[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154298] LibreOffice main icon is gray
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154298 --- Comment #2 from Coburn Ingram --- Probably just means it's the pre-release version, right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154615] LibreOffice with the "transparency effects" of Windows 11 Mica for the application background
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154615 --- Comment #1 from lazyr...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 186479 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=186479=edit Example of Mica applied to application background -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154615] New: LibreOffice with the "transparency effects" of Windows 11 Mica for the application background
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154615 Bug ID: 154615 Summary: LibreOffice with the "transparency effects" of Windows 11 Mica for the application background Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.5.2.2 release Hardware: All OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: lazyr...@gmail.com Description: Request: LibreOffice with the "transparency effects" of Windows 11 Mica as an optional feature for the application background Examples: https://www.reddit.com/r/libreoffice/comments/uj8ekp/microsoft_office_mica_effect_in_windows_11_looks/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Windows11/comments/qwtmvq/new_transparency_effect_on_office_insider/ Mica info: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/design/style/mica Steps to Reproduce: Enhancement request Actual Results: LibreOffice > Options... > Application Colors Expected Results: Enhancement request Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: Windows 11 > Settings > Personalization > Colors > Transparency effects -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154311] MS XML file opens differently in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154311 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154306] LanguageTool Server - GUI/UX enhancement of the settings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154306 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154302] Formatting nested tables spanning multiple pages is broken when footer also contains a table
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154302 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 150761] Extremely Slow on Saving of the Presentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150761 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear James Perreault, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154289] WRITER: Enabling outline folding disables character style application
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154289 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154299] Exportation "tronquée"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154299 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154298] LibreOffice main icon is gray
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154298 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 150761] Extremely Slow on Saving of the Presentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150761 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 150755] in the latest allemande version for ubuntu the writer dialog "suchen und ersetzen" is crashing the document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150755 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149837] only one master document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149837 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 150755] in the latest allemande version for ubuntu the writer dialog "suchen und ersetzen" is crashing the document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150755 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear Gerry-T. Fuchs, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149699] XLSX CALC FILTER - copying a selected row actually copying from a different sheet
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149699 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear rob, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149837] only one master document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149837 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear peter josvai, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138297] Outer frame and inner text frame mismatch after anchor change and broken even after undo (DOCX)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138297 --- Comment #12 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 86199] Inserted macro in Writer is not evaluated
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86199 --- Comment #14 from QA Administrators --- Dear Jez, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124036] Calc cells with formula's don't highlight cells in the presence of a % symbol
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124036 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear ali, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120737] Word count starting again when pasting text for the first time
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120737 --- Comment #9 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 116960] Fieldmarks can't be enumerated via getTextFields / getBookmarks
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116960 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Tristan Stenner, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154614] OpenType features in Writer not working on foreign scripts
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154614 --- Comment #2 from Dealey Maples --- Created attachment 186478 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=186478=edit The Font Features window, showing the preview that is noticeably different from the text in the document. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154614] OpenType features in Writer not working on foreign scripts
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154614 --- Comment #1 from Dealey Maples --- Created attachment 186477 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=186477=edit Example of text in a foreign script, as it appears before and after applying OpenType features. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154614] New: OpenType features in Writer not working on foreign scripts
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154614 Bug ID: 154614 Summary: OpenType features in Writer not working on foreign scripts Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.5.0.3 release Hardware: All OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: dealeyja...@gmail.com Description: In Writer, OpenType fonts (I have tried Antinoou, Scheherazade New and Amiri, and Shippori Mincho) on foreign scripts (Coptic, Arabic, and Japanese kana respectively) cannot have their OpenType features applied to any text. The Font Features window shows the correct modifications to the highlighted text in its preview, but these changes are not made to the text. I have observed this consistently across a few recent versions of LibreOffice, and in all cases OpenType fonts have worked fine of Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic text. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Add text in an affected script to the document 2. Set the text in an OpenType font meant for that script 3. Highlight the text and edit its OpenType features under Character/Font Features Actual Results: Though the preview in the Font Features window shows the features applied, the text in the document is unaffected. Expected Results: The text in the document should match the preview in the Font Features window. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: Version: 7.5.0.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: c21113d003cd3efa8c53188764377a8272d9d6de CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22621; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-GB (en_GB); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130072] Need documentation about field variable formats
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130072 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||4613 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154613] For type "Variable" field, the "General" format label is shown in the "Insert/Edit field dialog" according to document language of the field, while the "Text" format la
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154613 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84 ||146, ||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||0072 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 84146] EDITING FIELDS: Variable field with format 'Standard" value not set/shown
