RE: stv090x vs stv0900 support
Hi, Can someone help me, please? Regards, Kishore. -Original Message- From: Krishna Kishore Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 6:05 PM To: Chris Lee; Mariusz Bialonczyk Cc: Linux Media Mailing List; linux-...@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: stv090x vs stv0900 support Hi, When read_mac_address is called, khubd timed out error is seen. It looks like USB control msgs are not successfully being sent. Can someone please check attached logs and help me? Regards, Kishore. From: Krishna Kishore Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:49 PM To: Chris Lee; Mariusz Bialonczyk Cc: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: RE: stv090x vs stv0900 support Hi Chris, Does it help me in getting through the problem I am facing? On Desktop (Ubuntu 12.04), 7500 does not work. But, on desktop Ubuntu 13.04 it works fine. Since it is working well with 13.04, I tried with 3.8.x kernel on my board. It does not work. So, I can see that kernel version does not matter. I assume you have 7500 DVB receiver. Can you please try this device with Ubuntu 12.04 and 13.04 and see the difference in the behavior? If it helps you, I can send you logs of 12.04 and 13.04. Thanks in advance. Regards, Kishore. -Original Message- From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lee Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 6:21 PM To: Mariusz Bialonczyk Cc: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: stv090x vs stv0900 support Ive found a few bugs in stv090x that I want to get ironed out 100% before I submit the patch, dvb-s2 8psk fec2/3 for example has a slightly higher ber then stv0900, Got that fixed but Im still not happy with the patch, has a few other minor issues with low sr dvb-s qpsk sometimes not locking on the first attempt to tune. The Prof 7500 also seems to have an issue with stb6100 where get_frequency() wont return the correct frequency when other stb6100 devices I have do. Once I get those figured out to the point Im happy I'll submit it for everyones comments. Thanks for the link Mariusz, I'll check it out, maybe youve overcome some of the shortfalls Ive found Chris Lee On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Mariusz Bialonczyk ma...@skyboo.net wrote: On 07/24/2013 06:39 PM, Chris Lee wrote: Im looking for comments on these two modules, they overlap support for the same demods. stv0900 supporting stv0900 and stv090x supporting stv0900 and stv0903. Ive flipped a few cards from one to the other and they function fine. In some ways stv090x is better suited. Its a pain supporting two modules that are written differently but do the same thing, a fix in one almost always means it has to be implemented in the other as well. I totally agree with you. Im not necessarily suggesting dumping stv0900, but Id like to flip a few cards that I own over to stv090x just to standardize it. The Prof 7301 and Prof 7500. I did it already for 7301, see here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure /28082 but due to 'political' reasons it doesn't went upstream. For private use i am still using this patch on recent kernels, because it is working much more stable for my card comparing to stv0900. I think that moving prof 7500 should be relative easy, i even prepared a patch for this but I was not able to test it due to lack of hardware. Whats everyones thoughts on this? It will cut the number of patch''s in half when it comes to these demods. Ive got alot more coming lol :) Oh yes, you could also take into account another duplicate code: stb6100_cfg.h used for stv090x stb6100_proc.h used for stv0900 In my patch I've successfully switched to stb6100_cfg.h. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html regards, -- Mariusz Białończyk | xmpp/e-mail: ma...@skyboo.net http://manio.skyboo.net | https://github.com/manio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER: This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken Communication Technologies Limited (Sasken) unless sent with that express intent and with due authority of Sasken. Sasken has
Re: stv090x vs stv0900 support
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:20:32PM +, Krishna Kishore wrote: Hi, Can someone help me, please? Personally, I'm not allowed to do so because of: SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER: This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken Communication Technologies Limited (Sasken) unless sent with that express intent and with due authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the spread of viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Read Disclaimer at http://www.sasken.com/extras/mail_disclaimer.html Which is really incompatible with open mailing list discussions... sorry, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: stv090x vs stv0900 support
Hi Chris, Does it help me in getting through the problem I am facing? On Desktop (Ubuntu 12.04), 7500 does not work. But, on desktop Ubuntu 13.04 it works fine. Since it is working well with 13.04, I tried with 3.8.x kernel on my board. It does not work. So, I can see that kernel version does not matter. I assume you have 7500 DVB receiver. Can you please try this device with Ubuntu 12.04 and 13.04 and see the difference in the behavior? If it helps you, I can send you logs of 12.04 and 13.04. Thanks in advance. Regards, Kishore. -Original Message- From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lee Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 6:21 PM To: Mariusz Bialonczyk Cc: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: stv090x vs stv0900 support Ive found a few bugs in stv090x that I want to get ironed out 100% before I submit the patch, dvb-s2 8psk fec2/3 for example has a slightly higher ber then stv0900, Got that fixed but Im still not happy with the patch, has a few other minor issues with low sr dvb-s qpsk sometimes not locking on the first attempt to tune. The Prof 7500 also seems to have an issue with stb6100 where get_frequency() wont return the correct frequency when other stb6100 devices I have do. Once I get those figured out to the point Im happy I'll submit it for everyones comments. Thanks for the link Mariusz, I'll check it out, maybe youve overcome some of the shortfalls Ive found Chris Lee On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Mariusz Bialonczyk ma...