[Bug 160800] Libreoffice App in F-Droid outdated
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160800 Michael Weghorn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Michael Weghorn --- (In reply to Dominik Kupschke from comment #0) > Description: > The Libreoffice App for Android distributed over F-Droid is outdated. > Version in F-Droid: 7.6.5.2 > Version in Google Play Store: 7.6.6.3 > > Is it possible to publish the newer version on F-Droid too? Versions are published on F-Droid as well, but there's currently an infra/connectivity issue causing the F-Droid build to fail, see https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/merge_requests/14775#note_1843871640 . This will hopefully be fixed when the tarballs have been migrated to a new server. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160800] New: Libreoffice App in F-Droid outdated
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160800 Bug ID: 160800 Summary: Libreoffice App in F-Droid outdated Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.6.6.3 release Hardware: All OS: Android Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: Android Viewer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: domi...@kupschke.net Description: The Libreoffice App for Android distributed over F-Droid is outdated. Version in F-Droid: 7.6.5.2 Version in Google Play Store: 7.6.6.3 Is it possible to publish the newer version on F-Droid too? Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install F-Droid 2. Search for Libreoffice in F-Droid and check the version. 3. Search for Libreoffice in Google Play Store and check the version. Actual Results: Outdated version distributed over F-Droid. Expected Results: Same version as in Google Play Store should be distributed. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160253] Heading numbering wrong on file reload
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160253 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |mikekagan...@hotmail.com |desktop.org | --- Comment #16 from Mike Kaganski --- https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166572 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 35595] Application.Wait = invalid procedure call
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35595 --- Comment #7 from KaneCharles --- (In reply to QA Administrators from comment #3) > Please read this message in its entirety before responding. > > Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity on > it for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it is open > and confirmed. It would be nice to have the bug confirmed on a newer version > than the version reported in the original report to know that the bug is > still present -- sometimes a bug is inadvertently fixed over time and just > never closed. > > If you have time please do the following: > 1) Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version > of LibreOffice (preferably 4.2 or newer). > 2) If it is present please leave a comment telling us what version of > LibreOffice and your operating system. > 3) If it is NOT present please set the bug to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave > a short comment telling us your version and Operating System > > Please DO NOT > 1) Update the version field > 2) Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) > 3) Set the bug to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning > that is not appropriate in this case) > > + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + > + > LibreOffice is powered by a team of volunteers, every bug is confirmed > (triaged) by human beings who mostly give their time for free. We invite you > to join our triaging by checking out this link: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage > https://time-calculator.io/ > > There are also other ways to get involved including with marketing, UX, > documentation, and of course developing - > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/. > > Lastly, good bug reports help tremendously in making the process go > smoother, please always provide reproducible steps (even if it seems easy) > and attach any and all relevant material Thank you for reaching out to us regarding this bug. We appreciate your dedication to ensuring the quality of LibreOffice. I will conduct the testing on the currently supported version of LibreOffice as per your instructions and provide the necessary feedback on the bug tracker. I understand the importance of keeping the bug reports up to date and will ensure to follow the guidelines provided. I will refrain from updating the version field, replying via email, or setting the bug to RESOLVED - FIXED as per your instructions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160597] Attribute dr3d:vpn is incorrectly used. It determines view plane of 3D-Scene
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160597 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160602] LibreOffice Writer loses page margins and can't restore them normally
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160602 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157417] A table becomes write protected without the user choosing to set write protection.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157417 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear hicijew174, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157417] A table becomes write protected without the user choosing to set write protection.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157417 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157416] HyperLinks
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157416 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157184] Libre Office 7.6 breaks file associations (regression)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157184 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157416] HyperLinks