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84146 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||4613 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114039] [META] Fields dialog bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114039 Bug 114039 depends on bug 129820, which changed state. Bug 129820 Summary: Format "Standard" appears (replaced) Format "General" in Variables (Field) (see comment 4) https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129820 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129820] Format "Standard" appears (replaced) Format "General" in Variables (Field) (see comment 4)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129820 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 154613 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154613] For type "Variable" field, the "General" format label is shown in the "Insert/Edit field dialog" according to document language of the field, while the "Text" format la
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154613 --- Comment #2 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- *** Bug 129820 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154184] Deactivate "Apply to all similar texts" when changes are made to Entry selection
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154184 --- Comment #4 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Probably the tooltip/extended tip for this option in the dialog needs to be modified slightly to: Add an index entry to any other occurrences of the text selected into "Entry". And add this sentence to the extended tip: "For a modified entry, the match is conducted on the original selection, but the modified entry is inserted." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154184] Deactivate "Apply to all similar texts" when changes are made to Entry selection
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154184 --- Comment #3 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Created attachment 186476 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=186476=edit screenshot of proposed help update (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #2) > Ok. Here is an attempt: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/149984 Attachment gives a screenshot of the result of the proposed patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154613] For type "Variable" field, the "General" format label is shown in the "Insert/Edit field dialog" according to document language of the field, while the "Text" format la
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154613 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||er...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Eike Rathke --- The "Text" and "Formula" entries are UI resource strings, the "General" is a locale data dependent number format code keyword you also see in a table's or Calc's number format dialog, hence may change with the document locale. Won't fix. The rest may be related to bug 154218, please check with a version that contains its fixes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154611] Interaction between variable with same name but inserted with different formats
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154611 --- Comment #2 from Eike Rathke --- > Case 2: > 2. similar to case 2, to case 1 of course.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154613] For type "Variable" field, the "General" format label is shown in the "Insert/Edit field dialog" according to document language of the field, while the "Text" format la
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154613 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|For type "Variable" field, |For type "Variable" field, |the "General" format is |the "General" format label |shown according to the |is shown in the |document language, while|"Insert/Edit field dialog" |the "Text" format is shown |according to document |according to UI language|language of the field, ||while the "Text" format ||label is shown in the ||dialog according to UI ||language -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154611] Interaction between variable with same name but inserted with different formats
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154611 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||er...@redhat.com Ever confirmed|0 |1 Version|7.2.7.2 release |Inherited From OOo --- Comment #1 from Eike Rathke --- Case 1: 1. looks wrong to me, but might be intentional (in sense of Word compatible behaviour). Having seen the code lately I'm tending more to assume a bug here though.. 2. if you hit the check mark button that's expected; not sure what should happen if you didn't. There is no "other user field with same name", user fields are document global. But the state looks messy. Case 2: 1. similar to case 1. 2. similar to case 2, but there should be two instances of the variable; apparently setting a new triggers redisplaying the first. Things are a little more obvious if text1 and text2 (i.e. different texts) are used for each step. Behaviour is the same already in OOo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153897] Replace "Mark" with "Entry" in the "Label" of .uno:GotoNextIndexMark, .uno:GotoPrevIndexMark and .uno:IndexMarkToIndex
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153897 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Replace "Mark" with "Entry" |Replace "Mark" with "Entry" |in the "Label" of |in the "Label" of |.uno:GotoNextIndexMark, |.uno:GotoNextIndexMark, |.uno:GotoPrevtIndexMark and |.uno:GotoPrevIndexMark and |.uno:IndexMarkToIndex |.uno:IndexMarkToIndex --- Comment #6 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to sophie from comment #3) > (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1) > > @Sophie something to take to the l10n team in advance for a change? > Done :) Thanks for the head-up! @Sophie - Any news? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129294] [META] Variable field bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129294 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154613 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154613 [Bug 154613] For type "Variable" field, the "General" format is shown according to the document language, while the "Text" format is shown according to UI language -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154613] For type "Variable" field, the "General" format is shown according to the document language, while the "Text" format is shown according to UI language
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154613 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||107739, 129294 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107739 [Bug 107739] [META] Field bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129294 [Bug 129294] [META] Variable field bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107739] [META] Field bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107739 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154613 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154613 [Bug 154613] For type "Variable" field, the "General" format is shown according to the document language, while the "Text" format is shown according to UI language -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154613] New: For type "Variable" field, the "General" format is shown according to the document language, while the "Text" format is shown according to UI language
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154613 Bug ID: 154613 Summary: For type "Variable" field, the "General" format is shown according to the document language, while the "Text" format is shown according to UI language Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.2.7.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Web Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: sdc.bla...@youmail.dk Ctrl+F2 (or Insert - Field - More Fields - Variables tab) Select type "Set variable" or type "user field" Note the format list. Change the document language and note Format list Change UI interface language and note format list Actual: "Text" Format is shown according to the UI language. "General" is shown according to document language. For the inserted variables, the pattern of what language the format is shown for the inserted variables, when using "Edit field" is variable. Sometimes they seem to keep the language that they were inserted with. Other times, when the UI language changes, then the format language also changes. And sometimes the format changes. (Try to use one UI language, with a different document language to insert variables with the same name in both "Text" and "General" format, then save file and open with a different language interface) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154271] Adjust view port on auto scroll to maximize the visible area
