DHCP question

2002-07-09 Thread Joel Hammer

All the verbiage which follows simply leads up to this question: How,
in the routine course of events, can a dhcp server force a renewal, or
terminate, an ip number given to a client and reassign it to another
client before the end of the lease time?  This is what comcast did to me,
and I am still puzzled by it. 

Read on for some ramblings.

Just trying to figure out how my computer interacts with the comcast dhcp
server. dhcpcd runs all the time on my machine once you start it up.

I am reading RFC2131. It describes in detail how the server and client
interact.

No where can I find where the server can force the client to renew or
rebind prior to the times given in the original lease. That is to say,
as I understand it, (BIG assumption: understand) the client is the one
who sends the request for the lease renewal; and, the server cannot
initiate a lease change prior to the end of the lease. The dhcpcd daemon
is not listening for the server for messages. In fact, the dhcp server
cannot initiate a message to the client.  To support this conclusion,
there is no process listening to port 67 or 68 on my client machine.

Therefore,  with this information in my new lease:

LEASETIME=604800
RENEWALTIME=259200
REBINDTIME=529200

I am forced to renew within echo 604800 / (60*60*24) | bc or 7 days from
the date of this lease being granted.  Am I correct in concluding that in
the absence of some non routine event at Comcast, I am guaranteed this new
ip for seven days? That is to say, the comcast server cannot contact my
dhcpcd process and tell it to renew its lease before its expiration date?

My old lease, assigned by comcast,  had a 4 billion second expiration time (infinite). 

LEASETIME=4294967295
RENEWALTIME=259200
REBINDTIME=3758096383

dhcpcd by default asks for an infinite lease time.
echo ibase=16;  * 1 | bc = 4294967295 

As described in another thread, comcast terminated this lease and
reassigned my ip number without my knowledge. How can comcast tell I am
running with a static ip, unless they looked at their own database to
see the lease they assigned me originally?  Assuming they did that, how
could they reassign my ip number when it was still leased to my computer,
thereby just cutting me off from the internet, and threatening to terminate
my account if this happens again?

Any insight appreciated,
Joel

P.S. I would sent this letter to comcast if I knew where to send it.


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: have a compile problem

2002-07-09 Thread Keith Antoine

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:52, Net Llama! wrote:

 Run ldconfig -v | grep whatever_lib_you_need

 and see if it appears in the output.  If it appears then the problem is
 not the dynamic loader, its the RPM, or whatever you're trying to
 build/install.

Well that finds the files fine, so its the tarballs and src rpms that are at 
fault. It seems impossible that it would stuff up so many install, i.e
Avifile, Mjpegtools, imagemagick and mplayer. It must be something else that 
is at fault on my OS. But what!

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: DHCP question

2002-07-09 Thread m.w.chang

the dhcp server was resetted. :)

 All the verbiage which follows simply leads up to this question: How,
 in the routine course of events, can a dhcp server force a renewal, or
 terminate, an ip number given to a client and reassign it to another
 client before the end of the lease time?  This is what comcast did to me,
 and I am still puzzled by it. 

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: DHCP question

2002-07-09 Thread Joel Hammer

Well, maybe, but, the server should have the lease information on its hard
drive. Since the comcast people should want to maintain an orderly network,
I still don't see how they would violate their own leases.

Joel

On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:41:01PM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
 the dhcp server was resetted. :)
 
  All the verbiage which follows simply leads up to this question: How,
  in the routine course of events, can a dhcp server force a renewal, or
  terminate, an ip number given to a client and reassign it to another
  client before the end of the lease time?  This is what comcast did to me,
  and I am still puzzled by it. 
 
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: DHCP question

2002-07-09 Thread Joel Hammer

While I am burning up bandwidth, rfc2131 says that the client must not keep
using the ip number after the lease expires. However, I do not see any
provision in dhcpcd to disable the ip number when the lease expires. Does
anyone know how dhcpcd is supposed to carry this out?

Joel

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread William F. Day

An access point is like a hub/switch..  it does have embedded items in it
that are either configured over a serial/telnet connection or via a
webbrowser.

As for the wireless pcmcia and pci, I have yet to sit down and emss with
them yet...   trying to take over the wifes laptop so I can slap linux on it
and play with the wireless stuff on it..

Bill Day

Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
  6:10am  up 17 days, 20:06,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

- Original Message -
From: Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: Wireless (802.11) website?


 i guess i'm showing my ignorance.  so a base-station/access-point is
 basically an embedded device that doesn't need an OS based driver to work?

 i guess i need wireless for dumbies, cause i don't fully understand
 how it all comes together.

 Michael Hipp wrote:
  I'm not sure what sort of compatibility issue there could be with base
  stations (I'm assuming base station = access point). The various PCI,
USB
  and PCcards would more likely pose problems.
 
  http://www.linksys.com has some pretty good data here and there. They
even
  acknowledge the existence of Linux.
 
  I've used their wireless gear without problems, but not all of it in all
  configurations.
 
  Michael
 
  On Monday 08 July 2002 09:49 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
 
 Does anyone know of a good website that shows what kind of wireless gear
 works with linux?  I'm more concerned with the base stations than
 anything else.  thanks!
 
 
 
  ___
  Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
above URL.


 --
 ~
 L. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com

8:00pm  up 81 days,  2:47,  2 users,  load average: 0.14, 0.14, 0.16

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above
URL.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 7/1/02

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: DHCP question

2002-07-09 Thread David A. Bandel

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 04:27:54 -0400
begin  Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

 All the verbiage which follows simply leads up to this question: How,
 in the routine course of events, can a dhcp server force a renewal, or
 terminate, an ip number given to a client and reassign it to another
 client before the end of the lease time?  This is what comcast did to
 me, and I am still puzzled by it. 
 
 Read on for some ramblings.
 
 Just trying to figure out how my computer interacts with the comcast
 dhcp server. dhcpcd runs all the time on my machine once you start it
 up.
 
 I am reading RFC2131. It describes in detail how the server and client
 interact.
 
 No where can I find where the server can force the client to renew or
 rebind prior to the times given in the original lease. That is to say,
 as I understand it, (BIG assumption: understand) the client is the one
 who sends the request for the lease renewal; and, the server cannot
 initiate a lease change prior to the end of the lease. The dhcpcd daemon
 is not listening for the server for messages. In fact, the dhcp server
 cannot initiate a message to the client.  To support this conclusion,
 there is no process listening to port 67 or 68 on my client machine.
 
[snip]

No, but please reread the part about where a client shuts down and returns
the lease. Windoze users typically restart their computer twice a day, and
normally shut down at least daily.  It's a Windoze habit.  

 
 As described in another thread, comcast terminated this lease and
 reassigned my ip number without my knowledge. How can comcast tell I am
 running with a static ip, unless they looked at their own database to
 see the lease they assigned me originally?  Assuming they did that, how
 could they reassign my ip number when it was still leased to my
 computer, thereby just cutting me off from the internet, and threatening
 to terminate my account if this happens again?
 