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157416 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear nik, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157184] Libre Office 7.6 breaks file associations (regression)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157184 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear anixxsus, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157713] User-configuration location for language packs (new environment variable?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157713 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear maxim.cournoyer, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157925] JRE v21.0.1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157925 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear C, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 154835] When I insert a chart in any document and click the "Properties" button in the right side of the screen, its content shows up but instantly disappears.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154835 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Ronnel Portugal, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 74206] large autocorrect lists: typing in 'Replace' field is slower than 'With' field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74206 --- Comment #14 from QA Administrators --- Dear tommy27, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|160799 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799 [Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 93813] Integration of a color picker/pipette dropper control into the sidebar and color picker dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93813 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 | |0799| CC||trenttompk...@gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- *** Bug 160799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 | |813 | Keywords|needsUXEval | Blocks|85184 | --- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- With the existing two workarounds (Recent palette, and the copy-paste of colour code), I see this as a clear duplicate of bug 93813. See also bug 130967, which is already marked as duplicate It might be added to the widgets as part of a fix, and if not, it would be a follow-up enhancement request. Let's consolidate. Thank you! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93813 *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184 [Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350 --- Comment #19 from Justin L --- Created attachment 193829 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193829=edit commentsInWord.docx: the source document for the previous screenshot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350 --- Comment #18 from Justin L --- Created attachment 193828 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193828=edit commentsInWord2019.PNG: screenshot of single reply to thread in MSO Likely our poor model is just a copy of what MSO does. It too is extremely limited in comment replies. You can only reply to the thread, and comments cannot be re-organized, etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160791] Missing keyboard shortcuts for text formatting.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160791 --- Comment #3 from m_a_riosv --- What user interface do you use? I can see the 'simple underline' just to the right of the italics. Same place as in OpenOffice. Which is also customisable like LibreOffice. Usually taking a light review of manuals is a great help, not to learn everything, but to help remind you of something, when the need comes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792 --- Comment #6 from m_a_riosv --- Created attachment 193827 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193827=edit Adjunto un pequeño ejemplo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792 --- Comment #5 from m_a_riosv --- I think the problem stems from the fact that you are not using the styles to get the table of contents, nor are you applying them to the numbering, which you seem to have done by direct formatting using the icons in the bar. You are going to have to study a little bit the Writer documentation that I indicated in comment #2. On page 13 it tells you how to modify the character style of the list. You can also do the query at https://ask.libreoffice.org/c/spanish/10 Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) Creo que el problema nace de que no estás utilizando estilos para obtener la tabla de contenido, ni los estás aplicando a las numeraciones, lo cual parece has hecho mediante formato directo mediante los iconos de la barra. Vas a tener que estudiar un poco la documentación de Writer que te indique en el comentario #2. En a página 13 indica como modificar el estilo de carácter de la list. También puedes hacer la consulta en https://ask.libreoffice.org/c/spanish/10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160791] Missing keyboard shortcuts for text formatting.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160791 --- Comment #2 from vena.c...@virgin.net --- I did not know that about custom shortcuts, and I have been using OpenOffice for years. Most users probably do not know about custom shortcuts. Nevertheless, built in strike-through and underline shortcuts would be useful. Double-underline has a shortcut, but single underline does not, so this seems to be inconsistent and illogical. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 148192] Create a new option External Firebird file under Create new database
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148192 jcs...@libreoffice.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |jcs...@libreoffice.org |desktop.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764 --- Comment #12 from Jim Raykowski --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9) > How about defaulting to off? +1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 39468] translate German comments, removing redundant ones
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39468 --- Comment #368 from Commit Notification --- Ilmari Lauhakangas committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/7d13e62c3d468bd249db62cfdde14f28f74b3f59 tdf#39468 Translate German comments in vcl It will be available in 24.8.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 39468] translate German comments, removing redundant ones
