Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Xen XL Resource Agent
On 2013-11-15T09:05:53, Tom Parker tpar...@cbnco.com wrote: The XL tools are much faster and lighter weight. I am not sure if they report proper codes (I will have to test) but the XM stack has been deprecated so at some point I assume it will go away completely. The Xen RA already supports xen-list and xen-destroy in addition to the xm tools. Patches to additionally support xl are welcome. (Auto-detect what is available, and then choose xl - xen-* - xm.) We can't yet drop xm, since not all environments have xl yet. Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. -- Oscar Wilde ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Xen XL Resource Agent
My thoughts were to create a new RA and let admins choose. If you would prefer to auto-detect that is an option as well. Tom From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:27 AM To: General Linux-HA mailing list Reply To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Xen XL Resource Agent On 2013-11-15T09:05:53, Tom Parker tpar...@cbnco.com wrote: The XL tools are much faster and lighter weight. I am not sure if they report proper codes (I will have to test) but the XM stack has been deprecated so at some point I assume it will go away completely. The Xen RA already supports xen-list and xen-destroy in addition to the xm tools. Patches to additionally support xl are welcome. (Auto-detect what is available, and then choose xl - xen-* - xm.) We can't yet drop xm, since not all environments have xl yet. Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. -- Oscar Wilde ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Xen XL Resource Agent
The XL tools are much faster and lighter weight. I am not sure if they report proper codes (I will have to test) but the XM stack has been deprecated so at some point I assume it will go away completely. [LIVE] qaxen1:~ # time xl list NameID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 2534712 r- 146383.6 Domain list removed real0m0.053s user0m0.000s sys 0m0.008s [LIVE] qaxen1:~ # time xm list NameID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 2534712 r- 146381.1 Domain list removed real0m0.352s user0m0.236s sys 0m0.036s On 11/15/2013 02:04 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: Tom Parker tpar...@cbnco.com schrieb am 14.11.2013 um 19:23 in Nachricht 5285150b.9050...@cbnco.com: Hello. Now that XM has been deprecated is anyone working on a Xen RA that uses the xl tool stack? I woonder whether xl will (opposed to xm) report proper exit codes if operations fail. Otherwise I don't see the reason to change tools. MHO... I am willing to do the work but I don't want to duplicate the effort if someone else is doing/has already done it. Tom ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