If you have a dhcp server you can force termination of a lease.  If they
forced termination of all leases, then 2 days later checked to see which
IPs were in use, but not in their leases file (because the server checks
to see if an IP is in use before assigning it), then they know who has a
static IP (logically, if Windoze lusers do daily shutdowns).  OK, you're
not a Windoze luser, you're an exception.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: ipchains rule question: Destination ip

2002-07-09 Thread David A. Bandel

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:32:29 -0400
begin  Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

 It has been so long since I set up my firewall I have forgotten why I
 did this, so :
 
 Here are two typical rules from my firewall (ipchains). Note that with
 one, the target ip is 0.0.0.0, and with the other the target is
 68.36.44.105, which is the ip of the machine running the firewall. eth1
 is the external NIC facing the cable modem.
 
 target  tosa tosx  ifname source  destination ports
 
 ACCEPT udp  0xFF 0x00  eth1   198.82.161.227  0.0.0.0  * -   123
 ACCEPT udp  0xFF 0x00  eth1   198.82.162.213  68.36.44.105 * -   123
 
 I have used 68.36.44.105 in a number of destinations in my ipchain
 rules instead of 0.0.0.0, as noted above.  As far as I can see, these
 rules are equivalent, since my NIC, which is configured as 68.36.44.105,
 will not look at packets not addressed to it, at least under ordinary
 circumstances.

The above is your system to Internet on ntp port (123), the next rule is
Internet to your system on ntp port.

But I really suggest you start looking at iptables instead of this
dinosaur.

 
 I would like to remove targets such as 68.36.44.105 and substitute
 0.0.0.0 for all of them. Can someone suggest why this might not be a
 good idea? For example, I am wondering what would happen if my NIC were
 to run in PROMISCUOUS mode ?

You're mixing apples and oranges.  A NIC in promisc mode may see all the
packets on a network, but that does not mean it does anything usefull with
them.  As for the targets, you can reduce CPU load by switching to
iptables.

[Sorry, I see no sense entertaining ipchains questions when you should be
using iptables for better security and easier rules management]

 
 Any insight appreciated,
 

[snip]

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Michael Hipp

If you just want your Linux box to be wireless, all you need is a wireless 
access point sitting on a shelf somewhere and connected to your LAN. If it 
is a Linksys model, you config it via browser.  Think of it as a hub with 
no wires. Er, actually 1 wire, the one connecting to the LAN that gets the 
wireless 'puters out to the big wide world. But in any case, no O/S issues.

BTW, pick the location carefully. Once the signal starts passing through 
walls, it goes to nothing in a hurry. Installed a setup last week in an 
Attorney's house. Pretty big house prolly 4000+ square feet. With the 
access point/router in the geographic center of the house, Signal was 
approaching unusable at both ends of house. This particular AP/Rtr connects 
directly to the DSL and handles the PPPoE for DSL as well as NAT, DHCP and 
all the wireless stuff. It will also do VPN. My attorney friend bragged 
later that he could surf the net on his laptop while sitting on the 
throne.

You then need a USB, PCI or PCcard wireless NIC connected to the roving 
Linux box. Like any NIC, of course, you need a module/driver. I'm told 
plenty of them work, but I can't say that for sure. LinkSys usually gives 
Linux setup info for their devices.

Michael

On Monday 08 July 2002 10:12 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
 i guess i'm showing my ignorance.  so a base-station/access-point is
 basically an embedded device that doesn't need an OS based driver to
 work?

 i guess i need wireless for dumbies, cause i don't fully understand
 how it all comes together.

 Michael Hipp wrote:
  I'm not sure what sort of compatibility issue there could be with base
  stations (I'm assuming base station = access point). The various PCI,
  USB and PCcards would more likely pose problems.
 
  http://www.linksys.com has some pretty good data here and there. They
  even acknowledge the existence of Linux.
 
  I've used their wireless gear without problems, but not all of it in
  all configurations.
 
  Michael
 
  On Monday 08 July 2002 09:49 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
 Does anyone know of a good website that shows what kind of wireless
  gear works with linux?  I'm more concerned with the base stations than
  anything else.  thanks!
 
  ___
  Linux-users mailing list -
  http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe
  info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Net Llama!

On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
 On Mon, 08 Jul 2002 19:49:42 -0700
 begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

  Does anyone know of a good website that shows what kind of wireless gear
 
  works with linux?  I'm more concerned with the base stations than
  anything else.  thanks!

 What do you need?  If you need to run in Master, Repeater, or Secondary
 modes, you're out of luck (for the moment).

 I have a couple of wireless networks running using Linux as the base
 station, repeater (router), and access point by using ad-hoc mode.  I use
 WEP and iptables.

here's what i'm envisioning:

[INTERNET] - {DSL} - [Freesco Router] - [10pt hub] - - -  /

multipled computers on my network +  WiFi access point



So, am i smoking the good stuff, or is this doable?

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Net Llama!

On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
 On Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:12:14 -0700
 begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

  i guess i'm showing my ignorance.  so a base-station/access-point is
  basically an embedded device that doesn't need an OS based driver to
  work?
 
  i guess i need wireless for dumbies, cause i don't fully understand
  how it all comes together.
 

 commercial access points cannot be used as anything but that, they can't
 be used as Master or Repeater stations.  It has to do with proprietary
 code in the cards, and the big boys don't want anyone to muck with their
 gravy trains.

 In a linux box, however, a wireless card in ad-hoc mode is basically an
 ethernet card.  You do need to understand radio signals and how they work,
 fresnell zones, and more, but that's not hard either.

 Tell me what you need, I'll give you more than you've ever wanted to know.

OK, what i attempted to diagram in my previous email was, that i'm
getting DSL activated this Friday at home.  My grand plan (excluding the
WiFi
stuff) is to run a Freesco box box that has 2 NICs, one plugged directly
into the DSL router that the DSL provider gives me, and then the other
plugged into a 10 port hub (yes, i know switches are better, but this is
all i have on hand, and all i can afford right now).  I've got 2 linux
boxes that my wife  I use, plus 2 laptops (also linux).  everything is a
static (10.x.x.x) IP, and will have the Freesco box as its gateway to the
internet.

Now my vision for wireless is to get 1 or 2 wireless cards for the
laptops, and a base-station/access-point.  Plug the access-point into the
hub, point it to the Freesco box as the gateway (as i'm already doing),
and then get the laptops online anywhere in my house.

So, is this possible, or am i completely misunderstanding what wireless
can do for me?

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Michael Hipp

On Tuesday 09 July 2002 07:54 am, Net Llama! wrote:
 On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
  On Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:12:14 -0700
 
  begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
   i guess i'm showing my ignorance.  so a base-station/access-point is
   basically an embedded device that doesn't need an OS based driver to
   work?
  
   i guess i need wireless for dumbies, cause i don't fully understand
   how it all comes together.
 
  commercial access points cannot be used as anything but that, they
  can't be used as Master or Repeater stations.  It has to do with
  proprietary code in the cards, and the big boys don't want anyone to
  muck with their gravy trains.
 
  In a linux box, however, a wireless card in ad-hoc mode is basically an
  ethernet card.  You do need to understand radio signals and how they
  work, fresnell zones, and more, but that's not hard either.
 
  Tell me what you need, I'll give you more than you've ever wanted to
  know.

