Re: IP weirdness

2005-08-08 Thread Lutz Hamann
Thank you for your explanation and the URL, Vic.

I'd like to check it - if www.vm.ibm.com goes online again :-)
It seems to be off-line since last Friday or Saturday :-(

Does anybody know the reason - or is it only specific German/European
problem ?


  ciao  Lutz

-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



 Vic Cross
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 auTo
 Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
 390 Port   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU  Subject
   Re: IP weirdness

 06.08.2005 16:24


 Please respond to
 Linux on 390 Port
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU






On Saturday 06 August 2005 04:38, Neale Ferguson wrote:
NF I have a guest LAN that connects a number of guests.
snip
NF All but one of the guests can talk to each other, except one
NF (I'll call X) which can only talk to the default gateway. If I ping the
NF others from X I get no response. The same goes when I go from the any
NF other of the guests except R to X.
snip
NF We are z/VM 4.4 0404. Guest X is SLES9 SP2, Guest R is SLES7, other
NF guests are Debian.

There are a few VMLAN fixes out since 0404RSU.  From recent experience I'd
suggest you get right up to date and try again (the qeth driver on the
guests
other than X might need an update as well, although it strikes me as odd
that
the SLES 7 system works talking to the SLES 9 SP2 given that its qeth is
probably older than the Debians'...).

The z/VM team maintains an excellent resource that talks about (among other
things) z/VM maintenance levels in support of virtual networking:

 http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork

Look for the Virtual Switch and Guest LAN CP Maintenance levels link.

NF The other weirdness I see is that all the guests have a subnet mask of
NF 255.255.255.192 but Q LAN DETAILS reports everyone as 255.255.255.0.

No need to be concerned about this.  At earlier levels the display shows
the
natural network mask (i.e. as if you weren't subnetting) instead of the
actual subnet mask in use.  On z/VM 5.1 the subnet mask display is removed
(replaced by the MAC address, like the multicast display).

Cheers,
Vic Cross

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: IP weirdness

2005-08-08 Thread Dave Jones

Hi, Lutz.

www.vm.ibm.com has moved from 204.146.134.198 to 204.146.134.18.

DNS updates are working their way through the Internet, so it's not just
a German/European problem.


DJ

Lutz Hamann wrote:

Thank you for your explanation and the URL, Vic.

I'd like to check it - if www.vm.ibm.com goes online again :-)
It seems to be off-line since last Friday or Saturday :-(

Does anybody know the reason - or is it only specific German/European
problem ?


  ciao  Lutz

-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



 Vic Cross
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 auTo
 Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
 390 Port   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU  Subject
   Re: IP weirdness

 06.08.2005 16:24


 Please respond to
 Linux on 390 Port
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU






On Saturday 06 August 2005 04:38, Neale Ferguson wrote:
NF I have a guest LAN that connects a number of guests.
snip
NF All but one of the guests can talk to each other, except one
NF (I'll call X) which can only talk to the default gateway. If I ping the
NF others from X I get no response. The same goes when I go from the any
NF other of the guests except R to X.
snip
NF We are z/VM 4.4 0404. Guest X is SLES9 SP2, Guest R is SLES7, other
NF guests are Debian.

There are a few VMLAN fixes out since 0404RSU.  From recent experience I'd
suggest you get right up to date and try again (the qeth driver on the
guests
other than X might need an update as well, although it strikes me as odd
that
the SLES 7 system works talking to the SLES 9 SP2 given that its qeth is
probably older than the Debians'...).

The z/VM team maintains an excellent resource that talks about (among other
things) z/VM maintenance levels in support of virtual networking:

 http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork

Look for the Virtual Switch and Guest LAN CP Maintenance levels link.

NF The other weirdness I see is that all the guests have a subnet mask of
NF 255.255.255.192 but Q LAN DETAILS reports everyone as 255.255.255.0.

No need to be concerned about this.  At earlier levels the display shows
the
natural network mask (i.e. as if you weren't subnetting) instead of the
actual subnet mask in use.  On z/VM 5.1 the subnet mask display is removed
(replaced by the MAC address, like the multicast display).

Cheers,
Vic Cross

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: IP weirdness

2005-08-08 Thread Lutz Hamann
Thank you, Dave ...

I could never imagine that those DNS-updates take more than
2 days :-)  But let's wait  ...

But at least I can acces the site via their IP-address.


  ciao  Lutz


-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



 Dave Jones
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 are.com   To
 Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
 390 Port   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU  Subject
   Re: IP weirdness

 08.08.2005 14:12


 Please respond to
 Linux on 390 Port
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU






Hi, Lutz.

www.vm.ibm.com has moved from 204.146.134.198 to 204.146.134.18.

