Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 21 April 2007 02:02, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >  > Dave Jones wrote:
> >  > >  > Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this 
> > kernel.
> >  > >
> >  > > Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
> >  > >   
> >  > 
> >  > Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.
> >  > 
> >  > Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?
> >
> > Shrug, I'm out of ideas.  I'm hoping that it'll magically start working
> > when people start flushing their git trees for .22
> > Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x
> > because right now, I'm completely puzzled.
> 
> Well, it seemed reliable, but I just got a resume failure.  Different
> from any previous symptom I've seen:
> 
> Intel machine check architecture supported
> Intel machine check reporting enabled enabled on CPU#1
> Back to C!
> 

Hmm, looks like something in device_power_up() went awry.  Probably in
sysdev_resume().

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 21 April 2007 02:02, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
 Dave Jones wrote:
  On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
   Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this 
  kernel.

 Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
   

Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.

Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?
 
  Shrug, I'm out of ideas.  I'm hoping that it'll magically start working
  when people start flushing their git trees for .22
  Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x
  because right now, I'm completely puzzled.
 
 Well, it seemed reliable, but I just got a resume failure.  Different
 from any previous symptom I've seen:
 
 Intel machine check architecture supported
 Intel machine check reporting enabled enabled on CPU#1
 Back to C!
 hang

Hmm, looks like something in device_power_up() went awry.  Probably in
sysdev_resume().

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>  > Dave Jones wrote:
>  > >  > Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this 
> kernel.
>  > >
>  > > Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
>  > >   
>  > 
>  > Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.
>  > 
>  > Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?
>
> Shrug, I'm out of ideas.  I'm hoping that it'll magically start working
> when people start flushing their git trees for .22
> Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x
> because right now, I'm completely puzzled.

Well, it seemed reliable, but I just got a resume failure.  Different
from any previous symptom I've seen:

Intel machine check architecture supported
Intel machine check reporting enabled enabled on CPU#1
Back to C!


J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
 > Dave Jones wrote:
 > >  > Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this 
 > > kernel.
 > >
 > > Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
 > >   
 > 
 > Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.
 > 
 > Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?

Shrug, I'm out of ideas.  I'm hoping that it'll magically start working
when people start flushing their git trees for .22
Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x
because right now, I'm completely puzzled.

I was testing on a vanilla 2.6.21-rc7-git3.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
>  > Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.
>
> Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
>   

Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.

Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 08:28:10AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
 > Dave Jones wrote:
 > > -BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
 > > - [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
 > > - [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
 > > - [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
 > > - [] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
 > > - [] init+0x14b/0x241
 > > - [] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
 > > - ===
 > >
 > > heh, one for Ingo :)
 > Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.

Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.

 > > So most of the differences seem to be BIOS/firmware rather than hardware. 
 > > The PCI bus layout is identical for eg.
 > 
 > Do you have Intel wireless?  I realized one chance I'd made was to swap
 > the Atheros wireless with Intel, since it just seems to work better
 > overall.  I'd never had any major suspend/resume problems that I could
 > attribute to madwifi though (lots of minor wifi-related ones though).

yeah, the intel wireless.  Same as teh one in your pci.gz attachment..
03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network 
Connection (rev 02)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 1010
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 21

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
> -BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
> - [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
> - [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
> - [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
> - [] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
> - [] init+0x14b/0x241
> - [] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> - ===
>
> heh, one for Ingo :)
>   

Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.

> -ACPI: ACPI Dock Station Driver 
> -ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: found ejectable bay
> -ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: Adding notify handler
> -ACPI: Bay [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR] Added
>
> Hmm, I should try without the dock stuff built.
>
> -PCI: Using MMCONFIG
> +PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd82b, last bus=24
> +PCI: Using configuration type 1
>
> Think I've tried with and without MMCONFIG
>
> -pnp: PnP ACPI: found 11 devices
> +pnp: PnP ACPI: found 13 devices
>
> My Wacom tablet is one of them. There's also a mysterious 13th device :)
>
>  ibm_acpi: IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.13
>  ibm_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
> -ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7BHT37WW-1.10
> +ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7JHT12WW-1.03
>
> possibly just because of the touchscreen.
>   

I'm running a very recent BIOS in order to enable hardware
virtualization (VT/VMX).  The BIOS updates also update the EC firmware.

> So most of the differences seem to be BIOS/firmware rather than hardware. 
> The PCI bus layout is identical for eg.
>   

Do you have Intel wireless?  I realized one chance I'd made was to swap
the Atheros wireless with Intel, since it just seems to work better
overall.  I'd never had any major suspend/resume problems that I could
attribute to madwifi though (lots of minor wifi-related ones though).

> Looking at your .config, I notice that you don't have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT set
> (because you don't have any framebuffer drivers that use it enabled).
> Can you enable say.. CONFIG_FB_RADEON=m and CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=y
> (which should turn on CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y by dependancy), and see if
> it stops working for you? (You don't even need to load radeonfb.ko, just
> have it compiled).