 OK, what i attempted to diagram in my previous email was, that i'm
 getting DSL activated this Friday at home.  My grand plan (excluding the
 WiFi
 stuff) is to run a Freesco box box that has 2 NICs, one plugged directly
 into the DSL router that the DSL provider gives me, and then the other
 plugged into a 10 port hub (yes, i know switches are better, but this is
 all i have on hand, and all i can afford right now).  I've got 2 linux
 boxes that my wife  I use, plus 2 laptops (also linux).  everything is a
 static (10.x.x.x) IP, and will have the Freesco box as its gateway to the
 internet.

 Now my vision for wireless is to get 1 or 2 wireless cards for the
 laptops, and a base-station/access-point.  Plug the access-point into the
 hub, point it to the Freesco box as the gateway (as i'm already doing),
 and then get the laptops online anywhere in my house.

 So, is this possible, or am i completely misunderstanding what wireless
 can do for me?

You got it right. Just find wireless NICs that you can get working under 
Linux. The base-station could care less that the router and wireless 
clients are running Linux or anything else.


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: have a compile problem

2002-07-09 Thread Net Llama!

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Keith Antoine wrote:
 On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:52, Net Llama! wrote:

  Run ldconfig -v | grep whatever_lib_you_need
 
  and see if it appears in the output.  If it appears then the problem is
  not the dynamic loader, its the RPM, or whatever you're trying to
  build/install.

 Well that finds the files fine, so its the tarballs and src rpms that are at
 fault. It seems impossible that it would stuff up so many install, i.e
 Avifile, Mjpegtools, imagemagick and mplayer. It must be something else that
 is at fault on my OS. But what!

I've built just about all of that stuff without too much grief.  So, odds
are your system is putting libraries in very non-standard locations that
the RPMs aren't finding.  So, let's take this one package at a time
(avifile, mjpegtools etc).  Provide the errors that you're seeing, and we
can work from there.

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Web Filtering

2002-07-09 Thread Wil McGilvery



Regards,
 
Wil McGilvery
Manager, Digital Media

 
Lynch Technologies Inc.
416-744-7191
1-888-622-3729
416-744-0406  FAX
www.lynchdigital.com


I am looking at preventing the downloading of executables, etc through the internet 
and I am investigating DansGuardian as a possible solution. 

Does anyone else have experience in this area?

Thanks,

Wil

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Web Filtering

2002-07-09 Thread Net Llama!

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Wil McGilvery wrote:
 I am looking at preventing the downloading of executables, etc through the internet 
and I am investigating DansGuardian as a possible solution.

 Does anyone else have experience in this area?

 Thanks,


Can you clarify what you're trying to do here?  You want to stop desktop
users from downloading executables?  I've never heard of DansGuardian
however i kinda doubt that there is any perfect solution since an
executable is nothing more than a permissions bit on a file.

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: inittab question

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Thanks, David.  I thought I was losing my Linmarbles...

On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:26:55 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No.  It would have to be something like:
 
 11:2345:respawn:/usr/bin/tail -f /var/log/messages|/some/program 
 /dev/tty11 2/dev/null
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread David A. Bandel

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:54:57 -0400 (EDT)
begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

 On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
  On Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:12:14 -0700
  begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
 
   i guess i'm showing my ignorance.  so a base-station/access-point is
   basically an embedded device that doesn't need an OS based driver to
   work?
  
   i guess i need wireless for dumbies, cause i don't fully
   understand how it all comes together.
  
 
  commercial access points cannot be used as anything but that, they
  can't be used as Master or Repeater stations.  It has to do with
  proprietary code in the cards, and the big boys don't want anyone to
  muck with their gravy trains.
 
  In a linux box, however, a wireless card in ad-hoc mode is basically
  an ethernet card.  You do need to understand radio signals and how
  they work, fresnell zones, and more, but that's not hard either.
 
  Tell me what you need, I'll give you more than you've ever wanted to
  know.
 
 OK, what i attempted to diagram in my previous email was, that i'm
 getting DSL activated this Friday at home.  My grand plan (excluding the
 WiFi
 stuff) is to run a Freesco box box that has 2 NICs, one plugged directly
 into the DSL router that the DSL provider gives me, and then the other
 plugged into a 10 port hub (yes, i know switches are better, but this is
 all i have on hand, and all i can afford right now).  I've got 2 linux
 boxes that my wife  I use, plus 2 laptops (also linux).  everything is
 a static (10.x.x.x) IP, and will have the Freesco box as its gateway to
 the internet.
 
 Now my vision for wireless is to get 1 or 2 wireless cards for the
 laptops, and a base-station/access-point.  Plug the access-point into
 the hub, point it to the Freesco box as the gateway (as i'm already
 doing), and then get the laptops online anywhere in my house.
 
 So, is this possible, or am i completely misunderstanding what wireless
 can do for me?

My suggestion for you is the following:
forget the access point, it's an unnecessary expense.
In one system that's always on (I suppose, but don't know, that it could
be the freesco box), put a PCI-PCMCIA bridge card (I recommend one with
the Ricoh chipset) and a wireless card.  Spend the money you saved on the
access point to buy something like the Orinoco Extender antenna (works
with Orinoco/Agere cards, whatever card you use you'll need a compatible
connector for the card).  Place the extender antenna at approx eye-level
(when you're standing).
Install WIFI cards in your laptops. Depending on your distance from the
desktop, and the geography of your house, you may need small antennas for
the laptops. The WIFI network will, of course, be a different network than
your desktops, so make sure your routing is correct if you need to talk to
your desktops.

On WIFI cards, antennas, and wireless:
Most current WIFI cards are 50mW in power with no antenna.  An antenna
effectively increases the power for both sending and receiving.  Outdoors,
you can easily go 1/2 mile without antennas.  Newer cars w/ 100mW and even
200mW can go to almost a mile.  An antenna extends the sensitivity and
range.
Wireless is LOS (line of site).  It will pass through glass, but not solid
objects.  It will work in your house because for the most part you'll be
inside the ground plane (fresnell zone).  An antenna, particularly one
place up high, increases the ground plane (which size is based on antenna
height and output power).  So while the signal can't see through walls, it
can travel around them if the walls are within the ground plane.  With
overlapping ground planes, you'll always have connectivity despite the LOS
limitations.

On amplifiers:
Some folks (often HAM operators) think amps will increase distance through
increased power.  While this is true, you run the risk of overmodulating
stations closer in.  WIFI works on SNR (signal to noise ratio).  Amps
boost both, signal and noise.  They do little to change the SNR very much.
 Imagine you get 50 e-mails a day, 10 of which are important.  Your SNR is
-.20.  This is good (actual WIFI calcs are much more complicated, with
93/93 being perfect). You can effectively process 100 e-mails per day, but
no more (limitation on your time).  Suddenly, you find yourself getting
500 messages per day, of which 100 are important.  While the SNR is the
same, you'll probably never see any of the 100 important messages because
you're drowning in the 400 spams. Same principal applies to amp'd signals.

What haven't I covered?  Lots.  How antennas (typically 3dbi to 24dbi)
boost effective power (power is measured at the antenna).  Signal polarity
(must say a word or two here).