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154271 --- Comment #6 from maison --- However, Calc does better than Excel when you go a few pages further than the last cell and press Ctrl Up: it puts the last full cell in the middle of the screen, whereas Excel puts it on the first line of the screen, leaving almost all of the screen empty. So in this case Calc at least shows something more (i.e. half of the screen). The current behaviour of Calc jumping to a cell in the middle of the screen is more adapted to searches. It makes some sense that the search result appears mostly in the middle if Calc has to refresh the screen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146737] EDIT FIELDS: Cannot change format of inserted "user field" to any other format
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146737 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||er...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #2) > Changing the format of an inserted user field is not possible at all. Does that mean NAB? Or maybe a need for better documentation (e.g., in [1]) to note this impossibility? Or...`? [1] https://help.libreoffice.org/7.6/en-US/text/swriter/01/04090300.html?=WRITER -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 154450] Incorrect symbol for images in RTL languages
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154450 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |normal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94513] editing: Improvement: text completion should include validity values
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94513 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://ask.libreoffice.org ||/t/data-validation-cell-ran ||ge-needs-full-text-search/8 ||5920 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 154450] Incorrect symbol for images in RTL languages
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154450 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154612] New: Function CDate missing in overview "Converting Date Values"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154612 Bug ID: 154612 Summary: Function CDate missing in overview "Converting Date Values" Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Documentation Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: hgat...@mageho.de CC: olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org Description: The page with "Converting Date Values" does not list the function CDate Steps to Reproduce: 1.https://help.libreoffice.org/7.0/en-US/text/sbasic/shared/03030100.html?=BASIC 2.Search for "CDate " Actual Results: It will not be found on the page - but is an important conversion Expected Results: CDate should be found here! Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: https://help.libreoffice.org/7.0/en-US/text/sbasic/shared/03030100.html?=BASIC=WIN -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129661] [META] Right-To-Left (RTL) user interface issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129661 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154450 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154450 [Bug 154450] Incorrect symbol for images in RTL languages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 43808] [META] Right-To-Left and Complex Text Layout language issues (RTL/CTL)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154450 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154450 [Bug 154450] Incorrect symbol for images in RTL languages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108988] [META] Validity-related bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108988 Bug 108988 depends on bug 152936, which changed state. Bug 152936 Summary: Feature Request: Consider adding autocomplete (with full-text search) to cell validation https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152936 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103341] [META] AutoCorrect and Word Completion bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103341 Bug 103341 depends on bug 152936, which changed state. Bug 152936 Summary: Feature Request: Consider adding autocomplete (with full-text search) to cell validation https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152936 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94513] editing: Improvement: text completion should include validity values
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94513 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fairwarning...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- *** Bug 152936 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152936] Feature Request: Consider adding autocomplete (with full-text search) to cell validation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152936 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Consolidating into near-identical bug 94513. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 94513 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146737] EDIT FIELDS: Cannot change format of inserted "user field" to any other format
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146737 --- Comment #4 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #3) > Also, from experimenting, it seems possible... filed as bug 154611 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129294] [META] Variable field bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129294 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154611 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154611 [Bug 154611] Interaction between variable with same name but inserted with different formats -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154611] Interaction between variable with same name but inserted with different formats
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154611 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||107739, 129294 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107739 [Bug 107739] [META] Field bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129294 [Bug 129294] [META] Variable field bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107739] [META] Field bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107739 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154611 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154611 [Bug 154611] Interaction between variable with same name but inserted with different formats -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154611] New: Interaction between variable with same name but inserted with different formats
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154611 Bug ID: 154611 Summary: Interaction between variable with same name but inserted with different formats Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.2.7.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: sdc.bla...@youmail.dk When a variable (type "user field" or type "variable") has the same name but is inserted with different formats (Text vs. General), there is an interaction between them, in terms of what is displayed, which seems wrong. (could not find any relevant documentation) Case 1 (user field) 1. Insert variable type "user field" with "General" format, and a text string value. Actual: 0 is shown. 2. Insert another "user field", with same variable name, "Text" format, and a text string value. Actual: The text value is also shown in the first user field as well. (i.e., the "General" format is, in effect, overridden). Case 2 (variable) 1. Use "set variable" to insert a variable field with "General" format, and a text string value. Actual: Nothing is shown. 2. Insert another "variable" field, with same variable name as the first, but "Text" format, and a text string value. Actual: The text value that was entered for the first variable is now shown, even though the format is "General". In short, these two cases show how the same variable name with different formats result in "General" format fields being able to show text. Is that to be expected? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103238] [META] Customize dialog bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103238 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154610 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154610 [Bug 154610] Allow choosing sort key column in shortcuts list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41560] [META] Keyboard shortcuts tab of Customization dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41560 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154610 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154610 [Bug 154610] Allow choosing sort key column in shortcuts list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154610] Allow choosing sort key column in shortcuts list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154610 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval Blocks||103238, 41560 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41560 [Bug 41560] [META] Keyboard shortcuts tab of Customization dialog https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103238 [Bug 103238] [META] Customize dialog bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 154610] Allow choosing sort key column in shortcuts list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154610 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval Blocks||103238, 41560 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41560 [Bug 41560] [META] Keyboard shortcuts tab of Customization dialog https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103238 [Bug 103238] [META] Customize dialog bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154610] New: Allow choosing sort key column in shortcuts list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154610 Bug ID: 154610 Summary: Allow choosing sort key column in shortcuts list Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.5.1.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: eyalr...@gmx.com In the keyboard shortcuts pane of the Customize dialog, we see a list of all defined shortcuts. But - it's sorted by the key combination, not by the command. Sometimes one wants the other sort order, or one wants to see all possible key combinations without a defined command. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41560] [META] Keyboard shortcuts tab of Customization dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41560 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||15 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 [Bug 15] No keyboard shortcut for "Toggle Unordered List" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 154444] No keyboard shortcut for "Toggle Unordered List"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||41560 Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg --- So, you can define such a shortcut via the menus, Tools | Customize | Keyboard tab. You choose the "Unordered List" command and choose a shortcut. Please make an argument regarding why you believe such a shortcut should be defined by default. Personally, I feel that bulleting is important enough in presentation to merit having keyboard shortcut of its own, so +1 from me. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41560 [Bug 41560] [META] Keyboard shortcuts tab of Customization dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154444] No keyboard shortcut for "Toggle Unordered List"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||41560 Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg --- So, you can define such a shortcut via the menus, Tools | Customize | Keyboard tab. You choose the "Unordered List" command and choose a shortcut. Please make an argument regarding why you believe such a shortcut should be defined by default. Personally, I feel that bulleting is important enough in presentation to merit having keyboard shortcut of its own, so +1 from me. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41560 [Bug 41560] [META] Keyboard shortcuts tab of Customization dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154609] Need ability to search defined keyboard shortcuts in Keyboard tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154609 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103238, 41560 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41560 [Bug 41560] [META] Keyboard shortcuts tab of Customization dialog https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103238 [Bug 103238] [META] Customize dialog bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103238] [META] Customize dialog bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103238 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154609 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154609 [Bug 154609] Need ability to search defined keyboard shortcuts in Keyboard tab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41560] [META] Keyboard shortcuts tab of Customization dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41560 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154609 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154609 [Bug 154609] Need ability to search defined keyboard shortcuts in Keyboard tab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154609] New: Need ability to search defined keyboard shortcuts in Keyboard tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154609 Bug ID: 154609 Summary: Need ability to search defined keyboard shortcuts in Keyboard tab Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.5.1.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: eyalr...@gmx.com In the Customize... dialog, Keyboard tab, we have a search box for searching the commands - but we can't search the defined shortcuts. There are... probably over 200 shortcuts, and we should not have to examine each and every one of them to search for something. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108988] [META] Validity-related bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108988 Bug 108988 depends on bug 114393, which changed state. Bug 114393 Summary: Filter entries in Validity drop-down list by typed input https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114393 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114393] Filter entries in Validity drop-down list by typed input
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114393 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Very similar to what is suggested in bug 94513. Even though they are a slight bit different, I am marking as a duplicate as an ideal solution is best discussed in one single report. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 94513 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94513] editing: Improvement: text completion should include validity values
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94513 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||79045_79...@mail.ru --- Comment #6 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- *** Bug 114393 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154479] Writer don't attach the document when using the attach at email button
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154479 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Can't reproduce with: Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: b5c3a7502f7ff6ccf0f829c1f3a2ba50b8584c41 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.1; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: he-IL (en_IL); UI: en-US * Can you try running your LibreOffice and Thunderbird from the console? Maybe you'll get some warning/error message. * Can you try also with a newer version? * Does this happen to you only with document which have been saved, only docs which have not been saved, or both? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154557] Inconsistencies in RANK() function in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154557 --- Comment #5 from ady --- (In reply to ady from comment #3) > D_ Columns L:M use column K as Value for RANK(), with Data being A3:A7. > > E_ Columns O:P use RANK.AVG(). Sorry again. O:P is is similar to "D_" but with duplicate values in Data, A3:A10. > > F_ Columns S:T is similar to "D_" but with duplicate values in Data, A3:A10. S:T is like "D_" with RANK.AVG(). > > G_ Columns V:W use RANK.AVG(). V:w is with RANK.AVG() with duplicate values, A3:A10. At this point, with so many mistakes I made in my descriptions, I should probably just close this report and start a new one without the mistakes. @Buovjaga (Ilmari), please advise if you agree that I should just do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 154603] Copy from web and paste with 'transpose' suggestion
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154603 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154603] Copy from web and paste with 'transpose' suggestion
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154603 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154597] FILEOPEN DOCX image position wrong on page with vertical text direction
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154597 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv --- Reproduced with Version: 7.5.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 53bb9681a964705cf672590721dbc85eb4d0c3a2 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded and Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 456a146b9eb643655ae2bd336740e8c5536913aa CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded Jumbo Compared with Microsoft® Word para Microsoft 365 MSO (versión 2302 compilación 16.0.16130.20332) de 64 bits -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154270] Colours reset to defaults
