Error in FC4
Hello, I just installed Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. Ran the test.ly file and got the following error message: GNU LilyPond 2.6.3 /usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: In procedure dynamic-link in expression (load-extension libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1 scm_init_srfi_13): /usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: file: libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1, message: libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Did something fail to install properly? -- Tim Duncan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Slur adjusting
Hello,
I write a piece of Wagner, where there is many many slurs. To make
them look better (without collision with staff lines, accidentals,
other slurs and ties, to make them stick to notes) I use such
predefinitions:
\override Slur #'extra-offset...
\override Slur #'height-limit...
\override Slur #'control-points...
My version of Lilypond is 2.4.5 and my questions are:
1) How to revert the influance of such definitions after using it and
after the changed slur? I have problem especcialy with control-points
-- all the next slurs are changed. I have tried to use \once before
the override command, but then changing next slurs with another
command doesn't work at all. I've tried also putting the slured notes
into brackets { }, it has no effect either.
2) Is there any good method of changing slur curvature and slur
beginning point and ending point? Only control-points?
3) Why the slurs so often doesn't stick to notes they belog to? Am I
doing something wrong?
Best regards,
Anna Choma
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: version 2.6.x for debian (unstable or sarge)?
by far the easiest thing you can do is install with autopackage. It works, quite nicely. You can install it to your home directory. Unfortunately, there are not yet any 2.6 or 2.7 packages for Debian. So, if I understand correctly, at the moment the only way to get 2.6 or 2.7 for my debian systems would be installing from source, am I right? No. That is not what I said. You can also install via autopackage. Autopackage is a packaging system that, like apt/dpkg, keeps track of dependencies, and has various front-ends (both GUI and at the command line). You can install or uninstall it as root or as a regular user, alongside your normal, healthy dpkg system. I have had no major problems[1] with autopackage. If you are not interested in installing 2.6 or 2.7 from source, and are not interested in waiting for someone else to create a debian package for you, I strongly advise you to download the autopackage files. For general information on what autopackage is, go to autopackage.org. To save you the link-finding, http://autopackage.org/docs/howto-install/ explains how exactly to use the .autopackage files. [1] I've had no major problems, but I have had to manually fix problems with my $PATH settings that seem to come from autopackage messing with them when I opted to install autopackage locally rather than as root. There are several ways to avoid this. If you are interested, elaboration is easy. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Vertical spacing tweaks.
Fairchild wrote:
Not from me, but there have been many postings from individuals struggling
with page layout vertical springs. Suggest you ask the user list, with a
short description of the feature. (Or maybe anti-feature :-) )
I could implement the following:
- add a property
line-break-system-details
to NonMusicalPaperColumn
- This is an alist of properties, that are applied to the
system following a line-break at that point.
It could support the following properties:
Y-extent -- set the vertical size of the system (used as vertical
rods)
Y-refpoint-extent -- set the vertical size of the refpoints (used
as vertical springs)
PRICE: 130 euro
In addition, I could also make an
alignment-stretch-factor -- scale parameters used for vertical
alignments.
This would make it possible to set the distance between staves in
individual staves easily.
PRICE: 130 euro
With these feature in place, it would be possible to control vertical
spacing after line breaks. Of course, it's up to the user to force
certain breakpoints.
If there is sufficient interest, I can also include a -ddump-breaks ,
which writes a
line-breaks.ly
file, containing
breakLayout = { \skip 1*4
\break
\skip 1*3/4
\break
\pageBreak
.. etc ..
}
so that you can use page and line break layout, by doing
\score {
..my Music..
\breakLayout
}
PRICE: 130 euro
Contact me if you want to (co-)sponsor any of these features. Prices
include debugging, example files and limited documentation. Payment
costs and VAT (if applicable) are included in the prices.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: midi don't ties...
Alexandre Reche e Silva wrote: Peace Health in Jesus Christ I've noticed that the ties between same notes do not generate the equivalent sound in the midi file, e.g., two quarters notes tied sounds as two quarters indeed (and not as one half note). Why? Which LilyPond version? I tried a simple example in both version 2.6.3 and 2.7.10 and couldn't repeat the problem. If you have this problem in version 2.6.x, could you please send an example .ly file to the bug-lilypond mailing list that illustrates the problem? Shalon, a r s PS: I'm an old newbie in Lily and would like to know whether is a kind of template to orchestral music (woods, brasses, percussions, strings)? There's one example in the Tutorial. You may also want to take a look at the example called coriolan-margin.ly in the Tips and Tricks document. PS2: Is there a common practice in numbering code lines or even typeseting lily language? (Tabbing lines for example: 1 tab or three spaces or what?). Because since the program was launched it should have produced some standard use (like a good practice). I don't have nothing against democracy but some conventions would be pretty good; just in case one wishes read more easily another people's code. I don't think there is any formalized convention, but if you look at the examples in the manual, you will notice that they follow more or less the same conventions. I guess that some of the editors that have a LilyPond mode (jedit, emacs, vim, ...) may have some builtin support for tabbing and so on, which also provides a de-facto standard. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: templates
D Josiah Boothby wrote: you might try the lilypond snippet repository: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ Thanks... I was wondering. Since there's many ways to do things in Lilypond, there's also many ways to do them wrong. Are there some kind of review process when I add to the repository? Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: midi don't ties...
Peter Mogensen wrote: Alexandre Reche e Silva wrote: PS: I'm an old newbie in Lily and would like to know whether is a kind of template to orchestral music (woods, brasses, percussions, strings)? I have some templates for scores for marching band. (which have many of the same properties as orchestral scores.) The aim is to be able to easily transpose, quote and extract voices. It's still plagued by some bugs (lilypond and mine) though. Is there a place to submit such examples for others to see? Certainly, it's called the LilyPond Snippet Repository. Click at Documentation at the top of www.lilypond.org to find a link. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Missing file - piece.ly
What do you expect the file to contain? Where did you find a reference to it? /Mats alanvw wrote: Could someone tell me how or where I can access piece.ly file. Thank you, Alan Albury-Ward -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 16/09/2005 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Error in FC4
Why not search the mailing list archives? If you search in the archives for bug-lilypond for fedora libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so, you should find some relevant information. /Mats Timothy W. Duncan wrote: Hello, I just installed Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. Ran the test.ly file and got the following error message: GNU LilyPond 2.6.3 /usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: In procedure dynamic-link in expression (load-extension libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1 scm_init_srfi_13): /usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: file: libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1, message: libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Did something fail to install properly? -- Tim Duncan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Harp Pedals - programming error message
When I insert such a long markup:
--
_\markup { \large \bold {C} \natural \bold {D} \flat \bold {E} \sharp \bold
{F} \flat \bold {G} \natural \bold {A} \flat \bold {B} \sharp}
--
I got the following message (but the score compiles fine)
-
programming error: script direction not yet known
-
what's that?
Best Regards,
Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer
www.okonsar.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond and Tablatures
I hope you know that you can click on every example in the
on-line documentation, to see the corresponding LilyPond code.
For example, the second example in Section 7.5.2 Tablatures basic
seems very similar to what you want to do, right?
I modified your example a bit and included only the music in your
variables/definitions and put all the context related code
directly into \score{...}. I find it easier to understand the
full structure of the piece to do it that way, but you may
have other preferences. Anyway, after my modifications, the
code looks like this:
Melodie = {
\set Staff.midiInstrument = acoustic guitar (nylon)
\time 2/4
\key g \major
d'16-3 fis'-2 e'-0 c''-4 d' fis' e' c'' |
}
Basse = {
%!Nonprimary Voice
\set Staff.midiInstrument = acoustic guitar (nylon)
\time 2/4
\key g \major
\clef G_8
d'4 d' |
}
\score {
\context Staff = MelodieStaff
\clef G_8
\context Voice = Melodie {\voiceOne \Melodie}
\context Voice = Basse {\voiceTwo \Basse}
\context TabStaff = MelodieTab \Melodie
\layout {
}
\midi {
\tempo 4 = 80
}
}
/Mats
laurent ducos wrote:
Hi
i'm a french user of lilypond (my english is bad, sorry).