Signal polarity:  If you use something like the Orinoco range extender
antennas, you'll see that they are similar to an omni.  That is, they have
a radiation pattern, 360 degrees around, but probably vertically about 22
degrees (except within the ground plane).  However, you'll 

Re: Sharing Kernels Revisited

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

I know.  This is, I suppose, a philosophical difference.  Most Linux gurus
recommend running customized kernels.  I've played in that arena and feel
comfortable there, but still hold to several benefits of running canned
kernels.  The main benefit is upgradeability...  If there are security
issues which require a new kernel, I MUST rebuild the kernel(s).  Even if
I roll my own into RPM's and can take that upgraded kernel and plunk it on
all my machines, I still MUST rebuild the kernel.  Beyond that, it becomes
a support issue whereby no one can quickly know what my kernel is like. 
If I mail you guys or call support, I have to explain what my kernel has
configured and then there is the doubts of my correctness that I have to
overcome.  If I can say Stock ANYTHING, I'm far better off, because I am
relatively guaranteed that someone on this list or in the support team HAS
and DOES run that kernel.

I see benefits both ways, but in my attempt to remain corporately
responsible I must tip my hat to canned kernels.


On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:14:35 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If you're going to be playing these slick games
 with kernels, it would prolly be better if you built your own, so that
 you are sure what is in it.  Otherwise you could end up introducing all
 kinds of instabilities to the system if you're running a kernel on it
 that didn't come with it.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: [Fwd: Re: DVD-XINE]

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

AFAIK this probably has to do with Xine's public declaration that they do
not support the libdvdcss at this time due to its questionable legal
status.  Why doesn't someone just rewrite it and be done with it?  The
secret concepts are blown.  You can't outlaw the use of concepts,
especially if there are 5 or 10 different implementations of it.

It would seem that one could run Xine without the NAV plugin and use only
xine-lib and xine-ui.  (I believe) This would use the standard builtin
Xine DVD subsystem.  The following packages give the NAV subsystem, which
is often considered better than the built-in one:

libdvdread
libdvdnav
xine-dvdnav

According to the README file for libdvdread, it currently uses libdl to
dynamically probe for libdvdcss at runtime.  So if you have it,
congratulations, if not, you still can use the new subsystem if you like.

Look for COL3.1.x rpms to be linked to from the SxS site coming soon. 
(Due to potential legal issues, all but the libdvdcss packages will be
included.  If use of libdvdcss is legal for you, pull it from the videolan
site and buld from source-it should still work)

Matt

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:27:18 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 It was not the case in version pre .10 were I was able to run a dvd by 
 accessing the dvd button, whereas now one uses the 'nav' button.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: have a compile problem

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Have you updated your library cache by executing ldconfig since installing
any new required packages?

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:39:54 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This has reared its head recently whereby dependecy libs are not being
 found by a program that is being installed.
 
 The libraries do exist on the system and should be in the PATH, so why
 is it that they are not being found. This is not limitted to any
 particular lib, however some are found, it seems inconsistent. Ldconfig
 being called sometimes is a waste of time:
 
 ld.so.conf has these entries in:
 /usr/X11R6/lib
 /opt/kde/lib
 /opt/kde2/lib
 /opt/kde3/lib
 /usr/lib/qt2/lib
 /usr/lib/qt3/lib/
 /opt/volution/lib
 /usr/lib/
 /usr/local/lib/
 /usr/local/bin
 /usr/bin
 /opt/kde/bin
 
 
 For instance I have tried installed the rpm both it and a src rpm which
 do not fine the following 
 libaviplay-0.7.so.0
 libesd.so.0
 libpng.so.2
 libSDL-1.2.so.0
 
 If I do a locate on the system it comes back with :
 /usr/local/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0
 /usr/local/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.3
 /usr/local/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.6
 /usr/local/lib/libaviplay.la
 /usr/local/lib/libaviplay.so
 /usr/local/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.7
 /usr/local/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.8
 
 /lib/libpng.a
 /lib/libpng.so
 /lib/libpng.so.2
 /lib/libpng.so.2.1.0.8
 
 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.1.so.0
 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.1.so.0.5.3
 /usr/lib/libSDL.so
 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0
 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.0.4
 /usr/lib/libSDL.a
 /usr/lib/libSDLmain.a
 /lib/libSDL-1.1.so.0
 /lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0
 /lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.0.4
 /lib/libSDL.a
 /lib/libSDL.so
 /lib/libSDLmain.a
 
 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0
 /usr/lib/libesd.so.0.2.8
 /usr/lib/libesddsp.so.0
 /usr/lib/libesddsp.so.0.2.8
 /lib/libesd.so.0
 /lib/libesd.so.0.2.8
 /lib/libesddsp.so.0
 /lib/libesddsp.so.0.2.8
 
 
 Most seem to occur in 2 seperate areas, but /lib should be in the PATH
 and they should be found.
 
 This is occuring with Office beta install from a tarball, its also
 occurs as I said with src rpms and as dependencies with rpms.
 
 
 -- 
 Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in
 storage
 
 
 
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
 http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
 above URL.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Winders or Samba problem..

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

First off, this is a bit confusing.

On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:54:44 -0400
William F. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 ok, lets go this route...
 
 I ran COL eD2.4 for about a year with frequent updates to samba for
 security patches etc.  That was the only thing that changed till about 3
 months ago, including no clean installs of winders comps, everything was
 just dandy.
 
 Did a booboo on the COL box that prolly would have either required a
 major amount of work to fix, or a miracle..  Installed Trustix Secure
 Linux v1.5 on the box after a hardware upgrade.  Using my confs for
 various item, i.e. samba, dhcpd... I activated all items, nothing gave
 me a fit, everything worked for three months.  my latest backup of confs
 of course happened at the beginning of the week prior to noticing they
 were missing in NN.  

What?  What is NN?  Do you have any other backups?

 I also did an automated update for trustix using
 their swup --upgrade about a 2 or 3 days prior to noticing they were
 gone.  This is not on just one comp, but network wide.  I of course
 copied out my backup smb.conf over the new one and restarted samba and
 nmbd with init scripts.  This did nothing.

What is this?  swup?  And what did it do?  Did it change anything
NON-SAMBA related?  If so, what?  If there's a log, please include it.
 
 I have since removed all network components on each comp and
 reinstalled.  I have made double and triple sure that port all ports are
 open internally. My lan has unrestricted access internally.  IPChains
 restrictions outbound, including netbios etc.

This is fuzzy.  Please explain in more detail.  If you feel comfortable,
email me your ruleset off-list.

 All systems are pingable via IP and name but shares are not viewable. 
 All current mapped drives work as though they are on the harddisk. I
 have tried adding new users to winders and of course linux/samba as well
 and log into winders with the new users and a clean network setup. 
 Nothing.

Nothing, as in no changes to Network Neighborhood, right?

 As for WINS, no all comps are set to use DHCP for wins of course all are
 pointed at the linuxbox for dhcp.  All are assigned via mac addies.  Im
 almost certain this is not a samba problem as nothing has changed on it,
 it seems to be somethign with winders.  I have all the boxes current on
 their security patches etc...