OK, I'll give it a spin.

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:33:39PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
 > Dave Jones wrote:
 > > Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
 > > aren't quite so similar.  Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
 > > tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop' X60 too,
 > > is that the one you have perhaps?
 > 
 > Yes, mine is a normal laptop X60.  Still, its hard to imagine how they
 > could be very different; same CPU, same chipset, same graphics.  The
 > main difference is that your's has a Wacom tablet, presumably attached
 > to USB.
 > 
 > Details attached. How does it compare to your machine?

-1142MB HIGHMEM available.
+118MB HIGHMEM available.

So you have more RAM than I do :)

-NX (Execute Disable) protection: active

You enabled PAE, I didn't..
(Though I have tried both, makes no difference)

 DMI present.
+Using APIC driver default

Hmm.

 ACPI: RSDP 000F67B0, 0024 (r2 LENOVO)
-ACPI: XSDT 7F6D1896, 008C (r1 LENOVO TP-7B2060  LTP0)
-ACPI: FACP 7F6D1A00, 00F4 (r3 LENOVO TP-7B2060 LNVO1)
+ACPI: XSDT 3F6D12F5, 008C (r1 LENOVO TP-7J1050  LTP0)
+ACPI: FACP 3F6D1400, 00F4 (r3 LENOVO TP-7J1050 LNVO1)

BIOS differences (lots of these)

-Allocating PCI resources starting at 8800 (gap: 8000:7000)
+Allocating PCI resources starting at 5000 (gap: 4000:b000)

Probably due to the RAM differences shuffling the memmap.

-Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ acpi_sleep=s3_bios combined_mode=libata
+Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 profile=1

Hmm. I tried..
acpi_sleep=s3_bios
acpi_sleep=s3_mode
acpi_sleep=s3_bios,s3_mode
all did nothing for me.

-CPU: After all inits, caps: bfe9fbff 0010  2940 c1a9 
 
+CPU: After all inits, caps: bfe9f3ff 0010  2940 c1a9 
 

Probably PAE

-CPU0: Intel Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2400  @ 1.83GHz stepping 08
+CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU  L2400  @ 1.66GHz stepping 0c

slightly different CPU, but probably not enough to make any difference.

-BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
- [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
- [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
- [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
- [] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
- [] init+0x14b/0x241
- [] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
- ===

heh, one for Ingo :)

-ACPI: ACPI Dock Station Driver 
-ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: found ejectable bay
-ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: Adding notify handler
-ACPI: Bay [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR] Added

Hmm, I should try without the dock stuff built.

-PCI: Using MMCONFIG
+PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd82b, last bus=24
+PCI: Using configuration type 1

Think I've tried with and without MMCONFIG

-pnp: PnP ACPI: found 11 devices
+pnp: PnP ACPI: found 13 devices

My Wacom tablet is one of them. There's also a mysterious 13th device :)

 ibm_acpi: IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.13
 ibm_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
-ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7BHT37WW-1.10
+ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7JHT12WW-1.03

possibly just because of the touchscreen.

So most of the differences seem to be BIOS/firmware rather than hardware. 
The PCI bus layout is identical for eg.

Looking at your .config, I notice that you don't have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT set
(because you don't have any framebuffer drivers that use it enabled).
Can you enable say.. CONFIG_FB_RADEON=m and CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=y
(which should turn on CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y by dependancy), and see if
it stops working for you? (You don't even need to load radeonfb.ko, just
have it compiled).

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:33:39PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
  Dave Jones wrote:
   Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
   aren't quite so similar.  Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
   tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop' X60 too,
   is that the one you have perhaps?
  
  Yes, mine is a normal laptop X60.  Still, its hard to imagine how they
  could be very different; same CPU, same chipset, same graphics.  The
  main difference is that your's has a Wacom tablet, presumably attached
  to USB.
  
  Details attached. How does it compare to your machine?

-1142MB HIGHMEM available.
+118MB HIGHMEM available.

So you have more RAM than I do :)

-NX (Execute Disable) protection: active

You enabled PAE, I didn't..
(Though I have tried both, makes no difference)

 DMI present.
+Using APIC driver default

Hmm.

 ACPI: RSDP 000F67B0, 0024 (r2 LENOVO)
-ACPI: XSDT 7F6D1896, 008C (r1 LENOVO TP-7B2060  LTP0)
-ACPI: FACP 7F6D1A00, 00F4 (r3 LENOVO TP-7B2060 LNVO1)
+ACPI: XSDT 3F6D12F5, 008C (r1 LENOVO TP-7J1050  LTP0)
+ACPI: FACP 3F6D1400, 00F4 (r3 LENOVO TP-7J1050 LNVO1)

BIOS differences (lots of these)

-Allocating PCI resources starting at 8800 (gap: 8000:7000)
+Allocating PCI resources starting at 5000 (gap: 4000:b000)

Probably due to the RAM differences shuffling the memmap.

-Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ acpi_sleep=s3_bios combined_mode=libata
+Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 profile=1

Hmm. I tried..
acpi_sleep=s3_bios
acpi_sleep=s3_mode
acpi_sleep=s3_bios,s3_mode
all did nothing for me.

-CPU: After all inits, caps: bfe9fbff 0010  2940 c1a9 
 
+CPU: After all inits, caps: bfe9f3ff 0010  2940 c1a9 
 

Probably PAE

-CPU0: Intel Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2400  @ 1.83GHz stepping 08
+CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU  L2400  @ 1.66GHz stepping 0c

slightly different CPU, but probably not enough to make any difference.

-BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
- [c01091b5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
- [c010980c] show_trace+0x12/0x14
- [c01098cb] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
- [c0468dbd] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
- [c0461502] init+0x14b/0x241
- [c0108d97] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
- ===

heh, one for Ingo :)

-ACPI: ACPI Dock Station Driver 
-ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: found ejectable bay
-ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: Adding notify handler
-ACPI: Bay [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR] Added

Hmm, I should try without the dock stuff built.

-PCI: Using MMCONFIG
+PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd82b, last bus=24
+PCI: Using configuration type 1

Think I've tried with and without MMCONFIG

-pnp: PnP ACPI: found 11 devices
+pnp: PnP ACPI: found 13 devices

My Wacom tablet is one of them. There's also a mysterious 13th device :)

 ibm_acpi: IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.13
 ibm_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
-ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7BHT37WW-1.10
+ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7JHT12WW-1.03

possibly just because of the touchscreen.

So most of the differences seem to be BIOS/firmware rather than hardware. 
The PCI bus layout is identical for eg.

Looking at your .config, I notice that you don't have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT set
(because you don't have any framebuffer drivers that use it enabled).
Can you enable say.. CONFIG_FB_RADEON=m and CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=y
(which should turn on CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y by dependancy), and see if
it stops working for you? (You don't even need to load radeonfb.ko, just
have it compiled).

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
 -BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
 - [c01091b5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
 - [c010980c] show_trace+0x12/0x14
 - [c01098cb] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
 - [c0468dbd] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
 - [c0461502] init+0x14b/0x241
 - [c0108d97] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
 - ===

 heh, one for Ingo :)
   

Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.

 -ACPI: ACPI Dock Station Driver 
 -ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: found ejectable bay
 -ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: Adding notify handler
 -ACPI: Bay [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR] Added

 Hmm, I should try without the dock stuff built.

 -PCI: Using MMCONFIG
 +PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd82b, last bus=24
 +PCI: Using configuration type 1

 Think I've tried with and without MMCONFIG

 -pnp: PnP ACPI: found 11 devices
 +pnp: PnP ACPI: found 13 devices

 My Wacom tablet is one of them. There's also a mysterious 13th device :)

  ibm_acpi: IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.13
  ibm_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
 -ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7BHT37WW-1.10
 +ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7JHT12WW-1.03

 possibly just because of the touchscreen.
   

I'm running a very recent BIOS in order to enable hardware
virtualization (VT/VMX).  The BIOS updates also update the EC firmware.

 So most of the differences seem to be BIOS/firmware rather than hardware. 
 The PCI bus layout is identical for eg.
   

Do you have Intel wireless?  I realized one chance I'd made was to swap
the Atheros wireless with Intel, since it just seems to work better
overall.  I'd never had any major suspend/resume problems that I could
attribute to madwifi though (lots of minor wifi-related ones though).

 Looking at your .config, I notice that you don't have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT set
 (because you don't have any framebuffer drivers that use it enabled).
 Can you enable say.. CONFIG_FB_RADEON=m and CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=y
 (which should turn on CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y by dependancy), and see if
 it stops working for you? (You don't even need to load radeonfb.ko, just
 have it compiled).

OK, I'll give it a spin.

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 08:28:10AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
  Dave Jones wrote:
   -BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock()
   - [c01091b5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
   - [c010980c] show_trace+0x12/0x14
   - [c01098cb] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
   - [c0468dbd] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b
   - [c0461502] init+0x14b/0x241
   - [c0108d97] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
   - ===
  
   heh, one for Ingo :)
  Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.

Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.

   So most of the differences seem to be BIOS/firmware rather than hardware. 
   The PCI bus layout is identical for eg.
  
  Do you have Intel wireless?  I realized one chance I'd made was to swap
  the Atheros wireless with Intel, since it just seems to work better
  overall.  I'd never had any major suspend/resume problems that I could
  attribute to madwifi though (lots of minor wifi-related ones though).

yeah, the intel wireless.  Same as teh one in your pci.gz attachment..
03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network 
Connection (rev 02)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 1010
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 21

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
   Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel.

 Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
   

Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.

Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
  Dave Jones wrote:
 Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this 
   kernel.
  
   Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
 
  
  Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.
  
  Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?