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39468 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|target:5.3.0 target:5.4.0 |target:5.3.0 target:5.4.0 |target:5.5.0 target:6.0.0 |target:5.5.0 target:6.0.0 |target:6.2.0 target:6.3.0 |target:6.2.0 target:6.3.0 ||target:24.8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160469] Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160469 --- Comment #4 from Commit Notification --- Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-24-2": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/6b9cd13f502363c1784cdcb4538b6409a3a14c83 tdf#160469 Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything It will be available in 24.2.4. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160469] Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160469 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|target:24.8.0 |target:24.8.0 target:24.2.4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160714] Exporting ODP file to PDF in Impress does not export PDF figures correctly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160714 Patrick Luby (volunteer) changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |guibomac...@gmail.com |desktop.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Patrick Luby (volunteer) --- (In reply to Patrick Luby (volunteer) from comment #9) > Created attachment 193825 [details] > Exported PDF after fix I have submitted a fix for this bug in the following patch: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166544 Attachment #193825 shows what the exported PDF looks like with the fix. I'll post again when my fix is in a nightly master build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160714] Exporting ODP file to PDF in Impress does not export PDF figures correctly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160714 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Luby (volunteer) --- Created attachment 193825 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193825=edit Exported PDF after fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 93813] Integration of a color picker/pipette dropper control into the sidebar and color picker dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93813 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 ||0799 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160799 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799 [Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org Keywords||needsUXEval See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 ||813 Blocks||85184 --- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote --- In effect we already have this, just not in the "eyedropper" motif--and see also bug 93813 to rework the SD color replacment. That is, the 'Background Color' TB button opens the common color picker displaying the active palette (usually 'Standard'). And across the bottom is a swatch bar with the 12 most 'Recent' colors across the UI (so not just current Calc session). What is not obvious, is that for any cell on the sheet selected, launching the 'Background Color' picker's button link to the 'Custom color...' dialog will show the bg color of the cell. Likewise for the 'Font Color' picker's link to 'Custom color...' where dialog will show the fg color for font in the cell. Between the two, it is trivial to match colors for those occasions when the 12 swatch recent bar is insufficient, a textual copy/paste of the RGB. Not quite dropper style, and could be enhanced to pass RGBA values back to the Recent swatch bar for bg fill or fg text. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184 [Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 109139] [META] Cell selection bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109139 Bug 109139 depends on bug 160787, which changed state. Bug 160787 Summary: Calc active cell cursor has small transparent corners https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160787 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160787] Calc active cell cursor has small transparent corners
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160787 Noel Grandin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092 Bug 133092 depends on bug 160768, which changed state. Bug 160768 Summary: Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set up, Crash https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160768 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 107742] [META] Form control bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107742 Bug 107742 depends on bug 160768, which changed state. Bug 160768 Summary: Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set up, Crash https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160768 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160768] Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set up, Crash
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160768 Noel Grandin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160787] Calc active cell cursor has small transparent corners
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160787 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:24.8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160768] Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set up, Crash
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160768 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:24.8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792 --- Comment #4 from Damaso --- Y cuando realicé el cambio, tampoco funcionó el atajo de techado ctrl + z para deshacer el cambio inicial. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792 --- Comment #3 from Damaso --- Hola he intentado de todas las formas posibles deshacer los cambios al cambiarle el color de fondo de los números de las listas con el procedimiento inicial con hice el cambio, y simplemente no se puede. Adicionalmente todas las listas están relacionadas y no se les puede cambiar el color de fuente de manera individual a cada uno. Si puedes hacer las pruebas con el archivo que mandé te lo agradecería. Versión 24.2.2.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799 --- Comment #1 from ady --- Without relation to the eyedropper request, there is a way to copy the background color of a cell from the "format cell" dialog, where you can see the RGB/HEX values. There is also a way to copy the font color from the "font color > custom color" dialog. Of course there is the possibility of a simple copy format (clone) a cell, which includes those properties. Sure, an eyedropper feature might be simpler for users. I am just pointing out that there are alternatives available (as oppose to being some random try-and-error iteration attempts). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 38164] Allow scrolling through Slides by Mouse wheel
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38164 Sarper Akdemir (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |sarper.akdemir.extern@allot |desktop.org |ropia.de CC||sarper.akdemir.extern@allot ||ropia.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 38164] Allow scrolling through Slides by Mouse wheel
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38164 Sarper Akdemir (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160796] Conditional formating pb