I don't think you understand what this means.  Using DHCP for WINS means
that your DHCP server hands out the information to contact the WINS
server, not that the workstation will USE the DHCP server as a WINS
server.

 yes, start run \\servername to each box produces the available shares..
 including to the samba server...

Good.  Also, please send me some sort of diagram of where these boxes sit
with regards to the firewall(s).  Thanks,
Matt
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Web Filtering

2002-07-09 Thread Wil McGilvery

Yes I am trying to limit what people can download for three reasons.

1) We have a training room with internet access. I wish to allow browsing but not 
downloading. Because of the programs we are training people on; it is hard to limit 
their permissions on the pc.

2) I also have the usual people who insist on downloading screen savers and other 
programs that drive me nuts.

3) I have customers that won't allow internet access to their employees because of 
reason number 2.

DansGuardian is located at http://dansguardian.org/?page=introduction

In short it does say it can filter by mime type and file extension.

Any other comments or suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Regards,
 
Wil McGilvery
Manager, Digital Media

 
Lynch Technologies Inc.
416-744-7191
1-888-622-3729
416-744-0406  FAX
www.lynchdigital.com



-Original Message-
From: Net Llama! [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Web Filtering

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Wil McGilvery wrote:
 I am looking at preventing the downloading of executables, etc through the internet 
and I am investigating DansGuardian as a possible solution.

 Does anyone else have experience in this area?

 Thanks,


Can you clarify what you're trying to do here?  You want to stop desktop
users from downloading executables?  I've never heard of DansGuardian
however i kinda doubt that there is any perfect solution since an
executable is nothing more than a permissions bit on a file.

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

I'm not sure what you mean...  
There is a prism2 driver out there for using your prism2 NIC as a
base-station...  This includes DLink DWL650's, and many more.  Check out
the http://hostap.epitest.fi/ site for more info.  If they DON'T list what
cards use this chipset, check out the http://www.linux-wlan.org site as
I'm sure they have a good list.

If you are looking to BUY a good WAP, take your pick...  Anything that
supports 802.11b will work.  I'm not sure of the status of Linux drivers
for any of the 802.11a cards, but if you have one of them, any 802.11a WAP
will work as well.

On Mon, 08 Jul 2002 19:49:42 -0700
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does anyone know of a good website that shows what kind of wireless gear
 
 works with linux?  I'm more concerned with the base stations than 
 anything else.  thanks!
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Three that I personally use (and use for AirSnort) are:

D-Link DWL-650  (prism2 based card)
Lucent Orinoco
Cisco Aironet (340? 350?)

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:10:27 -0500
Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You then need a USB, PCI or PCcard wireless NIC connected to the roving 
 Linux box. Like any NIC, of course, you need a module/driver. I'm told 
 plenty of them work, but I can't say that for sure. LinkSys usually
 gives Linux setup info for their devices.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

You wanna write a book about it?  I'm learning new stuff, and there's
experience in your words which speaks volumes.

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:52:57 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:54:57 -0400 (EDT)
 begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
 
  On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
   On Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:12:14 -0700
   begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
  
i guess i'm showing my ignorance.  so a base-station/access-point
is basically an embedded device that doesn't need an OS based
driver to work?
   
i guess i need wireless for dumbies, cause i don't fully
understand how it all comes together.
   
  
   commercial access points cannot be used as anything but that, they
   can't be used as Master or Repeater stations.  It has to do with
   proprietary code in the cards, and the big boys don't want anyone to
   muck with their gravy trains.
  
   In a linux box, however, a wireless card in ad-hoc mode is basically
   an ethernet card.  You do need to understand radio signals and how
   they work, fresnell zones, and more, but that's not hard either.
  
   Tell me what you need, I'll give you more than you've ever wanted to
   know.
  
  OK, what i attempted to diagram in my previous email was, that i'm
  getting DSL activated this Friday at home.  My grand plan (excluding
  the WiFi
  stuff) is to run a Freesco box box that has 2 NICs, one plugged
  directly into the DSL router that the DSL provider gives me, and then
  the other plugged into a 10 port hub (yes, i know switches are better,
  but this is all i have on hand, and all i can afford right now).  I've
  got 2 linux boxes that my wife  I use, plus 2 laptops (also linux). 
  everything is a static (10.x.x.x) IP, and will have the Freesco box as
  its gateway to the internet.
  
  Now my vision for wireless is to get 1 or 2 wireless cards for the
  laptops, and a base-station/access-point.  Plug the access-point into
  the hub, point it to the Freesco box as the gateway (as i'm already
  doing), and then get the laptops online anywhere in my house.
  
  So, is this possible, or am i completely misunderstanding what
  wireless can do for me?
 
 My suggestion for you is the following:
 forget the access point, it's an unnecessary expense.
 In one system that's always on (I suppose, but don't know, that it could
 be the freesco box), put a PCI-PCMCIA bridge card (I recommend one with
 the Ricoh chipset) and a wireless card.  Spend the money you saved on
 the access point to buy something like the Orinoco Extender antenna
 (works with Orinoco/Agere cards, whatever card you use you'll need a
 compatible connector for the card).  Place the extender antenna at
 approx eye-level(when you're standing).
 Install WIFI cards in your laptops. Depending on your distance from the
 desktop, and the geography of your house, you may need small antennas
 for the laptops. The WIFI network will, of course, be a different
 network than your desktops, so make sure your routing is correct if you
 need to talk to your desktops.
 
 On WIFI cards, antennas, and wireless:
 Most current WIFI cards are 50mW in power with no antenna.  An antenna
 effectively increases the power for both sending and receiving. 
 Outdoors, you can easily go 1/2 mile without antennas.  Newer cars w/
 100mW and even 200mW can go to almost a mile.  An antenna extends the
 sensitivity and range.
 Wireless is LOS (line of site).  It will pass through glass, but not
 solid objects.  It will work in your house because for the most part
 you'll be inside the ground plane (fresnell zone).  An antenna,
 particularly one place up high, increases the ground plane (which size
 is based on antenna height and output power).  So while the signal can't
 see through walls, it can travel around them if the walls are within the
 ground plane.  With overlapping ground planes, you'll always have
 connectivity despite the LOS limitations.
 
 On amplifiers:
 Some folks (often HAM operators) think amps will increase distance
 through increased power.  While this is true, you run the risk of
 overmodulating stations closer in.  WIFI works on SNR (signal to noise
 ratio).  Amps boost both, signal and noise.  They do little to change
 the SNR very much.
  Imagine you get 50 e-mails a day, 10 of which are important.  Your SNR
  is
 -.20.  This is good (actual WIFI calcs are much more complicated, with
 93/93 being perfect). You can effectively process 100 e-mails per day,
 but no more (limitation on your time).  Suddenly, you find yourself
 getting 500 messages per day, of which 100 are important.  While the SNR
 is the same, you'll probably never see any of the 100 important messages
 because you're drowning in the 400 spams. Same principal applies to
 amp'd signals.
 
