[License-discuss] Zimbra licenses ?
Good morning (i'm living in France), I do not found the Zimbra licenses on OSI web site : - Zimbra Public License : http://www.zimbra.com/license/zimbra-public-license-1-4.html - Zimbra Public EULA : https://www.zimbra.com/license/zimbra-public-eula-2-5.html - Zimbra Network LA : http://files.zimbra.com/website/docs/zimbra_network_la.pdf Do you plan to study? Thanks by advance ! ;o) Regards, Arno. ___ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
Re: [License-discuss] Zimbra licenses ?
a...@free.fr scripsit: I do not found the Zimbra licenses on OSI web site : - Zimbra Public License : http://www.zimbra.com/license/zimbra-public-license-1-4.html - Zimbra Public EULA : https://www.zimbra.com/license/zimbra-public-eula-2-5.html - Zimbra Network LA : http://files.zimbra.com/website/docs/zimbra_network_la.pdf Do you plan to study? In general, OSI doesn't certify licenses unless the creator of the license submits them. In my personal opinion (I don't speak for OSI), the ZPL by itself is an Open Source license without patent permissions. Its copyright provisions are very similar to the Mozilla Public License. The other two are not Open Source licenses, but specifically defer to the ZPL and other Open Source licenses in respect of any software released under those licenses. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy. Dennett and Bennett are well-known. Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett. There is also one Dummett. By their works shall ye know them. However, just as no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly known by his works. Indeed, Bummett does not exist. It is part of the function of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him. ___ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
Re: [License-discuss] Zimbra licenses ?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:08:06 +0100 (CET) a...@free.fr wrote: Good morning (i'm living in France), I do not found the Zimbra licenses on OSI web site : - Zimbra Public License : http://www.zimbra.com/license/zimbra-public-license-1-4.html - Zimbra Public EULA : https://www.zimbra.com/license/zimbra-public-eula-2-5.html - Zimbra Network LA : http://files.zimbra.com/website/docs/zimbra_network_la.pdf Do you plan to study? As far as I know, no version of the Zimbra Public License was never submitted to the OSI for approval as an open source license. I don't think anyone would contend either of the two referenced EULAs are open source licenses. Were the Zimbra Public License to be submitted for OSI approval I suspect the most interesting issue to consider would be its 'badgeware' requirement. - RF ___ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
