Re: Fwd: Re: How do I add a small fermata?
Paul Scott-4 wrote:
On 06/08/2011 09:48 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Moving this back to the list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: How do I add a small fermata?
Date:Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:37:41 -0400
From:Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net
To: Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com
mailto:waterho...@ultrasw.com wrote:
On 06/08/2011 02:32 PM, Nils wrote:
How do I create a small fermata to show that it is not
original but inserted by the editor?
^\markup{ \fontsize #1 \musicglyph #scripts.ufermata }
where you choose any value you want instead of #1.
HTH
Paul Scott
is it normal that with the markup the fermata appears on the left side
of the note unlike the \fermata which appears right on top and centered?
Nils didn't say that he was talking about a fermata over a note. :)
I looked for a while in the Internals Reference without finding how to
change the font size of a fermata over a note.
Maybe someone else can help.
\override Script #'font-size = #-9
c'1 \fermata
\override MultiMeasureRestText #'font-size = #-6
R1 -\fermataMarkup
should help
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Fwd%3A-Re%3A-How-do-I-add-a-small-fermata--tp31806461p31806687.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How do I add a small fermata?
Good morning,
if you place the fermata as a MarkupTextScript event, you can shift it with
self-alignment-X:
--snip--
\once \override TextScript #'self-alignment-X = #-0.6
c^\markup { \fontsize #0 \musicglyph #scripts.ufermata }
--snip--
If you concat the ufermata with other text, you can see, that its used extent
does not apply to
its visual extent. So it will not be centered, if you set self-alignment-X to
0. With fonsize = #0
and self-alignment-X = #-0.6 it looks quite well.
Cheers,
Jan-Peter
Am 09.06.2011 um 07:00 schrieb Paul Scott:
On 06/08/2011 09:48 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Moving this back to the list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: How do I add a small fermata?
Date:Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:37:41 -0400
From:Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net
To: Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com wrote:
On 06/08/2011 02:32 PM, Nils wrote:
How do I create a small fermata to show that it is not original but inserted
by the editor?
^\markup{ \fontsize #1 \musicglyph #scripts.ufermata }
where you choose any value you want instead of #1.
HTH
Paul Scott
is it normal that with the markup the fermata appears on the left side of
the note unlike the \fermata which appears right on top and centered?
Nils didn't say that he was talking about a fermata over a note. :)
I looked for a while in the Internals Reference without finding how to change
the font size of a fermata over a note.
Maybe someone else can help.
Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How do I add a small fermata?
Hello again,
of course overriding Script is more convinient. Here are the examples:
--snip--
\version 2.14.0
\relative c'' {
\once \override TextScript #'self-alignment-X = #-0.7
c1_markup^\markup { \fontsize #-3 \musicglyph #scripts.ufermata }
\once \override Script #'font-size = #-3
\once \override Script #'padding = #0.3
c_Script\fermata
c_normal\fermata
}
--snip--
I prefer using \once \override over \override ... \revert. But thats a matter
of taste I think ;-)
In the example above I added a little padding, wich lifts the fermata a little
bit. And again thats a matter of tas
Cheers, Jan-Peter
Am 09.06.2011 um 08:00 schrieb -Eluze:
Paul Scott-4 wrote:
On 06/08/2011 09:48 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Moving this back to the list.
Original Message
Subject:Re: How do I add a small fermata?
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:37:41 -0400
From: Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net
To: Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com
mailto:waterho...@ultrasw.com wrote:
On 06/08/2011 02:32 PM, Nils wrote:
How do I create a small fermata to show that it is not
original but inserted by the editor?
^\markup{ \fontsize #1 \musicglyph #scripts.ufermata }
where you choose any value you want instead of #1.
HTH
Paul Scott
is it normal that with the markup the fermata appears on the left side
of the note unlike the \fermata which appears right on top and centered?
Nils didn't say that he was talking about a fermata over a note. :)
I looked for a while in the Internals Reference without finding how to
change the font size of a fermata over a note.
Maybe someone else can help.
\override Script #'font-size = #-9
c'1 \fermata
\override MultiMeasureRestText #'font-size = #-6
R1 -\fermataMarkup
should help
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Fwd%3A-Re%3A-How-do-I-add-a-small-fermata--tp31806461p31806687.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fwd: Re: How do I add a small fermata?
Paul Scott-4 wrote: is it normal that with the markup the fermata appears on the left side of the note unlike the \fermata which appears right on top and centered? there is a snippet which should meet your needs: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1id=637 Centering markup on note heads automatically cheers Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Fwd%3A-Re%3A-How-do-I-add-a-small-fermata--tp31806461p31806965.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How do I add a small fermata?
On 06/08/2011 11:21 PM, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
Good morning,
if you place the fermata as a MarkupTextScript event, you can shift it with
self-alignment-X:
--snip--
\once \override TextScript #'self-alignment-X = #-0.6
c^\markup { \fontsize #0 \musicglyph #scripts.ufermata }
That should not normally be necessary. Most needs would be either a
regular \fermata over a note or \fermataMarkup.
I should have realized that the one over a note would be a TextScript.
So
Eluze's simple answers should be all that are normally needed.
Thanks,
Paul
--snip--
If you concat the ufermata with other text, you can see, that its used extent
does not apply to
its visual extent. So it will not be centered, if you set self-alignment-X to
0. With fonsize = #0
and self-alignment-X = #-0.6 it looks quite well.
Cheers,
Jan-Peter
Am 09.06.2011 um 07:00 schrieb Paul Scott:
On 06/08/2011 09:48 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Moving this back to the list.
Original Message
Subject:Re: How do I add a small fermata?
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:37:41 -0400
From: Marc Mouriesm...@mouries.net
To: Paul Scottwaterho...@ultrasw.com
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Paul Scottwaterho...@ultrasw.com wrote:
On 06/08/2011 02:32 PM, Nils wrote:
How do I create a small fermata to show that it is not original but inserted by
the editor?
^\markup{ \fontsize #1 \musicglyph #scripts.ufermata }
where you choose any value you want instead of #1.
HTH
Paul Scott
is it normal that with the markup the fermata appears on the left side of the
note unlike the \fermata which appears right on top and centered?
Nils didn't say that he was talking about a fermata over a note. :)
I looked for a while in the Internals Reference without finding how to change
the font size of a fermata over a note.
Maybe someone else can help.
Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Paul Scott
Librarian
Southern Arizona Symphony Orchestra
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Removing manual beams when multiplying note values
- Original Message -
From: Nicholas Moe moe.nicho...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:40 PM
Subject: Removing manual beams when multiplying note values
Hello,
I am replicating a handwritten score of Renaissance polyphony. I
entered the notes with \autoBeamOff and manually entered the beams
where they were needed using square brackets. Later, I decided I
wanted to double the values of the notes, as is common with this type
of music. I figured out how to do it by using a snippet in The
LilyPond Report #19 and removing the beam stencils. But now I get all
sorts of errors. How do I suppress these?
Thanks,
Nick
BEGIN MINIMAL EXAMPLE
\version 2.13.61
looksSlower =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
(let ((new-music (ly:music-deep-copy music)))
(shift-duration-log new-music -1 0)
new-music))
\relative c' {
\looksSlower{
\autoBeamOff
\override Beam #'stencil = ##f
a8[ b]
}
}
Since you're removing the beam stencil and therefore stopping displaying any
form of beam, wouldn't the simplest solution be to remove the manual beams
([]) with a text editor search and replace?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
6/9 chord
When writing a 6/9 chord, for example c:6.9, the given chord symbol is C6/add9 whereas it should be C6/9 in my opinion. add9 would be correct if the 7 is omitted. Well, it is, but it is usual to just write 6/9 for that chord. Any idea how I could do this? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: 6/9 chord
Hello, From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Peter Crighton [petecrigh...@googlemail.com] Sent: 09 June 2011 12:09 To: LilyPond Mailing List Subject: 6/9 chord When writing a 6/9 chord, for example c:6.9, the given chord symbol is C6/add9 whereas it should be C6/9 in my opinion. add9 would be correct if the 7 is omitted. Well, it is, but it is usual to just write 6/9 for that chord. Any idea how I could do this? ___ http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=517 ? James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Correct Figured Bass signs (slashed and crossed numbers)
Hello, I need correct baroque figured bass signs not the modern equivalents which Lilypond provides. For example the slashed 6 where the slash is only in the upper part or the slashed 4 where the slash goes vertically through the right side of the 4, creating a 4+. http://www.musiktheorie-aktuell.de/tutorials/regola/Hahn_petiteSixte.png . 6 in the lower row, 4+ in the upper. There are other signs like this, but if anyone knows at all what I'm talking about he or she will surely know the rest. Anyone created such a set? If not, how can I do it on my own? (Publishers will) Nils ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Small notes in chords
