[linux-yocto] pruning of unused branches from linux-yocto-3.14 kernel repository
Hi Bruce, As most of the BSPs from meta-intel layer are using the standard/base for KBRANCH, these kernel branches from the linux-yocto-3.14 repository are not needed anymore, and can be deleted to reduce the branch count. Darren, Tom, Do you see any of these branches used anywhere else? standard/common-pc-64/chiefriver standard/common-pc-64/crystalforest standard/common-pc-64/jasperforest standard/common-pc-64/mohonpeak standard/common-pc-64/rangeley standard/common-pc-64/romley standard/common-pc-64/sugarbay standard/common-pc/atom-pc standard/crownbay standard/emenlow standard/fri2 standard/preempt-rt/base standard/sys940x standard/tiny/fri2 Bruce, If there is no objection you can proceed with deleting of these branches from the L-Y v3.14 kernel repository. Thanks, Nitin -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] pruning of unused branches from linux-yocto-3.14 kernel repository
On 5/13/14, 10:06, Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: Hi Bruce, As most of the BSPs from meta-intel layer are using the standard/base for KBRANCH, these kernel branches from the linux-yocto-3.14 repository are not needed anymore, and can be deleted to reduce the branch count. Darren, Tom, Do you see any of these branches used anywhere else? standard/common-pc-64/chiefriver standard/common-pc-64/crystalforest standard/common-pc-64/jasperforest standard/common-pc-64/mohonpeak standard/common-pc-64/rangeley standard/common-pc-64/romley standard/common-pc-64/sugarbay standard/common-pc/atom-pc standard/crownbay standard/emenlow standard/fri2 standard/preempt-rt/base Let's not prune preempt-rt/base - we should instead be adding the linux-yocto-rt recipe for 3.14! Bruce, there is a preempt-rt 3.14.3-rt5 available. I don't see it in the linux-yoct 3.14 repository. Am I missing it - are you waiting for someone to send the patch? This is *way* late to be doing this But we really should have preempt-rt at least in the tree :-( Sadly, I just haven't had time to do it unfortunately, but there is enough interest out there that we really should be making this part of our release criteria going forward. If it just builds Should we add the recipe and include it? standard/sys940x standard/tiny/fri2 Bruce, If there is no objection you can proceed with deleting of these branches from the L-Y v3.14 kernel repository. Thanks, Nitin -- Darren Hart Open Source Technology Center darren.h...@intel.com Intel Corporation -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] pruning of unused branches from linux-yocto-3.14 kernel repository
On 14-05-13 04:18 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 5/13/14, 10:06, Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: Hi Bruce, As most of the BSPs from meta-intel layer are using the standard/base for KBRANCH, these kernel branches from the linux-yocto-3.14 repository are not needed anymore, and can be deleted to reduce the branch count. Darren, Tom, Do you see any of these branches used anywhere else? standard/common-pc-64/chiefriver standard/common-pc-64/crystalforest standard/common-pc-64/jasperforest standard/common-pc-64/mohonpeak standard/common-pc-64/rangeley standard/common-pc-64/romley standard/common-pc-64/sugarbay standard/common-pc/atom-pc standard/crownbay standard/emenlow standard/fri2 standard/preempt-rt/base Let's not prune preempt-rt/base - we should instead be adding the linux-yocto-rt recipe for 3.14! Bruce, there is a preempt-rt 3.14.3-rt5 available. I don't see it in the linux-yoct 3.14 repository. Am I missing it - are you waiting for someone to send the patch? I merged the first 3.14-rt and was waiting for the dust to settle before doing more updates (the same as more -stable updates I have queued). This is *way* late to be doing this But we really should have preempt-rt at least in the tree :-( Sadly, I just haven't had time to do it unfortunately, but there is enough interest out there that we really should be making this part of our release criteria going forward. -rt is there, and I sent the recipe before yocto 1.6 dropped, and updated it for 3.14.2: commit 8dc545c511d765c0cbda32718ba296508b929a78 Author: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com Date: Mon May 5 09:45:14 2014 -0400 linux-yocto/3.14: update to v3.14.2 Updating to the korg 3.14.2 -stable release. (From OE-Core rev: 34afc38d86d169f0c0c5f2427f644b0dcc3bf9a1) Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org :100644 100644 330eda4f1fd1... c7b74d661d33... M meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bb I'll do the updated -rt content soon, was waiting for the early feedback on the -rt list to clear. Bruce If it just builds Should we add the recipe and include it? standard/sys940x standard/tiny/fri2 Bruce, If there is no objection you can proceed with deleting of these branches from the L-Y v3.14 kernel repository. Thanks, Nitin -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] pruning of unused branches from linux-yocto-3.14 kernel repository
On 14-05-13 01:06 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: Hi Bruce, As most of the BSPs from meta-intel layer are using the standard/base for KBRANCH, these kernel branches from the linux-yocto-3.14 repository are not needed anymore, and can be deleted to reduce the branch count. I'll delete the old intel BSP branches, but as I just replied, -rt/base will stay. Bruce Darren, Tom, Do you see any of these branches used anywhere else? standard/common-pc-64/chiefriver standard/common-pc-64/crystalforest standard/common-pc-64/jasperforest standard/common-pc-64/mohonpeak standard/common-pc-64/rangeley standard/common-pc-64/romley standard/common-pc-64/sugarbay standard/common-pc/atom-pc standard/crownbay standard/emenlow standard/fri2 standard/preempt-rt/base standard/sys940x standard/tiny/fri2 Bruce, If there is no objection you can proceed with deleting of these branches from the L-Y v3.14 kernel repository. Thanks, Nitin -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] pruning of unused branches from linux-yocto-3.14 kernel repository
On 5/13/2014 2:54 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-05-13 01:06 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: Hi Bruce, As most of the BSPs from meta-intel layer are using the standard/base for KBRANCH, these kernel branches from the linux-yocto-3.14 repository are not needed anymore, and can be deleted to reduce the branch count. I'll delete the old intel BSP branches, but as I just replied, -rt/base will stay. Bruce Thanks Bruce, Nitin Darren, Tom, Do you see any of these branches used anywhere else? standard/common-pc-64/chiefriver standard/common-pc-64/crystalforest standard/common-pc-64/jasperforest standard/common-pc-64/mohonpeak standard/common-pc-64/rangeley standard/common-pc-64/romley standard/common-pc-64/sugarbay standard/common-pc/atom-pc standard/crownbay standard/emenlow standard/fri2 standard/preempt-rt/base standard/sys940x standard/tiny/fri2 Bruce, If there is no objection you can proceed with deleting of these branches from the L-Y v3.14 kernel repository. Thanks, Nitin -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