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154270 --- Comment #9 from maison --- So, it’s not the profile. It’s the one toolbar interface that resets the colours and maybe who knows what other settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 109178] [META] Cell names bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109178 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||113237 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113237 [Bug 113237] UI: autocomplete / suggest cell (range) names in cell range pickers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108988] [META] Validity-related bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108988 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|113237 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113237 [Bug 113237] UI: autocomplete / suggest cell (range) names in cell range pickers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 113237] UI: autocomplete / suggest cell (range) names in cell range pickers
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113237 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Blocks|108988 |109178 Summary|UI Entering names for |UI: autocomplete / suggest |ranges in Data > Validity |cell (range) names in cell |doesn't provide |range pickers |autoCompletion | --- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I am generalising this bug report to any cell range picker (the ones that can be shrunk and expanded, like in Function Wizard, Data Validity, and a chart's Data Ranges). Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108988 [Bug 108988] [META] Validity-related bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109178 [Bug 109178] [META] Cell names bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 154603] Copy from web and paste with 'transpose' suggestion
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154603 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Windows (All) |All Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Summary|Copy from web and past with |Copy from web and paste |'transpose' crashes / |with 'transpose' suggestion |suggestion | Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All --- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Either this report is an enhancement request to allow direct 'transpose' when pasting multi-line text, or it is a bug report to "Remove Transpose option from context menu when if does not apply". If it is implemented for HTML, users might expect it to be implemented for plain text too, which conflicts with the Text Import dialog. However, for HTML tables, I can see how one would expect "right click > Paste Special > Transpose" to work, since it's available in the context menu. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154603] Copy from web and paste with 'transpose' suggestion
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154603 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Windows (All) |All Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Summary|Copy from web and past with |Copy from web and paste |'transpose' crashes / |with 'transpose' suggestion |suggestion | Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All --- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Either this report is an enhancement request to allow direct 'transpose' when pasting multi-line text, or it is a bug report to "Remove Transpose option from context menu when if does not apply". If it is implemented for HTML, users might expect it to be implemented for plain text too, which conflicts with the Text Import dialog. However, for HTML tables, I can see how one would expect "right click > Paste Special > Transpose" to work, since it's available in the context menu. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154270] Colours reset to defaults
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154270 --- Comment #8 from ady --- (In reply to maison from comment #7) > Nope, otherwise I would have mentioned. Windows 10 also. I just raised the potential question, according to the info you posted in comment 5. It was an attempt to try to narrow down the situation so as to replicate the issue, by someone with a similar context. If you can replicate the problem under Windows 10, please paste here that info. And if you test this under Windows 10 and you cannot replicate this problem, please add such details too. BTW, which type of toolbar/UI are you using? Is it the standard UI, or some other? (Menu View > User Interface) Have you tried menu Help > Restart in Safe Mode? (I would suggest a backup of your profile before resetting to factory default.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154593] Show a "Welcome Screen" on first startup with appropriate info and choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154593 --- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > This is a duplicate of bug 137931, bug 101945, or bug 69042 to me, Bug 101945 is about displaying things during install, so not a duplicate of that. Bug 69042 is certainly related, in that it's a possible kind of content which could go on a welcome screen / dialog - but it's not a dupe, since this is a generalization. Same goes for bug 137931. One could argue that this should be a meta-bug for tracking proposals of things which might go on a welcome dialog. Before 137931, nothing had "made the cut". Now we have at least one thing (choice of UI flavor), and possibly another thing (Light/Dark/Follow DE). There are other suggestions. How certain are we that none of them would be appropriate? Note that once we have _some_ welcome dialog, the extent of justification needed for additional items on it is lower than justifying a dialog which doesn't exist. Anyway, shall we make this into a meta bug / tracker? PS - Personally, I'm fine with Stuart's position, I opened this bug because people are making such suggestions on 137931 where they clearly don't belong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154270] Colours reset to defaults
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154270 --- Comment #7 from maison --- Nope, otherwise I would have mentioned. Windows 10 also. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154270] Colours reset to defaults
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154270 --- Comment #6 from ady --- (In reply to maison from comment #5) > CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI render: Maybe this happens only in Windows Seven (?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154608] [LOCALHELP] Add more examples of Regular Expressions for special characters
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154608 --- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski --- Note the "For a full list of supported metacharacters and syntax, see ICU Regular Expressions documentation" there, which is exactly for the complete syntax. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153242] Change label "Separator" to "Before Caption" and "Numbering separator" to "After numbering" in Caption dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153242 --- Comment #6 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > "Numbering separator" option is unclear. New proposal: "After caption number" Reasons: 1. More precise/specific than original proposal "After numbering" 2. Only 1 character longer than current label. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143036] Crash pressing undo/redo while table layouting still running (swlo!SwFrame::IsLeaveUpperAllowed+0x6e5b)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143036 --- Comment #4 from Telesto --- No repro with Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: c4a58634753a84b09f20f7271d6525a6656522d3 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: nl-NL Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: include/rtl sal/qa
include/rtl/string.hxx |4
include/rtl/stringconcat.hxx | 14 ++
include/rtl/ustring.hxx|4
sal/qa/rtl/strings/test_strings_valuex.cxx |4 ++--
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 1e9f4de320f67d1218c710bcee1969a2324c6888
Author: Mike Kaganski
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 4 11:27:54 2023 +0200
Commit: Mike Kaganski
CommitDate: Tue Apr 4 23:01:56 2023 +0200
Make O(U)String::boolean also return an O(U)StringNumber
Change-Id: I184fa0e4e45662e0fac86076d1c8733a0465bb56
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/149978
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski
diff --git a/include/rtl/string.hxx b/include/rtl/string.hxx
index 70829b43aae2..9c2c6ae61f60 100644
--- a/include/rtl/string.hxx
+++ b/include/rtl/string.hxx
@@ -2125,6 +2125,9 @@ public:
return boolean(b);
}
+#ifdef LIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY // "RTL_FAST_STRING"
+static OStringNumber boolean(bool b) { return
OStringNumber(b); }
+#else
/**
Returns the string representation of the boolean argument.
