Re: SMP and kernel

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm wondering why you're doing this in the first place.  Why not just run
 a uniproc kernel?

There are a few distros that deliver only SMP kernels. Our goal with a
distro is to try and use it out-of-the-box, making changes only where
needed. We use to do more customization in Unix, but have been trying a new
approach in Linux. This also helps make our stuff 'distro agnostic', which
we planed to be a good thing.

-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SCO vs. ...

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:24 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Anyone seen this in Cringley´s column?
 
 http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/06/16/24OPcringely_1.html
 
 Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and ATT at the same time in
 different courtrooms, not even if I were M$.  And SCO's not even close
 to that big.
 
 SCO reminds me more and more of the little mouse trying to suck an
 elephant through a straw.

Yep. Then there is the oddly titled Swedish kid's show called (translated)
'Four ants are more than one elephant'.


-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SCO vs. ...

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:24:51 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 begin  David A. Bandel's  quote:
 
 | Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and ATT at the same time
 | in different courtrooms, not even if I were M$.  And SCO's not even
 | close to that big.
 
 my guess was that on about wednesday novell would announce that, 
 actually, it had kept the ibm stuff, so sco was without standing 
 there, too.

And had to pay Novell part of the money that had been charging for licensing
something SCO did not own.


-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


SuSE upgrade

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for testing
various distros but is not currently installed anywhere. I am looking to try
SuSE 8.2. If I buy an upgrade, will it only install on an existing 7.1, or
will it only ask for a CD to check that this is an upgrade? I don't seem to
find info on this on SuSE's site. They just say upgrades are available. But
not what the install requirements are for this. Any ideas?


-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome in
their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could still
run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so without hassle?

-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Myles Green
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:13, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
 I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome in
 their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could still
 run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so without hassle?

Yes it is, just select a different theme for the various components (desktop 
theme, icon theme, etc). Also, if you're interested, the newest KDE
available from ftp.kde.org installs cleanly and gets rid of the Blue Curve
look as a default.

BTW Ximian Desktop 2 (XD2) installs quite nicely (I downloaded the RPMs and 
installed them myself) and completes the purging of Blue Curve ;-)

HTH
-- 
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 04:36:48 -0600
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:13, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
  I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome
  in their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could
  still run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so
  without hassle?
 
 Yes it is, just select a different theme for the various components
 (desktop theme, icon theme, etc). Also, if you're interested, the newest
 KDE available from ftp.kde.org installs cleanly and gets rid of the Blue
 Curve look as a default.
 
 BTW Ximian Desktop 2 (XD2) installs quite nicely (I downloaded the RPMs
 and installed them myself) and completes the purging of Blue Curve ;-)

We are trying to see how far we can go with a distro without changing
things. Updates beyond the original CDs are avoided when possible.

-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SuSE upgrade

2003-06-17 Thread dep
begin  Roger Oberholtzer's  quote:
| I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for
| testing various distros but is not currently installed anywhere. I
| am looking to try SuSE 8.2. If I buy an upgrade, will it only
| install on an existing 7.1, or will it only ask for a CD to check
| that this is an upgrade? I don't seem to find info on this on
| SuSE's site. They just say upgrades are available. But not what the
| install requirements are for this. Any ideas?

unless something has changed drastically with 8.2, the upgrade is 
identical to the full distribution, and the upgrade price is more a 
repeat customer reward than anything else.
-- 
dep

http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within
the envelope, and no animated paperclip anywhere.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SuSE upgrade

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:55:09 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 begin  Roger Oberholtzer's  quote:
 | I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for
 | testing various distros but is not currently installed anywhere. I
 | am looking to try SuSE 8.2. If I buy an upgrade, will it only
 | install on an existing 7.1, or will it only ask for a CD to check
 | that this is an upgrade? I don't seem to find info on this on
 | SuSE's site. They just say upgrades are available. But not what the
 | install requirements are for this. Any ideas?
 
 unless something has changed drastically with 8.2, the upgrade is 
 identical to the full distribution, and the upgrade price is more a 
 repeat customer reward than anything else.

So it is up to the reseller to enforce that it is an upgrade? Seems the one
I am using does not bother...


-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Myles Green
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 05:24, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
 On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 04:36:48 -0600
 Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:13, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
   I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome
   in their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could
   still run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so
   without hassle?
  
  Yes it is, just select a different theme for the various components
  (desktop theme, icon theme, etc). Also, if you're interested, the newest
  KDE available from ftp.kde.org installs cleanly and gets rid of the Blue
  Curve look as a default.
  
  BTW Ximian Desktop 2 (XD2) installs quite nicely (I downloaded the RPMs
  and installed them myself) and completes the purging of Blue Curve ;-)
 
 We are trying to see how far we can go with a distro without changing
 things. Updates beyond the original CDs are avoided when possible.

Then the answer is still yes, just look through the various settings
under themes, icons etc.
-- 
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer

  We are trying to see how far we can go with a distro without changing
  things. Updates beyond the original CDs are avoided when possible.
 
 Then the answer is still yes, just look through the various settings
 under themes, icons etc.

Great. RH9 arrives tomorrow. Let's see what it does.



-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On 6/17/2003 8:36 AM, someone claiming to be Myles Green wrote:

On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 05:24, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 04:36:48 -0600
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:13, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome
in their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could
still run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so
without hassle?
Yes it is, just select a different theme for the various components
(desktop theme, icon theme, etc). Also, if you're interested, the newest
KDE available from ftp.kde.org installs cleanly and gets rid of the Blue
Curve look as a default.
BTW Ximian Desktop 2 (XD2) installs quite nicely (I downloaded the RPMs
and installed them myself) and completes the purging of Blue Curve ;-)
We are trying to see how far we can go with a distro without changing
things. Updates beyond the original CDs are avoided when possible.


Then the answer is still yes, just look through the various settings
under themes, icons etc.
Kinda off-thread, but there's also the kde-redhat project, 
http://kde-redhat.sf.net, which, when combined with apt for rpm, 
provides an easy way to keep kde up to date.

Regards,
Tim
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer

 Kinda off-thread, but there's also the kde-redhat project, 
 http://kde-redhat.sf.net, which, when combined with apt for rpm, 
 provides an easy way to keep kde up to date.

The main reason we have tried not to rely on these types of things is that
the systems are in vehicles out on the road. We try to make it 'simple' to
do a field reinstall, should the case arise. Although it hardly ever does,
if we change this goal, I just know field installs will become common...

For home use, I am a Gentoo/emerge devotee.

-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SMP and kernel

2003-06-17 Thread Net Llama!
Which distros do this?  It sounds like pure laziness on their part for not
supplying two kernels.

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

 On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I'm wondering why you're doing this in the first place.  Why not just run
  a uniproc kernel?

 There are a few distros that deliver only SMP kernels. Our goal with a
 distro is to try and use it out-of-the-box, making changes only where
 needed. We use to do more customization in Unix, but have been trying a new
 approach in Linux. This also helps make our stuff 'distro agnostic', which
 we planed to be a good thing.



-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


OT Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On 6/17/2003 8:56 AM, someone claiming to be Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

Kinda off-thread, but there's also the kde-redhat project, 
http://kde-redhat.sf.net, which, when combined with apt for rpm, 
provides an easy way to keep kde up to date.


The main reason we have tried not to rely on these types of things is that
the systems are in vehicles out on the road. We try to make it 'simple' to
do a field reinstall, should the case arise. Although it hardly ever does,
if we change this goal, I just know field installs will become common...
For home use, I am a Gentoo/emerge devotee.

Understood. That's why I said it was kinda off-thread as it doesn't 
apply to your situation. But others may not know about the kde-redhat 
project, so I threw it out there.

FWIW, I keep the main kde installation up to date (currently kde 3.1.2, 
RHL 8.0) using apt and the kde-redhat project, for use by the wife and 
kids. Personally, I run KDE from CVS. Just started building what will be 
3.2, but haven't actually run it on a regular basis. Sticking with 3.1 
branch for now. (Yes, I have two CVS versions of kde installed, plus a 
released version.)

Regards,
Tim
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread bof


Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome in
their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could still
run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so without hassle?
IIRC, there is an option under KDE to set it to the default KDE look. I 
can't provide more specific info as I no longer have access to a
RH 9.0 system, but I do recall seeing it as an option somewhere.

BOF

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SMP and kernel

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Which distros do this?  It sounds like pure laziness on their part for not
 supplying two kernels.

One is 'that distro which shall not be named', a.k.a. Caldera COL 3.1x.


-- 
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer  ·   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB ·  WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ·
· Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ·Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ·
· 115 34 Stockholm   ·   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ·
· Sweden ·  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ·
++···+

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SuSE upgrade

2003-06-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 8:07 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
 On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:55:09 -0400

 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  begin  Roger Oberholtzer's  quote:
  | I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for
  | testing various distros but is not currently installed anywhere. I
  | am looking to try SuSE 8.2. If I buy an upgrade, will it only
  | install on an existing 7.1, or will it only ask for a CD to check
  | that this is an upgrade? I don't seem to find info on this on
  | SuSE's site. They just say upgrades are available. But not what
  | the install requirements are for this. Any ideas?
 
  unless something has changed drastically with 8.2, the upgrade is
  identical to the full distribution, and the upgrade price is more a
  repeat customer reward than anything else.

 So it is up to the reseller to enforce that it is an upgrade? Seems
 the one I am using does not bother...

The only difference with the upgrade is that it does not include any of 
the manuals.  I don't think SuSE cares whether you already own a copy of 
a prev. release or not.


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 06/17/03 
10:28  +
++
Yesterday, my eyeglass prescription ran out.

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SMP and kernel

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:29:04 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Which distros do this?  It sounds like pure laziness on their part
   for not supplying two kernels.
 
  One is 'that distro which shall not be named', a.k.a. Caldera COL
  3.1x.
 
 That doesn't count.  Its not even being sold any more.

Hence the search for a new distro. Something 'off-the'shelf', which COL
2.4 and 3.1.1 were for us.

We are considering RH 9 and SuSE 8.2. My previous test of SuSE 7.2 was a
mixed thing. Impressive number of applications. However, many simply
dumped core. Time for the next round. Of course, at home I use and really
like Gentoo. But I would not deploy in a mobile production system.

--

Roger Oberholtzer
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: bootable Redhat based CD?

2003-06-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote:
 Just a thought but have you looked at Bernard's bootable linux on freshmeat?

 freshmeat.net/projects/bblcd/?topic_id=147%2C866

 It has all you need to build a bootable CD from your currently running distro.

 I did this once on an SuSE distro and it worked pretty well.  I think it needs
 the minix fs though but that's pretty easy to add to the kernel.

This is working out perfectly, thanks so much.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9 and KDE

2003-06-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:16:46 -0600
bof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
 
 I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and
 Gnome intheir latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you
 could stillrun KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it
 so without hassle?
 
 IIRC, there is an option under KDE to set it to the default KDE look. I 
 can't provide more specific info as I no longer have access to a
 RH 9.0 system, but I do recall seeing it as an option somewhere.

It will be one of the first things I look for!

 
 BOF
 
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: SMP and kernel

2003-06-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
 On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:29:04 -0400 (EDT)
 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
   On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
   Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Which distros do this?  It sounds like pure laziness on their part
for not supplying two kernels.
  
   One is 'that distro which shall not be named', a.k.a. Caldera COL
   3.1x.
 
  That doesn't count.  Its not even being sold any more.

 Hence the search for a new distro. Something 'off-the'shelf', which COL
 2.4 and 3.1.1 were for us.

 We are considering RH 9 and SuSE 8.2. My previous test of SuSE 7.2 was a
 mixed thing. Impressive number of applications. However, many simply
 dumped core. Time for the next round. Of course, at home I use and really
 like Gentoo. But I would not deploy in a mobile production system.

I've been using the XFS version of RH9 on two of my laptops for abou a
month now.  It seems to be fairly solid.  It will most likely be what i
upgrade to for my existing production RH-7.3 boxen.

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: bootable Redhat based CD?

2003-06-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
 On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote:
  Just a thought but have you looked at Bernard's bootable linux on
  freshmeat?
 
  freshmeat.net/projects/bblcd/?topic_id=147%2C866
 
  It has all you need to build a bootable CD from your currently
  running distro.
 
  I did this once on an SuSE distro and it worked pretty well.  I
  think it needs the minix fs though but that's pretty easy to add to
  the kernel.

 This is working out perfectly, thanks so much.

You're quite welcome


 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 06/17/03 
12:25  +
++
You might be a high-tech Red-neck if:
   your spouse sends you an e-mail instead of calling you to dinner

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Linus to work full-time on Linux

2003-06-17 Thread Gary Wilson
June 17, 2003
Linus Torvalds Joins Development Group
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

 
Filed at 3:30 p.m. ET

SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) -- The creator of the Linux
operating system is joining a global development group
to focus on further improving the open-source
software.

