Re: [ACTIVITY] 8 - 12 January 2018

2018-01-22 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
Oops, this weekly report was for 15-19 January 2018 not 8-12 Jan.

On 23 January 2018 at 13:25, Prathamesh Kulkarni
 wrote:
> == This Week ==
>
> * GCC bugs (4/10)
> a) TCWG-1331 - Created patch
> b) PR83750 - Created patch
>
> * TCWG-1234 (5/10)
> - WIP patch on second approach
>
> * Misc (1/10)
> - Meetings
>
> == Next Week ==
> - GCC bugs
> - TCWG-1234
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain


[ACTIVITY] 8 - 12 January 2018

2018-01-22 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
== This Week ==

* GCC bugs (4/10)
a) TCWG-1331 - Created patch
b) PR83750 - Created patch

* TCWG-1234 (5/10)
- WIP patch on second approach

* Misc (1/10)
- Meetings

== Next Week ==
- GCC bugs
- TCWG-1234
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain


[ACTIVITY] Week 03

2018-01-22 Thread Yvan Roux
== Progress ==
o LLVM
   * Bugzilla 33011 (MVN instruction "Upredictable" bit patterns incorrect):
  - Working on upstream comments
   * Working on more unpredictable handling in Tablegen
   * Fixing an issue with registers class in peephole optimization
(exhibited by unpredictable patches).
   * Buildbots babysitting: investigated OOM issue, offending patch reverted.

o Misc
   * Various meetings and discussions.
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain


[ACTIVITY] 15 - 19 Jan

2018-01-22 Thread Yao Qi
# Progress #

* GDB is confused by the line table generated by GCC with -gcolumn-info
  PR 22531.  [2/5]
  Chat with other two people who are changing the same file, and they
  are OK to get my changes first.  Commit one obvious patch, and testing
  one patch series for refactor.

* TCWG-181, GDB compile feature.  [2/5]
  Many new test failures in gdb.compile, because it is not supported on
  arm and aarch64, but we have no way to disable them.  Commit two fixes
  to get test better, but still many fails on arm-linux.  I think I
  still need a patch to disable the test form arm-linux.

* TCWG-1040, SVE patches review.  [1/5]
  Review Alan's patches.

# Plan #
* PR 22531, upstream preparatory patches,
* Answer questions to my pending patch series,  TCWG-1292.

-- 
Yao Qi
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain