[Libreoffice-qa] SAIPEM AMERICA INC JOB OFFER (OFFSHORE)
Saipem America Inc. 15950 Park Row Houston, Texas 77084 USA OUR REF: SAP/078811/JO The Saipem America offshore Inc Intends to invite experienced Individuals/Expatriates or Consultancy firm who is Capable of rendering expertise services in various fields of Engineering, Construction and Installation, NDT, Geology, Project Management, Welding and Fabrication, Plant/Start-Up, Machine operators, Service Technicians, Maintenance, Mechanical/Technical/Design Engineering, Information Technology, Administrative, Commissioning and Medical Experts. Crew Managers And Assistant. Diving vessels and Riggers. The Saipem America Inc request all applicants from various countries to send detailed CV in accordance with the format indicated. The Company further encourages all applicants to forward their respective application to this email address (saipemamerica1...@live.com) BENEFITS, PACKAGES AND ENTITLEMENT : Saipem America value their workers by recognizing their hard work and offering a competitive salary and benefit package that includes the following. Medical Dental Vision Basic Life Insurance Accidental Death & Dismemberment (AD&D) Disability (Short & Long Term) 401K Vacation Days Sick Pay Tuition Reimbursement Program Please note that application received after the deadline will not be considered. Similarly applications not submitted in accordance with the indicated format may also be rejected. The relevant reference number should be stated on left - hand corner of any mail being sent in relation to this Job application. We shall enter into correspondence only with Short listed applicants or expatriates. Sincerely Prof. Mike Collins Human Resources Manager ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.2 RC2 test builds available
Hi Petr, all Petr Mladek wrote > > Hmm, where do you see the version 3.5.0 and 3.4.602? I can't find it > anywhere. I checked name of the installer, about dialog and output from > libreoffice --version. So, I am confused. > In the file properties of any exe file under Windows https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47840 http://ask.libreoffice.org/question/1459/secunia-psi-reports-insecure Secunia gets the file version from the binary files http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/how_it_works/ Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-3-5-2-RC2-test-builds-available-tp3865482p3883827.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.2 RC2 test builds available
Pedro píše v Po 02. 04. 2012 v 07:41 -0700: > Petr Mladek wrote > > > > Why could it cause bad image? IMHO, it was bug on the Secunia side and > > it is fixed now. We used this version scheme also for LO-3.4 and nobody > > complained. > > > > A bug on the Secunia side that LO version 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 are named 3.5.0? I > have to disagree... I agree that it looks bad. > As I mentioned in a previous email, it was NOT the same in 3.4.x: e.g. > 3.4.6 was named named 3.4.602 > It wasn't correct but it was visibly similar (the number after the second > point is the same) and the numbers were increasing on the correct group > (third group) Hmm, where do you see the version 3.5.0 and 3.4.602? I can't find it anywhere. I checked name of the installer, about dialog and output from libreoffice --version. So, I am confused. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Investigating Caseconductor for next QA call
Rimas Kudelis píše v Pá 30. 03. 2012 v 20:12 +0300: > As for the high hopes – I think it's an overestimation. I've created > myself an account in the test server, but just like you, I haven't > figured out what I can do next, but then again, I didn't have much time > to stare at it and click things either. CC *looks* drastically different > than Litmus, maybe that's the culprit. It seems that there are different roles, see http://readthedocs.org/docs/moztrap/en/latest/userguide/model/roles.html#default-roles We would need to ask administrators to give us more privileges. IMHO, users can only view results by default. I am even unable to execute test cases. I am afraid that we can't judge the system without playing with all features. I am sorry, I do not enough time for any deep investigation, so I am not going to ask for the permissions. Any volunteer is welcome. Sophie is perfectly fine :-) Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