 What haven't I covered?  Lots.  How antennas (typically 3dbi to 24dbi)
 boost effective power (power is measured at the antenna).  Signal
 polarity(must say a word or two 

Re: ipchains rule question: Destination ip

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 06:34:32 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:32:29 -0400
 begin  Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
 
  It has been so long since I set up my firewall I have forgotten why I
  did this, so :
  
  Here are two typical rules from my firewall (ipchains). Note that with
  one, the target ip is 0.0.0.0, and with the other the target is
  68.36.44.105, which is the ip of the machine running the firewall.
  eth1 is the external NIC facing the cable modem.
  
  target  tosa tosx  ifname source  destination
  ports
  
  ACCEPT udp  0xFF 0x00  eth1   198.82.161.227  0.0.0.0  * -   123
  ACCEPT udp  0xFF 0x00  eth1   198.82.162.213  68.36.44.105 * -   123
  
  I have used 68.36.44.105 in a number of destinations in my ipchain
  rules instead of 0.0.0.0, as noted above.  As far as I can see, these
  rules are equivalent, since my NIC, which is configured as
  68.36.44.105, will not look at packets not addressed to it, at least
  under ordinary circumstances.
 
 The above is your system to Internet on ntp port (123), the next rule
 isInternet to your system on ntp port.

Not quite.  The first one your system to Anywhere for NTP.  The second
rule is another machine to the outside of the firewall on NTP and has no
business being there unless your firewall is going to provide NTP to this
other machine.

 
 But I really suggest you start looking at iptables instead of this
 dinosaur.
 
This I totally agree with.

If you MUST stick with IPChains, you may consider designating a box to be
the NTP server for the inside.  Then your rules would look like:

udp NTPBOX:123  -  0.0.0.0:123
udp 0.0.0.0:123 -  NTPBOX:123

Then everyone else should be able to talk to the internal box.
But really, what's the point of a firewall if you're not going to use
connection-tracking which IPChains doesn't give you?  Use IPTables.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: DVD-XINE

2002-07-09 Thread Peter Ruskin

On Monday 08 Jul 2002 17:38, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
 Another Q:  Do you know what a dvd_raw_device is and how it differs
 from a dvd_device?
 Thanks,
 Matt
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
 http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe
 info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.

$ ll /dev |grep dvd
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 Jul  2 01:50 dvd - scd0
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root8 Jul  2 01:50 rdvd - raw/raw2

Xine apparently likes this, I use it but I've never tried without it, so I 
don't know the performance benefits.
-- 
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Bluebird) for i586. Linux user 275590.
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+  512MB   Kernel: 2.4.18-6mdk-pnr-win4lin
KDE: 3.0.1   Qt: 3.0.4   up 1 hour 38 minutes.
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Web Filtering

2002-07-09 Thread Jim Bonnet

Wil McGilvery wrote:
 Yes I am trying to limit what people can download for three reasons.
 
 1) We have a training room with internet access. I wish to allow browsing but not 
downloading. Because of the programs we are training people on; it is hard to limit 
their permissions on the pc.
 
 2) I also have the usual people who insist on downloading screen savers and other 
programs that drive me nuts.
 
 3) I have customers that won't allow internet access to their employees because of 
reason number 2.
 
 DansGuardian is located at http://dansguardian.org/?page=introduction
 
 In short it does say it can filter by mime type and file extension.
 
 Any other comments or suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Wil-

Well after reading through the site.. it *looks* like it will do what 
you want.. I assume these
are windoze boxes you are trying to secure?

If so, and Im sorry Im fuzzy on the details, there is some software that 
scans the system on bootup, and upon shutting it down, restores said 
machine to is bootup state. so any software added or changes made, like 
switching the background image.. are taken away on shutdown.The thing is 
password protected so users cant just remove it.. I suppose you could 
delete it or something though. These were NT boxes too IIRC. I can't for 
the life of me remember what its called though. When I was going through 
my cisco cert at the local junior college they had it installed. I'll 
see if I can't find the name of it.. but that could be a good option also.

hth-
Jim

-- 
quattro... the unfair advantage...



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: ipchains rule question: Destination ip

2002-07-09 Thread David A. Bandel

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:08:23 -0400
begin  Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

[snip]
  
  The above is your system to Internet on ntp port (123), the next
  rule isInternet to your system on ntp port.
 
 Not quite.  The first one your system to Anywhere for NTP.  The second
 rule is another machine to the outside of the firewall on NTP and has no
 business being there unless your firewall is going to provide NTP to
 this other machine.

Umm.  You said the same thing I did, so how can it be not quite?  I just
didn't judge the sagacity of allowing the world to use him as an NTP
server (maybe he _wants_ to).  I have a system that I and my customers
(perhaps 150 or so systems) use as an NTP server (and it's slaved off
time.nist.gov).  He didn't say if that was also his case.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Sharing Kernels Revisited

2002-07-09 Thread David A. Bandel

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:03:46 -0400
begin  Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

[snip]

 
 I see benefits both ways, but in my attempt to remain corporately
 responsible I must tip my hat to canned kernels.
 
 

canned kernels are great if:
you don't run a specialized system (i.e., firewall), you don't care about
running a bloated kernel (i.e., desktop system).  But I dare say, while
Caldera and all others try to include the world in modules, they often
fall short in niche areas and won't have the latest drivers (like the
wireless drivers for example).

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Sharing Kernels Revisited

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

2.4.13 (COLW3.1.1) provides drivers which handle the DLink, Orinoco, and
Cisco wireless cards out of the box just fine.  I'm not saying that there
aren't drawbacks to both approaches, but the approach I believe most
fitting to mainstream server installs (at least in Corporate America) is
canned kernels.  Perhaps in smaller companies or other countries the
balance lies somewhere else.


On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:57:13 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:03:46 -0400
 begin  Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
 
 [snip]
 
  
  I see benefits both ways, but in my attempt to remain corporately
  responsible I must tip my hat to canned kernels.
  
  
 
 canned kernels are great if:
 you don't run a specialized system (i.e., firewall), you don't care
 about running a bloated kernel (i.e., desktop system).  But I dare say,
 while Caldera and all others try to include the world in modules, they
 often fall short in niche areas and won't have the latest drivers (like
 the wireless drivers for example).
 
 Ciao,
 
 David A. Bandel
 -- 
 Focus on the dream, not the competition.
   -- Nemesis Racing Team motto
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
 http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
 above URL.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: ipchains rule question: Destination ip

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:52:41 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:08:23 -0400
 begin  Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
 
 [snip]
   
   The above is your system to Internet on ntp port (123), the next
   rule isInternet to your system on ntp port.
  
  Not quite.  The first one your system to Anywhere for NTP.  The second
  rule is another machine to the outside of the firewall on NTP and has
  no business being there unless your firewall is going to provide NTP
  to this other machine.
 
 Umm.  You said the same thing I did, so how can it be not quite?  I
 just didn't judge the sagacity of allowing the world to use him as an
 NTP server (maybe he _wants_ to).  I have a system that I and my
 customers(perhaps 150 or so systems) use as an NTP server (and it's
 slaved off time.nist.gov).  He didn't say if that was also his case.