How can I make some notes of a chord (for example background vocals) smaller than the lead melody? I know of tweaking the font-size, but I don't want to do this for every single note… Is there an easier way? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Correct Figured Bass signs (slashed and crossed numbers)
NIls From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Nils [n...@hammerfeste.com] Sent: 09 June 2011 12:22 To: LilyPond Mailing List Subject: Correct Figured Bass signs (slashed and crossed numbers) Hello, I need correct baroque figured bass signs not the modern equivalents which Lilypond provides. For example the slashed 6 where the slash is only in the upper part or the slashed 4 where the slash goes vertically through the right side of the 4, creating a 4+. http://www.musiktheorie-aktuell.de/tutorials/regola/Hahn_petiteSixte.png . 6 in the lower row, 4+ in the upper. There are other signs like this, but if anyone knows at all what I'm talking about he or she will surely know the rest. Anyone created such a set? If not, how can I do it on my own? (Publishers will) -- http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/other#index-_005cbackslashed_002ddigit This isn't what you want I know but might give you some clues (or others) how you could go about creating that specific FB char without re-inventing the wheel. James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Small notes in chords
Peter Crighton petecrigh...@googlemail.com writes: How can I make some notes of a chord (for example background vocals) smaller than the lead melody? I know of tweaking the font-size, but I don't want to do this for every single note… Is there an easier way? This does not really make sense. A chord is something happening in a single voice. Where do you get that single voice from? Are you using a partcombiner? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Correct Figured Bass signs (slashed and crossed numbers)
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2011, 13:22:06 schrieb Nils: I need correct baroque figured bass signs not the modern equivalents which Lilypond provides. Yes, that's a valid feature request in my eyes (actually, I'll need them too for my own editions). For example the slashed 6 where the slash is only in the upper part The slashed 6 in your example is apparently a very old variation. In most modern editions the slash is diagonally through the upper arc of the 6. or the slashed 4 where the slash goes vertically through the right side of the 4, creating a 4+. http://www.musiktheorie-aktuell.de/tutorials/regola/Hahn_petiteSixte.png . 6 in the lower row, 4+ in the upper. There are other signs like this, but if anyone knows at all what I'm talking about he or she will surely know the rest. Basically, a complete set of slashed digits that I encountered so far are: 2+ with the vertical slash through the extended horizontal line of the 2 4+ with the vertical slash through the extended horizontal line of the 4 5+ with the vertical slash through the extended horizontal line of the 5 6+ with the slash diagonally (left top to right bottom through the upper curve of the 6 See also: http://www.robertkelleyphd.com/FiguredBass.pdf Note, however, that these slashed 6 digits were used mainly only in hand- written scores and in modern printed scores. Many printed scores of the 19th centuries have the slashes for the 6 like lilypond. See e.g. page 8 of Mozart's Benedictus sit Deus, Alte Mozart Ausgabe (Wolfgang Amadeus Mozarts Werke, Serie III: Kleinere geistliche Gesangwerke. Leipzig: Breitkopf Härtel, 1880. Plate W.A.M. 117.): http://216.129.110.22/files/imglnks/usimg/5/53/IMSLP78470-PMLP158784- Mozart_Werke_Breitkopf_Serie_03_KV117.pdf (The 4+ is printed as described above, see e.g. p.13) On the other hand, some printed scores of the 19th century have the slashes as you suggest them E.g. line 2 measure 4, or line 6 measure 1 of: http://imslp.info/files/imglnks/usimg/e/ef/IMSLP32559-PMLP74139- Eybler_Graduale_DiesSanctificatus_HV61_Org.pdf I have encountered the 5+ only once: http://216.129.110.22/files/imglnks/usimg/0/0b/IMSLP32525-PMLP74102- Eybler_SperateInDeo_Org.pdf Anyone created such a set? If not, how can I do it on my own? (Publishers will) No, but it would be great to have it. Cheers, Reinhold -- -- Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Small notes in chords
Hello,
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Peter
Crighton [petecrigh...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 09 June 2011 12:59
To: LilyPond Mailing List
Subject: Small notes in chords
How can I make some notes of a chord (for example background vocals)
smaller than the lead melody? I know of tweaking the font-size, but I
don't want to do this for every single note… Is there an easier way?