@@ -2141,6 +2144,7 @@ public:
char aBuf[RTL_STR_MAX_VALUEOFBOOLEAN];
return OString(aBuf, rtl_str_valueOfBoolean(aBuf, b));
}
+#endif
/**
Returns the string representation of the char argument.
diff --git a/include/rtl/stringconcat.hxx b/include/rtl/stringconcat.hxx
index da32c7982792..118d93df5007 100644
--- a/include/rtl/stringconcat.hxx
+++ b/include/rtl/stringconcat.hxx
@@ -393,6 +393,13 @@ struct OStringNumber< double >
OStringNumber(number_t d) { length = rtl_str_valueOfDouble(buf, d); }
};
+template<>
+struct OStringNumber< bool >
+: public StringNumberBase
+{
+OStringNumber(number_t b) { length = rtl_str_valueOfBoolean(buf, b); }
+};
+
/**
@internal
@@ -439,6 +446,13 @@ struct OUStringNumber< double >
OUStringNumber(number_t d) { length = rtl_ustr_valueOfDouble(buf, d); }
};
+template<>
+struct OUStringNumber< bool >
+: public StringNumberBase
+{
+OUStringNumber(number_t b) { length = rtl_ustr_valueOfBoolean(buf, b); }
+};
+
template< typename C, typename T, std::size_t nBufSize >
struct ToStringHelper< StringNumberBase< C, T, nBufSize > >
{
diff --git a/include/rtl/ustring.hxx b/include/rtl/ustring.hxx
index ddc0b5d2c0b2..36d122c1fe5a 100644
--- a/include/rtl/ustring.hxx
+++ b/include/rtl/ustring.hxx
@@ -3186,6 +3186,9 @@ public:
return boolean(b);
}
+#ifdef LIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY // "RTL_FAST_STRING"
+static OUStringNumber boolean(bool b) { return
OUStringNumber(b); }
+#else
/**
Returns the string representation of the boolean argument.
@@ -3202,6 +3205,7 @@ public:
sal_Unicode aBuf[RTL_USTR_MAX_VALUEOFBOOLEAN];
return OUString(aBuf, rtl_ustr_valueOfBoolean(aBuf, b));
}
+#endif
/**
Returns the string representation of the char argument.
diff --git a/sal/qa/rtl/strings/test_strings_valuex.cxx
b/sal/qa/rtl/strings/test_strings_valuex.cxx
index 6c9c836442e1..953cf8b68efb 100644
--- a/sal/qa/rtl/strings/test_strings_valuex.cxx
+++ b/sal/qa/rtl/strings/test_strings_valuex.cxx
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ namespace {
template< typename T >
void testBoolean() {
-CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL( T( "false" ), T::boolean( false ) );
-CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL( T( "true" ), T::boolean( true ) );
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL( T( "false" ), T(T::boolean( false )) );
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL( T( "true" ), T(T::boolean( true )) );
}
}
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154152] Paste-Special > Text, Number or Formula does nothing when data copied from other app
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154152 ady changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||4603 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154603] Copy from web and past with 'transpose' crashes / suggestion
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154603 ady changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||4152 --- Comment #2 from ady --- Paste (special) Transpose is aimed at range of cells, not text from some (random) other software. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-7-5' - 2 commits - bin/lo-all-static-libs download.lst external/libwebp RepositoryExternal.mk
RepositoryExternal.mk |1 + bin/lo-all-static-libs |1 + download.lst |4 ++-- external/libwebp/Makefile.vc.patch | 28 ++-- 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) New commits: commit 3313ca1f0c28afecec7e7b1e680382db246bafaf Author: Caolán McNamara AuthorDate: Mon Apr 3 12:21:58 2023 +0100 Commit: Xisco Fauli CommitDate: Tue Apr 4 22:52:38 2023 +0200 move to libwebp 1.3.0 release Change-Id: I88205be86e15d9878040958b96dc30043d9eb0b6 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/149959 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara Signed-off-by: Xisco Fauli Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/150010 diff --git a/download.lst b/download.lst index f9867db2cf53..274fe1ebe91d 100644 --- a/download.lst +++ b/download.lst @@ -330,8 +330,8 @@ LIBTOMMATH_TARBALL := ltm-1.0.zip # three static lines # so that git cherry-pick # will not run into conflicts -LIBWEBP_SHA256SUM := 17fd427d210702a595f08ec619afa2cd3bd323f838ad109666482eac8fff65f0 -LIBWEBP_TARBALL := libwebp-1.3.0-rc1.tar.gz +LIBWEBP_SHA256SUM := 64ac4614db292ae8c5aa26de0295bf1623dbb3985054cb656c55e67431def17c +LIBWEBP_TARBALL := libwebp-1.3.0.tar.gz # three static lines # so that git cherry-pick # will not run into conflicts commit e4474f8d00bc32c70d1342e6bf4f721e4f2df9a5 Author: Caolán McNamara AuthorDate: Thu Dec 29 20:36:07 2022 + Commit: Xisco Fauli CommitDate: Tue Apr 4 22:52:32 2023 +0200 Related: ofz Use-of-uninitialized-value Change-Id: I2f6e726f713836295603bf7112371aa4aff2c7c0 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/144868 