@skyboo.net wrote: On 07/24/2013 06:39 PM, Chris Lee wrote: Im looking for comments on these two modules, they overlap support for the same demods. stv0900 supporting stv0900 and stv090x supporting stv0900 and stv0903. Ive flipped a few cards from one to the other and they function fine. In some ways stv090x is better suited. Its a pain supporting two modules that are written differently but do the same thing, a fix in one almost always means it has to be implemented in the other as well. I totally agree with you. Im not necessarily suggesting dumping stv0900, but Id like to flip a few cards that I own over to stv090x just to standardize it. The Prof 7301 and Prof 7500. I did it already for 7301, see here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure /28082 but due to 'political' reasons it doesn't went upstream. For private use i am still using this patch on recent kernels, because it is working much more stable for my card comparing to stv0900. I think that moving prof 7500 should be relative easy, i even prepared a patch for this but I was not able to test it due to lack of hardware. Whats everyones thoughts on this? It will cut the number of patch''s in half when it comes to these demods. Ive got alot more coming lol :) Oh yes, you could also take into account another duplicate code: stb6100_cfg.h used for stv090x stb6100_proc.h used for stv0900 In my patch I've successfully switched to stb6100_cfg.h. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html regards, -- Mariusz Białończyk | xmpp/e-mail: ma...@skyboo.net http://manio.skyboo.net | https://github.com/manio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER: This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken Communication Technologies Limited (Sasken) unless sent with that express intent and with due authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the spread of viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Read Disclaimer at http://www.sasken.com/extras/mail_disclaimer.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: stv090x vs stv0900 support
On 07/24/2013 06:39 PM, Chris Lee wrote: Im looking for comments on these two modules, they overlap support for the same demods. stv0900 supporting stv0900 and stv090x supporting stv0900 and stv0903. Ive flipped a few cards from one to the other and they function fine. In some ways stv090x is better suited. Its a pain supporting two modules that are written differently but do the same thing, a fix in one almost always means it has to be implemented in the other as well. I totally agree with you. Im not necessarily suggesting dumping stv0900, but Id like to flip a few cards that I own over to stv090x just to standardize it. The Prof 7301 and Prof 7500. I did it already for 7301, see here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/28082 but due to 'political' reasons it doesn't went upstream. For private use i am still using this patch on recent kernels, because it is working much more stable for my card comparing to stv0900. I think that moving prof 7500 should be relative easy, i even prepared a patch for this but I was not able to test it due to lack of hardware. Whats everyones thoughts on this? It will cut the number of patch''s in half when it comes to these demods. Ive got alot more coming lol :) Oh yes, you could also take into account another duplicate code: stb6100_cfg.h used for stv090x stb6100_proc.h used for stv0900 In my patch I've successfully switched to stb6100_cfg.h. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html regards, -- Mariusz Białończyk | xmpp/e-mail: ma...@skyboo.net http://manio.skyboo.net | https://github.com/manio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: stv090x vs stv0900 support
Ive found a few bugs in stv090x that I want to get ironed out 100% before I submit the patch, dvb-s2 8psk fec2/3 for example has a slightly higher ber then stv0900, Got that fixed but Im still not happy with the patch, has a few other minor issues with low sr dvb-s qpsk sometimes not locking on the first attempt to tune. The Prof 7500 also seems to have an issue with stb6100 where get_frequency() wont return the correct frequency when other stb6100 devices I have do. Once I get those figured out to the point Im happy I'll submit it for everyones comments. Thanks for the link Mariusz, I'll check it out, maybe youve overcome some of the shortfalls Ive found Chris Lee On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Mariusz Bialonczyk ma...@skyboo.net wrote: On 07/24/2013 06:39 PM, Chris Lee wrote: Im looking for comments on these two modules, they overlap support for the same demods. stv0900 supporting stv0900 and stv090x supporting stv0900 and stv0903. Ive flipped a few cards from one to the other and they function fine. In some ways stv090x is better suited. Its a pain supporting two modules that are written differently but do the same thing, a fix in one almost always means it has to be implemented in the other as well. I totally agree with you. Im not necessarily suggesting dumping stv0900, but Id like to flip a few cards that I own over to stv090x just to standardize it. The Prof 7301 and Prof 7500. I did it already for 7301, see here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/28082 but due to 'political' reasons it doesn't went upstream. For private use i am still using this patch on recent kernels, because it is working much more stable for my card comparing to stv0900. I think that moving prof 7500 should be relative easy, i even prepared a patch for this but I was not able to test it due to lack of hardware. Whats everyones thoughts on this? It will cut the number of patch''s in half when it comes to these demods. Ive got alot more coming lol :) Oh yes, you could also take into account another duplicate code: stb6100_cfg.h used for stv090x stb6100_proc.h used for stv0900 In my patch I've successfully switched to stb6100_cfg.h. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html regards, -- Mariusz Białończyk | xmpp/e-mail: ma...@skyboo.net http://manio.skyboo.net | https://github.com/manio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
