Re: (Internet Customer Service.) I would say you are somewhat missing the point.

2009-05-28 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

--- On Wed, 5/27/09, sammy ominsky wrote:

 It appears that someone somewhere is listening to what we
 need, and doing something about it.
 

I would say that HOT attempts to acquire more knowledgeable {support,service} 
personal. The point that Linux is starting to become main stream is much less 
important for the good experience you had.


  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: xfone 018 phone service and Linux

2009-05-08 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

--- On Wed, 5/6/09, Arie Skliarouk sklia...@gmail.com wrote:

 Eventually I did not went with 018, as they have the
 ugliest support I ever seen - they don't reply on
 emails. I asked twice from them to send oraat keva blank,
 and got nothing.
 The broken שלך button on צור
 קשר page (under firefox) did not help either:
 
 
 http://www.018.co.il/contactus.asp
 

I would say that is a general trend in Israel. I have more examples. Either no 
email address is published, or that you can't make a progress solely by email.

 Now I am looking in direction of 012 and have couple of
 questions to actual users of theirs voip service with Linux
 (if there are any):
 
 http://www.012.net.il/sales.aspx?docID=8639FolderID=1005lang=hetabn=0
 Does the line management site (http://072web.net) works from
 firefox?
 

The interface has 2 parts: one that control the more static settings, and the 
other control the more RT ones. Not sure about the former. The later doesn't. 
Note the static and RT are from an ordinary user perspective. 

 Do they provide SIP credentials, or are these hidden in
 the hw sip adapter they provide?

Even though I don't know what SIP credentials are, I am pretty sure they are 
hidden.

 Can Asterisk be used with the service?

Probably not, unless you are looking to connect Asterisk in the same way that 
you would connect it to a Bezeq line.

 Thank you in advance!
 

Rumor is that 074 now offers 3 months, no commitment, free ISP + land phone 
services.

 --
 Arie
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 03:01,
 e2xbegqsdyt21hfc e2xbegqsdyt21...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 I don't know the technical details or 018.
 
 I do know that 012 provides you with a sip adapter that is
 plugged between  the bezeq/hot modem and your PC/ordinary
 phone. It could be that that adapter reserve some BW for the
 sip packets. In any case, my experience is that both 750K
 ADSl/cables is sufficient for a good quality phone service,
 with a lightly usage for internet and phone. The sip adapter
 I initially had was made in the US. I assume they use a US
 proven technology. My current sip adapter is made by
 AudioCodes. 012 claims that the sip adapter they provide
 should work with any ISP. I had two ISPs, and in my case
 their claim is justified.
 
 
 
 There is also a rumor that bezeq's new generation
 network uses sip over copper for the phone services.
 
 
 
 --- On Sat, 3/7/09, Arie Skliarouk sklia...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 
 
  From: Arie Skliarouk sklia...@gmail.com
 
  Subject: Re: xfone 018 phone service and Linux
 
  To: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 
  Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 11:21 PM
 
  Hi,
 
 
 
  On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 13:54, Gilad Ben-Yossef
 
  gi...@codefidence.comwrote:
 
 
 
Arie Skliarouk wrote:
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   How do they solve the latency problems inherent
 to any
 
  internet connection?
 
  
 
   The round trip time to a well connected (read:
 0%
 
  packet loss) server in
 
   Israel from an Israeli ISP, where Israel here is
 
  defined as connected to
 
   the IIX, is under 50ms.
 
  
 
 
 
  On a 150kbit upload ADSL upload of a 1500 bytes
 packet
 
  takes about 85ms. To
 
  send out the VoIP packet would take another 85ms (on
 
  condition that you have
 
  a really good QoS). This causes latency of 85-170ms
 with
 
  jitter 85ms. The
 
  VoIP speech (SIP protocol) has a lot of skips and is
 
  unacceptable.
 
 
 
  Theory aside, I would like to hear first-hand
 experiences
 
  of people with 018
 
  before I commit for a year of phone service with
 them.
 
 
 
  --
 
  Arie
 
 
 ___
 
  Linux-il mailing list
 
  Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 
  http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
 


  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Why the use of domain-literals in email addresses is strongly discouraged?

2009-04-09 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

Why the use of some...@[an_explicit_ip_address] is strongly discouraged?



  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Why the use of domain-literals in email addresses is strongly discouraged?

2009-04-09 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

--- On Thu, 4/9/09, Shachar Shemesh wrote:

  e2xbegqsdyt21hfc wrote:
  
Why the use of some...@[an_explicit_ip_address] is
  strongly discouraged?

 a. Where did you get the idea it was strongly discouraged?

Quoting RFC 822:

Note:  THE USE OF DOMAIN-LITERALS IS STRONGLY DISCOURAGED.  It
   is  permitted  only  as  a means of bypassing temporary
   system limitations, such as name tables which  are  not
   complete.

 b. Why would you WANT to use it?

I want to test an app by writing a quick/dirty wrapper that sends mail to a 
single, known, mail server and avoids DNS lookup.



  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Why the use of domain-literals in email addresses is strongly discouraged?

2009-04-09 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

--- On Thu, 4/9/09, nir grinberg n...@grinberg.org wrote:

 just a question, how many times in avarage do you have to repeat your
 address, when given over the phone?
 :)

Preferably just once.
I didn't get your point.



  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


[Off-Topic] A simple/basic question in English

2009-04-09 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

Is the following paragraph correct:

The program does not do that. Instead, behaves
as described earlier.

?

Wouldn't the following is correct, or, at least, better:

The program does not do that. Instead, it behaves
as described earlier.

?

Note the addition of `it' near the beginning of the second sentence.



  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: time zone problems

2009-03-29 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Erez D erez0...@gmail.com wrote:

 i am 3 hours from GMT (as expected for israel daylight
 saving)
 
 
 however:
 
 struct tm time_str;
 ...
 int d=timegm(time_str)-timelocal(time_str);
 printf(%d\n,d);
 
 
 
 prints 7200 (which is 2*3600 - two hours).
 
 
 any idea ?
 or in in other words, how the f...@#k i get the offset from
 GMT c-code ?
 


Doesn't stdc dated before DT was invented?
I can only suggest gnu/doc or googe for extensions or other libs. 


  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: bug in date?

2009-03-26 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

Due to IST, there was no such time as 27 MAR 2009 02:54:00.
$ date -s 27 MAR 2009 02:14:00
date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:14:00'
$ date -s 27 MAR 2009 02:01:00
date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:01:00'

--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Hetz Ben Hamo het...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Hetz Ben Hamo het...@gmail.com
 Subject: bug in date?
 To: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 1:56 AM
 Hi,
 
 Take a look at this:
 
 # date -s 27 MAR 2009 02:54:00
 date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:54:00'
 
 However..
 
 # date -s 27 MAR 2009 03:00:00
 Fri Mar 27 03:00:00 IDT 2009
 
 Why is it invalid??
 
 Thanks,
 Hetz
 -- 
 Skepticism is the lazy person's default position.
 my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org
 
 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
 


  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: xfone 018 phone service and Linux

2009-03-07 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

I don't know the technical details or 018.
I do know that 012 provides you with a sip adapter that is plugged between  the 
bezeq/hot modem and your PC/ordinary phone. It could be that that adapter 
reserve some BW for the sip packets. In any case, my experience is that both 
750K ADSl/cables is sufficient for a good quality phone service, with a lightly 
usage for internet and phone. The sip adapter I initially had was made in the 
US. I assume they use a US proven technology. My current sip adapter is made by 
AudioCodes. 012 claims that the sip adapter they provide should work with any 
ISP. I had two ISPs, and in my case their claim is justified.
There is also a rumor that bezeq's new generation network uses sip over copper 
for the phone services.

--- On Sat, 3/7/09, Arie Skliarouk sklia...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Arie Skliarouk sklia...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: xfone 018 phone service and Linux
 To: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 11:21 PM
 Hi,
 
 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 13:54, Gilad Ben-Yossef
 gi...@codefidence.comwrote:
 
   Arie Skliarouk wrote:
 
 
 
  How do they solve the latency problems inherent to any
 internet connection?
 
  The round trip time to a well connected (read: 0%
 packet loss) server in
  Israel from an Israeli ISP, where Israel here is
 defined as connected to
  the IIX, is under 50ms.
 
 
 On a 150kbit upload ADSL upload of a 1500 bytes packet
 takes about 85ms. To
 send out the VoIP packet would take another 85ms (on
 condition that you have
 a really good QoS). This causes latency of 85-170ms with
 jitter 85ms. The
 VoIP speech (SIP protocol) has a lot of skips and is
 unacceptable.
 
 Theory aside, I would like to hear first-hand experiences
 of people with 018
 before I commit for a year of phone service with them.
 
 -- 
 Arie
 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: persistent disk numbering

2009-02-28 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc

IIRC, udev can force persistent names. You might have to configure it for
that and/or use other names.

--- On Sat, 2/28/09, Erez D erez0...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Erez D erez0...@gmail.com
 Subject: persistent disk numbering
 To: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 Date: Saturday, February 28, 2009, 12:22 PM
 hi
 
 i have 2 sata disks. i boot from both (one at a time of
 course)
 
 when i disconnect the second, all is persistent, the first
 stays sda
 however when i disconnect the first, the seconds changes
 from sdb to sda
 
 is there a way to make it persistent ?
 (something like UID= or LABEL= as is done in fstab )
 ___
 Linux-il mailing list
 Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: How You Can Help the Tel Aviv Open Source Club

2009-02-16 Thread e2xbegqsdyt21hfc
1) At its current state, I think the only importance of telux is having a 
suitable place to meet if the need arise.
2) I won't have a presentation in telux (and not else where too) in the 
foreseeable future.
3) I doubt if I will come to a meeting in telux (and not else where too) in the 
foreseeble future
4) I will understand, and won't take it against you, if you stop.

 I'm tired of being the only one who cares and volunteers.
   Shlomi Fish

How can you say that when others come to hear and give talks?
Didn't you meant to say that you are tired of the poor results and low return 
of your many efforts?


  

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il