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara Signed-off-by: Xisco Fauli Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/150011 diff --git a/RepositoryExternal.mk b/RepositoryExternal.mk index ad8f0204cd4e..92ea4ba17670 100644 --- a/RepositoryExternal.mk +++ b/RepositoryExternal.mk @@ -2693,6 +2693,7 @@ $(call gb_LinkTarget_add_libs,$(1),\ else $(call gb_LinkTarget_add_libs,$(1),\ -L$(call gb_UnpackedTarball_get_dir,libwebp)/src/.libs -lwebp \ + -L$(call gb_UnpackedTarball_get_dir,libwebp)/sharpyuv/.libs -lsharpyuv \ ) endif $(call gb_LinkTarget_use_external_project,$(1),libwebp) diff --git a/bin/lo-all-static-libs b/bin/lo-all-static-libs index af4ff25f348b..3db8d803d07a 100755 --- a/bin/lo-all-static-libs +++ b/bin/lo-all-static-libs @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ echo $INSTDIR/$LIBO_LIB_FOLDER/lib*.a \ $WORKDIR/UnpackedTarball/libvisio/src/lib/.libs/*.a \ $WORKDIR/UnpackedTarball/libtiff/libtiff/.libs/*.a \ $WORKDIR/UnpackedTarball/libwebp/src/.libs/*.a \ + $WORKDIR/UnpackedTarball/libwebp/sharpyuv/.libs/*.a \ $WORKDIR/UnpackedTarball/libwp?/src/lib/.libs/*.a \ $WORKDIR/UnpackedTarball/raptor/src/.libs/*.a \ $WORKDIR/UnpackedTarball/rasqal/src/.libs/*.a \ diff --git a/download.lst b/download.lst index e4332f8de06c..f9867db2cf53 100644 --- a/download.lst +++ b/download.lst @@ -330,8 +330,8 @@ LIBTOMMATH_TARBALL := ltm-1.0.zip # three static lines # so that git cherry-pick # will not run into conflicts -LIBWEBP_SHA256SUM := 7bf5a8a28cc69bcfa8cb214f2c3095703c6b73ac5fba4d5480c205331d9494df -LIBWEBP_TARBALL := libwebp-1.2.4.tar.gz +LIBWEBP_SHA256SUM := 17fd427d210702a595f08ec619afa2cd3bd323f838ad109666482eac8fff65f0 +LIBWEBP_TARBALL := libwebp-1.3.0-rc1.tar.gz # three static lines # so that git cherry-pick # will not run into conflicts diff --git a/external/libwebp/Makefile.vc.patch b/external/libwebp/Makefile.vc.patch index f13c12410e46..41c899921a1c 100644 --- a/external/libwebp/Makefile.vc.patch +++ b/external/libwebp/Makefile.vc.patch @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- Makefile.vc.sav2021-07-30 00:55:37.0 +0200 +++ Makefile.vc2022-01-25 17:35:30.206117700 +0100 -@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@ - LIBWEBPDEMUX_BASENAME = libwebpdemux +@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ + LIBSHARPYUV_BASENAME = libsharpyuv !IFNDEF ARCH -!IF ! [ cl 2>&1 | find "x86" > NUL ] @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ ARCH = ARM !ELSE !ERROR Unable to auto-detect toolchain architecture! \ -@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ +@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ ## Nothing more to do below this line! NOLOGO = /nologo @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ DIROBJ = $(DIRBASE)\obj DIRLIB = $(DIRBASE)\lib DIRINC = $(DIRBASE)\include -@@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ +@@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ # Target configuration !IF "$(CFG)" == "release-static" @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ RTLIB = $(RTLIBD) STATICLIBBUILD = TRUE LIBWEBPDECODER_BASENAME = $(LIBWEBPDECODER_BASENAME)_debug -@@ -97,11 +97,11 @@ - LIBWEBPMUX_BASENAME = $(LIBWEBPMUX_BASENAME)_debug +@@ -99,11 +99,11 @@ LIBWEBPDEMUX_BASENAME = $(LIBWEBPDEMUX_BASENAME)_debug + LIBSHARPYUV_BASENAME = $(LIBSHARPYUV_BASENAME)_debug !ELSE IF "$(CFG)" == "release-dynamic" -CC= $(CCNODBG) +CC_= $(CCNODBG) @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ RC= $(RCDEBUG) RTLIB = $(RTLIBD)
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154608] New: [LOCALHELP] Add more examples of Regular Expressions for special characters
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154608
Bug ID: 154608
Summary: [LOCALHELP] Add more examples of Regular Expressions
for special characters
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.6.0.0 alpha0+ Master
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Documentation
Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org
CC: olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org
Demand from community member on regular expressions Help page:
--8<--
I recently had a conversation at chemnitzer linux days with a user who was
looking for a way to replace soft hyphens (which were generated by another
program) after import. We both didn't find out how to do that. Later on I found
out that a regular expression using one of those
\xAD
\x{00AD}
\u00AD
\U00AD
\N{SOFT HYPHEN}
would do.
Perhaps this is a good idea to have this (because it is an invisible char) as
an example on help page
file:///Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/Resources/help/en-US/text/shared/01/0211.html
- especially the last one \N{SOFT HYPHEN}, which is imho nowhere documented.
And I'm quite sure there are more of this kind, too.
