Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

[Julia Lawall]

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

> 2017-10-30 12:52 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Julia,
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> >> > /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
> >> > for false positives.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> >  scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci |6 +++---
> >> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci 
> >> > b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> >> > index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
> >> > --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> >> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> >> > @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
> >> >  /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended 
> >> > to be
> >> >  /// part of the if branch.
> >> >  ///
> >> > -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> >> > -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code 
> >> > that
> >> > -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> >> > +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> >> > +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code 
> >> > that
> >> > +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> >> >  ///
> >>
> >> Just a nit.
> >>
> >> The last /// should be turned into //
> >> if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
> >> after the semantic patch information.
> >>
> >> (I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up 
> >> this.)
> >
> > Thanks for detecting the problem.  It would be great if you could pick it
> > up, since I haven't heard confirmation from Michal that he will start this
> > again.  The change seems fine.  Thanks for your help.
> >
> > julia
> >
> >>
>
> Fix up the second ///
> and applied to linux-kbuild/misc.

Thanks!

julia

Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

[Julia Lawall]

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

> 2017-10-30 12:52 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Julia,
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> >> > /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
> >> > for false positives.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> >  scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci |6 +++---
> >> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci 
> >> > b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> >> > index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
> >> > --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> >> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> >> > @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
> >> >  /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended 
> >> > to be
> >> >  /// part of the if branch.
> >> >  ///
> >> > -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> >> > -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code 
> >> > that
> >> > -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> >> > +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> >> > +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code 
> >> > that
> >> > +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> >> >  ///
> >>
> >> Just a nit.
> >>
> >> The last /// should be turned into //
> >> if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
> >> after the semantic patch information.
> >>
> >> (I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up 
> >> this.)
> >
> > Thanks for detecting the problem.  It would be great if you could pick it
> > up, since I haven't heard confirmation from Michal that he will start this
> > again.  The change seems fine.  Thanks for your help.
> >
> > julia
> >
> >>
>
> Fix up the second ///
> and applied to linux-kbuild/misc.

Thanks!

julia

Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

[Masahiro Yamada]

2017-10-30 12:52 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Hi Julia,
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>> > /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
>> > for false positives.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 
>> >
>> > ---
>> >  scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci |6 +++---
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci 
>> > b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
>> > index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
>> > --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
>> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
>> > @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
>> >  /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended to 
>> > be
>> >  /// part of the if branch.
>> >  ///
>> > -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
>> > -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
>> > -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
>> > +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
>> > +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
>> > +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
>> >  ///
>>
>> Just a nit.
>>
>> The last /// should be turned into //
>> if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
>> after the semantic patch information.
>>
>> (I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up 
>> this.)
>
> Thanks for detecting the problem.  It would be great if you could pick it
> up, since I haven't heard confirmation from Michal that he will start this
> again.  The change seems fine.  Thanks for your help.
>
> julia
>
>>

Fix up the second ///
and applied to linux-kbuild/misc.





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

[Masahiro Yamada]

2017-10-30 12:52 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Hi Julia,
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>> > /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
>> > for false positives.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 
>> >
>> > ---
>> >  scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci |6 +++---
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci 
>> > b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
>> > index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
>> > --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
>> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
>> > @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
>> >  /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended to 
>> > be
>> >  /// part of the if branch.
>> >  ///
>> > -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
>> > -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
>> > -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
>> > +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
>> > +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
>> > +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
>> >  ///
>>
>> Just a nit.
>>
>> The last /// should be turned into //
>> if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
>> after the semantic patch information.
>>
>> (I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up 
>> this.)
>
> Thanks for detecting the problem.  It would be great if you could pick it
> up, since I haven't heard confirmation from Michal that he will start this
> again.  The change seems fine.  Thanks for your help.
>
> julia
>
>>

Fix up the second ///
and applied to linux-kbuild/misc.





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

[Julia Lawall]

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

> Hi Julia,
>
>
> 2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> > /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
> > for false positives.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 
> >
> > ---
> >  scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci |6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci 
> > b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> > index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
> > --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> > @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
> >  /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended to be
> >  /// part of the if branch.
> >  ///
> > -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> > -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> > -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> > +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> > +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> > +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> >  ///
>
> Just a nit.
>
> The last /// should be turned into //
> if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
> after the semantic patch information.
>
> (I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up this.)

Thanks for detecting the problem.  It would be great if you could pick it
up, since I haven't heard confirmation from Michal that he will start this
again.  The change seems fine.  Thanks for your help.

julia

>
>
>
> >  // Confidence: Low
> >  // Copyright: (C) 2010 Nicolas Palix, DIKU.  GPLv2.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
>

Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

[Julia Lawall]

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

> Hi Julia,
>
>
> 2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> > /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
> > for false positives.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 
> >
> > ---
> >  scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci |6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci 
> > b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> > index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
> > --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> > @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
> >  /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended to be
> >  /// part of the if branch.
> >  ///
> > -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> > -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> > -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> > +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> > +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> > +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> >  ///
>
> Just a nit.
>
> The last /// should be turned into //
> if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
> after the semantic patch information.
>
> (I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up this.)

Thanks for detecting the problem.  It would be great if you could pick it
up, since I haven't heard confirmation from Michal that he will start this
again.  The change seems fine.  Thanks for your help.

julia

>
>
>
> >  // Confidence: Low
> >  // Copyright: (C) 2010 Nicolas Palix, DIKU.  GPLv2.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
>

Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Julia,


2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
> for false positives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 
>
> ---
>  scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci |6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci 
> b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
>  /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended to be
>  /// part of the if branch.
>  ///
> -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
>  ///

Just a nit.

The last /// should be turned into //
if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
after the semantic patch information.

(I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up this.)



>  // Confidence: Low
>  // Copyright: (C) 2010 Nicolas Palix, DIKU.  GPLv2.
>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: use false positive annotation

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Julia,


2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
> for false positives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall 
>
> ---
>  scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci |6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci 
> b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci
> @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
>  /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended to be
>  /// part of the if branch.
>  ///
> -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
> +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column
> +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that
> +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column.
>  ///

Just a nit.

The last /// should be turned into //
if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series
after the semantic patch information.

(I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up this.)



>  // Confidence: Low
>  // Copyright: (C) 2010 Nicolas Palix, DIKU.  GPLv2.
>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada