[liberationtech] I International Feminoise Festival

[Cristina (99)]

[Español debajo*]
*[Official Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lgm3nNFMkY ]

Press Release

*1st FEMINOISE INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL*

*Feminoise*invites you to be part of this experience, by assisting,
living, sharing the message and experiencing this event that we present
this day to the public, after months of work, giving it to Light.

We will have the presence of artists and communicators both local,
coming from different Argentinian provinces and international, whom will
travel specially for this event.
Brasil, México, Venezuela, Uruguay, Bolivia, Chile are some of the
countries who confirmed their spot on the festival.

*City of Buenos Aires, January 27th, 2019.*

From April the 4th to April the 6th of 2019 the *First International
Feminoise Festival* will be held in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina,
created collectively and self-managed.

During the days of the 4th and 5th of April, there will be *workshops,
talks, exhibits, installations and later live shows* of artists and
technicians both women and also genre disident individuals, around
sound, movement and audiovisual expression, de-colonized, no longer
adapted to conformity, cathartic and empowering.

Workshops and conferences that will give DIY (“do it yourself”) tools in
different disciplines, related to technology and emancipation, with
different gender perspectives. From electronics, the manufacture of
different materials, sound equipment to care and self-defense.

On the Saturday, 6th of April there will be a *Feminoiser Party*, with
*live sets and performances*, in its special and joyful format.


*For further information, interview requests and specific pieces please
contact:*

Cristina (99): +54 9 11 6486 6288


  *

Youtube Channel: *Feminoise Latinoamerica*

  *

Instagram: *feminoiselatinoamerica*

  *

Bandcamp:*sisterstriangla.bandcamp.com*


*We at Feminoise *are a loving sisterhood of women and gender identity
dissident individuals, that while varied in our origins and paths, are
united.

This is because we have understood we are not alone and beyond the fact
that each of us may follow it’s personal way, we no longer want to
continue the way we were: isolated. Therefore we get together to share
and generate, transmit and learn, to build our world and banish that
which seems harmful to us.

We are noise for those who are still within conforming boundaries.

We are perfume for those who can smell freedom. From our fleeting
interventions, we leave prints here and there but most prominently in
Latin America, making echoes in several parts of the world.

*Feminoise* presents itself as a collective even though a lot of us are
recognized individually, because we believe that nothing can be more
healing than to share our experiences with each other while we go
transforming us and everything around us.

We create without putting a stop to disciplines and spaces. We start
from the artistic language because it’s one that distinguishes no bounds.

We put the body of habit and limitation, to release ourselves from the
memories that keep us in a state of anguish. We open ourselves to
generate the escape of that trap towards new movements and new sounds.

We are a secret that manifests itself, then keeps itself hidden and then
unexpectedly emerges with even more strength: a finding to ourselves and
everyone.

Our*festival* distinguishes itself from others by its *collective*
nature: we are not different personalities that are summoned by an
organization, we come together by our own will. We generate it together,
even over geographic and socioeconomic barriers, from Latin America,
with everything that’s implied by that context these days.
We do not want to promote an art style or a specific set of aesthetics,
nor to rank any artist in comparison with another.
We make the ideas, organization and realization of the festival an
enriching experience out of itself. And this is for everyone a turning
point, of a strength and impact that is radically distinctive.

* * *

[Castellano-Español]

Comunicado de Prensa

*I FESTIVAL INTERNACIONAL FEMINOISE*

Feminoise te invita a formar parte de esta experiencia asistiendo,
difundiendo, vivenciando este evento que presentamos hoy públicamente,
luego de meses de trabajo, dando a la luz lo gestado.

Contaremos con la presencia de artistas y comunicadorxs locales y de
distintas provincias de la Argentina e internacionales que viajarán
especialmente para ello.
Brasil, México, Venezuela, Uruguay, Bolivia, Chile son algunos de los
países que ya confirmaron su participación en el festival.


*Ciudad de Buenos Aires, 27 de enero de 2019.*

Del 4 al 6 de Abril de 2019 se desarrollará en la Ciudad de Buenos
Aires, Argentina, el *Primer Festival Internacional Feminoise*,
colectiva autogestiva.

Durante el 4 y 5 de Abril habrá *talleres, charlas, muestras,
instalaciones y luego shows en vivo *de artistas y técnicxs mujeres y de
identidades de género disidentes, auto-convocades, en torno al sonido,
el 

Re: [liberationtech] [cpsr-activists] CPSR Curriculum?

[Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes]

I disagree. 

I read the ACM code in its entirety, and although very difficult to follow in 
the current rarefied mega-Corporate environment, it is what it should be for 
professionals that should be serving society first instead of profiting from it 
regardless of consequences.

I also commend the very participatory process the ACM went through to create it 
in the first place. I surely gave my input, and now I felt I was heard and 
represented in the end product.