DNS updates are working their way through the Internet, so it's not just
a German/European problem.


DJ

Lutz Hamann wrote:
 Thank you for your explanation and the URL, Vic.

 I'd like to check it - if www.vm.ibm.com goes online again :-)
 It seems to be off-line since last Friday or Saturday :-(

 Does anybody know the reason - or is it only specific German/European
 problem ?


   ciao  Lutz

 -
 Lutz  Hamann
 BETA Systems  Software AG
 z/OS  System Engineering
 -



  Vic Cross
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  au
To
  Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
  390 Port
cc
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  IST.EDU
Subject
Re: IP weirdness

  06.08.2005 16:24


  Please respond to
  Linux on 390 Port
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  IST.EDU






 On Saturday 06 August 2005 04:38, Neale Ferguson wrote:
 NF I have a guest LAN that connects a number of guests.
 snip
 NF All but one of the guests can talk to each other, except one
 NF (I'll call X) which can only talk to the default gateway. If I ping
the
 NF others from X I get no response. The same goes when I go from the any
 NF other of the guests except R to X.
 snip
 NF We are z/VM 4.4 0404. Guest X is SLES9 SP2, Guest R is SLES7, other
 NF guests are Debian.

 There are a few VMLAN fixes out since 0404RSU.  From recent experience
I'd
 suggest you get right up to date and try again (the qeth driver on the
 guests
 other than X might need an update as well, although it strikes me as odd
 that
 the SLES 7 system works talking to the SLES 9 SP2 given that its qeth is
 probably older than the Debians'...).

 The z/VM team maintains an excellent resource that talks about (among
other
 things) z/VM maintenance levels in support of virtual networking:

  http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork

 Look for the Virtual Switch and Guest LAN CP Maintenance levels link.

 NF The other weirdness I see is that all the guests have a subnet mask
of
 NF 255.255.255.192 but Q LAN DETAILS reports everyone as 255.255.255.0.

 No need to be concerned about this.  At earlier levels the display shows
 the
 natural network mask (i.e. as if you weren't subnetting) instead of the
 actual subnet mask in use.  On z/VM 5.1 the subnet mask display is
removed
 (replaced by the MAC address, like the multicast display).

 Cheers,
 Vic Cross

 --
 For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
 visit
 http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

 --
 For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
 http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: IP weirdness

2005-08-08 Thread Dave Jones

You're welcome, Lutz.

There was a discussion over the weekend on the VM-ESA list about why it
takes so long for DNS updates to propagate. It has to do with the TTL
(time to live) values set by various DNS administrators.

Have a good week.

DJ

Lutz Hamann wrote:

Thank you, Dave ...

I could never imagine that those DNS-updates take more than
2 days :-)  But let's wait  ...

But at least I can acces the site via their IP-address.


  ciao  Lutz


-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



 Dave Jones
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 are.com   To
 Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
 390 Port   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU  Subject
   Re: IP weirdness

 08.08.2005 14:12


 Please respond to
 Linux on 390 Port
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU






Hi, Lutz.

www.vm.ibm.com has moved from 204.146.134.198 to 204.146.134.18.

DNS updates are working their way through the Internet, so it's not just
a German/European problem.


DJ

Lutz Hamann wrote:


Thank you for your explanation and the URL, Vic.

I'd like to check it - if www.vm.ibm.com goes online again :-)
It seems to be off-line since last Friday or Saturday :-(

Does anybody know the reason - or is it only specific German/European
problem ?


 ciao  Lutz

-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



Vic Cross
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
au


To


Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
390 Port


cc


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU


Subject


  Re: IP weirdness

06.08.2005 16:24


Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU






On Saturday 06 August 2005 04:38, Neale Ferguson wrote:
NF I have a guest LAN that connects a number of guests.
snip
NF All but one of the guests can talk to each other, except one
NF (I'll call X) which can only talk to the default gateway. If I ping


the


NF others from X I get no response. The same goes when I go from the any
NF other of the guests except R to X.
snip
NF We are z/VM 4.4 0404. Guest X is SLES9 SP2, Guest R is SLES7, other
NF guests are Debian.

There are a few VMLAN fixes out since 0404RSU.  From recent experience


I'd


suggest you get right up to date and try again (the qeth driver on the
guests
other than X might need an update as well, although it strikes me as odd
that
the SLES 7 system works talking to the SLES 9 SP2 given that its qeth is
probably older than the Debians'...).

