all, Attached was a picture with a repeatably failing boot when I build LFS with systemd support. Any suggestion where I screwed-up? This is already like the introduction of systemd-238. Regards, Frans. Since pictures are not allowed: The output ends with: systemd[1]: Detected virtualization vw-other systemd[1]: Detected architecture x86_64 systemd[1]: Caught , dumped core at pid 39 systemd[1}: Freezing execution it then continues with three lines about the clocksource and it is frozen. The only thing I know about systemd is to stay the hell away from it. Sorry I can not help -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] Booting LFS with systemd
Dear all, Attached is a picture with a repeatably failing boot when I build LFS with systemd support. Any suggestion where I screwed-up? This is already like the introduction of systemd-238. Regards, Frans. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] Booting LFS with systemd
Dear all, Attached was a picture with a repeatably failing boot when I build LFS with systemd support. Any suggestion where I screwed-up? This is already like the introduction of systemd-238. Regards, Frans. Since pictures are not allowed: The output ends with: systemd[1]: Detected virtualization vw-other systemd[1]: Detected architecture x86_64 systemd[1]: Caught , dumped core at pid 39 systemd[1}: Freezing execution it then continues with three lines about the clocksource and it is frozen. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] Booting LFS with systemd
Dear all, Attached was a picture with a repeatably failing boot when I build LFS with systemd support. Any suggestion where I screwed-up? This is already like the introduction of systemd-238. Regards, Frans. Since pictures are not allowed: The output ends with: systemd[1]: Detected virtualization vw-other systemd[1]: Detected architecture x86_64 systemd[1]: Caught , dumped core at pid 39 systemd[1}: Freezing execution it then continues with three lines about the clocksource and it is frozen. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