Linus Torvalds said Tuesday he is taking a leave from
his research job at chip-maker Transmeta Corp.

He will become the first fellow at the Beaverton,
Ore.-based Open Source Development Lab, which is
funded by high-tech companies to, among other things,
enhance Linux for corporate data centers. At the lab,
he will focus on the next major revision of the Linux
core, or kernel.

``It feels a bit strange to finally officially work on
what I've been doing for the last 12 years, but with
the upcoming 2.6.x release it makes sense to be able
to concentrate fully on Linux,'' he said.

Torvalds, then a university student in Finland,
created Linux in 1991 to bring the power and
reliability of the Unix operating system to relatively
inexpensive computers based on Intel Corp.
microprocessors. He freely distributed the software,
requiring that improvements also be open and freely
distributed.

In recent years, it has become a low-cost alternative
to proprietary Unix operating systems such as
Hewlett-Packard Co.'s HP/UX, IBM Corp.'s AIX and Sun
Microsystems Inc.'s Solaris. Some companies and
government agencies also have embraced Linux over the
dominant Windows operating system from Microsoft Corp.

The research firm Gartner predicts Linux may have 15
percent of the worldwide server market by 2007.

Torvalds, who joined Transmeta before it launched its
Crusoe microprocessor in 2000, is taking an indefinite
leave from the chip maker. Neither he nor the company
have elaborated on his role at Transmeta since he
joined six years ago.

The Open Source Development Lab is sponsored by
Computer Associates, Fujitsu, Hitachi, HP, IBM, Intel,
NEC and others.



__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


cu: /dev/ttyS0: Line in use

2003-06-17 Thread listmail
At this point I think I've about run out of ideas as to what could be
causing such an error, as a short while ago I was able to make a
connection using the serial port.

What I'm trying to do is configure a terminal server, and I need to get
access to it through a serial port to configure its network interface.

The particular machine I'm using supports serial console redirection, but
I've disabled that in the bios.  I also removed the flags in the boot
loader that redirect output to the serial port upon system boot, and also
disabled any console running there in /etc/inittab.

At the moment 'lsof | grep /dev/ttyS0' doesn't return anything.

Just in case the terminal server itself (which was reset to factory
defaults for a reinstall), somehow was attempting to make a connection to
the particular serial port in question I powered it down, but that made no
difference.

Can anyone suggest anywhere else to look for the source of the problem?

David Aikema
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


OT Textmaker for Linux from Softmaker software

2003-06-17 Thread Harry Giles
Has anyone had any experience with these folks?  How do you get them to 
respond?

I purchased the Linux CD version, they send me registration info for 
Textmaker fro Windows and Pocket PC's.  I email them 6 times in 2 weeks, no 
response.  Today I get the CD for Textmaker for Windows and Pocket PC's 
(useless to me).

Any imput appreciated.

Harry G
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: OT Textmaker for Linux from Softmaker software

2003-06-17 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 02:20 pm, Harry Giles wrote:
 Has anyone had any experience with these folks?  How do you get them
 to respond?

 I purchased the Linux CD version, they send me registration info for
 Textmaker fro Windows and Pocket PC's.  I email them 6 times in 2
 weeks, no response.  Today I get the CD for Textmaker for Windows and
 Pocket PC's (useless to me).

 Any imput appreciated.

 Harry G

I use Text Maker; it's pretty decent.  I had some problems getting ahold 
of them and when I mentioned it to them, they seemed amazed that I 
couldn't get ahold of them.  I think they might have some dead e-mail 
addresses.
Try this guy:

Martin Kotulla [EMAIL PROTECTED]

and tell him I sent you.


-- 
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd Rather Be Sailing

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: OT Textmaker for Linux from Softmaker software

2003-06-17 Thread dep
begin  Harry Giles's  quote:
| Has anyone had any experience with these folks?  How do you get
| them to respond?

tony's response is accurate. are you sure the linux version isn't on 
the cd also? (i have the download version and keep *numerous* 
backups, because after using it for six weeks or so i would be 
utterly lost without it, so i'm prepared for everything i can be 
short of a direct nuclear hit. for what i do, it's by far the best 
linux word processor i've seen and, with the possible exception of 
describe, the best, period.)
-- 
dep

http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within
the envelope, and no animated paperclip anywhere.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: cu: /dev/ttyS0: Line in use

2003-06-17 Thread Keith Morse
Grasping at straws,  an stale lock file perhaps?