--8<--
Help page is
https://help.libreoffice.org/master/en-US/text/shared/01/0211.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120421] LibreLogo: avoid program loss at crashes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120421 ady changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: vcl/unx
vcl/unx/generic/gdi/cairotextrender.cxx | 70 +---
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit c9c463af22d1c7ea75c8af2d7cf5e2c0a152e40f
Author: Caolán McNamara
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 4 17:15:13 2023 +0100
Commit: Caolán McNamara
CommitDate: Tue Apr 4 22:26:47 2023 +0200
split out the pieces that apply the font to the cairo context
Change-Id: I0577832f57b15621d150da4cb50e134c9c06bae7
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/150029
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara
diff --git a/vcl/unx/generic/gdi/cairotextrender.cxx
b/vcl/unx/generic/gdi/cairotextrender.cxx
index 664c8dbea9cd..f3fb3bde6b83 100644
--- a/vcl/unx/generic/gdi/cairotextrender.cxx
+++ b/vcl/unx/generic/gdi/cairotextrender.cxx
@@ -162,6 +162,44 @@ CairoTextRender::~CairoTextRender()
cairo_font_options_destroy(mpRoundGlyphPosOffOptions);
}
+static void ApplyFont(cairo_t* cr, const CairoFontsCache::CacheId& rId, double
nWidth, double nHeight, int nGlyphRotation,
+ const GenericSalLayout& rLayout)
+{
+cairo_font_face_t* font_face = CairoFontsCache::FindCachedFont(rId);
+if (!font_face)
+{
+const FontConfigFontOptions *pOptions = rId.mpOptions;
+FcPattern *pPattern = pOptions->GetPattern();
+font_face = cairo_ft_font_face_create_for_pattern(pPattern);
+CairoFontsCache::CacheFont(font_face, rId);
+}
+cairo_set_font_face(cr, font_face);
+
+cairo_set_font_size(cr, nHeight);
+
+cairo_matrix_t m;
+cairo_matrix_init_identity();
+
+if (rLayout.GetOrientation())
+cairo_matrix_rotate(, toRadian(rLayout.GetOrientation()));
+
+cairo_matrix_scale(, nWidth, nHeight);
+
+if (nGlyphRotation)
+cairo_matrix_rotate(, toRadian(Degree10(nGlyphRotation * 900)));
+
+const FreetypeFontInstance& rInstance =
static_cast(rLayout.GetFont());
+if (rInstance.NeedsArtificialItalic())
+{
+cairo_matrix_t shear;
+cairo_matrix_init_identity();
+shear.xy = -shear.xx * ARTIFICIAL_ITALIC_SKEW;
+cairo_matrix_multiply(, , );
+}
+
+cairo_set_font_matrix(cr, );
+}
+
void CairoTextRender::DrawTextLayout(const GenericSalLayout& rLayout, const
SalGraphics& rGraphics)
{
const FreetypeFontInstance& rInstance =
static_cast(rLayout.GetFont());
@@ -326,8 +364,6 @@ void CairoTextRender::DrawTextLayout(const
GenericSalLayout& rLayout, const SalG
aId.mpOptions = rFont.GetFontOptions();
aId.mbEmbolden = rInstance.NeedsArtificialBold();
-cairo_matrix_t m;
-
std::vector::const_iterator aEnd = glyph_extrarotation.end();
std::vector::const_iterator aStart = glyph_extrarotation.begin();
std::vector::const_iterator aI = aStart;
@@ -341,37 +377,9 @@ void CairoTextRender::DrawTextLayout(const
GenericSalLayout& rLayout, const SalG
size_t nLen = std::distance(aI, aNext);
aId.mbVerticalMetrics = nGlyphRotation != 0.0;
-cairo_font_face_t* font_face = CairoFontsCache::FindCachedFont(aId);
-if (!font_face)
-{
-const FontConfigFontOptions *pOptions = aId.mpOptions;
-FcPattern *pPattern = pOptions->GetPattern();
-font_face = cairo_ft_font_face_create_for_pattern(pPattern);
-CairoFontsCache::CacheFont(font_face, aId);
-}
-cairo_set_font_face(cr, font_face);
-
-cairo_set_font_size(cr, nHeight);
-cairo_matrix_init_identity();
-
-if (rLayout.GetOrientation())
-cairo_matrix_rotate(, toRadian(rLayout.GetOrientation()));
-
-cairo_matrix_scale(, nWidth, nHeight);
-
-if (nGlyphRotation)
-cairo_matrix_rotate(, toRadian(Degree10(nGlyphRotation * 900)));
-
-if (rInstance.NeedsArtificialItalic())
-{
-cairo_matrix_t shear;
-cairo_matrix_init_identity();
-shear.xy = -shear.xx * ARTIFICIAL_ITALIC_SKEW;
-cairo_matrix_multiply(, , );
-}
+ApplyFont(cr, aId, nWidth, nHeight, nGlyphRotation, rLayout);
-cairo_set_font_matrix(cr, );
cairo_show_glyphs(cr, _glyphs[nStartIndex], nLen);
if (cairo_status(cr) != CAIRO_STATUS_SUCCESS)
{
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154560] Data validity bugs in custom formulas and drop-down lists.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsDevAdvice Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103030] [META] Navigator sidebar deck and floating window
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103030 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||154604 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154604 [Bug 154604] Navigator should support listing objects in front-to-back rather than back-to-front order -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