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160796 ady changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 159950] Offer to download missing fonts from relevant online sources (dynamically, after installation)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Offer to download & install |Offer to download missing |missing fonts from online |fonts from relevant online |sources |sources (dynamically, after ||installation) --- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #8) > Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license. Agreed, but this bug doesn't suggest hosting fonts. Rather, it's about allowing the download of fonts from known, stable, 3rd-party sources. > Nor can > we police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used. Also agreed, but I don't believe I suggested we do that. > But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with unlicensed or illegal font > bundling. Again - this bug is not about bundling :-( I am not suggesting we bundle more stuff. Let me try to clarify this in the phrasing of the title. In fact, if anything, this may allow for a reduction in the number of bundled fonts. > I've > suggested a TDF commissioned metric equivalent to Aptos under SIL Open Font > License, host it for download and bundle it into LibreOffice. A fine suggestion, which is mostly orthogonal to this bug. I mentioned Aptos as an example of a font which users may like to have LibreOffice download when they encounter it in a document - providing that this is possible license-wise and availablility-wise, with a legit source. But if we can't do this for Aptos - we can still do it for many other fonts. > Otherwise facilitating access to "cloud hosted" or "centralized" (e.g. on > premise) font repositories with dynamic font loading, and optional install > to user profile, is a needed feature. Hmm... that would be useful as well. So, LO as bundled could have several publicly-accessible font download sources, which could be searched when an unavailable font is encountered; but this list could be made user-extensible, with a URL of a font repository which an organization might offer/configure (or an individual user if they have access to one). How does that sound? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160786] Weird formatting in Calc 24.2
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160786 raal changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected Regression By||Khaled Hosny CC||kha...@libreoffice.org, ||r...@post.cz --- Comment #6 from raal --- This seems to have begun at the below commit in bibisect repository/OS linux-64-24.2. Adding Cc: to Khaled Hosny ; Could you possibly take a look at this one? Thanks 4ce9836c2406d6fc50482782ef4675b5e5078edb is the first bad commit commit 4ce9836c2406d6fc50482782ef4675b5e5078edb Author: Jenkins Build User Date: Sun Jul 23 06:26:11 2023 +0200 source sha:4b743de97fc133623e46827869c4ea3eb845ad47 154292: tdf#156234: Don’t round glyph coordinates when doing subpixel positioning | https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/154292 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764 --- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote --- testing with Version: 24.2.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d56cc158d8a96260b836f100ef4b4ef25d6f1a01 CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 103030] [META] Navigator sidebar deck and floating window (also "Target in Document")
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103030 Bug 103030 depends on bug 160764, which changed state. Bug 160764 Summary: Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 144817] Navigator: Disable Sections tracking option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144817 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.m.ast...@verizon.net --- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote --- *** Bug 160764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from V Stuart Foote --- Oh crud! How'd I miss the persistent category tracking for all the categories done for bug 145132 at 7.3 [1] all still set with true defaults as currently refactored [2]. So the per content category context menu "tracking" toggle is toggled enabled by default when inserting new Sections. And verified the attachment 193805 sample document 2 has it set, also that when I toggle it off, the Heading category navigation behaves with no jump into the encompassing section. Also verified that if toggled disabled, newly inserted sections observe the persistent toggle disabled. In addition to the context menu toggle, the Navigator "SectionTracking" value can be set via Expert Configuration, or manually edited in the LO registrymodifications.xcu at: false Sorry for the noise Jim, * =-ref-= [1] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/122874 [2] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/129981 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 144817 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160799] New: FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799 Bug ID: 160799 Summary: FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: trenttompk...@gmail.com In the box that lets you select the background color of a cell, it would be nice if there was an eyedropper icon that you could click, that would select the existing background color of a cell (this could apply to font color too). I'm not colorblind, and even I have trouble differentiating between multiple shades of green to pick the exact same green I used before. I can see that it is wrong after I pick it, but then I have to pick it again. For someone who is actually colorblind trying to work on an existing file made by someone else and keep consistent colors. I thought maybe the eyedropper was just missing from the drop down because it isn't a modal, so the default behavior is to close when someone clicks outside it. But even the Custom Color screen doesn't have that option. So, I would add the change by: Adding an eyedropper icon to the background color dropdown. When clicked, it closes the dropdown and turns the users cursor into an eyedropper. After they click a cell, the selected background color becomes the background color of whatever cell they clicked and the cursor reverts to normal. And that's it. And maybe give the option to blind that to a shortcut key, so if you like hit CTRL+B, your cursor turns into an eyedropper, and the next cell you click, it will 'suck up' its background color. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 132253] CHARACTER DIALOG: Drop hyperlink from character attributes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132253 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |desktop.org |tion.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160796] Conditional formating pb
