Re: [libav-devel] the big configure cleanup (act VI)
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 08:09:31PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > I settled for the naming scheme of using a test_ prefix for the helper > functions that do not set result variables and a check_ prefix for those > that do. Alternative/better names are welcome. try_foo() and tryset_foo()? I cannot say I'm too fond of this alternative :-/ Diego ___ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
Re: [libav-devel] the big configure cleanup (act VI)
On 11/02/2018 20:09, Diego Biurrun wrote: Today's installment of the series brings new helper functions to refactor recurring patterns. I settled for the naming scheme of using a test_ prefix for the helper functions that do not set result variables and a check_ prefix for those that do. Alternative/better names are welcome. Looks fine, assuming it survives fate. lu ___ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
[libav-devel] the big configure cleanup (act VI)
Today's installment of the series brings new helper functions to refactor recurring patterns. I settled for the naming scheme of using a test_ prefix for the helper functions that do not set result variables and a check_ prefix for those that do. Alternative/better names are welcome. ___ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
