[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156099] Rename "rotation object" to "solid of revolution"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156099 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156099] Rename "rotation object" to "solid of revolution"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156099 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Blocks||115596, 103759 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting. Following Stuart's comment 1 the current term is appropriate and easy to understand. => WF (And it would be a pity to localize the beautiful "Solid of Revolution" *g*) Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103759 [Bug 103759] [META] 3D model bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115596 [Bug 115596] [META] Labels of UNO commands bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156099] Rename "rotation object" to "solid of revolution"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156099 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Tuomas Hietala from comment #0) > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. See > https://translations.documentfoundation.org/languages/en/libo_ui-master/ > search/?offset=1=rotation+object_by=-priority%2Cposition= These are not steps to reproduce. I don't see where this term is used and in what context. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156099] Rename "rotation object" to "solid of revolution"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156099 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de, ||so...@libreoffice.org, ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org --- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote --- Actually ODF 1.3 sec. 10.5 provides our 3D Shape handling. And 10.5.7 [1] defines "a three-dimensional rotation shape based on the given polygon" as implemented in source with lathe3d.hxx All the strings used for 3D shapes are consistently defined [2] as Objects. So, there is no error in translation. And IMHO in this context "rotation object" is more appropriate than the more convoluted "solid of revolution" which while lexically correct adds nothing to the UI or the UX. Term change would also trigger l10n translator thrash. IMHO => WF =-ref-= [1] https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html#element-dr3d_rotate [2] https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/svx/strings.hrc?a=true=d0a9d04d=139#139 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156099] Rename "rotation object" to "solid of revolution"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156099 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||tele...@surfxs.nl Keywords||needsUXEval -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
