[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89321] The (new) Document Foundation Bugzilla page needs to become more user oriented
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89321 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from BogdanB --- I think this bug should be close as mention in comment 2. This is not the wright place to report that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89321] The (new) Document Foundation Bugzilla page needs to become more user oriented
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89321 --- Comment #2 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) qu...@runcibility.com --- Technically speaking, bugs about Bugzilla should go to Redmine: https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/projects/infrastructure/issues/new (In reply to A (Andy) from comment #1) to understand what is for instance ci-infra, Yep, ci-infra should also migrate to Redmine, so that the 'LibreOffice' product can just focus on the LibreOffice suite (and nothing else). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89321] The (new) Document Foundation Bugzilla page needs to become more user oriented
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89321 A (Andy) stgohi-lob...@yahoo.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||stgohi-lob...@yahoo.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from A (Andy) stgohi-lob...@yahoo.de --- I agree that some aspects can be improved. From my point of view most of the fields are necessary, but not the field Hardware, because I think most users (that are no IT specialists) do not know what to select there. I also agree that the naming in the Component field is not consistent as described by the Bug Reporter. Maybe this list can also cleaned up or/and more information is provided to understand what is for instance ci-infra, contrib, framework, graphics stack, Linguistic, sdk, ux-advise? Concerning the Enhancement issue I would also agree with the Bug Reporter. I see again and again bug reports, where the user probably did not know that the differentation of a normal bug and an enhancement request can be found in the Severity field, because this is not intuitive. This should be clearer. The field Version is from my point of view ok. I do not know if this can be further improved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