I would like that the partition is presented in this manner
Partition with two voice (i arrived there) an below the tablature of the
\Melodie voice (in spite of my research in documentation I do not arrive
there )
Thanks to help me
-
\version 2.6.0
blanknotes = {
\override Voice.NoteHead
#'transparent = ##t
\override Voice.Stem
#'transparent = ##t
}
unblanknotes = {\revert Voice.NoteHead #'transparent
\revert Voice.Stem #'transparent
}
\header{
title = Brasileirinho
subtitle =
poet =
composer = Joao Pernambuco
meter =
opus =
arranger = Laurent Ducos
instrument =
dedication =
piece =
head =
copyright = Gnu General Public Licence
footer =
tagline =
}
#(set-global-staff-size 20)
Melodie = \context Voice = Melodie {
\set Staff.midiInstrument = acoustic guitar (nylon)
\time 2/4
\key g \major
\clef G_8
\stemUp
d'16-3 fis'-2 e'-0 c''-4 d' fis' e' c'' |
}
Basse = \context Voice = Basse {
%!Nonprimary Voice
\set Staff.midiInstrument = acoustic guitar (nylon)
\time 2/4
\key g \major
\clef G_8
\stemDown
d'4 d' |
}
MelodieStaff = \context Staff = MelodieStaff
\Melodie
\Basse
\score {
\MelodieStaff
\layout {
}
\midi {
\tempo 4 = 80
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: templates
Peter Mogensen wrote: Thanks... I was wondering. Since there's many ways to do things in Lilypond, there's also many ways to do them wrong. Are there some kind of review process when I add to the repository? Anyway... He're an example (I think there's no copyright problems with this one): http://bigendian.dk/lily/ Please tell me if you think it's good enough to upload. As I said, it's not perfect. When I look at the source, I can think of the following problem/hacks: * Ties are not continued into second endings * There's no support for flams, ruffs and rolls in Lilypond (slip=flam) * I had to make ghost gracenotes in the other instruments because of flams in the snare voice * It's difficult to get rehearsalmarks to not collide with volta and other text like Fine and metronome indications. * I was lucky with this piece that tremolo strokes were not needed on any beamed notes (to simulate ruffs and rolls). Beames would have caused them to align to the beam, producing wrong results. * When you create a \book, you can change the piece text for each piece, but you can't change the instrument. So I used piece * The final partial meassure has a r4, which doesn't show. The reason is that I had to use R4 to get the staff hidden when empty. (look the last measure of the drumStaff) * When using a one-line staff, rehearsalmarks think they can move closer to the remaining line... and then they collide with the bars :( * Bar numbers collide with StaffGroup braces. * I had to do a wierd hack to the last full measure of the snare and explicitly write the beam. Else Lilypond would place to stroked 8ths instead... Don't know why. ... oh.. .and don't mind the MIDI-info. It's probably broken. Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Viewing Postscript Files in Windows..