I did not say what you did.  If you meant to say it differently, that's
not my fault, but you did not say anything clearly.  If I were to write
rules based on what you said, they would be something like:

target  tosa tosx  ifname source  destination ports
ACCEPT udp  0xFF 0x00  eth1   198.82.161.227  0.0.0.0   * -   123
ACCEPT udp  0xFF 0x00  eth1   0.0.0.0 198.82.161.227* -   123


but what he gave is:

target  tosa tosx  ifname source  destination ports
ACCEPT udp  0xFF 0x00  eth1   198.82.161.227  0.0.0.0  * -   123
ACCEPT udp  0xFF 0x00  eth1   198.82.162.213  68.36.44.105 * -   123
(68.36.44.105 being the external IP of the firewall)

198.82.161.227: proxy.cc.vt.edu
198.82.162.213: lennier.cc.vt.edu
68.36.44.105:   bgp387816bgs.jersyc01.nj.comcast.net

Where are you looking?  How does 
the next rule isInternet to your system on ntp port.
fit into this description at all?

What I said was WRONG, as I had not done the lookups to figure out that
198.82.x.x were the hosts being synched with
I revise my statement to say that (assuming NTP outbound is accepted):
rule 1: Internet NTP Server's replies to anywhere controlled by your
firewall are accepted.
rule 2: Another Internet NTP Servers replies to your Firewall.

Rule 1 would work for responses from that server to your network, as long
as udp123 outbound is accepted traffic.
Rule 2 would work for responses either directly to the firewall or for
hosts being MASQ'ed
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: [Fwd: Fw: OTAnyone know of some good r5 admin books]

2002-07-09 Thread Matt . Carpenter

   

Kreigh 

Tomaszewski  To: Matt Carpenter/IT/Alticor@Alticor 

 cc:   

07/09/2002   Subject: [Fwd: Fw: OTAnyone know of 
some good r5 admin books]   
01:32 PM   

   

   








Using Lotus Notes 4 by Cate Richards (1996 by QUE corp)

Lotus Notes and Domino R5 Development Unleased by Deborah Lynd and Steven
Kern (2000 by SAMS)

and of course the Lotus administrator guides and IBM redbooks.

- Forwarded by Kreigh Tomaszewski/IT/Alticor on 07/09/2002 01:29 PM
-
   
 
Kreigh 
 
Tomaszewski   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Kreigh@Tomaszcc:  
 
ewski.netSubject: [Fwd: Fw: OTAnyone know of 
some good r5 admin books]   
   
 
07/08/2002 
 
06:12 PM   
 
   
 
   
 




Sending to work where I have the books...

- Message from Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 8 Jul 2002
11:25:29 -0400 -
   
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
   
 Subject: Fw: OTAnyone know of some good r5  
  admin books  
   



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 20:52:41 +1000
From: James McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OTAnyone know of some good r5 admin books


Hi Yall,

Have you ever had to become an instant expert.? well I am supposed to be
supporting a r5.0.4 notes environment and I was wondering if anyone knows
of
any good admin books on r5 domino server administration?

Thanks

--

James McDonald
Systems Engineer - Onsite
Mincom

___
Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above
URL.







___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: have a compile problem

2002-07-09 Thread Keith Antoine

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 23:13, Net Llama! wrote:
r
 I've built just about all of that stuff without too much grief.  So, odds
 are your system is putting libraries in very non-standard locations that
 the RPMs aren't finding.  So, let's take this one package at a time
 (avifile, mjpegtools etc).  Provide the errors that you're seeing, and we
 can work from there.

Ok thats fine, many thanks. The problem with this too is that I have also 
managed to build them in the past, but not now. The system I am using is 
Caldera 3.1.1 and that in the past was the most likely of all the distros to 
compile without problems.

Its early morning now, and I have to go out so I will post the problems with 
avilfile as a starter later today. I'll also set a background as to what I as 
backup and restore of work done.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Codeweavers Wine

2002-07-09 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Is anyone running Codeweavers Wine Preview 6?  That is dated April 2002.
I have been running Wine for some time running Lotus Notes Client R5. 
This particular install, running 5.0.10, from March 22nd, looks really
good, except when typing an email, I get no feedback when I type more than
one letter in the email window.  If I type a backspace, I get to see what
I typed (minus the character I just deleted).  This is on MDK8.1.  So I
was wondering if anyone else had this problem, if it is a Codeweavers/Wine
issue, or a problem with MDK8.1 (it complains about the FreeType
versions), or what.

Also, has ANYONE figured out how to use the printers?  Obviously there's
SOME code for using printers/spoolers since the winesetup app has configs
for it, but how do I use it!?

Thanks!
Matt
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Keith Morse

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote:

 Three that I personally use (and use for AirSnort) are:
 
 D-Link DWL-650  (prism2 based card)
 Lucent Orinoco
 Cisco Aironet (340? 350?)


A friend tried about a year ago to get a Lucent card to work with 
AirSnort.  At that time it wasn't possible.  They must have made quite a 
bit of progess since then.

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread Net Llama!

OK, i've acquired two Cisco (Aironet) 4800 cards.  Anyone know if there
are any good websites out there that list/catalog publicly accessible WiFi
networks?

Also, i'm assuming that the basic premise is that the card would just keep
trying to acquire an IP from a DHCP server (assuming that i've set it up
for DHCP) until it found one?

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Keith Morse wrote:

 On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote:

  Three that I personally use (and use for AirSnort) are:
 
  D-Link DWL-650  (prism2 based card)
  Lucent Orinoco
  Cisco Aironet (340? 350?)


 A friend tried about a year ago to get a Lucent card to work with
 AirSnort.  At that time it wasn't possible.  They must have made quite a
 bit of progess since then.

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.


-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Evolution importing Outlook data

2002-07-09 Thread Zoki

 -Message d'origine-
 De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Net Llama!
 Envoye : lundi 8 juillet 2002 15:35
 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Objet : Re: Evolution importing Outlook data
 
 
 I'm fairly certain that netscape uses the mbox format.


*** Yes it does.

--
Cheers,
Zoran.

If you find me, send me $HOME. My address is cd


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



dhclient

2002-07-09 Thread Joel Hammer

Is there a stepbystep for dhclient?
Joel

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: dhclient

2002-07-09 Thread Net Llama!

nope.  want to write one?

Joel Hammer wrote:
 Is there a stepbystep for dhclient?
 Joel

-- 
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com

   3:50pm  up 81 days, 22:37,  2 users,  load average: 0.20, 0.19, 0.18

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread William F. Day

Exactly.. thats how my setup is working, sorta.. my broadband(wireless type
dsl) into my tsl server with 2 nics out to a 8pt switch and the access point
is plugged with a standard rj45 directly into the switch.

Bill Day

Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
  8:10pm  up 18 days, 10:06,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

- Original Message -
From: Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Wireless (802.11) website?


 On Tuesday 09 July 2002 07:54 am, Net Llama! wrote:
  On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
   On Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:12:14 -0700
  
   begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
i guess i'm showing my ignorance.  so a base-station/access-point is
basically an embedded device that doesn't need an OS based driver to
work?
   
i guess i need wireless for dumbies, cause i don't fully
understand
how it all comes together.
  
   commercial access points cannot be used as anything but that, they
   can't be used as Master or Repeater stations.  It has to do with
   proprietary code in the cards, and the big boys don't want anyone to
   muck with their gravy trains.
  
   In a linux box, however, a wireless card in ad-hoc mode is basically
an
   ethernet card.  You do need to understand radio signals and how they
   work, fresnell zones, and more, but that's not hard either.
  
   Tell me what you need, I'll give you more than you've ever wanted to
   know.
 
  OK, what i attempted to diagram in my previous email was, that i'm
  getting DSL activated this Friday at home.  My grand plan (excluding the
  WiFi
  stuff) is to run a Freesco box box that has 2 NICs, one plugged directly
  into the DSL router that the DSL provider gives me, and then the other
  plugged into a 10 port hub (yes, i know switches are better, but this is
  all i have on hand, and all i can afford right now).  I've got 2 linux
  boxes that my wife  I use, plus 2 laptops (also linux).  everything is
a
  static (10.x.x.x) IP, and will have the Freesco box as its gateway to
the
  internet.
 
  Now my vision for wireless is to get 1 or 2 wireless cards for the
  laptops, and a base-station/access-point.  Plug the access-point into
the
  hub, point it to the Freesco box as the gateway (as i'm already doing),
  and then get the laptops online anywhere in my house.
 
  So, is this possible, or am i completely misunderstanding what wireless
  can do for me?

 You got it right. Just find wireless NICs that you can get working under
 Linux. The base-station could care less that the router and wireless
 clients are running Linux or anything else.


 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above
URL.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 7/1/02

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Evolution importing Outlook data

2002-07-09 Thread zohar

the way I used was to first export the .pst files into outlook Express. I am
not using Evolution but I think Evolution must be supporting . dbf format of
OE.  Check in evolution menus OR help OR there support.
- Original Message -
From: Zoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:01 AM
Subject: RE: Evolution importing Outlook data


 *** Exporting the data to a file and importing it into Evolution comes to
my
 mind...

 Do not use Evolution so I cannot help you with the choice of the file
 formats.

 Cheers,
 Zoran.


  -Message d'origine-
  De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Michael Hipp
  Envoye : dimanche 7 juillet 2002 22:07
  A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Objet : Evolution importing Outlook data
 
 
  There appears to be no way to do it. Ximian published some kludgy
  workarounds that do only half the job. But I have a client with a 365MB
  outlook.pst file (email, contacts, tasks, calendar, notes) and I
  can't get
  it into Evolution.
 
  This is a showstopper piece of missing functionality for Evolution.
 
  Any help?


 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above
URL.

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: dhclient

2002-07-09 Thread Bill Davidson

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:41:31 -0400
Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I thought for sure there would be a howto on dhcp, but I can't find
 one of those, either.
 
 Joel

It's a bit dated, but...

http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/DHCP/index.html

Bill
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Wireless (802.11) website?

2002-07-09 Thread ronnie gauthier

Search google, wireless war dialing or war driving.

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OK, i've acquired two Cisco (Aironet) 4800 cards.  Anyone know if there
are any good websites out there that list/catalog publicly accessible WiFi
networks?

Also, i'm assuming that the basic premise is that the card would just keep
trying to acquire an IP from a DHCP server (assuming that i've set it up
for DHCP) until it found one?

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Keith Morse wrote:

 On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matthew Carpenter wrote:

  Three that I personally use (and use for AirSnort) are:
 
  D-Link DWL-650  (prism2 based card)
  Lucent Orinoco
  Cisco Aironet (340? 350?)


 A friend tried about a year ago to get a Lucent card to work with
 AirSnort.  At that time it wasn't possible.  They must have made quite a
 bit of progess since then.

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.


-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



opinions on firewall?

2002-07-09 Thread Douglas J Hunley

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

anyone see anything wrong, any holes, incorrect assumptions, room for 
improvement, etc with the attached iptables script?
- -- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org

/*
 * For moronic filesystems that do not allow holes in file.
 * We may have to extend the file.
 */
2.4.0-test2 /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9KzuYSrrWWknCnMIRAkxdAJ4vAO8TfBRb8qfUo8w8tE0MvuI48gCgvnUF
ngBzCyn62n9rsCuhPraE+xU=
=pUEg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



firewall
Description: application/shellscript


Re: have a compile problem

2002-07-09 Thread Keith Antoine

On Tuesday 09 July 2002 11:13 pm, Net Llama! espoused with vigour:

 I've built just about all of that stuff without too much grief.  So, odds
 are your system is putting libraries in very non-standard locations that
 the RPMs aren't finding.  So, let's take this one package at a time
 (avifile, mjpegtools etc).  Provide the errors that you're seeing, and we
 can work from there.

Lonnie, thanks agin for the assist:

Ok, I said that I would do Avifile first but something happened so as botht 
it and Mjpegtools compiled at last. I did a 'autogen.sh' , the result said 
not to use Automake 1.6 which I was. I downloaded 1.5 and did a make clean 
'bingo' it worked and so did Mjpegtools. However Linuxvideostudio and MPLayer 
have make problems still. Seeing that they are relatively small errors I am 
including both here. I will see if ImageMagick now compiles later on.

studio:
 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXv -lpng -ljpeg
/usr/lib/libpng.a(png.o): In function `png_reset_crc':
png.o(.text+0x180): undefined reference to `crc32'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(png.o): In function `png_calculate_crc':
png.o(.text+0x1e6): undefined reference to `crc32'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(png.o): In function `png_reset_zstream':
png.o(.text+0x953): undefined reference to `inflateReset'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(pngwrite.o): In function `png_write_flush':
pngwrite.o(.text+0xc12): undefined reference to `deflate'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(pngwrite.o): In function `png_write_destroy':
pngwrite.o(.text+0xda1): undefined reference to `deflateEnd'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(pngwutil.o): In function `png_text_compress':
pngwutil.o(.text+0x28a): undefined reference to `deflate'
pngwutil.o(.text+0x3aa): undefined reference to `deflate'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(pngwutil.o): In function `png_write_compressed_data_out':
pngwutil.o(.text+0x5b9): undefined reference to `deflateReset'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(pngwutil.o): In function `png_write_IHDR':
pngwutil.o(.text+0x8c8): undefined reference to `deflateInit2_'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(pngwutil.o): In function `png_write_finish_row':
pngwutil.o(.text+0x2117): undefined reference to `deflate'
pngwutil.o(.text+0x21b6): undefined reference to `deflateReset'
/usr/lib/libpng.a(pngwutil.o): In function `png_write_filtered_row':
pngwutil.o(.text+0x3071): undefined reference to `deflate'
make[2]: *** [stv] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/linuxvideostudio-0.1.5/src'

Mplayer:
 -L/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib -lSDL -lpthread -Lvidix -lvidix
libmpdemux/libmpdemux.a(demux_ogg.o): In function `demux_ogg_read_packet':
demux_ogg.o(.text+0x5e): undefined reference to `vorbis_packet_blocksize'
make: *** [mplayer] Error 1

It is obvious even to me that studio had png problems, but waht.
-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.