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160796 m_a_riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #2 from m_a_riosv --- I think you have not used properly relative/absolute references in MAX(B1:B10)->MAX($B$1:$B$10) E.g. for B2, the max value with relative reference is calculated MAX(B2:B11) But please explain better with what value do you want to get with the conditional format. This site is used in English, you have good translators for that, like https://www.deepl.com/translator if you don't like Google translator. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 107331] [META] Document themes bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107331 Bug 107331 depends on bug 160050, which changed state. Bug 160050 Summary: CONFIGURATION: In Writer, on theme format, adding a theme shows window with covered text/graphics https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160050 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792 m_a_riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #2 from m_a_riosv --- I think you need to review the documentation about work with list. Chapter 12 about list. https://documentation.libreoffice.org/es/documentacion-en-espanol/writer/ there is also a very good book about writer: https://elpinguinotolkiano.wordpress.com/domando-al-escritor-2/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160791] Missing keyboard shortcuts for text formatting.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160791 m_a_riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #1 from m_a_riosv --- You can define your own shortcut: Menu/Tools/Customize/Keyboard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160788] LibreOffice made my computer glitch out randomly and I lost everything I'd typed.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160788 m_a_riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #1 from m_a_riosv --- Please test in safe mode, Menu/Help/Restart in Safe Mode Please paste here the information on Menu/Help/About LibreOffice (There is an icon to copy) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 77141] leaks a fd on closed odb: locks file on Windows share
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77141 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #26 from Julien Nabet --- Lionel: following the fix for tdf#144256, any update for this one? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 144256] Missing destruction of FirebirdDriver::~FirebirdDriver, OSDBCDriverManager::~OSDBCDriverManager, OPoolCollection::~OPoolCollection opening and closing an ODB
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144256 --- Comment #12 from Julien Nabet --- Badfully, it doesn't fix the console logs when closing odb with hsql embedded. I still got: warn:vcl.schedule.deinit:171962:171962:vcl/source/app/scheduler.cxx:176: DeInit task: Timer a: 1 p: 1 framework::AutoRecovery m_aTimer 60ms (0x55896d1038e0) warn:vcl.schedule.deinit:171962:171962:vcl/source/app/scheduler.cxx:176: DeInit task: Timer a: 1 p: 1 drawinglayer ImpTimedRefDev destroy mpVirDev 18ms (0x55896e0c86a0) warn:vcl.schedule.deinit:171962:171962:vcl/source/app/scheduler.cxx:176: DeInit task: Timer a: 1 p: 1 MemoryManager::MemoryManager maSwapOutTimer 1000ms (0x7f657a860d20) warn:vcl.schedule.deinit:171962:171962:vcl/source/app/scheduler.cxx:197: DeInit active tasks: 3 (ignored: 0) warn:dbaccess:171962:171962:dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx:859: DBG_UNHANDLED_EXCEPTION in commitStorageIfWriteable_ignoreErrors exception: com.sun.star.embed.StorageWrappedTargetException message: "/home/julien/lo/libreoffice/package/source/xstor/xstorage.cxx:3569: Problems on commit! at /home/julien/lo/libreoffice/package/source/xstor/xstorage.cxx:3569" context: OStorage wrapped: com.sun.star.lang.WrappedTargetException message: "/home/julien/lo/libreoffice/package/source/zippackage/ZipPackage.cxx:1427: Problem writing the original content! at /home/julien/lo/libreoffice/package/source/zippackage/ZipPackage.cxx:1426" context: ZipPackage wrapped: com.sun.star.uno.DeploymentException message: "component context fails to supply service com.sun.star.packages.manifest.ManifestWriter of type com.sun.star.packages.manifest.XManifestWriter at /home/julien/lo/libreoffice/workdir/UnoApiHeadersTarget/offapi/normal/com/sun/star/packages/manifest/ManifestWriter.hpp:46" context: cppu::(anonymous namespace)::ComponentContext warn:dbaccess:171962:171962:dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx:920: com.sun.star.uno.DeploymentException message: "component context fails to supply service com.sun.star.security.DocumentDigitalSignatures of type com.sun.star.security.XDocumentDigitalSignatures at /home/julien/lo/libreoffice/workdir/UnoApiHeadersTarget/offapi/normal/com/sun/star/security/DocumentDigitalSignatures.hpp:80" context: cppu::(anonymous namespace)::ComponentContext warn:dbaccess:171962:171962:dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx:746: ODatabaseModelImpl::commitRootStorage: could not commit the storage! warn:legacy.osl:171962:171962:dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/databasecontext.cxx:489: ODatabaseContext::storeTransientProperties: a non-empty data source which I do not know?! warn:unotools.config:171962:171962:unotools/source/config/configmgr.cxx:147: ConfigManager not empty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350 --- Comment #17 from Justin L --- (In reply to Timur from comment #15) > Separately, please explain that all "replies" are replies of a top comment > and never a reply to a reply. The only thing that suggests you have "replied to a reply" is some free-form answer-text that says 'Reply to xyz (04/23/2024, 09:29): "..."' However, that answer-text is NOT composed by the actions of hitting the reply button (FN_REPLY) and there is NOTHING in the comment itself that points to the comment that you think you replied to. INSTEAD, the answer-text is composed during its first LAYOUT, and is compiled FROM THE COMMENT IT FOLLOWS. This all happens long after the comment has been created. The internals of the comment indicate that its ParentPostItId is the top level comment - which is why the navigator shows only two levels of comments. Therefore, when I changed "MoveCaret" to move the reply to the end of the thread instead of the beginning of the thread, the answer-text "replied" to the second-last comment instead of the first comment. In other words, the entire comment design is based on the assumption that replies go to the top of the thread. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160050] CONFIGURATION: In Writer, on theme format, adding a theme shows window with covered text/graphics
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160050 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qui...@gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |desktop.org |tion.org --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- Tomaz defined a fix width and height for the dialog; I removed this in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166541. The alternative could be a GtkScrollWindow behind the grid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 159950] Offer to download & install missing fonts from online sources
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950 --- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote --- Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license. Nor can we police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used. But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with unlicensed or illegal font bundling. "Free" or "Available" have to be kept at arms length. Why I've suggested a TDF commissioned metric equivalent to Aptos under SIL Open Font License, host it for download and bundle it into LibreOffice. Otherwise facilitating access to "cloud hosted" or "centralized" (e.g. on premise) font repositories with dynamic font loading, and optional install to user profile, is a needed feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350 --- Comment #16 from Justin L --- Created attachment 193824 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193824=edit Reply to someone else's comment in OOo 3.3.png: screenshot of replying in OOo. Using Comment Reply Example.docx (attachment 145913 from bug 119229) and bibisect-releases git checkout oldest (openoffice-3.3.0), I see a reply button. (Until recently, there was code that prevent someone from replying to their own comments - I assume that code is related to why your screenshot doesn't show a reply option.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160798] Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798 --- Comment #4 from Roland Baudin --- I forgot the LO version and system: Version: 24.2.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d56cc158d8a96260b836f100ef4b4ef25d6f1a01 CPU threads: 48; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded System: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS 64 bits -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160798] Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798 --- Comment #3 from Roland Baudin --- Created attachment 193823 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193823=edit Screenshot of test.pptx opened in PowerPoint 2016 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160798] Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798 --- Comment #2 from Roland Baudin --- Created attachment 193822 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193822=edit Converted presentation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160798] Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798 --- Comment #1 from Roland Baudin --- Created attachment 193821 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193821=edit Test presentation with some arrows -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160353] List images in order of document appearance in Calc Navigator
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160353 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|List images in order of |List images in order of |document appearance in |document appearance in Calc |navigator |Navigator Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| Severity|normal |enhancement CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||rayk...@gmail.com, ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Keywords||needsUXEval --- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I'd call this an enhancement. UX/Design, Jim, what do you think? Relevant fixed bugs (all Writer): Bug 146419 Bug 143569 Bug 134960 Bug 86395 Bug 52115 Bug 40427 Relevant patches from bug 134960 comment 27: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133101 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133342 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133350 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133359 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131448 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160798] New: Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798 Bug ID: 160798 Summary: Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office Product: LibreOffice Version: 24.2.2.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rolan...@free.fr Description: When exporting a document (here an Impress presentation) to MS Office (here in PowerPoint 2016), if arrows were converted to contours, then their heads become double in PowerPoint (see attached screenshot). Moreover, this seems to appear only when the line thickness is 0. And when the line thickness is not zero, the arrow head don't have the right size, they are too big. I did tests in Impress and PowerPoint (or Draw), but I guess the issue will be in Writer and Word too. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a blank presentation in Impress and insert an arrow somewhere 2. Select the arrow and convert it to contour (not curve or any another format) 3. Save the presentation to test.odp and convert it to PowerPoint 2007-365 .pptx format. 4. Open the test.pptx file in PowerPoint and check that the arrow has a double head Actual Results: The arrow has a double head in PowerPoint. Expected Results: In PowerPoint, the arrow should have the same shape and size as in Impress. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: If the arrow has a thickness > 0, then there is no double head, but a single bigger head in PowerPoint. I did the tests with fresh LibreOffice profile. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > The close naming is a source of confusion. How about "History" or > "Navigation History"? Eww, no. "Recency" would be most correct TB name, but a horrible burden for l10n/i18n to localize. So instead "Recent Positions" for TB name, keeping current button names "Back" / "Forward"? That would remove any Navigation vs. Navigator ambiguity. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160556] Crash in: ntdll.dll
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160556 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 ||0525 Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Can you please provide a minimal sample file with steps to get this different crash signature? Otherwise we might just merge with bug 160525. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160525] Crash in: Edit::ImplSetText(rtl::OUString const &,Selection const *) when opening Bullets and Numbering dialog in Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160525 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 ||0556 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160796] Conditional formating pb