Hi All, A quick update on viewing postscript files in windows... especially gsview... Thanks to the response by Peter Mongensen I was able to view the postscript file he created... this was created with Linux.Debian Sarge+DeMuDiLilypond 2.4.5tetex-bin 2.0.2-30gs 8.01-5 This means that there is some problem with how the postscript file is created under the windows version of Lilypond... since postscript files produced by a Linux version of Lilypond can be viewed with gsview under windows... Trent ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: templates
Trent Johnston wrote: It's been on the list for a while... the windows native version produces a postscript file that can't be viewed for some reason... The postscript files produced with the linux version of Lilypond can be viewed... Obviously it's bug with Lilypond and not with the windows version.. thanks... Hmm.. from what I've heard that doesn't seem too obvious to me. If the Lilypond output is the same on the two platforms and the Linux Postscript file is postscript-correct, it seems more to be a problem with postscript-handling on Windows (which is not something which surprises me) If my PS-file works, then why not try to run my .ly file with Lilypond 2.4.5 on Windows and compare at which stages the output differs? Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: templates
Thanks for that Peter... It's been on the list for a while... the windows native version produces a postscript file that can't be viewed for some reason... The postscript files produced with the linux version of Lilypond can be viewed... Obviously it's bug with Lilypond and not with the windows version.. thanks... Hmm... I haven't done anything to make it work. I normally only use PS, since it takess too long (IMHO) to run Lilypond when also producing PDF. Yes .. PDF is very cumbersome ... so that's why I'm trying to use the postscript files but they don't seem to work in the windows version... Thanks again.. Trent ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: templates
Hi Peter, The postscript file you have with your ly file on the website.. was that produced with a linux or windows native or windows cgwin version of lilypond?? This is quite off topic to what you originally sent the email for... but windows users have had trouble opening postscript files under gsview but for some reason the postscript file you had on your website seemed to work.. any help with the lilypond platform would be of great help... Thanks.. Trent - Original Message - From: Peter Mogensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 8:37 PM Subject: Re: templates Peter Mogensen wrote: Thanks... I was wondering. Since there's many ways to do things in Lilypond, there's also many ways to do them wrong. Are there some kind of review process when I add to the repository? Anyway... He're an example (I think there's no copyright problems with this one): http://bigendian.dk/lily/ Please tell me if you think it's good enough to upload. As I said, it's not perfect. When I look at the source, I can think of the following problem/hacks: * Ties are not continued into second endings * There's no support for flams, ruffs and rolls in Lilypond (slip=flam) * I had to make ghost gracenotes in the other instruments because of flams in the snare voice * It's difficult to get rehearsalmarks to not collide with volta and other text like Fine and metronome indications. * I was lucky with this piece that tremolo strokes were not needed on any beamed notes (to simulate ruffs and rolls). Beames would have caused them to align to the beam, producing wrong results. * When you create a \book, you can change the piece text for each piece, but you can't change the instrument. So I used piece * The final partial meassure has a r4, which doesn't show. The reason is that I had to use R4 to get the staff hidden when empty. (look the last measure of the drumStaff) * When using a one-line staff, rehearsalmarks think they can move closer to the remaining line... and then they collide with the bars :( * Bar numbers collide with StaffGroup braces. * I had to do a wierd hack to the last full measure of the snare and explicitly write the beam. Else Lilypond would place to stroked 8ths instead... Don't know why. ... oh.. .and don't mind the MIDI-info. It's probably broken. Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Viewing Postscript Files in Windows..
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 13.38, Trent Johnston wrote: Hi All, A quick update on viewing postscript files in windows... especially gsview... Thanks to the response by Peter Mongensen I was able to view the postscript file he created... this was created with Linux. Debian Sarge+DeMuDi Lilypond 2.4.5 lilypond 2.4.x uses a completely different mechanism for producing postscript files, than 2.6. To view lilypond 2.6 output, you will most likely need ghostscript = 8.15 (gsview uses ghostscript to display the files) -- Erik ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Vertical spacing tweaks.
