Re: [libreplanet-discuss] RiseUp needs our help...
On 2016-09-06 12:34 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > Right. So how is it OK to use this ML to beg for money to non-free > software and culture? I don't think it should be. It looks like they use[0-8] and value[9-11,15-16] free software, as well as value free culture[12-14,15-16]. Admittedly it's not clear whether everything they use is free software, or if that's an unstated goal currently. That much I'd say is worth asking them for clarification. As for "[using] this ML to beg for money", that wording is a bit extreme, but I can see your point. However, it's worth noting: 1) it wasn't RiseUp themselves who emailed this list 2) should RiseUp not be using completely free software, there have been many other cases where nonfree software has been promoted to some degree for its other freedom-respecting values. Examples include: flattr, duckduckgo. dmr --- (use) [0] https://riseup.net/en/lists [1] https://riseup.net/en/vpn [2] https://leap.se/en/docs/get-involved/source [3] https://we.riseup.net/ [4] https://riseup.net/en/about-us/projects/programmers-wanted [5] http://riseuplabs.org/ [6] https://pad.riseup.net/ [7] https://share.riseup.net/ [8] https://gitlab.com/groups/riseup (value) [9] https://riseup.net/en/about-us [10] https://riseup.net/en/security/resources [11] https://riseup.net/en/chat (value-culture) [12] https://riseup.net/en/security [13] https://riseup.net/en/about-us/politics [14] https://riseup.net/en/canary (value,value-culture) [15] https://riseup.net/en/security/resources/radical-servers [16] https://riseup.net/en/about-us/projects
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] RiseUp needs our help...
> Their help website is CC-NC-SA, which is non-free in terms of free > culture. But GNU.org and FSF.org use CC-ND, which is also non-free in terms of "free culture", so I am not sure that's a great argument. Source code, however, I am not sure about indeed. This[1] is all I managed to find. Perhaps a message to the admins would be in order? [1] http://riseuplabs.org/ -- Serge Hooge () ascii ribbon campaign - against HTML e-mail /\- against proprietary attachments
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] RiseUp needs our help...
Serge Hoogewrites: >> Their help website is CC-NC-SA, which is non-free in terms of free >> culture. > But GNU.org and FSF.org use CC-ND, which is also non-free in terms of > "free culture", so I am not sure that's a great argument. > > Source code, however, I am not sure about indeed. > This[1] is all I managed to find. > > Perhaps a message to the admins would be in order? > > [1] http://riseuplabs.org/ AFAIK the user panel at https://user.riseup.net isn't free software yet because it needs a security revision ;) ;) other services are free software based: * pad.riseup.net => etherpad-lite * lists.riseup.net => sympa * we.riseup.net => crabgrass * vpn => bitmask etc -- .oÓ) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] RiseUp needs our help...
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Serge Hoogewrote: > But GNU.org and FSF.org use CC-ND, which is also non-free in terms of > "free culture", so I am not sure that's a great argument. > > Source code, however, I am not sure about indeed. > This[1] is all I managed to find. > > Perhaps a message to the admins would be in order? > This is indeed correct. Sorry if my message implied CC-ND meant non-free software. As I've said before on this list, I agree with the separation of free culture and free software in terms of concepts and movements, and am more of an advocate for free software than free culture. Indeed, we should message the admins. The way I see it there are two outcomes: 1. The software is indeed proprietary, and now we know for the future. 2. The software doesn't have a license, and we can maybe convince the admins to apply a free software license. 3. The software is free, but the admins are just not publicizing it (due to laziness, lack of awareness, etc.) and we can convince them to do so. *-- * Regards, *Tyler Romeo* 0x405d34a7c86b42df https://parent5446.nyc
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] RiseUp needs our help...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Is their server software AGPL or otherwise free software? - -- Alexander alexan...@plaimi.net https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXzum3AAoJENQqWdRUGk8B9GsP+wVhoyw2XlgJlsbn9fZ807+A 5IC7pT2JIu/QJgmRYUC+h2Y/aLpgfDWfAGXRau5cJHmTJaUCzBGVVouv2X9I7WQ4 0LCC+wc2fg2au7qxXmGl6muAB8QfqR9gdEsYAZBsqYssLfS20sQaeaTnPdJmswD/ 9WVFd0S6AArVJrZ7YEQWyVHX9dID404lLWTBTBoVqdrbJtJ0/DAYsWKtbfPmrKmI P9gqKphO1cNvM0stIp3kf0kk/p+n2ioOrpbk6hq92MMUQJIb8EwbEWtd+2jot+JB u4ZB4PtYBY4Wv+akeoTQnezY4KZY5cAn+0ge9xKlgPqiXc3WRvmdCq+a3YhR+IWa dgWiBylioBqZw7lv2sHlem9kvXhIhJMDX/lcxHzM1Fh1MCsjEmr0tQFXegVoO/AL F/q4UQczkhOvzgSHyVdY2vfE2XdrJ8+YirYDNcOQYbcNy8KE7hxcgXyrk6U7ZPaw YVRnLz+ulvZbA31Y0Ck+UIpg1Fz2GTbaaXDHmJr/ugRS/KaSd8/NN6oEadje43n+ xudJOY18dK/hwLSUkCc84dBQGenBnU/uIyVpxgCssJ0B120mJQIvqvDxPrrEESn8 WLJaKGWNi6lVpoEeHPn8hmqQQpGat/ft0cPL1/siKwjjLbTRcWujA5T7yQlt05Kw wVpEhlCseJkaT3zVp8aL =QJO6 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Aseprite is now proprietary software
The problem with BitCoin is that it's a separated currency. It doesn't really serve to manage existing currencies. I can't use Electrum BitCoin wallet to manage my Brazilian Reals (I don't have any, but anyways, it's an example). GNU Taler seems to try to solve it, since it doesn't create a currency on its own, but serve as a mere/simple transport agent. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Aseprite is now proprietary software
> What do people feel about bounties? You want a feature? Pay for it. If not > I'll get to it when I can. Bugs might be a tricky one but over charging > features can compensate for bugs? I like this idea. There have been times when I want a feature only to find the project is nearly dead or dying. I think the hurdle will be creating a payment system that works for all parties. I think Bitcoin shows promise - but as already mentioned, it can be hard for some to easily acquire. --