Shrug, I'm out of ideas.  I'm hoping that it'll magically start working
when people start flushing their git trees for .22
Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x
because right now, I'm completely puzzled.

I was testing on a vanilla 2.6.21-rc7-git3.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
   Dave Jones wrote:
  Andi, I think.  I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this 
 kernel.
   
Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related.
  
   
   Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works.
   
   Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work?

 Shrug, I'm out of ideas.  I'm hoping that it'll magically start working
 when people start flushing their git trees for .22
 Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x
 because right now, I'm completely puzzled.

Well, it seemed reliable, but I just got a resume failure.  Different
from any previous symptom I've seen:

Intel machine check architecture supported
Intel machine check reporting enabled enabled on CPU#1
Back to C!
hang

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
> Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
> aren't quite so similar.  Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
> tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop' X60 too,
> is that the one you have perhaps?
>   

Yes, mine is a normal laptop X60.  Still, its hard to imagine how they
could be very different; same CPU, same chipset, same graphics.  The
main difference is that your's has a Wacom tablet, presumably attached
to USB.

Details attached. How does it compare to your machine?

J


config.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


dmesg.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


pci.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


usb.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


dmi.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:15:48PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
 > Dave Jones wrote:
 > > Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
 > > I'm guessing not.
 > >   
 > 
 > Hm, think so.  backlight controls work, via both
 > /proc/acpi/ibm/backlight and /sys/class/backlight/*/brightness.
 > 
 > $ ls -l /sys/class/backlight/
 > total 0
 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video0
 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video1
 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 ibm

Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
aren't quite so similar.  Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop' X60 too,
is that the one you have perhaps?

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
> Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
> I'm guessing not.
>   

Hm, think so.  backlight controls work, via both
/proc/acpi/ibm/backlight and /sys/class/backlight/*/brightness.

$ ls -l /sys/class/backlight/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video1
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 ibm


J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:57:15PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
 > Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
 > >  workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
 > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
 > > Submitter  : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >  Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > > Caused-By  : PCI merge
 > >  commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
 > > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >  Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > > Status : unknown
 > >   
 > 
 > OK. 2.6.21-rc7 suspend/resume works perfectly for me.  It's the first
 > kernel version in a long time.  I have no workarounds or special boot
 > options.  It's using hpet as the clocksource.

Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
I'm guessing not.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
>  workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
> Submitter  : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By  : PCI merge
>  commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
> Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status : unknown
>   

OK. 2.6.21-rc7 suspend/resume works perfectly for me.  It's the first
kernel version in a long time.  I have no workarounds or special boot
options.  It's using hpet as the clocksource.

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Adrian Bunk wrote:
 Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
  workaround: booting with hpet=disable
 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
 Submitter  : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Caused-By  : PCI merge
  commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
 Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status : unknown
   

OK. 2.6.21-rc7 suspend/resume works perfectly for me.  It's the first
kernel version in a long time.  I have no workarounds or special boot
options.  It's using hpet as the clocksource.

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:57:15PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
  Adrian Bunk wrote:
   Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
workaround: booting with hpet=disable
   References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
   Submitter  : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Caused-By  : PCI merge
commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
   Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Status : unknown
 
  
  OK. 2.6.21-rc7 suspend/resume works perfectly for me.  It's the first
  kernel version in a long time.  I have no workarounds or special boot
  options.  It's using hpet as the clocksource.

Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
I'm guessing not.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
 Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
 I'm guessing not.
   

Hm, think so.  backlight controls work, via both
/proc/acpi/ibm/backlight and /sys/class/backlight/*/brightness.

$ ls -l /sys/class/backlight/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video1
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 ibm


J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:15:48PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
  Dave Jones wrote:
   Do you have the backlight code enabled ?
   I'm guessing not.
 
  
  Hm, think so.  backlight controls work, via both
  /proc/acpi/ibm/backlight and /sys/class/backlight/*/brightness.
  
  $ ls -l /sys/class/backlight/
  total 0
  drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video0
  drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 acpi_video1
  drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Apr 19 22:13 ibm

Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
aren't quite so similar.  Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop' X60 too,
is that the one you have perhaps?

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-19 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dave Jones wrote:
 Hmm, given you hit the hpet problems and I didn't I think our X60's
 aren't quite so similar.  Mine is the one with the swivelly touchscreen
 tablet-pc mode. I understand they made a regular 'laptop' X60 too,
 is that the one you have perhaps?
   

Yes, mine is a normal laptop X60.  Still, its hard to imagine how they
could be very different; same CPU, same chipset, same graphics.  The
main difference is that your's has a Wacom tablet, presumably attached
to USB.

Details attached. How does it compare to your machine?