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160796 --- Comment #1 from Julien Nabet --- Quick translation: "Conditional formatting reacts differently when entering an addition in another cell. see attachment". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160796] Conditional formating pb
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160796 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|voorwaardelijke opmaak |Conditional formating pb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 159661] SVG: text is not displayed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159661 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:24.8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 159661] SVG: text is not displayed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159661 --- Comment #4 from Commit Notification --- Xisco Fauli committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/98935eef13c7d755221d79fe7d3c5869a40a7c37 tdf#159661, tdf#160773: svgio: Add unittest It will be available in 24.8.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350 --- Comment #15 from Timur --- Created attachment 193820 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193820=edit Comment menu (In reply to Justin L from comment #13) > (In reply to Timur from comment #0) > > Seems like implementationError from when replies were added in LO 5.4. > I can reply to comments in OOo 3.3. Plese explain how to reply to comments in OO. Per attachment, in OO or 4.4 or 5.2, in comment menu there is no Reply, seen from LO 5.4. Separately, please explain that all "replies" are replies of a top comment and never a reply to a reply. Wrt that my test showed different behavior when replying to the top comment and replying to replies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 120719] tools -> options ability to backup and restore user options and customizations, reuse the profile export / restore from SafeModeDialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120719 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org --- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #12) > @Samuel, any reason the Backup and Restore from SafeModeUI couldn't be > reused against a profile saved outside the SafeMode dialog? Essentially a question to developers (adding a button next to "Archive User Profile" is simple). I wonder how to deal with renamed, removed, added attributes. Probably to ignore it. Personally I'd prefer Justin's solution, if enhanced with save-to and load-from functions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160032] MASTER Document -- updating linked documents automatically: different setting for master documents (on opening)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160032 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org, ||mentoring@documentfoundatio ||n.org Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyInteresting, ||easyHack, skillCpp, topicUI Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- LinkManager::UpdateAllLinks() shows the question with STR_QUERY_UPDATE_LINKS. The function is used in various scenarios across all modules and we must not disable it globally. But there is a bAskUpdate option! And since the function is used only a few times in sw/, I suggest to find the right code pointer per debugger. Not sure if the weld::MessageDialog can have a checkbox, might require some UI based dialog. The checkbox would be hidden unless it's a master document, and the dialog in this condition if the checkbox was checked before (or rather unchecked with "[x] Show this message"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160797] New: File / Export, Export as, Send, Preview in Web browser .... AND: "Generate" ... or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160797 Bug ID: 160797 Summary: File / Export, Export as, Send, Preview in Web browser AND: "Generate" ... or Product: LibreOffice Version: 24.8.0.0 alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: j...@cspv.hu hi, This is an old thing... Send / "Email (this) document" Send / "Send via Bluetooth" both make sens... Whereas: Send / "Outline to clipboard" ... ... is like asking someone at a dining table to send you the salt, or offering someone that you'd send a coffee is she liked... meaning you'd make one for her.. #1 - - - - So, how about "Generate"? I mean, this is what happens, when you "send" the outline to the clipboard in use... Imagine: File / Generate / "Create Master Document" compare it to: File / Send / "Create Master Document" #2 - - - - I guess, the only thing that keeps "send" in place is that programmers like to use it... in terms of outputs and inputs... for them, it makes sense... "Send: Outline to Clipboard" is a valid sentence for them Moreover, Generate would sound clumsy here: File / Generate / "Outline to Clipboard" cause it would require a longer second part: Generate: outline -- and "send it" -- to clipboard... ... #3 - - - - Maybe, "Output" would be a better solution... but Output: outline to clipboard... even though it makes sense... "out" appears twice... making it confuse... #4 - - - - okay: how about adding a new menu item: "Email" :) and put all email stuff under it? then the meaning of "send" wouldn't be ambiguous! :) But then send to Mediwwiki and send via bluetooth would be odd... and if you out them under "send", we would have the exact situation as now... #5 - - - - Maybe: instead of Generate, "Create" would actually work... Would it? I admit, this really is tough... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 102265] Help for Impress Format menu needs to have four submenus created and linked to the help page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102265 --- Comment #19 from Commit Notification --- Olivier Hallot committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/help/commit/d50121f44bc54b22ccc603093cf5fd0b75f26155 tdf#102265 More work on Impress format menu (5) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 109178] [META] Named Cell Ranges and Formula Expressions bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109178 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160255 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160255 [Bug 160255] Named Ranges Should Be Able to be Used in Conditional Formatting Dialog Box -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160255] Named Ranges Should Be Able to be Used in Conditional Formatting Dialog Box