The z/VM team maintains an excellent resource that talks about (among


other


things) z/VM maintenance levels in support of virtual networking:

http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork

Look for the Virtual Switch and Guest LAN CP Maintenance levels link.

NF The other weirdness I see is that all the guests have a subnet mask


of


NF 255.255.255.192 but Q LAN DETAILS reports everyone as 255.255.255.0.

No need to be concerned about this.  At earlier levels the display shows
the
natural network mask (i.e. as if you weren't subnetting) instead of the
actual subnet mask in use.  On z/VM 5.1 the subnet mask display is


removed


(replaced by the MAC address, like the multicast display).

Cheers,
Vic Cross

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or


visit


http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390



--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Re: IP weirdness

2005-08-08 Thread Lutz Hamann
Explanation accepted, Dave !

And I should know it - because I am one of those (admins) :-)

I always use the $TTL  86400  (default) in our z/OS BIND9-
implementations 


  ciao   Lutz

-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



 Dave Jones
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 are.com   To
 Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
 390 Port   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU  Subject
   Re: IP weirdness

 08.08.2005 14:32


 Please respond to
 Linux on 390 Port
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU






You're welcome, Lutz.

There was a discussion over the weekend on the VM-ESA list about why it
takes so long for DNS updates to propagate. It has to do with the TTL
(time to live) values set by various DNS administrators.

Have a good week.

DJ

Lutz Hamann wrote:
 Thank you, Dave ...

 I could never imagine that those DNS-updates take more than
 2 days :-)  But let's wait  ...

 But at least I can acces the site via their IP-address.


   ciao  Lutz


 -
 Lutz  Hamann
 BETA Systems  Software AG
 z/OS  System Engineering
 -



  Dave Jones
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  are.com
To
  Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
  390 Port
cc
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  IST.EDU
Subject
Re: IP weirdness

  08.08.2005 14:12


  Please respond to
  Linux on 390 Port
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  IST.EDU






 Hi, Lutz.

 www.vm.ibm.com has moved from 204.146.134.198 to 204.146.134.18.

 DNS updates are working their way through the Internet, so it's not just
 a German/European problem.


 DJ

 Lutz Hamann wrote:

Thank you for your explanation and the URL, Vic.

I'd like to check it - if www.vm.ibm.com goes online again :-)
It seems to be off-line since last Friday or Saturday :-(

Does anybody know the reason - or is it only specific German/European
problem ?


  ciao  Lutz

-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



 Vic Cross
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 au

 To

 Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
 390 Port

 cc

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU

 Subject

   Re: IP weirdness

 06.08.2005 16:24


 Please respond to
 Linux on 390 Port
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU






On Saturday 06 August 2005 04:38, Neale Ferguson wrote:
NF I have a guest LAN that connects a number of guests.
snip
NF All but one of the guests can talk to each other, except one
NF (I'll call X) which can only talk to the default gateway. If I ping

 the

NF others from X I get no response. The same goes when I go from the any
NF other of the guests except R to X.
snip
NF We are z/VM 4.4 0404. Guest X is SLES9 SP2, Guest R is SLES7, other
NF guests are Debian.

There are a few VMLAN fixes out since 0404RSU.  From recent experience

 I'd

suggest you get right up to date and try again (the qeth driver on the
guests
other than X might need an update as well, although it strikes me as odd
that
the SLES 7 system works talking to the SLES 9 SP2 given that its qeth is
probably older than the Debians'...).

The z/VM team maintains an excellent resource that talks about (among

 other

things) z/VM maintenance levels in support of virtual networking:

 http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork

Look for the Virtual Switch and Guest LAN CP Maintenance levels link.

NF The other weirdness I see is that all the guests have a subnet mask

 of

NF 255.255.255.192 but Q LAN DETAILS reports everyone as 255.255.255.0.

No need to be concerned about this.  At earlier levels the display shows
the
natural network mask (i.e. as if you weren't subnetting) instead of the
actual subnet mask in use.  On z/VM 5.1 the subnet mask display is

 removed

(replaced by the MAC address, like the multicast display).

Cheers,
Vic Cross

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO

Re: IP weirdness

2005-08-08 Thread Dave Jones

Well, in that case, Lutz, we'll all just blame you then. :-)

DJ

Lutz Hamann wrote:

Explanation accepted, Dave !