J


config.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


dmesg.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


pci.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


usb.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


dmi.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-17 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:48:55AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:

 > > When the backlight doesn't come on, for some reason, nothing else
 > > runs.  Capslock works, so it's at least partially alive, but even
 > > doing..
 > > 
 > > echo mem > /sys/power/state ; echo foo >/bar ; sync
 > > 
 > > results in no /bar being created.
 > > Ethernet remains down when its in this state too.
 > 
 > Have you tried these boot options?
 > 
 > acpi_sleep=s3_mode; or
 > acpi_sleep=s3_bios,s3_mode

Yeah, did nothing. I also tried acpi_sleep=s3_bios on its own.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-17 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 23:34 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> 
>  > >  > >  > CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
>  > >  > >  > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
>  > >  > > 
>  > >  > > That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Anything under /sys/class/backlight?
>  > > 
>  > > Entries from ibm_acpi.  I rmmod'd that, leaving the dir empty,
>  > > and it still fails.
>  > 
>  > What happens if you never load ibm-acpi?
> 
> Same thing. No backlight on resume.
> I rm'd the .ko, so there's no chance it got loaded.
> 
>  > I'm a bit puzzled as CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT doesn't do anything with the
>  > intelfb driver. One thing it does do is set
>  > CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE. When you disabled FB_BACKLIGHT and got a
>  > working display on resume, was that set and was (or had) ibm-acpi been
>  > loaded?
>  > 
>  > A variety of other options such as ACPI_IBM also set
>  > CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE although without a backlight driver it
>  > will do nothing hence the suspicion is on ibm-acpi, perhaps interacting
>  > with the backlight class badly.
>  > 
>  > Does echoing numbers to /sys/class/backlight/ibm_acpi/brightness change
>  > the backlight brightness as expected?
> 
> /sys/class/backlight/ibm/brightness takes a value from 0 to 7.
> Starts off with a default of 0. I tried all values in there, and
> it made no visible difference.  But as the no-backlight thing happens
> without this even loaded, I think this is a separate problem.
> 
>  > If you can ssh into the machine
>  > after its resumed with the display problem, it would be interesting to
>  > know what the brightness was and if changing it helped too...
> 
> When the backlight doesn't come on, for some reason, nothing else
> runs.  Capslock works, so it's at least partially alive, but even
> doing..
> 
> echo mem > /sys/power/state ; echo foo >/bar ; sync
> 
> results in no /bar being created.
> Ethernet remains down when its in this state too.

Have you tried these boot options?

acpi_sleep=s3_mode; or
acpi_sleep=s3_bios,s3_mode

Tony


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-17 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 23:34 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
 
 CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
 CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
   
   That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
  
  Anything under /sys/class/backlight?

Entries from ibm_acpi.  I rmmod'd that, leaving the dir empty,
and it still fails.
   
   What happens if you never load ibm-acpi?
 
 Same thing. No backlight on resume.
 I rm'd the .ko, so there's no chance it got loaded.
 
   I'm a bit puzzled as CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT doesn't do anything with the
   intelfb driver. One thing it does do is set
   CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE. When you disabled FB_BACKLIGHT and got a
   working display on resume, was that set and was (or had) ibm-acpi been
   loaded?
   
   A variety of other options such as ACPI_IBM also set
   CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE although without a backlight driver it
   will do nothing hence the suspicion is on ibm-acpi, perhaps interacting
   with the backlight class badly.
   
   Does echoing numbers to /sys/class/backlight/ibm_acpi/brightness change
   the backlight brightness as expected?
 
 /sys/class/backlight/ibm/brightness takes a value from 0 to 7.
 Starts off with a default of 0. I tried all values in there, and
 it made no visible difference.  But as the no-backlight thing happens
 without this even loaded, I think this is a separate problem.
 
   If you can ssh into the machine
   after its resumed with the display problem, it would be interesting to
   know what the brightness was and if changing it helped too...
 
 When the backlight doesn't come on, for some reason, nothing else
 runs.  Capslock works, so it's at least partially alive, but even
 doing..
 
 echo mem  /sys/power/state ; echo foo /bar ; sync
 
 results in no /bar being created.
 Ethernet remains down when its in this state too.

Have you tried these boot options?

acpi_sleep=s3_mode; or
acpi_sleep=s3_bios,s3_mode

Tony


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-17 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:48:55AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:

   When the backlight doesn't come on, for some reason, nothing else
   runs.  Capslock works, so it's at least partially alive, but even
   doing..
   
   echo mem  /sys/power/state ; echo foo /bar ; sync
   
   results in no /bar being created.
   Ethernet remains down when its in this state too.
  
  Have you tried these boot options?
  
  acpi_sleep=s3_mode; or
  acpi_sleep=s3_bios,s3_mode

Yeah, did nothing. I also tried acpi_sleep=s3_bios on its own.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:

 > >  > >  > CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
 > >  > >  > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
 > >  > 
 > >  > Anything under /sys/class/backlight?
 > > 
 > > Entries from ibm_acpi.  I rmmod'd that, leaving the dir empty,
 > > and it still fails.
 > 
 > What happens if you never load ibm-acpi?