stv090x vs stv0900 support
Im looking for comments on these two modules, they overlap support for the same demods. stv0900 supporting stv0900 and stv090x supporting stv0900 and stv0903. Ive flipped a few cards from one to the other and they function fine. In some ways stv090x is better suited. Its a pain supporting two modules that are written differently but do the same thing, a fix in one almost always means it has to be implemented in the other as well. Im not necessarily suggesting dumping stv0900, but Id like to flip a few cards that I own over to stv090x just to standardize it. The Prof 7301 and Prof 7500. Whats everyones thoughts on this? It will cut the number of patch''s in half when it comes to these demods. Ive got alot more coming lol :) Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: stv090x vs stv0900 support
My opinion is that, it is better to have only stv090x. Apart from minimizing the number of patches and ease of maintenance, it will avoid the confusion that I had When I started using prof 7500. I had to enable stv0900 and stb6100. I got confused on whether to enable stv0900 or to enable stv090x. -Original Message- From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lee Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:09 PM To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: stv090x vs stv0900 support Im looking for comments on these two modules, they overlap support for the same demods. stv0900 supporting stv0900 and stv090x supporting stv0900 and stv0903. Ive flipped a few cards from one to the other and they function fine. In some ways stv090x is better suited. Its a pain supporting two modules that are written differently but do the same thing, a fix in one almost always means it has to be implemented in the other as well. Im not necessarily suggesting dumping stv0900, but Id like to flip a few cards that I own over to stv090x just to standardize it. The Prof 7301 and Prof 7500. Whats everyones thoughts on this? It will cut the number of patch''s in half when it comes to these demods. Ive got alot more coming lol :) Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER: This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken Communication Technologies Limited (Sasken) unless sent with that express intent and with due authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the spread of viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Read Disclaimer at http://www.sasken.com/extras/mail_disclaimer.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: stv090x vs stv0900 support
On 07/24/2013 08:21 PM, Krishna Kishore wrote: My opinion is that, it is better to have only stv090x. Apart from minimizing the number of patches and ease of maintenance, it will avoid the confusion that I had When I started using prof 7500. I had to enable stv0900 and stb6100. I got confused on whether to enable stv0900 or to enable stv090x. -Original Message- From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lee Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:09 PM To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: stv090x vs stv0900 support Im looking for comments on these two modules, they overlap support for the same demods. stv0900 supporting stv0900 and stv090x supporting stv0900 and stv0903. Ive flipped a few cards from one to the other and they function fine. In some ways stv090x is better suited. Its a pain supporting two modules that are written differently but do the same thing, a fix in one almost always means it has to be implemented in the other as well. Im not necessarily suggesting dumping stv0900, but Id like to flip a few cards that I own over to stv090x just to standardize it. The Prof 7301 and Prof 7500. Whats everyones thoughts on this? It will cut the number of patch''s in half when it comes to these demods. Ive got alot more coming lol :) Chris stv0900 is better separated from the tuner whilst stv090x has weird stv6110x_devctl structure. That's why I used stv0900 for anysee driver. I wonder is there something special supported by stv090x because normal tuner/demod callbacks are not enough. regards Antti -- http://palosaari.fi/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: stv090x vs stv0900 support
On 07/24/13 19:52, Antti Palosaari wrote: On 07/24/2013 08:21 PM, Krishna Kishore wrote: My opinion is that, it is better to have only stv090x. Apart from minimizing the number of patches and ease of maintenance, it will avoid the confusion that I had When I started using prof 7500. I had to enable stv0900 and stb6100. I got confused on whether to enable stv0900 or to enable stv090x. -Original Message- From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lee Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:09 PM To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: stv090x vs stv0900 support Im looking for comments on these two modules, they overlap support for the same demods. stv0900 supporting stv0900 and stv090x supporting stv0900 and stv0903. Ive flipped a few cards from one to the other and they function fine. In some ways stv090x is better suited. Its a pain supporting two modules that are written differently but do the same thing, a fix in one almost always means it has to be implemented in the other as well. Im not necessarily suggesting dumping stv0900, but Id like to flip a few cards that I own over to stv090x just to standardize it. The Prof 7301 and Prof 7500. Whats everyones thoughts on this? It will cut the number of patch''s in half when it comes to these demods. Ive got alot more coming lol :) Chris stv0900 is better separated from the tuner whilst stv090x has weird stv6110x_devctl structure. That's why I used stv0900 for anysee driver. I wonder is there something special supported by stv090x because normal tuner/demod callbacks are not enough. That's probably for the ddbridge driver, while ours is pretty old (0.5) Ralph/oliver is working on 0.9 atm. 0.8.6 still uses the same structure i think. regards Antti -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
