Re: [v6, 07/11] powerpc/powernv: set power_save func after the idle states are initialized
On Wed, 2016-08-06 at 16:54:27 UTC, "Shreyas B. Prabhu" wrote: > pnv_init_idle_states discovers supported idle states from the > device tree and does the required initialization. Set power_save > function pointer only after this initialization is done > > Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > Acked-by: Michael Neuling Applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/5593e3032736ccba30d28bd27e cheers ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [v6, 07/11] powerpc/powernv: set power_save func after the idle states are initialized
On 06/15/2016 11:11 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-06 at 16:54:27 UTC, "Shreyas B. Prabhu" wrote: >> pnv_init_idle_states discovers supported idle states from the >> device tree and does the required initialization. Set power_save >> function pointer only after this initialization is done > > This looks like a bug fix? Or is this not a concern in practice for some > reason > (and if so what is that reason)? > This isn't a concern currently because, all powernv machines so far supported nap and nap does not need any initialization from kernel side. Thanks, Shreyas ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [v6, 07/11] powerpc/powernv: set power_save func after the idle states are initialized
On Wed, 2016-08-06 at 16:54:27 UTC, "Shreyas B. Prabhu" wrote: > pnv_init_idle_states discovers supported idle states from the > device tree and does the required initialization. Set power_save > function pointer only after this initialization is done This looks like a bug fix? Or is this not a concern in practice for some reason (and if so what is that reason)? cheers ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev