Re: [lfs-support] GCC atomic test failure
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I don't recall seeing this. Are you on a relatively older system? A timeout in a test would indicate that to me. If that is the only problem you see in gcc, then you are probably OK to continue. Hardware in this thing is about five years old. It's an I5 something. After this failure, things proceeded normally with only the failures listed in the book. It's still going, though. This takes the longest. If there's another problem i'll post again; otherwise, looks ok so far. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] GCC atomic test failure
On 3/29/20 9:07 AM, Rob wrote: In Chapter 6.25, GCC-9.2.0 We're in chroot. All else went ok, and then we have: Running /sources/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/atomic.exp ... WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O1 execution test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O2 execution test A search seemed to indicate this has something to do with some kind of C syntax problem. I am not clear, however, if this is something I should be worried about. The discussions kind of went over my head. What do you all think? I don't recall seeing this. Are you on a relatively older system? A timeout in a test would indicate that to me. If that is the only problem you see in gcc, then you are probably OK to continue. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] GCC atomic test failure
In Chapter 6.25, GCC-9.2.0 We're in chroot. All else went ok, and then we have: Running /sources/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/atomic.exp ... WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O1 execution test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O2 execution test A search seemed to indicate this has something to do with some kind of C syntax problem. I am not clear, however, if this is something I should be worried about. The discussions kind of went over my head. What do you all think? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