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160255 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Blocks||109178, 87351 Keywords|needsUXEval |needsDevAdvice --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- Would be nice but requires cross-platform and -application support. In other words it needs to be defined in the file format. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87351 [Bug 87351] [META] Conditional formatting bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109178 [Bug 109178] [META] Named Cell Ranges and Formula Expressions bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 87351] [META] Conditional formatting bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87351 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160255 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160255 [Bug 160255] Named Ranges Should Be Able to be Used in Conditional Formatting Dialog Box -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze --- The close naming is a source of confusion. How about "History" or "Navigation History"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160796] New: voorwaardelijke opmaak
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160796 Bug ID: 160796 Summary: voorwaardelijke opmaak Product: LibreOffice Version: 24.2.2.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: biz43...@proton.me Created attachment 193819 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193819=edit calc sheet Voorwaardelijke opmaak Voorwaardelijke opmaak reageert wisselend bij het invullen van een optelling in een andere cel. zie bijlage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 157943] LibreOffice 7.6.2.1 - opened files can be modified by someone else without first person's knowledge, even when .lock file exists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157943 --- Comment #15 from Regis Perdreau --- The problem is that this function is critical * it can lead to the loss of a document. * The documentation is not up to date. * The user interface is not complete, with a third 'open' button whose role is not very well defined. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160795] New: "Title" and "heading" to be recognized as "section title" --- a higher level of heading, a "Heading 0"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160795 Bug ID: 160795 Summary: "Title" and "heading" to be recognized as "section title" --- a higher level of heading, a "Heading 0" Product: LibreOffice Version: 24.8.0.0 alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: j...@cspv.hu hi, I'm not sure if I can elucidate this properly... But I'm talking about working with sections... and headings... of which "Heading 1" is the top level one... With one document, just like with HTML documents, "Heading 1" (aka "h1") is the highest level... But as soon as we're working on a book, a new "unit" comes into play.. which is higher level than "heading 1"... i.e. higher than a chapter... We have a name for that: "Section" But when you edit the book, the highest heading that is recognized as a heading, is heading 1... nothing above it... So, while you can make WRITER to recognize the "Heading 1" titles, and display it "in the top of the page"*, you can't do that with Title or heading. No "heading 1" variants are recognized, either, like, "heading 1 - this section"... I guess, what I'm talking about is just an "under the hood" thing... Cause basically nothing should be changed, only the way the program behaves... in terms of recognizing Heading 1 -- this section as a "heading 1" heading... and recognizing a "Title" or a "heading" heading as a "heading 0" heading... sorry for the ambiguity of this idea :( ___ * I didn't want to use the h-word, as it would have interfered with heading :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 123768] Make shortcuts extensionizable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123768 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||8355 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158355] Support per-platform/per-desktop-environment variation of keyboard shortcuts
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158355 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 ||3768 --- Comment #16 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #15) > Duplicate of bug 123768? Ideally with a more convenient solution... You asked this in comment #7 and I replied in comment #8. The ask here regards the defaults. And, in fact, I believe it is easier to implement than making shortcuts extensionizable. But it's true that if 123768 were available, the more savvy users could resolve this problem for themselves. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160469] Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160469 Noel Grandin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 150839] View layout has no alternative access method
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150839 --- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg --- A little bike-shedding by the author of the dupe bug (i.e. me): * I agree that this should be in a submenu of the View menu. * I think "pages" is not a good submenu title. It's as though you're supposed to choose whether to view pages; or which pages to view. Perhaps something like "multi-page layout" or "Layout of pages" or "Viewport layout" or "Page placement". None of these are great, maybe you have a better idea * I think the item titles should be a little more descriptive than with the bottom toolbar, because we don't have the icons to illustrate. So maybe "Single page per row", "Multiple pages per row" and "Book view". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 120200] [META] Update or correct help for features
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120200 Bug 120200 depends on bug 159863, which changed state. Bug 159863 Summary: Ctl + Shift + PgDn no longer assigned to JumpToFootnoteArea https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159863 What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 120200] [META] Update or correct help for features
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120200 Bug 120200 depends on bug 159863, which changed state. Bug 159863 Summary: Ctl + Shift + PgDn no longer assigned to JumpToFootnoteArea https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159863 What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160469] Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160469 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:24.8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
