Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-design] Send Feedback Option

2012-12-01 Thread Hillar Liiv
Hello,

I think there should be link to
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/too, to get more manpower for
libreoffice.
(And Get involved page must be redesigned in future - less text, more
action...).

Some get involved pages:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contribute/
http://www.gnome.org/get-involved/


Medieval


2012/11/30 Stefan Knorr (Astron) 

> Hi all,
>
> Rainer wrote this:
> > I like it! And I have some proposals for additions.
>
> Very helpful, thanks. I think I included a bit of almost everything
> you said when I updated the page.
>
>
> On 29 November 2012 21:23, Michael Meeks  wrote:
> > Hah :-) so - JFYI - when people click on send-feedback, we now
> have
> > more details about their systems: the exact version of the software
> > they're running, the platform, the component (writer, base etc.) and
> > more. That would need propagating to "file a bug" of course;
>
> Sure. Keep in mind, what I did is intended as a mockup, not as a final
> implementation. I think I left out everything that was harder to do,
> for Rob. I didn't know we add version strings to the feedback URL now,
> though. That's definitely nice progress.
>
>
> > I wonder - Mozilla have done a lot of this work before us - can
> we
> > re-use their backend infrastructure and share development work on that ?
> > it'd suck to re-invent all their data analytics / query processing
> > etc. ?
>
> Here's how I think Twitter v/ Mozilla's system stack up:
>
> Twitter:
> * no need to set up a new hardware/etc. (at least for collecting
> feedback; analysing feedback without hardware might be harder)
> * verified users => less spam (?)
> * many people have Twitter accounts already, so not such a high hurdle
> * possible to follow up with users, creating actual contact between
> developers/designers/QA'ers/marketeers/... and users
> * people might expect us to follow up with them, and when we don't
> they become angry (?)
> * data becomes Twitter's property not ours
> * dependent on Twitter's general mood and API
> * probably hard to annotate tweets with LibO/OS version
>
> i.m.o:
> * need to set up hardware
> * lots and lots of spam and gibberish
> * no hurdle but clicking the Send Feedback button
> * impossible to follow up with users
> * posts are automatically tagged with LibO/OS version
> * data is our property
>
> The (supposed) ease of use (both to us and the user) and the promise
> of having less spam make Twitter seem attractive to me, still.
>
>
> > is prolly beyond us ATM, but ... perhaps worth collecting if
> someone
> > will do real analytics on it.
>
> I personally think the feedback is mostly useful for collecting
> real-world thumbs-ups/thumbs-downs by region and time.[1] As you said,
> actual text analysis is hard, especially if you have to take into
> account that our users speak so many languages.
>
> Astron.
>
>
> [1] There might be the psychological effect that people feel heard, too.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
> Problems?
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted
>
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.4 RC3 available

2012-12-01 Thread Fridrich Strba
Dear Community,

The Document Foundation is happy to announce the third release candidate
of LibreOffice 3.6.4. The upcoming 3.6.4 will be the fifth in a series
of frequent bugfix releases for our 3.6 code line. Please be aware that
LibreOffice 3.6.4 RC3 is not yet ready for production use, you should
continue to use LibreOffice 3.6.3 for that.

The release is available for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X from our QA
builds download page at

  http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/

Should you find bugs, please report them to the FreeDesktop Bugzilla:

  https://bugs.freedesktop.org

A good way to assess the beta quality is to run some specific manual
tests on it, our TCM wiki page has more details:

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests#Full_Regression_Test

(and the announcement mail:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-December/022464.html)

For other ways to get involved with this exciting project - you can e.g.
contribute code:

  http://www.libreoffice.org/developers-2/

translate LibreOffice to your language:

  http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Translation_for_3.6

or help with funding our operations:

  http://donate.libreoffice.org

A list of known issues and fixed bugs with 3.6.4 RC3 is available
from our wiki:

  http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.6.4/RC3

Please find the list of changes here:

http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/commit-log-libreoffice-3-6-4-release-3.6.4.3.log

Let us close again with a BIG Thank You! to all of you having
contributed to the LibreOffice project - this release would not have
been possible without your help.

Yours,
The Document Foundation Board of Directors
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.4 RC3 available

2012-12-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi Fridrich,

Le 01/12/2012 21:20, Fridrich Strba a écrit :
> Dear Community,
>
> The Document Foundation is happy to announce the third release candidate
> of LibreOffice 3.6.4. The upcoming 3.6.4 will be the fifth in a series
> of frequent bugfix releases for our 3.6 code line. Please be aware that
> LibreOffice 3.6.4 RC3 is not yet ready for production use, you should
> continue to use LibreOffice 3.6.3 for that.
>
> [...]
>
> Please find the list of changes here:
>
> http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/commit-log-libreoffice-3-6-4-release-3.6.4.3.log
This last link gives an error 404.
At the moment it seems that the correct link is :
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/commit-log-tag-libreoffice-3.6.4.3-release-3.6.4.3.log

Best regards
JBF

-- 
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] mailing list administration

2012-12-01 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Today I increased maximum Size for attachments from 64kB to 100kB to 
avoid problems with attached Bug statistics.



CU

Rainer

P.S.: This thread should keep you up to date, discussion if desired 
please in extra threads to keep this one clear and short.

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/