Re: RE : [GIT PULL] at91: Device Tree update for 3.11 #2
On 17/06/2013 18:56, Olof Johansson : On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Ferre, Nicolas wrote: On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: Arnd, Olof, Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches. It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent you last week. After having split it, here is the DT part. It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should go through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to define at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first. A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added. Thanks, best regards, The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af: ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 22:40:37 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt Pulled, thanks. Hi, I do not see it appearing in arm-soc/at91/dt branch even though is it present in arm-soc/for-next: is it normal? I had missed to push that (and the driver branch) up. They are there now, as at91/dt2 and at91/drivers. Fixed the bad branch name in arm-soc-for-next-contents.txt as well. Nice, thanks. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: RE : [GIT PULL] at91: Device Tree update for 3.11 #2
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Ferre, Nicolas wrote: > >>On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> Arnd, Olof, >>> >>> Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches. >>> It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent >>> you >>> last week. After having split it, here is the DT part. >>> It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should >>> go >>> through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to >>> define >>> at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree >>> (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first. >>> A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added. >>> >>> Thanks, best regards, >>> >>> The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af: >>> >>> ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 >>> 22:40:37 +0200) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt >> >>Pulled, thanks. > > Hi, > > I do not see it appearing in arm-soc/at91/dt branch even though is it present > in arm-soc/for-next: is it normal? I had missed to push that (and the driver branch) up. They are there now, as at91/dt2 and at91/drivers. Fixed the bad branch name in arm-soc-for-next-contents.txt as well. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE : [GIT PULL] at91: Device Tree update for 3.11 #2
>On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches. >> It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent you >> last week. After having split it, here is the DT part. >> It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should >> go >> through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to >> define >> at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree >> (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first. >> A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added. >> >> Thanks, best regards, >> >> The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af: >> >> ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 >> 22:40:37 +0200) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt > >Pulled, thanks. Hi, I do not see it appearing in arm-soc/at91/dt branch even though is it present in arm-soc/for-next: is it normal? Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [GIT PULL] at91: Device Tree update for 3.11 #2
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Arnd, Olof, > > Additional pull-request for AT91 DT patches. > It contains the remaining part of the USB gadget pull-request that I sent you > last week. After having split it, here is the DT part. > It also contains the update of DMA bindings: it is the AT91 part the should go > through arm-soc. I have included the patch (ARM: at91: dt: add header to > define > at_hdmac configuration) so that we avoid build errors whichever git tree > (slave-dma or arm-soc) is merged first. > A SPI DT patch for at91sam9x5 is also added. > > Thanks, best regards, > > The following changes since commit 028633c238f91dc113520a7ad25d37b2ba9068af: > > ARM: at91/dt: add pinctrl definition for at91 tc blocks (2013-05-31 > 22:40:37 +0200) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt Pulled, thanks. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