Same thing. No backlight on resume.
I rm'd the .ko, so there's no chance it got loaded.

 > I'm a bit puzzled as CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT doesn't do anything with the
 > intelfb driver. One thing it does do is set
 > CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE. When you disabled FB_BACKLIGHT and got a
 > working display on resume, was that set and was (or had) ibm-acpi been
 > loaded?
 > 
 > A variety of other options such as ACPI_IBM also set
 > CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE although without a backlight driver it
 > will do nothing hence the suspicion is on ibm-acpi, perhaps interacting
 > with the backlight class badly.
 > 
 > Does echoing numbers to /sys/class/backlight/ibm_acpi/brightness change
 > the backlight brightness as expected?

/sys/class/backlight/ibm/brightness takes a value from 0 to 7.
Starts off with a default of 0. I tried all values in there, and
it made no visible difference.  But as the no-backlight thing happens
without this even loaded, I think this is a separate problem.

 > If you can ssh into the machine
 > after its resumed with the display problem, it would be interesting to
 > know what the brightness was and if changing it helped too...

When the backlight doesn't come on, for some reason, nothing else
runs.  Capslock works, so it's at least partially alive, but even
doing..

echo mem > /sys/power/state ; echo foo >/bar ; sync

results in no /bar being created.
Ethernet remains down when its in this state too.

It's the reason it's taken this long to get any debug info out of it at all.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 16 April 2007 02:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
> 
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
> possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
> 
> Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
> 
[--snip--]
> 
> 
> Subject: suspend to disk works only once
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/13/240
> Submitter  : Tobias Diedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By  : Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  commit ed746e3b18f4df18afa3763155972c5835f284c5
> Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status : problem is being debugged

Workaround is possible: do "echo shutdown > /sys/power/disk" before the
suspend or, for s2disk, add "shutdown method = shutdown" to the configuration
file.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: 
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>  > On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>  > >  
>  > >  > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
>  > >  > enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you 
> try?
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
>  > >  > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
>  > > 
>  > > That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
>  > 
>  > Anything under /sys/class/backlight?
> 
> Entries from ibm_acpi.  I rmmod'd that, leaving the dir empty,
> and it still fails.

What happens if you never load ibm-acpi?

I'm a bit puzzled as CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT doesn't do anything with the
intelfb driver. One thing it does do is set
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE. When you disabled FB_BACKLIGHT and got a
working display on resume, was that set and was (or had) ibm-acpi been
loaded?

A variety of other options such as ACPI_IBM also set
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE although without a backlight driver it
will do nothing hence the suspicion is on ibm-acpi, perhaps interacting
with the backlight class badly.

Does echoing numbers to /sys/class/backlight/ibm_acpi/brightness change
the backlight brightness as expected? If you can ssh into the machine
after its resumed with the display problem, it would be interesting to
know what the brightness was and if changing it helped too...

Regards,

Richard

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
 > On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
 > >  
 > >  > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
 > >  > enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
 > >  > 
 > >  > CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
 > >  > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
 > > 
 > > That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
 > 
 > Anything under /sys/class/backlight?

Entries from ibm_acpi.  I rmmod'd that, leaving the dir empty,
and it still fails.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>  
>  > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
>  > enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
>  > 
>  > CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
>  > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
> 
> That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.

Anything under /sys/class/backlight?

Tony


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
 
 > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
 > enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
 > 
 > CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
 > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n

That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 02:29 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>  > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>  > > 
>  > >  > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
>  > >  >  workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
>  > >  > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
>  > >  > Submitter  : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > >  >  Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > >  > Caused-By  : PCI merge
>  > >  >  commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
>  > >  > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > >  >  Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > >  > Status : unknown
>  > > 



> I'll try and narrow down exactly where it's failing in the
> backlight code next, but it's getting late here, so I may
> leave this until tomorrow for further investigation.
> Some other clues for anyone playing along at home:
> This X60 has Intel graphics.  ie, I'm not using any of
> the drivers that 'select FB_BACKLIGHT',

CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?

CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n

Tony


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > > 
 > >  > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
 > >  >  workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
 > >  > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
 > >  > Submitter  : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >  >  Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >  > Caused-By  : PCI merge
 > >  >  commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
 > >  > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >  >  Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >  > Status : unknown
 > > 
 > > note that this workaround doesn't seem to work in all cases.
 > > Mine may a slightly different model (I have the tablet version)
 > > but disabling hpet shows the same regression.
 > > I've been fighting Eric's USB debug cable code in the hope
 > > of getting _something_ useful out of it other than a black screen,
 > > but I've been getting nowhere with it.
 > 
 > I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.

I'm not sure why I never hit the same bug that Jeremy did
(again, maybe subtle hardware differences between our models),
but I finally got somewhere.   -rc7 with the same config I've
been testing exhibited exactly the same bug.   Disabling
the FB_BACKLIGHT option (and all the FB drivers that 'select' it),
I get a working display on resume again.

