In favor. Dino
> On Jan 11, 2024, at 7:52 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Happy new year! > > As you may have seen from Alberto’s shepherd review of the name encoding > document, it is suggested to move the document to standard track. > > Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this change and that > deployment experience is added to the document. > > Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree with the > change. > > Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or you are > against. > (Silence does not count) > > Please reply. > > Ciao > > L. > > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding >> Date: December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1 >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> Hi all, >> The shepherd’s review of the LISP Distinguished Name Encoding has been >> posted. The document is in good shape and minor identified nits have been >> fixed. Please find the review here: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/ >> However, as part of the review, it was raised the question if the document >> is in the right stream (currently in Experimental). Given that there are >> known implementations of the spec and that it has been running in production >> for some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this document to >> Standards track instead. >> Thanks, >> Alberto >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