___
You could try using a CueVoice context..this makes the notes in that voice the
size of..err..well cue notes :)
I'm currently updating the documentation so there is nothing that useful there
just yet apart from an email or two I have but this snippet might help (I am
adapting it for the help system)
\relative {
R1
{ e2\rest r4. e8 }
\new CueVoice
{ \stemUp d'8^flute c d e fis2 }
d,4 r a r
}
Hopefully you get the idea
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Removing manual beams when multiplying note values
I would like to keep the option of using either system. And after
further thought, I wouldn't want to remove every beam since the few
sixteenth notes I have would be converted to eighth notes, and I would
want to keep those beams. I did a search for 16 and created these
commands to place before and after those instances:
removeBeams = \override Beam #'stencil = ##f
showBeams = \override Beam #'stencil = ##t
If I'm compiling without multiplying note values, I can set these to
null and get back to where I began.
Since I'm working off of a score with modernised rhythms, I'm content
with doing my compilation checks without multiplying. After everything
is typed in, I can switch on the multiplication and just ignore the
warnings, since I already know I got everything else right!
Nick
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nicholas Moe moe.nicho...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:40 PM
Subject: Removing manual beams when multiplying note values
Hello,
I am replicating a handwritten score of Renaissance polyphony. I
entered the notes with \autoBeamOff and manually entered the beams
where they were needed using square brackets. Later, I decided I
wanted to double the values of the notes, as is common with this type
of music. I figured out how to do it by using a snippet in The
LilyPond Report #19 and removing the beam stencils. But now I get all
sorts of errors. How do I suppress these?
Thanks,
Nick
BEGIN MINIMAL EXAMPLE
\version 2.13.61
looksSlower =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
(let ((new-music (ly:music-deep-copy music)))
(shift-duration-log new-music -1 0)
new-music))
\relative c' {
\looksSlower{
\autoBeamOff
\override Beam #'stencil = ##f
a8[ b]
}
}
Since you're removing the beam stencil and therefore stopping displaying any
form of beam, wouldn't the simplest solution be to remove the manual beams
([]) with a text editor search and replace?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
V2.14.0 - midi volume midi arpeggio
Thank you for the release of 2.14.0. I install this version on to my window 7
pc and I am running jedit with lilypondtool.
I coded a song with S A T B (seperately) with piano (right + left hands).The
songs has 96 bars (measures). At bar 96 (last cord is an cross staff arpeggio.
QUESTIONS:
1. the midi output does not produce arpeggio sound. How can I fixed it.
2. I produce a midi output for each voice + piano. I want to produce the
voice
sound track is louder than the piano. I use the following
\include articulate.ly
and
\new voice {
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.2
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.6
}
but I cannot produce the effect I want. How can I resolved this?
3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that frescobaldi will
use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download v2.14.0 for linux and it is
a
.sh file. How can I use it for install?
Thank you for the help.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
problem with cross-staff stems
Hi all,
I’m having a difficulty involving cross-staff stems, and I wonder if
someone can help me.
In the example below, I would like to have the quarter-note stems
joined from one staff to the other, with the stem direction of the
eighth-note figure pointing up. (Down would look better in my
example, but I do need this particular arrangement for a more complex
passage.) Trouble is, the quarter-note stems in the lower staff will
not extend beyond the beam and the stems won’t join. (Varying the
stem-length override just pushes the staves further apart.) The
attached image shows the problem.
Replacing the \voiceOne in the lower staff with \stemUp has the same result.
Does anyone know how to get what I’m after?
%%%
\version 2.14.0
top = \relative c' {
{ r4 e e e }
{ s4
\change Staff = bottom
\override Stem #'cross-staff = ##t
\override Stem #'length = #20
\override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t
c, c c
}
}
bottom = \relative c' {
\clef bass
\voiceOne % similar results with \voiceThree or \stemUp
g8 a g a g a g a
}
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff = top {
\top
}
\new Staff = bottom {
\bottom
}
%%%
Thanks,
David
attachment: cross-staff-test.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Correct Figured Bass signs (slashed and crossed numbers)
On 6/9/11 5:22 AM, Nils n...@hammerfeste.com wrote: Hello, I need correct baroque figured bass signs not the modern equivalents which Lilypond provides. For example the slashed 6 where the slash is only in the upper part or the slashed 4 where the slash goes vertically through the right side of the 4, creating a 4+. http://www.musiktheorie-aktuell.de/tutorials/regola/Hahn_petiteSixte.png . 6 in the lower row, 4+ in the upper. There are other signs like this, but if anyone knows at all what I'm talking about he or she will surely know the rest. Anyone created such a set? If not, how can I do it on my own? (Publishers will) There are multiple ways to do it. One is to create new glyphs for the font, using metafont. This would probably be done by modifying the file mf/feta-numbers.mf. However, since bass figures can accept markups, perhaps the simplest way is to just create a markup that does what you want, and use that for a bass figure. Alternatively, some new figured bass properties could be added to select the style, instead of making new glyphs or markups. This would require changes to scm/translation-functions.scm (the function format-bass-figure). Alternatively, a new figured-bass formatter procedure could be written in Scheme, and could be used with #(set! figuredBassFormatter my-new-figured-bass-format-procedure). HTH, Carl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problem with cross-staff stems
Hi David,
2011/6/9 David Nalesnik dnale...@umail.iu.edu:
In the example below, I would like to have the quarter-note stems
joined from one staff to the other, with the stem direction of the
eighth-note figure pointing up. (Down would look better in my
example, but I do need this particular arrangement for a more complex
passage.) Trouble is, the quarter-note stems in the lower staff will
not extend beyond the beam and the stems won’t join. (Varying the
stem-length override just pushes the staves further apart.) The
attached image shows the problem.
Do you want something like in the attachment?
I suggest this code:
%%%
\version 2.13.61 %didn't check it in 2.14.0. but i don't anticipate
any surprises
top = \relative c' {
{ r4
\override Stem #'cross-staff = ##t
\override Stem #'length = #21
\override Stem #'Y-offset = #-7
\override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t
e e e }
{ s4
\change Staff = bottom
c, c c
}
}
bottom = \relative c' {
\clef bass
\voiceOne % similar results with \voiceThree or \stemUp
g8 a g a g a g a
}
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff = top {
\top
}
\new Staff = bottom {
\bottom
}
%%%
attachment: something like this.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: V2.14.0 - midi volume midi arpeggio
Hi Ming,
2011/6/9 MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com:
Thank you for the release of 2.14.0. I install this version on to my window
7 pc and I am running jedit with lilypondtool.
I coded a song with S A T B (seperately) with piano (right + left hands).The
songs has 96 bars (measures). At bar 96 (last cord is an cross staff
arpeggio.
QUESTIONS:
1. the midi output does not produce arpeggio sound. How can I fixed it.
2. I produce a midi output for each voice + piano. I want to produce the
voice sound track is louder than the piano. I use the following
\include articulate.ly
and
\new voice {
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.2
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.6
}
but I cannot produce the effect I want. How can I resolved this?
Did these two work in 2.12.3?
3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that frescobaldi
will use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download v2.14.0 for linux
and it is a .sh file. How can I use it for install?
Open Terminal (shell, command line - the black window in which you can
type commands) and type
cd WRITE-HERE-THE-PATH-TO-THE-DIRECTORY-WHERE-DOWNLOADED-FILE-IS
(press return key)
sh lilypond-2.14.0-OS-TYPE.sh
(press return key)
and LilyPond should be installed.
Hope this helps,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problem with cross-staff stems
2011/6/9 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
Hi David,
2011/6/9 David Nalesnik dnale...@umail.iu.edu:
In the example below, I would like to have the quarter-note stems
joined from one staff to the other, with the stem direction of the
eighth-note figure pointing up. (Down would look better in my
example, but I do need this particular arrangement for a more complex
passage.) Trouble is, the quarter-note stems in the lower staff will
not extend beyond the beam and the stems won’t join. (Varying the
stem-length override just pushes the staves further apart.) The
attached image shows the problem.
Do you want something like in the attachment?
I suggest this code (...)
PS overridding beam positions seems to work too:
%%%
\version 2.14.0
top = \relative c' {
{ r4 e e e }
{ s4
\change Staff = bottom
\override Stem #'cross-staff = ##t
\override Stem #'length = #20
\override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t
c, c c
}
}
bottom = \relative c' {
\clef bass
\voiceOne % similar results with \voiceThree or \stemUp
\override Beam #'positions = #'(4.5 . 4.5)
g8 a g a g a g a
}
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff = top {
\top
}
\new Staff = bottom {
\bottom
}
%%%
HTH,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: V2.14.0 - midi volume midi arpeggio
Il giorno gio, 09/06/2011 alle 11.40 -0700, MING TSANG ha scritto: 3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that frescobaldi will use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download v2.14.0 for linux and it is a .sh file. How can I use it for install? In Frescobaldi clic on Setting Configure Frescobaldi, choose LilyPond preferences. You'll see the lilypond binaries recognized by Frescobaldi. I think that Frescobaldi sees automatically any lilypond binary which is in the $PATH. Otherwise you have to add it manually. If you install the .sh file, the binary will be in your $PATH for sure. You can choose the default binary to use. A pretty cool feature is the automatic selection of the right lilypond binary (installed on your system) based on the \version statement in the file. HTH, Federico ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: V2.14.0 - midi volume midi arpeggio
2011/6/9 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
Il giorno gio, 09/06/2011 alle 11.40 -0700, MING TSANG ha scritto:
3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that
frescobaldi will use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download
v2.14.0 for linux and it is a .sh file. How can I use it for install?
In Frescobaldi clic on Setting Configure Frescobaldi, choose LilyPond
preferences.
You'll see the lilypond binaries recognized by Frescobaldi.
I think that Frescobaldi sees automatically any lilypond binary which is
in the $PATH.
I think Ming's problem is about installing LilyPond on Ubuntu, not
connecting it with Frescobaldi.
Ming, open Terminal (shell, command line - the black window in which
you can type commands) and type
cd HERE-WRITE-THE-PATH-TO-THE-DIRECTORY-WHERE-DOWNLOADED-FILE-IS
(press return key)
sh lilypond-2.14.0-1.linux-x86.sh
(press return key)
and LilyPond should be installed. Then you can follow Frederico's advice.
2011/6/9 MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com:
1. the midi output does not produce arpeggio sound. How can I fixed it.
2. I produce a midi output for each voice + piano. I want to produce the
voice sound track is louder than the piano. I use the following
\include articulate.ly
and
\new voice {
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.2
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.6
}
but I cannot produce the effect I want. How can I resolved this?
Did these two work in 2.12.3?
Hope that helps,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: The results of your email commands
Hi,
i receive strange automatic e-mails from our list. What do they mean?
Was my message eaten? (i suppose not because it is present in our
mailinglist archives)...
Maybe i should simply ignore it?
thanks in advance,
Janek
2011/6/9 lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org:
The results of your email command are provided below. Attached is your
original message.
- Unprocessed:
2011/6/9 MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com:
Thank you for the release of 2.14.0. I install this version on to my
window
7 pc and I am running jedit with lilypondtool.
I coded a song with S A T B (seperately) with piano (right + left
hands).The
songs has 96 bars (measures). At bar 96 (last cord is an cross staff
arpeggio.
QUESTIONS:
1. the midi output does not produce arpeggio sound. How can I fixed it.
2. I produce a midi output for each voice + piano. I want to produce
the
voice sound track is louder than the piano. I use the following
\include articulate.ly
and
\new voice {
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.2
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.6
}
but I cannot produce the effect I want. How can I resolved this?
Did these two work in 2.12.3?
3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that
frescobaldi
- Ignored:
will use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download v2.14.0 for linux
and it is a .sh file. How can I use it for install?
Open Terminal (shell, command line - the black window in which you can
type commands) and type
cd WRITE-HERE-THE-PATH-TO-THE-DIRECTORY-WHERE-DOWNLOADED-FILE-IS
(press return key)
sh lilypond-2.14.0-OS-TYPE.sh
(press return key)
and LilyPond should be installed.
Hope this helps,
Janek
- Done.
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
From: Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
To: MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:15:27 +0200
Subject: Re: V2.14.0 - midi volume midi arpeggio
Hi Ming,
2011/6/9 MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com:
Thank you for the release of 2.14.0. I install this version on to my window
7 pc and I am running jedit with lilypondtool.
I coded a song with S A T B (seperately) with piano (right + left hands).The
songs has 96 bars (measures). At bar 96 (last cord is an cross staff
arpeggio.
QUESTIONS:
1. the midi output does not produce arpeggio sound. How can I fixed it.
