Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug sur Nouveau dans le BSA français!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rob, I've added Jean-Baptiste in cc because I won't have the time to take care of the BSA this week. Jean-Baptiste will you be able to deal with it? On 09/06/2013 11:00, Rob Snelders wrote: Hi Sophie, Can you look for any weird texts in the French BSA? Can you also add q...@fr.libreoffice.org to the fr-qa-list so it is allowed to send email to that list. I think I don't understand what you mean here, should we subscribe the list to itself? I think then we can take it in production. Thanks a lot for your work! Kind regards Sophie - -- Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org Tel:+33683901545 Membership Certification Committee Member - Co-founder The Document Foundation -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRtYxuAAoJEJRaC8j6sATNBA0H/3x5NlrIYnV/zDzweXzB1CxZ 7XlyCdlFg9T7T1w9FJJjDkaBZgre9IfsFyrFy+Mfrxu9r+RnUjUZdV1p/LXiITE1 Zg1hvLMYZ083xx4TqXxyej2o9+7het6of5bZs15fle89aYx65Hyjn98y4VNqnfOd ukNMAxw577a3GePddOYoojRfGzEj+da0RP9RcTdl/4ONH5r+IA/pmxjl17x94nN+ 1aLDE01RUXUEFoCqJ4S3etxKVQs9CBgAajo9C8EscEXZIAyv59cXDhOzorxREMjV y809mKWnkY9EqweMyMKPvH8dn/quegxtECUYplHny/hIjfwMLWJ1BEEK/TVKQrc= =EMPu -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisect Whiteboard Status
On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 10:44 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: I finally got around to updating the wiki: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard#Bibisect Let's not use all the other options now and stick with: bibisected PreBibisect bibisectrequest So, considering the possibility of updating wiki page HowToBibisect in line with the reduction in the number of whiteboard values, I wonder: (*) The explanation of whiteboard status PreBibisect says Only use this f you are using the daily bibisect package or the bibisect40 package, as the tagged version does not go back as far. I suggest Only use this if you are using the 4.0 bibisect package or the 3.5 bibisect package, as the tagged versions in the other bibisect packages do not go back as far. If the suggestion is not right, then my understanding of the bibisect packages is in urgent need of correction. Help! (*) Should existing whiteboard words bibisect40bugs, bibisect36bugs, and bibisect35bugs be changed to bibisectrequest? Is it worth the flurry of emails and updated date-last-changed fields? Only for open bugs, perhaps? The use of fewer whiteboard values hereafter will make the old values useless for queries anyway, right? Thanks, Terry. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisect Whiteboard Status
Hey Terrence, On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.comwrote: On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 10:44 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: I finally got around to updating the wiki: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard#Bibisect Let's not use all the other options now and stick with: bibisected PreBibisect bibisectrequest So, considering the possibility of updating wiki page HowToBibisect in line with the reduction in the number of whiteboard values, I wonder: (*) The explanation of whiteboard status PreBibisect says Only use this f you are using the daily bibisect package or the bibisect40 package, as the tagged version does not go back as far. I suggest Only use this if you are using the 4.0 bibisect package or the 3.5 bibisect package, as the tagged versions in the other bibisect packages do not go back as far. +1, sounds fine, although no one should be using 3.5 bibisect package any longer. The bibiect40 package contains everything in 3.5 so using 3.5 is outdated. I believe the wiki says something along these lines :) If the suggestion is not right, then my understanding of the bibisect packages is in urgent need of correction. Help! Hm looks like you get it :) (*) Should existing whiteboard words bibisect40bugs, bibisect36bugs, and bibisect35bugs be changed to bibisectrequest? Is it worth the flurry of emails and updated date-last-changed fields? Only for open bugs, perhaps? No, these mean that bibisect was done, not that it's requested. So the more appropriate would be bibisected but I don't think we should do this, at least not yet, with the NEEDINFO project going we're already sending a lot of spam to developers and users from FDO - sending even more seems like a bad idea atm. In the future this could be useful. Can you quickly get a query together that shows us approx. how many bugs we're talking about - I think focusing on non closed bugs would be ideal, why update whiteboard status on bugs that have been fixed? Best, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibreOffice QA Volunteer jmadero@gmail.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug sur Nouveau dans le BSA français!
Hi, Le 10/06/2013 10:21, Sophie Gautier a écrit : Hi Rob, I've added Jean-Baptiste in cc because I won't have the time to take care of the BSA this week. Jean-Baptiste will you be able to deal with it? I am not sure if the posting on qa@fr list works: on qa@fr I see only the Sophie's answer. I checked the archives http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/fr/qa/ where I found only http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/fr/qa/msg01400.html Best regards. JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