This makes a lot of sense. As before, when I resumed, the backlight
wasn't coming back on, but I knew the machine was alive, as
capslock was working.  (Amusingly, I never noticed the backlight
wasn't coming back on until tonight, when I started debugging this
with the lights off.  Late-night debugging ftw).

I'll try and narrow down exactly where it's failing in the
backlight code next, but it's getting late here, so I may
leave this until tomorrow for further investigation.
Some other clues for anyone playing along at home:
This X60 has Intel graphics.  ie, I'm not using any of
the drivers that 'select FB_BACKLIGHT', so somewhere in
the common fb code is code that I'm guessing is dependant
upon the framebuffer driver doing something or other
if FB_BACKLIGHT is set.

(Adding Richard to Cc: as he seems to be responsible for
 the FB backlight code from what I can tell.)

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
  On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
   On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
   
 Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
  workaround: booting with hpet=disable
 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
 Submitter  : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Caused-By  : PCI merge
  commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
 Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status : unknown
   
   note that this workaround doesn't seem to work in all cases.
   Mine may a slightly different model (I have the tablet version)
   but disabling hpet shows the same regression.
   I've been fighting Eric's USB debug cable code in the hope
   of getting _something_ useful out of it other than a black screen,
   but I've been getting nowhere with it.
  
  I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.

I'm not sure why I never hit the same bug that Jeremy did
(again, maybe subtle hardware differences between our models),
but I finally got somewhere.   -rc7 with the same config I've
been testing exhibited exactly the same bug.   Disabling
the FB_BACKLIGHT option (and all the FB drivers that 'select' it),
I get a working display on resume again.

This makes a lot of sense. As before, when I resumed, the backlight
wasn't coming back on, but I knew the machine was alive, as
capslock was working.  (Amusingly, I never noticed the backlight
wasn't coming back on until tonight, when I started debugging this
with the lights off.  Late-night debugging ftw).

I'll try and narrow down exactly where it's failing in the
backlight code next, but it's getting late here, so I may
leave this until tomorrow for further investigation.
Some other clues for anyone playing along at home:
This X60 has Intel graphics.  ie, I'm not using any of
the drivers that 'select FB_BACKLIGHT', so somewhere in
the common fb code is code that I'm guessing is dependant
upon the framebuffer driver doing something or other
if FB_BACKLIGHT is set.

(Adding Richard to Cc: as he seems to be responsible for
 the FB backlight code from what I can tell.)

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 02:29 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
   On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

  Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
   workaround: booting with hpet=disable
  References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
  Submitter  : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Caused-By  : PCI merge
   commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
  Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Status : unknown


snip

 I'll try and narrow down exactly where it's failing in the
 backlight code next, but it's getting late here, so I may
 leave this until tomorrow for further investigation.
 Some other clues for anyone playing along at home:
 This X60 has Intel graphics.  ie, I'm not using any of
 the drivers that 'select FB_BACKLIGHT',

CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?

CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n

Tony


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
 
  CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
  enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
  
  CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
  CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n

That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
  
   CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
   enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
   
   CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
   CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
 
 That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.

Anything under /sys/class/backlight?

Tony


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
  On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
   On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:

 CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
 enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you try?
 
 CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
 CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
   
   That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
  
  Anything under /sys/class/backlight?

Entries from ibm_acpi.  I rmmod'd that, leaving the dir empty,
and it still fails.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: 
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
   On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 03:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
 
  CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE, which, in turn is
  enabled by FB_BACKLIGHT. So we can narrow it down further, can you 
 try?
  
  CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
  CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n

That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
   
   Anything under /sys/class/backlight?
 
 Entries from ibm_acpi.  I rmmod'd that, leaving the dir empty,
 and it still fails.

What happens if you never load ibm-acpi?

I'm a bit puzzled as CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT doesn't do anything with the
intelfb driver. One thing it does do is set
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE. When you disabled FB_BACKLIGHT and got a
working display on resume, was that set and was (or had) ibm-acpi been
loaded?

A variety of other options such as ACPI_IBM also set
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE although without a backlight driver it
will do nothing hence the suspicion is on ibm-acpi, perhaps interacting
with the backlight class badly.

Does echoing numbers to /sys/class/backlight/ibm_acpi/brightness change
the backlight brightness as expected? If you can ssh into the machine
after its resumed with the display problem, it would be interesting to
know what the brightness was and if changing it helped too...

Regards,

Richard

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 16 April 2007 02:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
 
 If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
 of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
 of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
 possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
 
 Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
 
[--snip--]
 
 
 Subject: suspend to disk works only once
 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/13/240
 Submitter  : Tobias Diedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Caused-By  : Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  commit ed746e3b18f4df18afa3763155972c5835f284c5
 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Dmitry Torokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status : problem is being debugged

Workaround is possible: do echo shutdown  /sys/power/disk before the
suspend or, for s2disk, add shutdown method = shutdown to the configuration
file.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:

CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n
  
  That also gets me a dead display. Backlight doesn't turn back on.
 
