Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?

[Fabio Maino (fmaino)]

I support moving this document to standard track

Fabio

From: lisp  on behalf of Luigi Iannone 
Date: Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53 AM
To: LISP mailing list list 
Cc: lisp-cha...@ietf.org 
Subject: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?
Hi All,

Happy new year!

As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding 
document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.

Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change and that 
deployment experience is added to the document.

Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree with the change.

Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or you are against.
(Silence does not count)

Please reply.

Ciao

L.




Begin forwarded message:

From: "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)" 
Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding
Date: December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1
To: "lisp@ietf.org" 

Hi all,

The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name Encoding has been posted. 
The document is in good shape and minor identified nits have been fixed. Please 
find the review here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/

However, as part of the review, it was raised the question if the document is 
in the right stream (currently in Experimental). Given that there are known 
implementations of the spec and that it has been running in production for some 
time, my suggestion is to consider moving this document to Standards track 
instead.

Thanks,
Alberto
___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?

[Dino Farinacci]

In favor.

Dino

> On Jan 11, 2024, at 7:52 AM, Luigi Iannone  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Happy new year! 
> 
> As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding 
> document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.
> 
> Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change and that 
> deployment experience is added to the document.
> 
> Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree with the 
> change.
> 
> Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or you are 
> against.
> (Silence does not count)
> 
> Please reply.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
>  
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)" 
>> Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding
>> Date: December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1
>> To: "lisp@ietf.org" 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>>  The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name Encoding has been 
>> posted. The document is in good shape and minor identified nits have been 
>> fixed. Please find the review here:
>>  
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/
>>  However, as part of the review, it was raised the question if the document 
>> is in the right stream (currently in Experimental). Given that there are 
>> known implementations of the spec and that it has been running in production 
>> for some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this document to 
>> Standards track instead.
>>  Thanks,
>> Alberto
>> ___
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> 
> ___
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

[lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard track?

[Luigi Iannone]

Hi All,

Happy new year! 

As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding 
document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track.

Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change and that 
deployment experience is added to the document.

Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree with the change.

Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or you are against.
(Silence does not count)

Please reply.

Ciao

L.
 


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)" 
> Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding
> Date: December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1
> To: "lisp@ietf.org" 
> 
> Hi all,
>  
> The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name Encoding has been 
> posted. The document is in good shape and minor identified nits have been 
> fixed. Please find the review here:
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/
>  
> However, as part of the review, it was raised the question if the document is 
> in the right stream (currently in Experimental). Given that there are known 
> implementations of the spec and that it has been running in production for 
> some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this document to Standards 
> track instead.
>  
> Thanks,
> Alberto
> ___
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp