Re: [lfs-support] Fwd: Too Many GLIBC Test Failures?

[Douglas R. Reno]

On 12/10/20 10:54 PM, Jeff Forehand wrote:
Sorry, but I am sending this again because I was not subscribed yet 
when I sent it the first time.


-- Forwarded message -
From: *Jeff Forehand* mailto:skinny...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 5:15 PM
Subject: Too Many GLIBC Test Failures?
To: >



I am in Chapter 8.8 of the LFS-Systemd 10.0 build book. The glibc 2.32 
"make check" test is resulting in 23 FAILs (see attached - I have 
trimmed out the non-failures). My host system is Ubuntu 20.04LTS 
running on a mid-2000s i7 processor. I have done some searching 
through the archives, but nothing very recent pops up which may 
indicate that my setup is uniquely broken.


Are there any failures in the list that are showstoppers? The first 
one, "c++-types-check," seems like one that should pass in my limited 
knowledge on this subject.


All of the builds up to this point seem to have gone well. Anyone have 
an idea where I may have messed this up?


Thanks in advance for your help,
Jeff


Hi Jeff,

I looked at the test output that you sent, and I do agree that something 
is amiss. The question is... what exactly is going on...


Let's start here - do you have the virtual filesystems mounted? If 
there's something going on with /dev, /dev/pts, and others, I can 
absolutely understand things like fd_to_filename and memfd_create failing.


What kernel version is in use (uname -r)?

We haven't heard a report of Ubuntu 20.04LTS causing problems yet - but 
that's not to say that it isn't having an impact of some kind either. 
Generally, when I bootstrap a system for the first time, I use the 
latest Debian release. There are significant differences in packages 
though between Debian 10 and Ubuntu 20.04LTS.


- Doug

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

[lfs-support] Fwd: Too Many GLIBC Test Failures?

[Jeff Forehand]

Sorry, but I am sending this again because I was not subscribed yet when I
sent it the first time.

-- Forwarded message -
From: Jeff Forehand 
Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 5:15 PM
Subject: Too Many GLIBC Test Failures?
To: 


I am in Chapter 8.8 of the LFS-Systemd 10.0 build book. The glibc 2.32
"make check" test is resulting in 23 FAILs (see attached - I have trimmed
out the non-failures). My host system is Ubuntu 20.04LTS running on a
mid-2000s i7 processor. I have done some searching through the archives,
but nothing very recent pops up which may indicate that my setup is
uniquely broken.

Are there any failures in the list that are showstoppers? The first one,
"c++-types-check," seems like one that should pass in my limited knowledge
on this subject.

All of the builds up to this point seem to have gone well. Anyone have an
idea where I may have messed this up?

Thanks in advance for your help,
Jeff
FAIL: c++-types-check
FAIL: csu/test-multiarch
FAIL: debug/tst-chk3
FAIL: debug/tst-chk6
FAIL: debug/tst-lfschk3
FAIL: debug/tst-lfschk6
FAIL: elf/tst-audit14
FAIL: elf/tst-audit15
FAIL: elf/tst-audit16
FAIL: inet/tst-if_index-long
FAIL: io/tst-lchmod
FAIL: io/tst-open-tmpfile
FAIL: login/tst-updwtmpx
FAIL: misc/tst-fd_to_filename
FAIL: misc/tst-memfd_create
FAIL: misc/tst-ttyname
FAIL: nptl/tst-attr3
FAIL: nptl/tst-execstack
FAIL: nptl/tst-setgetname
FAIL: posix/tst-wait4
FAIL: posix/tst-waitid
FAIL: support/tst-support-process_state
FAIL: support/tst-support_descriptors
Summary of test results:
 23 FAIL
   4207 PASS
 34 UNSUPPORTED
 17 XFAIL
  2 XPASS
make[1]: *** [Makefile:633: tests] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/glibc-2.32'
make: *** [Makefile:9: check] Error 2
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style