Fairchild wrote: Han-Wen - What I proposed is to implement individual line spacing control with\breakSpace #n to force n staff spaces between lines, and \pageBreakSpace #n to force n staff spaces at the bottom of a page. Spacing following normal breaks or those forced with \break or \pageBreak would be calculated as now. This presents a simple syntax to the user, and allows precise vertical spacing of individual lines or of an entire page if each line is followed by a \breakSpace or \pageBreakSpace. What I am proposing is a more fine-grained control of the spacing engine. It would be possible to write syntactic sugar (eg. \breakSpace #XXX ) to make that mechanism more palatable to the casual user. Usually, syntax sugar is the easy part of solving a problem. I propose that the hard parts of the problem be addressed first. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: templates
Peter Mogensen wrote: As I said, it's not perfect. When I look at the source, I can think of the following problem/hacks: * Ties are not continued into second endings oh ... one thing more... * How do I force page-breaks between each \score in a \book ? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: templates
Great that you want to contribute! Some comments: - Citing the introductory text of the LSR: LSR is a place where people can contribute there creative ideas ...these ideas are represented by snippets of Lilypond sources—small examples, short and to the point, that show a particular feature or a hack. I have myself argued that LSR is also a place for templates, i.e. examples of how to organize an .ly file. Before you submit your score, take a moment to consider what it really is you want to illustrate. The impression I got when looking at your example was that it illustrated a large number of different things. Maybe it's better to cut it down and separate out several snippets where each is more focused on some specific aspect? - Add comments in the code to make it easier for others to follow what you are doing. - See below for specific comments on the issues you brought up. Peter Mogensen wrote: Peter Mogensen wrote: Thanks... I was wondering. Since there's many ways to do things in Lilypond, there's also many ways to do them wrong. Are there some kind of review process when I add to the repository? Anyway... He're an example (I think there's no copyright problems with this one): http://bigendian.dk/lily/ Please tell me if you think it's good enough to upload. As I said, it's not perfect. When I look at the source, I can think of the following problem/hacks: * Ties are not continued into second endings The standard trick is to add a tie from an invisible note. You can find several examples in the mailing list archives. * There's no support for flams, ruffs and rolls in Lilypond (slip=flam) Here you can also find some examples of solutions in the mailing list archives, using embedded postscript commands. * I had to make ghost gracenotes in the other instruments because of flams in the snare voice * It's difficult to get rehearsalmarks to not collide with volta and other text like Fine and metronome indications. The standard solution is to move all rehearsal marks upwards by increasing the padding property. * I was lucky with this piece that tremolo strokes were not needed on any beamed notes (to simulate ruffs and rolls). Beames would have caused them to align to the beam, producing wrong results. * When you create a \book, you can change the piece text for each piece, but you can't change the instrument. So I used piece Read about printallheaders in 10.1.4 Page formatting in the manual. * The final partial meassure has a r4, which doesn't show. The reason is that I had to use R4 to get the staff hidden when empty. (look the last measure of the drumStaff) One possible workaround is to use the \tag feature described in 8.2.8 Different editions from one source * When using a one-line staff, rehearsalmarks think they can move closer to the remaining line... and then they collide with the bars :( Send an example to bug-lilypond. * Bar numbers collide with StaffGroup braces. Well-known problem. Just increase the padding of the BarNumber layout object. * I had to do a wierd hack to the last full measure of the snare and explicitly write the beam. Else Lilypond would place to stroked 8ths instead... Don't know why. ... oh.. .and don't mind the MIDI-info. It's probably broken. Peter /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: templates
It's described in the manual for version 2.6 and in several emails in the mailing list archives. /Mats Peter Mogensen wrote: Peter Mogensen wrote: As I said, it's not perfect. When I look at the source, I can think of the following problem/hacks: * Ties are not continued into second endings oh ... one thing more... * How do I force page-breaks between each \score in a \book ? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Viewing Postscript Files in Windows..
If you read earlier emails on this thread, you will notice that it doesn't help to upgrade to ghostscript =8.15 in Windows. Also, for files produced by LilyPond 2.6 or newer, it doesn't help if it was produced in Linux or Windows, I get the same error message from GSView anyway. /Mats Erik Sandberg wrote: On Tuesday 20 September 2005 13.38, Trent Johnston wrote: Hi All, A quick update on viewing postscript files in windows... especially gsview... Thanks to the response by Peter Mongensen I was able to view the postscript file he created... this was created with Linux. Debian Sarge+DeMuDi Lilypond 2.4.5 lilypond 2.4.x uses a completely different mechanism for producing postscript files, than 2.6. To view lilypond 2.6 output, you will most likely need ghostscript = 8.15 (gsview uses ghostscript to display the files) -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
pdf pickle
Hi all, I have a lily file that with png output I ended up with two documents. however the pdf ouput gives me a multipage pdf which I don't want how do I force the ps2pdf output to be two documents? thanks Aaron __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Wrong type argument in position 1 error and other questions
I've cut out a lot of the extra stuff from my file.
I'm guessing nobody looked at it.
I tried to do some more examination and found that 2
things need to be present to get the error. The \time
2/4 statement has to be present AND more than 2
measures in the nextguitar section need to be present.
Again I'm using version 2.6.0 in cygwin.
The full error message is:
Calculating line breaks...
[3][5]/usr/share/lilypond/2.6.0/scm/output-lib.scm:43:24:
In procedure cadr in expression (cadr note-collums):
/usr/share/lilypond/2.6.0/scm/output-lib.scm:43:24:
Wrong type argument in position 1: ()
I fixed the warning: Junking event: `KeyChangeEvent':
messages by moving the \key g \major statement
within the \new Staff declaration.
Thanks for any help.
guitarmusic =
{
\time 4/4
g,16\6 d\5 g\4 c'\3~ c'\3 g\4 d\5 g,\6
bes,16\6 d16\5 g16\4 c'16\3~ c'4\3
f,16\6 c16\5 f16\4 c'16\3~ c'16\3 f16\4 c16\5
d,16\6
e,16\6 b,16\5 e16\4 b16\3~ b8.\3 d,16\6
f,\6 bes,\5 ees\4 aes\3~ aes\3 ees\4 bes,\5 ees,\6
d,\6 c\5 d\4 a\3~ a4\3~
\time 2/4
}
nextguitar =
{
r4 r8. bes'16\3 d''4\3~ d''16\3( e''8.\3
bes'8\3 a'16\3 g'\3~) g'4\3~ g'2\3(
bes'4.\3 b'8\3 d''2\3~)
d''2\3
}
chordlist = \chords
{
g2:sus4 bes2:6 9
f2:1.5.8 e2:1.5.8
ees2:sus4 d1:7^3
}
\version 2.6.0
\score
{
\new StaffGroup
\new ChordNames \tempo 4=52 \chordlist
\new Staff { \key g \major \clef G_8
\guitarmusic }
\new TabStaff
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #'(4 -1 -5 -10
-15 -22)
{
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
\override Dots #'transparent = ##t
\override Beam #'transparent = ##t
\guitarmusic
}
\new Staff {\key g \major \clef G_8
\nextguitar}
\new TabStaff {
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
\override Dots #'transparent = ##t
\override Beam #'transparent = ##t
\nextguitar
}
}
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
metric modulation problem
(Sorry if this message was already sent, I had problems with the mail)
Hi,
I am trying to put a metric modulation mark, but I cannot find a way to achieve
it:
so far I have:
{a1 \mark \markup { \tiny \note #8 #1 = \tiny \note #8 #1 } a1}
but I would like to have the bracket and the number of a tuplet above the
first eight symbol, to show that the previous eight notes within tuplets,
are, in the new tempo, equal to simple eight notes.
You can have a look on those web pages:
http://hometown.aol.com/loudfonts/TempiFnt.htm
and
http://www.dimusicengraving.com/metric_modulation.htm
any suggestion?
Regards,
Libero Mureddu
lilypond 2.7.10
macos 10.4.2
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Wrong type argument in position 1 error and other questions
Kevin -
I looked at it. Your truncated file compiles without error in version
2.4.6.
The output looks strange, attached.
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kevin Nowaczyk
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:08 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Wrong type argument in position 1 error and other questions
I've cut out a lot of the extra stuff from my file.
I'm guessing nobody looked at it.
I tried to do some more examination and found that 2
things need to be present to get the error. The \time
2/4 statement has to be present AND more than 2
measures in the nextguitar section need to be present.
Again I'm using version 2.6.0 in cygwin.
The full error message is:
Calculating line breaks...
[3][5]/usr/share/lilypond/2.6.0/scm/output-lib.scm:43:24:
In procedure cadr in expression (cadr note-collums):
/usr/share/lilypond/2.6.0/scm/output-lib.scm:43:24:
Wrong type argument in position 1: ()
I fixed the warning: Junking event: `KeyChangeEvent':
messages by moving the \key g \major statement
within the \new Staff declaration.
Thanks for any help.
guitarmusic =
{
\time 4/4
g,16\6 d\5 g\4 c'\3~ c'\3 g\4 d\5 g,\6
bes,16\6 d16\5 g16\4 c'16\3~ c'4\3
f,16\6 c16\5 f16\4 c'16\3~ c'16\3 f16\4 c16\5
d,16\6
e,16\6 b,16\5 e16\4 b16\3~ b8.\3 d,16\6
f,\6 bes,\5 ees\4 aes\3~ aes\3 ees\4 bes,\5 ees,\6
d,\6 c\5 d\4 a\3~ a4\3~
\time 2/4
}
nextguitar =
{
r4 r8. bes'16\3 d''4\3~ d''16\3( e''8.\3
bes'8\3 a'16\3 g'\3~) g'4\3~ g'2\3(
bes'4.\3 b'8\3 d''2\3~)
d''2\3
}
chordlist = \chords
{
g2:sus4 bes2:6 9
f2:1.5.8 e2:1.5.8
ees2:sus4 d1:7^3
}
\version 2.6.0
\score
{
\new StaffGroup
\new ChordNames \tempo 4=52 \chordlist
\new Staff { \key g \major \clef G_8
\guitarmusic }
\new TabStaff
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #'(4 -1 -5 -10
-15 -22)
{
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
\override Dots #'transparent = ##t
\override Beam #'transparent = ##t
\guitarmusic
}
\new Staff {\key g \major \clef G_8
\nextguitar}
\new TabStaff {
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
\override Dots #'transparent = ##t
\override Beam #'transparent = ##t
\nextguitar
}
}
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Saints.png
Description: PNG image
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: pdf pickle
The only method I know of to get two output PDF files from one and
the same .ly file is to include two \book{...} blocks in the .ly file.
Each \book{...} will result in one separate output file. Example
\version 2.6.0
\book{
% The score of the first output file
\score{
\relative c'{c d e f | g1}
}
}
\book{
% The score of the second output file
\score{
\relative c'{c e g e | c1}
}
}
/Mats
Aaron Mehl wrote:
Hi all,
I have a lily file that with png output I ended up
with two documents.
however the pdf ouput gives me a multipage pdf which I
don't want how do I force the ps2pdf output to be two
documents?
thanks
Aaron
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Autopackage for bash
In July, I tried installing Lilypond 2.6.0, but the autopackage did not work. I am running GNU bash 1.14.7(1) under Caldera OpenLinux 2.2.14. I recently tried again with 2.7.4 and got the same error messages: === ./lilypond-2.7.4.x86.package: [[: command not found ./lilypond-2.7.4.x86.package: [[: command not found ./lilypond-2.7.4.x86.package: [[: command not found ./lilypond-2.7.4.x86.package: [[: command not found ./lilypond-2.7.4.x86.package: [[: command not found ./lilypond-2.7.4.x86.package: [[: command not found chmod: : No such file or directory ./lilypond-2.7.4.x86.package: [[: command not found /meta/@lilypond.org/lilypond:2.7.4/apkg-installer: syntax error near unexpected token `x=(`' /meta/@lilypond.org/lilypond:2.7.4/apkg-installer: /meta/@lilypond.org/lilypond:2.7.4/apkg-installer: line 14: `x=(`echo $x`)' === As far as I know, [[ ]] is ksh syntax, not bash syntax. I would be most grateful to know of a package that works with bash, or of any other solution. Thank you. M. T. Chen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
subject headers (WAS Re: templates)
As a small note, and a little off topic, more users will benefit more from these discussions if the subject tag indicates what is being discussed. Josiah On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:37 +0200, Peter Mogensen wrote: Trent Johnston wrote: It's been on the list for a while... the windows native version produces a postscript file that can't be viewed for some reason... The postscript files produced with the linux version of Lilypond can be viewed... Obviously it's bug with Lilypond and not with the windows version.. thanks... Hmm.. from what I've heard that doesn't seem too obvious to me. If the Lilypond output is the same on the two platforms and the Linux Postscript file is postscript-correct, it seems more to be a problem with postscript-handling on Windows (which is not something which surprises me) If my PS-file works, then why not try to run my .ly file with Lilypond 2.4.5 on Windows and compare at which stages the output differs? Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Autopackage for bash
Chen Ming Tien writes: In July, I tried installing Lilypond 2.6.0, but the autopackage did not work. I am running GNU bash 1.14.7(1) under Caldera OpenLinux 2.2.14. As far as I know, [[ ]] is ksh syntax, not bash syntax. This feature was added to bash-2.02, in 1998. Please upgrade your bash software, or send a bug report to the autopackage developers. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond for Windows 2.5.28 - Guile error
