Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
On 02/24/2014 06:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that it never actually made it to my inbox; could you verify that I was indeed on the recipient list? And if not resend it. Oh, yes. Sorry for that. I will resend it soon with ccing you. In case I was actually on the recipient list I need to go figure out where it went. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Hi Peter. > It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip > except this one. > What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that it never actually made it to my inbox; could you verify that I was indeed on the recipient list? And if not resend it. In case I was actually on the recipient list I need to go figure out where it went. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that it never actually made it to my inbox; could you verify that I was indeed on the recipient list? And if not resend it. In case I was actually on the recipient list I need to go figure out where it went. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
On 02/24/2014 06:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that it never actually made it to my inbox; could you verify that I was indeed on the recipient list? And if not resend it. Oh, yes. Sorry for that. I will resend it soon with ccing you. In case I was actually on the recipient list I need to go figure out where it went. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Hi Peter. > It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip > except this one. > What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? I might have just missed it; fail on my end. I'll try and sort it on monday. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
Hi Peter.
It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip
except this one.
What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do?
Thanx
On 02/11/2014 03:34 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang
cc: Steven Rostedt
cc: Frederic Weisbecker
cc: Ingo Molnar
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index a5457d5..0434ff1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ static int write_iteration = 50;
module_param(write_iteration, uint, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_iteration, "# of writes between timestamp readings");
-static int producer_nice = 19;
-static int consumer_nice = 19;
+static int producer_nice = MAX_NICE;
+static int consumer_nice = MAX_NICE;
static int producer_fifo = -1;
static int consumer_fifo = -1;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
/* Let the user know that the test is running at low priority */
if (producer_fifo < 0 && consumer_fifo < 0 &&
- producer_nice == 19 && consumer_nice == 19)
+ producer_nice == MAX_NICE && consumer_nice == MAX_NICE)
trace_printk("WARNING!!! This test is running at lowest
priority.\n");
trace_printk("Time: %lld (usecs)\n", time);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? Thanx On 02/11/2014 03:34 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang yangds.f...@cn.fujitsu.com cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com cc: Ingo Molnar mi...@redhat.com --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c index a5457d5..0434ff1 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ static int write_iteration = 50; module_param(write_iteration, uint, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_iteration, # of writes between timestamp readings); -static int producer_nice = 19; -static int consumer_nice = 19; +static int producer_nice = MAX_NICE; +static int consumer_nice = MAX_NICE; static int producer_fifo = -1; static int consumer_fifo = -1; @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void) /* Let the user know that the test is running at low priority */ if (producer_fifo 0 consumer_fifo 0 - producer_nice == 19 consumer_nice == 19) + producer_nice == MAX_NICE consumer_nice == MAX_NICE) trace_printk(WARNING!!! This test is running at lowest priority.\n); trace_printk(Time: %lld (usecs)\n, time); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? I might have just missed it; fail on my end. I'll try and sort it on monday. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
