[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #12 from Christian Lehmann --- However, it may still be instructive to look why the Windows version fairs so much better on this count. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #11 from Christian Lehmann --- Yes, this observation is apparently on the right track. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #10 from Buovjaga --- Ok, now I notice that the lag is experienced when typing (esp. hitting a key and holding) into a paragraph containing a field. I checked some versions and the behaviour *might* have changed, but it seems too inexact to bother with a bibisect. Christian: can you confirm this distinction, if you try in paragraphs without fields? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #9 from Christian Lehmann --- I now tried the original file on LO 7.4.0.0.alpha. The latency of keystrokes is the same as with earlier Linux versions. The Example file created by Buogjaga may be faster to edit because it does not have 1.8 MB, but only 1.2 MB. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #8 from Buovjaga --- Created attachment 179343 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=179343=edit Example file I can reproduce slowness with 7.3, but not really with master. Notes from sanitising the comments: After unzipping, I ran this to have a non-minified xml to work with: xmllint --format content.xml > pretty_xml_file.xml For the pretty xml file, I used my Kate editor to do this regular expression find & replace: Find: ()([^<]+?)() Replace: \1xxx xxx xxx\3 It was tricky to find a suitable regex and I kind of gave up and settled for good enough. The reason is that there could be these types of elements inside the text spans: To explain the regex a bit: - it uses three capture groups - the capture groups are referenced in the replace statement with \1 and \3 (skipping the middle group as it had the private content) - the middle group says that we want any characters as long as they are not < - the +? means that there can be any number of characters in a "non-greedy" way, so it will stop looking when it hits the next After the mass replacing, there remained only a few comments that I manually replaced in LibreOffice itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #7 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #6) > I am afraid if I touch the content.xml, it will get broken. > Would you want to do it for me? I would then upload the file as it is now. Yes, you can email it to me directly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #6 from Christian Lehmann --- I am afraid if I touch the content.xml, it will get broken. Would you want to do it for me? I would then upload the file as it is now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #5 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #4) > I followed the website instructions to sanitize the file. However, the > comments keep their original text. On the one hand, it would not be > appropriate to delete them because they are part of the size problem of the > file. On the other hand, the comments contain the _really_ private > information, so I would prefer to obliterate them. However, it cannot be > done manually as there are 150 of them. Any suggestions? Annoying: Replace All is disabled, if Comments is checked in Find & Replace dialog's other options. The only remaining way seems to be to unzip the file and figure out a way to mass-anonymise the comments directly in the content.xml file in a text editor and then zip it again. Document files are really zip files, just with a different extension. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #4 from Christian Lehmann --- I followed the website instructions to sanitize the file. However, the comments keep their original text. On the one hand, it would not be appropriate to delete them because they are part of the size problem of the file. On the other hand, the comments contain the _really_ private information, so I would prefer to obliterate them. However, it cannot be done manually as there are 150 of them. Any suggestions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #3 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #2) > @Telesto: > Thanks for coming back. > > A) The larger the file, the heavier the problem. With those everyday files > of two pages, every installation of LO runs smoothly. On the other hand, I > have only one file of this size, so I cannot tell whether the problem would > be the same with _any_ file of this size. > (I could upload it [once more], but first I would have to obliterate the > text.) You can check this for anonymising: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Sanitizing_Files_Before_Submission It would be nice to test an example file. As documents can have many different features, the slowdown can be due to some very specific thing. Also, are you running a Wayland session on Linux? You can check from the terminal with env | grep -i wayland If the command does not print anything, you are running an X11 session. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 --- Comment #2 from Christian Lehmann --- @Telesto: Thanks for coming back. A) The larger the file, the heavier the problem. With those everyday files of two pages, every installation of LO runs smoothly. On the other hand, I have only one file of this size, so I cannot tell whether the problem would be the same with _any_ file of this size. (I could upload it [once more], but first I would have to obliterate the text.) B) On this Linux, I have KDE Plasma Version 5.18.6. C) I don't remember. However, opening Help > About LibreOffice, it says: Dieses Produkt wurde von OpenSuse zur Verfügung gestellt. This looks very much like I did not download it from the LO website, but instead used the OpenSuse package manager to install it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148333] EDITING: LO is slower on Linux than on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148333 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #1 from Telesto --- @Christian Well there are plenty questions to ask A) Is this specific a specific large document.. B) What is Desktop Environment? KDE/XFCE? C) What the source of LibreOffice? LibreOffice.org using package manager Not an expert on Linux either.. Adding also someone with more expertise.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
