Re: D-LINK wireless DIR600 150 Router
This is what I have gleemed from the Dick Smith Electronics website. It would seem it is just to a maximum of the 802.11 G standard. btw you may want to remove your address from the reply to address field of your email client setup, This will allow the default reply of emails to go back to the list and not directly to the original poster allowing all to benefit. Take Care Tom ***DSE*** D-Link Wireless 150 Router Create a high-speed wireless network for your home using the D-Link Wireless 150 Router. Connect the DIR-600 to a broadband modem and wirelessly share your high-speed Internet connection and enjoy surfing the web, checking e-mail, and chatting with family and friends online. The router uses Wireless 150 technology, which offers increased speed and range over the 802.11g⁄b standard*. The DIR-600 also includes an integrated 4-port 10⁄100BASE-TX Ethernet switch that gives you the flexibility to connect wired computers to the network. On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 20:32 +1300, dave wrote: D-LINK wireless DIR600 150 Router
Re: Spam assassin and mailman
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 09:18 +1300, Nick Rout wrote: I run a couple of mailing lists on mailman, in fact someone else owns the iron and adminsters the machine, I am just the admin/moderator of the mailing lists. The lists can only be posted to by subscribers. Too often I get a message that spamassassin has identified possible spam. I look at the supposed spam message and it isn't from a subscriber address. So why doesn't mailman simply reject it as from a non-subscriber instead of bothering me that it is possible spam? I don't care if it is spam or not, if its from a non-subscriber, it should just be bounced or dumped without bothering me. Puzzled of ChCh. Not being an expert on mailman, could it be the difference between the sender ( as identified by the mail from: smtp handshaking ) and the perceived sender ( the from: header in the mail body )?? Cheers, Steve -- Steve Holdoway st...@greengecko.co.nz http://www.greengecko.co.nz MSN: st...@greengecko.co.nz GPG Fingerprint = B337 828D 03E1 4F11 CB90 853C C8AB AF04 EF68 52E0 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Spam assassin and mailman
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 09:40 +1300, steve wrote: On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 09:18 +1300, Nick Rout wrote: I run a couple of mailing lists on mailman, in fact someone else owns the iron and adminsters the machine, I am just the admin/moderator of the mailing lists. The lists can only be posted to by subscribers. Too often I get a message that spamassassin has identified possible spam. I look at the supposed spam message and it isn't from a subscriber address. So why doesn't mailman simply reject it as from a non-subscriber instead of bothering me that it is possible spam? I don't care if it is spam or not, if its from a non-subscriber, it should just be bounced or dumped without bothering me. Puzzled of ChCh. Not being an expert on mailman, could it be the difference between the sender ( as identified by the mail from: smtp handshaking ) and the perceived sender ( the from: header in the mail body )?? Cheers, Steve In the process of learning, I am going to ask the ignorant question. If mail is rejected from non-subscribers, how will subscription requests be handled by mailman? Take Care Tom
Re: Spam assassin and mailman
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Tom Smith snake...@xtra.co.nz wrote: In the process of learning, I am going to ask the ignorant question. If mail is rejected from non-subscribers, how will subscription requests be handled by mailman? Messages that are intended to go to everyone on the list are send to listn...@...; Messages that are for sign-up go to listname-subscr...@ Many people on a list who want to get off just post UNSUBSCRIBE to the general list; mailman will optionally try to find these mistakes and autofix them ... (i.e. don't send them on to the list subscribers, and unsub the user as per their intended request). -jim
Re: Spam assassin and mailman
On 2009-12-18 09:18, Nick Rout wrote: So why doesn't mailman simply reject it as from a non-subscriber instead of bothering me that it is possible spam? I don't care if it is spam or not, if its from a non-subscriber, it should just be bounced or dumped without bothering me. You can change the order of the message pipeline stages (even on a per list basis) if you like. It defaults this way because each stage of the pipeline is independent, and when SpamDetect runs it doesn't know how you have set generic_nonmember_action. If you do have it set to 'Discard' then you could try moving SpamDetect after Moderate stage. -- Jim Tittsler http://www.OnNZ.net/ GPG: 0x01159DB6 Python Starship http://Starship.Python.net/crew/jwt/ Mailman IRC irc://irc.freenode.net/#mailman