2. I produce a midi output for each voice + piano. I want to produce the
voice sound track is louder than the piano. I use the following
\include articulate.ly
and
\new voice {
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.2
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.6
}
but I cannot produce the effect I want. How can I resolved this?
Did these two work in 2.12.3?
3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that frescobaldi
will use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download v2.14.0 for linux
and it is a .sh file. How can I use it for install?
Open Terminal (shell, command line - the black window in which you can
type commands) and type
cd WRITE-HERE-THE-PATH-TO-THE-DIRECTORY-WHERE-DOWNLOADED-FILE-IS
(press return key)
sh lilypond-2.14.0-OS-TYPE.sh
(press return key)
and LilyPond should be installed.
Hope this helps,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: The results of your email commands
Because Ming included this email in CC:
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org
and you replied to all.
It happened the same to me.
Il giorno gio, 09/06/2011 alle 23.37 +0200, Janek Warchoł ha scritto:
Hi,
i receive strange automatic e-mails from our list. What do they mean?
Was my message eaten? (i suppose not because it is present in our
mailinglist archives)...
Maybe i should simply ignore it?
thanks in advance,
Janek
2011/6/9 lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org:
The results of your email command are provided below. Attached is your
original message.
- Unprocessed:
2011/6/9 MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com:
Thank you for the release of 2.14.0. I install this version on to my
window
7 pc and I am running jedit with lilypondtool.
I coded a song with S A T B (seperately) with piano (right + left
hands).The
songs has 96 bars (measures). At bar 96 (last cord is an cross staff
arpeggio.
QUESTIONS:
1. the midi output does not produce arpeggio sound. How can I fixed
it.
2. I produce a midi output for each voice + piano. I want to produce
the
voice sound track is louder than the piano. I use the following
\include articulate.ly
and
\new voice {
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.2
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.6
}
but I cannot produce the effect I want. How can I resolved this?
Did these two work in 2.12.3?
3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that
frescobaldi
- Ignored:
will use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download v2.14.0 for
linux
and it is a .sh file. How can I use it for install?
Open Terminal (shell, command line - the black window in which you can
type commands) and type
cd WRITE-HERE-THE-PATH-TO-THE-DIRECTORY-WHERE-DOWNLOADED-FILE-IS
(press return key)
sh lilypond-2.14.0-OS-TYPE.sh
(press return key)
and LilyPond should be installed.
Hope this helps,
Janek
- Done.
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
From: Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
To: MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:15:27 +0200
Subject: Re: V2.14.0 - midi volume midi arpeggio
Hi Ming,
2011/6/9 MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com:
Thank you for the release of 2.14.0. I install this version on to my
window
7 pc and I am running jedit with lilypondtool.
I coded a song with S A T B (seperately) with piano (right + left
hands).The
songs has 96 bars (measures). At bar 96 (last cord is an cross staff
arpeggio.
QUESTIONS:
1. the midi output does not produce arpeggio sound. How can I fixed it.
2. I produce a midi output for each voice + piano. I want to produce the
voice sound track is louder than the piano. I use the following
\include articulate.ly
and
\new voice {
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.2
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.6
}
but I cannot produce the effect I want. How can I resolved this?
Did these two work in 2.12.3?
3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that frescobaldi
will use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download v2.14.0 for linux
and it is a .sh file. How can I use it for install?
Open Terminal (shell, command line - the black window in which you can
type commands) and type
cd WRITE-HERE-THE-PATH-TO-THE-DIRECTORY-WHERE-DOWNLOADED-FILE-IS
(press return key)
sh lilypond-2.14.0-OS-TYPE.sh
(press return key)
and LilyPond should be installed.
Hope this helps,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Falls and doits for a chord
Works very well!
Many thanks!
Massimo
Il 07/06/2011 22:59, Federico Bruni ha scritto:
Il giorno mar, 07/06/2011 alle 14.55 +0200, Massimo Lovato ha scritto:
Ciao Federico.
Thank you very much for your reply.
I tried your solution, and I think I have no alternatives. The
problem
is that it isn't a real chord, because the notes aren't well
vertical
aligned.
Ok, I see the problem.
This snippet should work as you wish (hopefully):
\version 2.14.0
\score {
\new Staff {
{ \voiceOne c2-\bendAfter #+5 }
\\
{ \voiceThree g2-\bendAfter #+5 }
}
}
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Small notes in chords
Peter Crighton petecrigh...@googlemail.com writes:
How can I make some notes of a chord (for example background vocals)
smaller than the lead melody? I know of tweaking the font-size, but I
don't want to do this for every single note… Is there an easier way?