And I should know it - because I am one of those (admins) :-)

I always use the $TTL  86400  (default) in our z/OS BIND9-
implementations 


  ciao   Lutz

-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



 Dave Jones
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 are.com   To
 Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
 390 Port   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU  Subject
   Re: IP weirdness

 08.08.2005 14:32


 Please respond to
 Linux on 390 Port
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IST.EDU






You're welcome, Lutz.

There was a discussion over the weekend on the VM-ESA list about why it
takes so long for DNS updates to propagate. It has to do with the TTL
(time to live) values set by various DNS administrators.

Have a good week.

DJ

Lutz Hamann wrote:


Thank you, Dave ...

I could never imagine that those DNS-updates take more than
2 days :-)  But let's wait  ...

But at least I can acces the site via their IP-address.


 ciao  Lutz


-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



Dave Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
are.com


To


Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
390 Port


cc


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU


Subject


  Re: IP weirdness

08.08.2005 14:12


Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU






Hi, Lutz.

www.vm.ibm.com has moved from 204.146.134.198 to 204.146.134.18.

DNS updates are working their way through the Internet, so it's not just
a German/European problem.


DJ

Lutz Hamann wrote:



Thank you for your explanation and the URL, Vic.

I'd like to check it - if www.vm.ibm.com goes online again :-)
It seems to be off-line since last Friday or Saturday :-(

Does anybody know the reason - or is it only specific German/European
problem ?


ciao  Lutz

-
Lutz  Hamann
BETA Systems  Software AG
z/OS  System Engineering
-



   Vic Cross
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   au


To



   Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
   390 Port


cc



   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   IST.EDU


Subject



 Re: IP weirdness

   06.08.2005 16:24


   Please respond to
   Linux on 390 Port
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   IST.EDU






On Saturday 06 August 2005 04:38, Neale Ferguson wrote:
NF I have a guest LAN that connects a number of guests.
snip
NF All but one of the guests can talk to each other, except one
NF (I'll call X) which can only talk to the default gateway. If I ping


the



NF others from X I get no response. The same goes when I go from the any
NF other of the guests except R to X.
snip
NF We are z/VM 4.4 0404. Guest X is SLES9 SP2, Guest R is SLES7, other
NF guests are Debian.

There are a few VMLAN fixes out since 0404RSU.  From recent experience


I'd



suggest you get right up to date and try again (the qeth driver on the
guests
other than X might need an update as well, although it strikes me as odd
that
the SLES 7 system works talking to the SLES 9 SP2 given that its qeth is
probably older than the Debians'...).

The z/VM team maintains an excellent resource that talks about (among


other



things) z/VM maintenance levels in support of virtual networking:

   http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork

Look for the Virtual Switch and Guest LAN CP Maintenance levels link.

NF The other weirdness I see is that all the guests have a subnet mask


of



NF 255.255.255.192 but Q LAN DETAILS reports everyone as 255.255.255.0.

No need to be concerned about this.  At earlier levels the display shows
the
natural network mask (i.e. as if you weren't subnetting) instead of the
actual subnet mask in use.  On z/VM 5.1 the subnet mask display is


removed



(replaced by the MAC address, like the multicast display).

Cheers,
Vic Cross

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email

Re: IP weirdness

2005-08-06 Thread Vic Cross
On Saturday 06 August 2005 04:38, Neale Ferguson wrote:
NF I have a guest LAN that connects a number of guests.
snip
NF All but one of the guests can talk to each other, except one
NF (I'll call X) which can only talk to the default gateway. If I ping the
NF others from X I get no response. The same goes when I go from the any
NF other of the guests except R to X.
snip
NF We are z/VM 4.4 0404. Guest X is SLES9 SP2, Guest R is SLES7, other
NF guests are Debian.

There are a few VMLAN fixes out since 0404RSU.  From recent experience I'd
suggest you get right up to date and try again (the qeth driver on the guests
other than X might need an update as well, although it strikes me as odd that
the SLES 7 system works talking to the SLES 9 SP2 given that its qeth is
probably older than the Debians'...).

The z/VM team maintains an excellent resource that talks about (among other
things) z/VM maintenance levels in support of virtual networking:

http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork

Look for the Virtual Switch and Guest LAN CP Maintenance levels link.

NF The other weirdness I see is that all the guests have a subnet mask of
NF 255.255.255.192 but Q LAN DETAILS reports everyone as 255.255.255.0.

No need to be concerned about this.  At earlier levels the display shows the
natural network mask (i.e. as if you weren't subnetting) instead of the
actual subnet mask in use.  On z/VM 5.1 the subnet mask display is removed
(replaced by the MAC address, like the multicast display).

Cheers,
Vic Cross

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390