SVG output with 2.19.31

[Andrew Bernard]

Is anybody using SVG with 2.19.31?

I am seeing this error:

Layout output to `sonata-page-1.svg'...
warning: cannot find SVG font #f
warning: cannot find SVG font #f
/home/andro/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/output-svg.scm:428:30: In 
procedure string-join in expression (string-join (map # glyphs) "
"):
/home/andro/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/output-svg.scm:428:30: 
Wrong type (expecting string): #

This is just a heads up to see if this is a known issue. My score is extremely 
long and complex, and I am attempting to binary chop it to narrow down the 
issue now, but I thought I would probe the list first.

I am using fonts such as lilyboulez, but commenting the custom fonts out make 
no difference to the error. I am seeing this error on Ubuntu 15.04 and openSUSE 
Leap 42.1.


Andrew




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: SVG output with 2.19.31

[Andrew Bernard]

Answering my own issue on further investigation, I refer to Noto Sans Bold 
Italic in an override for dynamics. My system lacks the SVG fonts for this 
typeface. Enabling –V and going through the backtrace led to some insight.

But the error message presented that just refers to font #f is not very 
illuminating. Would it be an enhancement request to suggest that the missing 
font be named in the error message?

Andrew





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: SVG output with 2.19.31

[Federico Bruni]

Il giorno gio 19 nov 2015 alle 11:11, Andrew Bernard 
 ha scritto:
Answering my own issue on further investigation, I refer to Noto Sans 
Bold Italic in an override for dynamics. My system lacks the SVG 
fonts for this typeface. Enabling –V and going through the 
backtrace led to some insight.


But the error message presented that just refers to font #f is not 
very illuminating. Would it be an enhancement request to suggest that 
the missing font be named in the error message?


This should be issue 3809?
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3809/

which I cannot reproduce, BTW




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: SVG output with 2.19.31

[Andrew Bernard]

Hi Federico,

Yes indeed, exactly that. And thanks.

Andrew





On 19/11/2015, 22:05, "Federico Bruni"  wrote:

>This should be issue 3809?
>https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3809/


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: SVG output with 2.19.31

[Federico Bruni]

Il giorno gio 19 nov 2015 alle 12:05, Federico Bruni 
 ha scritto:

Il giorno gio 19 nov 2015 alle 11:11, Andrew Bernard
 ha scritto:
> Answering my own issue on further investigation, I refer to Noto 
Sans

> Bold Italic in an override for dynamics. My system lacks the SVG
> fonts for this typeface. Enabling –V and going through the
> backtrace led to some insight.
>
> But the error message presented that just refers to font #f is not
> very illuminating. Would it be an enhancement request to suggest 
that

> the missing font be named in the error message?

This should be issue 3809?
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3809/

which I cannot reproduce, BTW


oops, I forgot to compile it to SVG :)
I can reproduce it


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user