I wrote the following trying to do the same thing. Here's s snippet
example:
\include english.ly
t = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?)
(music-map (lambda (x)
(if (eq? (ly:music-property x 'name) 'EventChord)
(let ((copy (ly:music-deep-copy x)))
(let ((elements (cdr (ly:music-property copy 'elements
(while (pair? elements)
(set! (ly:music-property (first elements) 'tweaks)
(acons 'font-size -3 (ly:music-property (car elements)
'tweaks)))
(set! elements (cdr elements
copy) x))
x))
\relative f' {
\clef treble
\key bf \major
\t { r4 r8 bf g ef bf ef bf g g'4 d bf f! f'! |
c bf f f'2 ~ c a f f'4 a f c' f |
bf d f1 ~ | }
}
The function will make all but the first note head mentioned in the
chord be displayed normally, with any other note heads in the chord
using font-size -3.
Here is the output:
inline: test36.png
--
Michael Welsh Duggan
(m...@md5i.com)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Small notes in chords
Also listed as http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=538 -- Michael Welsh Duggan (m...@md5i.com) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: V2.14.0 - midi volume midi arpeggio
Thank you for your reply.
I follow your suggestion steps, I got the following error. I am new to linux
world (approx. one month). I have a hard time copying out terminal message.
sh: can't open lilypond-2.14.0-1.linux-x86.sh
arpeggio chord midi sound was not produced on 2.12.3 either.
From: Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
To: Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com
Cc: MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com; lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org;
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thu, June 9, 2011 4:03:30 PM
Subject: Re: V2.14.0 - midi volume midi arpeggio
2011/6/9 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
Il giorno gio, 09/06/2011 alle 11.40 -0700, MING TSANG ha scritto:
3. How can I install lilypond 2.14.0 for Ubuntu 10.10 so that
frescobaldi will use 2.14.0 instead of now using 2.12.3? I download
v2.14.0 for linux and it is a .sh file. How can I use it for install?
In Frescobaldi clic on Setting Configure Frescobaldi, choose LilyPond
preferences.
You'll see the lilypond binaries recognized by Frescobaldi.
I think that Frescobaldi sees automatically any lilypond binary which is
in the $PATH.
I think Ming's problem is about installing LilyPond on Ubuntu, not
connecting it with Frescobaldi.
Ming, open Terminal (shell, command line - the black window in which
you can type commands) and type
cd HERE-WRITE-THE-PATH-TO-THE-DIRECTORY-WHERE-DOWNLOADED-FILE-IS
(press return key)
sh lilypond-2.14.0-1.linux-x86.sh
(press return key)
and LilyPond should be installed. Then you can follow Frederico's advice.
2011/6/9 MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com:
1. the midi output does not produce arpeggio sound. How can I fixed it.
2. I produce a midi output for each voice + piano. I want to produce the
voice sound track is louder than the piano. I use the following
\include articulate.ly
and
\new voice {
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.2
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.6
}
but I cannot produce the effect I want. How can I resolved this?
Did these two work in 2.12.3?
Hope that helps,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Consistent bar number positioning
I am writing a piece which requires lyrics above and below the staff.
I would like to have regular measure numbers right above the bar-line
(i.e. always approx. 0.75 staff lines above the staff). Ideally I
would like to make the lyrics invisible to the bar numbers.
I have been unable to find a way to consistently do this throughout
the piece. Even doing an #'extra-offset tweak doesn't work, because
the starting point is not always the same, and in the actual piece of
music, the starting point is higher or lower on each system depending
on how the notes are in that system.
Does anyone have an idea of how to do this? Is there a way to make the
lyrics invisible to the bar numbers? I have an example set up below.
Nick Moe
BEGIN EXAMPLE
\version 2.14.0
\score {
\new Staff = staff {
\new Voice = music {
\override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility =
#'#(#f #t #t)
\set Score.barNumberVisibility =
#(every-nth-bar-number-visible 1)
\override Score.BarNumber #'Y-offset = #-1
\repeat unfold 8 { a'1 }
}
\new Lyrics \with { alignAboveContext = staff }
\lyricsto music {
\lyricmode {
ter -- ram tu -- o ad hoc e -- nim
}
}
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