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: OT Textmaker for Linux from Softmaker software

2003-06-17 Thread Harry Giles
On Tue June 17 2003 06:49 pm, dep wrote:
 begin  Harry Giles's  quote:
 | Has anyone had any experience with these folks?  How do you get
 | them to respond?

 tony's response is accurate. are you sure the linux version isn't on
 the cd also?
snip

I just checked, just a pdf file, and 2 .exe files.

Me be sad.

 8-(

I agree with you, Dep.  It is a GREAT program.  I am using the demo right 
now, but I need to be able to save in .doc file format, which the demo 
won't do.

I sent an email to the person that Tony suggested.  They are 6 hours ahead 
of me in EST, which would make it 2:49 AM.  

Hopefully, I will find out soon.  Unfortunately, I have to go to Marco 
Island Fl. tomorrow for a overnight job, so I will have to wait until 
Thursday.

Thanks for you help though.  because of your review at Linux and Main, I 
gave it a try.

Huum.   I guess that makes you kind of responsible, huh?  If it doesn't 
get straightened out, you can send me a check or money order for $68.99.  
Ah, you just wrote a review.  You can just pay half.

8-)  Just kidding.  

Harry G
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: cu: /dev/ttyS0: Line in use

2003-06-17 Thread David Aikema
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13  PM, Keith Morse wrote:

Grasping at straws,  an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?

David Aikema

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: cu: /dev/ttyS0: Line in use

2003-06-17 Thread Net Llama!
On 06/17/03 18:54, David Aikema wrote:

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13  PM, Keith Morse wrote:

Grasping at straws,  an stale lock file perhaps?


Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
/var/lock ??

--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com
  7:00pm  up 2 days, 23:44,  1 user,  load average: 0.08, 0.07, 0.02

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: cu: /dev/ttyS0: Line in use

2003-06-17 Thread David Aikema
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 07:01  PM, Net Llama! wrote:

On 06/17/03 18:54, David Aikema wrote:

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13  PM, Keith Morse wrote:
Grasping at straws,  an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
/var/lock ??
Thanks.  There was a uucp directory in there, but it was empty, so I'm 
thinking that its only purpose would be to create an area where the 
uucp user could have write access to create locks.  Does that sound 
right?

David Aikema

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: cu: /dev/ttyS0: Line in use

2003-06-17 Thread Kurt Wall
Quoth David Aikema:
 On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13  PM, Keith Morse wrote:
 
 Grasping at straws,  an stale lock file perhaps?
 
 Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?

/var/run or /var/lock?

K
-- 
It was a virgin forest, a place where the Hand of Man had never set
foot.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: cu: /dev/ttyS0: Line in use

2003-06-17 Thread David Aikema
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 07:38  PM, Kurt Wall wrote:

Quoth David Aikema:
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13  PM, Keith Morse wrote:

Grasping at straws,  an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
/var/run or /var/lock?
There's nothing that seems relevant in /var/run right now

David Aikema

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: cu: /dev/ttyS0: Line in use

2003-06-17 Thread Net Llama!
On 06/17/03 20:03, David Aikema wrote:

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 07:38  PM, Kurt Wall wrote:

Quoth David Aikema:

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13  PM, Keith Morse wrote:

Grasping at straws,  an stale lock file perhaps?


Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?


/var/run or /var/lock?


There's nothing that seems relevant in /var/run right now
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=lang_enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8safe=offthreadm=fa.gmucrhv.77ueg1%40ifi.uio.nornum=1prev=/groups%3Fas_epq%3D/dev/ttyS0%253A%2520Line%2520in%2520use%26safe%3Doff%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26lr%3Dlang_en%26num%3D50%26hl%3Den
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=lang_enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8safe=offthreadm=fa.gdlrclv.6k8top%40ifi.uio.nornum=6prev=/groups%3Fas_epq%3D/dev/ttyS0%253A%2520Line%2520in%2520use%26safe%3Doff%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26lr%3Dlang_en%26num%3D50%26hl%3Den
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com
  8:05pm  up 3 days, 49 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.21, 0.34, 0.34

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users