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Mojca Miklavec writes: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/22512. Well, the script calls lilypond filename. Maybe it should call $(which lilypond) filename. Why doesn't it happen already at the installation time then? Because I do not know how to do that, and none of the core developers use windows or knows very much about it. I tried using BAT wrappers to fix this problem of installation time prefixes, but that was a complete and utter disaster. I had quite some help and input from windows users/programmers, but we could not manage to produce something that would work on more than one flavour of windows. Just to make sure: does that mean that something like: # in file lilypond.bat somewhere in PATH: C:\progs\lilypond\usr\bin\lilypond.exe %1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9 doesn't work on older versions of windows (or that it reduces/badly influences the lilypond functionality)? For simple cases it seems to work on XP. I can perhaps try it on windows 98, but I would have to search for windows 95 slightly longer. (I guess that lilypond.bat also has to be placed somewhere else than lilypond.exe then.) Thank you, Mojca ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ties in second endings
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
* Ties are not continued into second endings
The standard trick is to add a tie from an invisible note. You can
find several examples in the mailing list archives.
I did that.
But this is also one of the examples where the hack doesn't play well
with the entire score. This invisible note takes up space, which ruins
the alignment with notes in other staffs where there's no tie.
I just realized that one possibility to solve this is to make the
invisible note a grace note. In that way, it won't destroy the
rhythm. Example:
\version 2.6.0
\score{
\new Voice \relative c' {
\repeat volta 2 {c d2 e4 | f g a2 ~ }
\alternative{{a4 g2 f4 | e2 d }{ \grace{\hideNotes a'4~} \unHideNotes
a g e d\ | c1 }}
}
}
Unfortunately this seems to give the same problem as when the music
starts with a grace note (causing the time sign to be duplicated).
Only now it's the second volta-spanner which is duplicated.
So... two hacks would be required.
Oh... Apropos co-sponsoring.
I would like to co-sponsor the second ending tie bug being resolved.
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Partcombine music
Hello, I write an orchestra piece and have some problem with partcombine formatting. 1) I need to have some control over partcombine setting. It's done automaticcaly (sometimes stems and slurs are written in two oposite directions and there are two voices, sometimes the two voices are linked into one). How to achieve control over such formatting? I would like to have more one voice formatting with a sign a2. Two voices are very often identicall, so why are they split? 2) How to raise a little the solo word in partcombine music? It appears automatically and it's ok. Best regards, Anna Choma ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Slur adjusting
Thank you very much. I've just installed version 2.6.3 and many slurs
look a little better. But still they need some predefinitions, so I
didn't remove commands \override. They work still.
Best regards,
Anna Choma
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The slur support has been reimplemented in version 2.6 and
further improved in the latest development versions, 2.7.9
or later. Before you invest too much time on tweaking the
output of version 2.4, you may want to try a newer version.
Note also that you cannot expect the tweaks you do for version 2.4
to be of any specific relevance in later LilyPond versions.
Anna Choma wrote:
Hello,
I write a piece of Wagner, where there is many many slurs. To make
them look better (without collision with staff lines, accidentals,
other slurs and ties, to make them stick to notes) I use such
predefinitions:
\override Slur #'extra-offset...
\override Slur #'height-limit...
\override Slur #'control-points...
My version of Lilypond is 2.4.5 and my questions are:
1) How to revert the influance of such definitions after using it and
after the changed slur? I have problem especcialy with control-points
-- all the next slurs are changed. I have tried to use \once before
the override command, but then changing next slurs with another
command doesn't work at all. I've tried also putting the slured notes
into brackets { }, it has no effect either.
You should definitely use \once. The question is just where you
should specify the settings, before the beginning of the slur or
before the end of the slur. I don't know the answer, so you had
better try it out yourself.
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