Regards / Saludos / Grato

Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes

> On Feb 5, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Richard Brooks  wrote:
> 
> In my security course, I have students look at and contrast
> the ACM and IEEE codes of ethics.
> 
> To be honest the ACM code is long winded, hard to follow, and
> (in my opinion) almost impossible to follow.
> 
> It does not surprise me that it did not influence the people.
> What would surprise me is if they read the whole thing.
> 
> The IEEE code is brief and less legalistic in tone.
> 
>> On 2/4/19 2:20 PM, Aaron Massey wrote:
>> Re: seeking empirical evidence about ethics instruction
>> 
>> A recent publication at FSE attempted to evaluate the impact of the new
>> ACM code of ethics on decision-making and found no evidence of an effect
>> according to their methodology.  You can read the paper here:
>> 
>> https://people.engr.ncsu.edu/ermurph3/papers/fse18nier.pdf
>> 
>> It’s worth asking whether this is the sort of structure a study of this
>> nature should have.  For example, this study doesn’t really address many
>> (or any?) of the points Charles made earlier.
>> 
>> Best, Aaron
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon  04 Feb 2019  07:40 AM, Charles M. Ess wrote:
>>> And thanks on both fronts!
>>> 
>>> My acknowledging that it was a critical, spot-on point was not
>>> gratuitous or merely courteous: behind it is a larger point - one that
>>> we don't always point out to our undergraduate students.  But
>>> Aristotle warned at the outset of his Nichomachean Ethics that no one
>>> under 30 should attempt it - precisely because of their comparative
>>> lack of experience as enculturated ethical beings.  (Part of this
>>> enculturation includes precisely our learning from our mistakes -
>>> phronesis as self-correcting ethical judgment.)
>>> FWIW: while I loved teaching undergraduate philosophy courses, such as
>>> ethics and logic, for example - and still think that there's value and
>>> some measure of good effect from them - having so-called
>>> "non-traditional" was always a great pleasure, precisely because they
>>> could bring their greater experience into play.  FWIW: the past couple
>>> of decades have been even better on this front as I've been privileged
>>> to work with a number of groups and communities who meet Aristotle's
>>> age requirement - and it shows up in insights, discussion, debates,
>>> dialogue, etc. that are that much richer for it.
>>> 
>>> In all events - yes, kudos and great thanks, Paul!
>>> - c.
>>> 
 On 04/02/2019 05:32, Paul wrote:
 Charles,
I would like to claim partial credit for spurring your excellent
 response. ;)
   Paul
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Professor in Media Studies
>>> Department of Media and Communication
>>> University of Oslo
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Postboks 1093
>>> Blindern 0317
>>> Oslo, Norway
>>> c.m@media.uio.no
>>> -- 
>>> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major
>>> commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you
>>> moderated:
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech.
>>> Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing
>>> liberationtech-ow...@lists.stanford.edu.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ===
> R. R. Brooks
> 
> Professor
> Holcombe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> Clemson University
> 
> 313-C Riggs Hall
> PO Box 340915
> Clemson, SC 29634-0915
> USA
> 
> Tel.   864-656-0920
> Fax.   864-656-5910
> Voicemail: 864-986-0813
> email: r...@acm.org
> web:   http://www.clemson.edu/~rrb
> PGP:   48EC1E30
> -- 
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
> search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
> change to digest mode, or change password by emailing 
> liberationtech-ow...@lists.stanford.edu.
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest mode, or change password by emailing 
liberationtech-ow...@lists.stanford.edu.

Re: [liberationtech] [cpsr-activists] CPSR Curriculum?

[Richard Brooks]

In my security course, I have students look at and contrast
the ACM and IEEE codes of ethics.

To be honest the ACM code is long winded, hard to follow, and
(in my opinion) almost impossible to follow.

It does not surprise me that it did not influence the people.
What would surprise me is if they read the whole thing.

The IEEE code is brief and less legalistic in tone.

On 2/4/19 2:20 PM, Aaron Massey wrote:
> Re: seeking empirical evidence about ethics instruction
> 
> A recent publication at FSE attempted to evaluate the impact of the new
> ACM code of ethics on decision-making and found no evidence of an effect
> according to their methodology.  You can read the paper here:
> 
> https://people.engr.ncsu.edu/ermurph3/papers/fse18nier.pdf
> 
> It’s worth asking whether this is the sort of structure a study of this
> nature should have.  For example, this study doesn’t really address many
> (or any?) of the points Charles made earlier.
> 
> Best, Aaron
> 
> 
> On Mon  04 Feb 2019  07:40 AM, Charles M. Ess wrote:
>> And thanks on both fronts!
>>
>> My acknowledging that it was a critical, spot-on point was not
>> gratuitous or merely courteous: behind it is a larger point - one that
>> we don't always point out to our undergraduate students.  But
>> Aristotle warned at the outset of his Nichomachean Ethics that no one
>> under 30 should attempt it - precisely because of their comparative
>> lack of experience as enculturated ethical beings.  (Part of this
>> enculturation includes precisely our learning from our mistakes -
>> phronesis as self-correcting ethical judgment.)
>> FWIW: while I loved teaching undergraduate philosophy courses, such as
>> ethics and logic, for example - and still think that there's value and
>> some measure of good effect from them - having so-called
>> "non-traditional" was always a great pleasure, precisely because they
>> could bring their greater experience into play.  FWIW: the past couple
>> of decades have been even better on this front as I've been privileged
>> to work with a number of groups and communities who meet Aristotle's
>> age requirement - and it shows up in insights, discussion, debates,
>> dialogue, etc. that are that much richer for it.
>>
>> In all events - yes, kudos and great thanks, Paul!
>> - c.
>>
>> On 04/02/2019 05:32, Paul wrote:
>>> Charles,
>>>    I would like to claim partial credit for spurring your excellent
>>> response. ;)
>>>   Paul
>>
>> -- 
>> Professor in Media Studies
>> Department of Media and Communication
>> University of Oslo
>> 
>>
>> Postboks 1093
>> Blindern 0317
>> Oslo, Norway
>> c.m@media.uio.no
>> -- 
>> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major
>> commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you
>> moderated:
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech.
>> Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing
>> liberationtech-ow...@lists.stanford.edu.
> 


-- 
===
R. R. Brooks

Professor
Holcombe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Clemson University

313-C Riggs Hall
PO Box 340915
Clemson, SC 29634-0915
USA

Tel.   864-656-0920
Fax.   864-656-5910
Voicemail: 864-986-0813
email: r...@acm.org
web:   http://www.clemson.edu/~rrb
PGP:   48EC1E30
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest mode, or change password by emailing 
liberationtech-ow...@lists.stanford.edu.