 Anything under /sys/class/backlight?
   
   Entries from ibm_acpi.  I rmmod'd that, leaving the dir empty,
   and it still fails.
  
  What happens if you never load ibm-acpi?

Same thing. No backlight on resume.
I rm'd the .ko, so there's no chance it got loaded.

  I'm a bit puzzled as CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT doesn't do anything with the
  intelfb driver. One thing it does do is set
  CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE. When you disabled FB_BACKLIGHT and got a
  working display on resume, was that set and was (or had) ibm-acpi been
  loaded?
  
  A variety of other options such as ACPI_IBM also set
  CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE although without a backlight driver it
  will do nothing hence the suspicion is on ibm-acpi, perhaps interacting
  with the backlight class badly.
  
  Does echoing numbers to /sys/class/backlight/ibm_acpi/brightness change
  the backlight brightness as expected?

/sys/class/backlight/ibm/brightness takes a value from 0 to 7.
Starts off with a default of 0. I tried all values in there, and
it made no visible difference.  But as the no-backlight thing happens
without this even loaded, I think this is a separate problem.

  If you can ssh into the machine
  after its resumed with the display problem, it would be interesting to
  know what the brightness was and if changing it helped too...

When the backlight doesn't come on, for some reason, nothing else
runs.  Capslock works, so it's at least partially alive, but even
doing..

echo mem  /sys/power/state ; echo foo /bar ; sync

results in no /bar being created.
Ethernet remains down when its in this state too.

It's the reason it's taken this long to get any debug info out of it at all.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-15 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.
>
> So "hpet=disable" worked for Jeremy but not for you, IOW: you two were 
> running into different regressions?
>
> @Jeremy:
> If this is true, is your HPET related related regression still present 
> in -rc7?

I need to recheck, but when I tried -rc6, I was still having resume
problems but hpet=disabled didn't help.  So I definitely think there are
multiple bugs with the same symtoms.  I haven't tried -rc7 yet.

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
>  > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
>  >  workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
>  > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
>  > Submitter  : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > Caused-By  : PCI merge
>  >  commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
>  > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > Status : unknown
> 
> note that this workaround doesn't seem to work in all cases.
> Mine may a slightly different model (I have the tablet version)
> but disabling hpet shows the same regression.
> I've been fighting Eric's USB debug cable code in the hope
> of getting _something_ useful out of it other than a black screen,
> but I've been getting nowhere with it.

I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.

So "hpet=disable" worked for Jeremy but not for you, IOW: you two were 
running into different regressions?

@Jeremy:
If this is true, is your HPET related related regression still present 
in -rc7?

>   Dave

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-15 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

 > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
 >  workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
 > Submitter  : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 >  Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Caused-By  : PCI merge
 >  commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
 > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 >  Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Status : unknown

note that this workaround doesn't seem to work in all cases.
Mine may a slightly different model (I have the tablet version)
but disabling hpet shows the same regression.
I've been fighting Eric's USB debug cable code in the hope
of getting _something_ useful out of it other than a black screen,
but I've been getting nowhere with it.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-15 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

  Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
   workaround: booting with hpet=disable
  References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
  Submitter  : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Caused-By  : PCI merge
   commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
  Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Status : unknown

note that this workaround doesn't seem to work in all cases.
Mine may a slightly different model (I have the tablet version)
but disabling hpet shows the same regression.
I've been fighting Eric's USB debug cable code in the hope
of getting _something_ useful out of it other than a black screen,
but I've been getting nowhere with it.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 
   Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
workaround: booting with hpet=disable
   References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
   Submitter  : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Caused-By  : PCI merge
commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfeb02b7a7
   Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Status : unknown
 
 note that this workaround doesn't seem to work in all cases.
 Mine may a slightly different model (I have the tablet version)
 but disabling hpet shows the same regression.
 I've been fighting Eric's USB debug cable code in the hope
 of getting _something_ useful out of it other than a black screen,
 but I've been getting nowhere with it.

I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.

So hpet=disable worked for Jeremy but not for you, IOW: you two were 
running into different regressions?

@Jeremy:
If this is true, is your HPET related related regression still present 
in -rc7?

   Dave

cu
Adrian

-- 

   Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   Only a promise, Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions

2007-04-15 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Adrian Bunk wrote:
 I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.

 So hpet=disable worked for Jeremy but not for you, IOW: you two were 
 running into different regressions?

 @Jeremy:
 If this is true, is your HPET related related regression still present 
 in -rc7?

I need to recheck, but when I tried -rc6, I was still having resume
problems but hpet=disabled didn't help.  So I definitely think there are
multiple bugs with the same symtoms.  I haven't tried -rc7 yet.

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/