[pfSense] pfSense hardware with comersial support.
Hi Everyone! Is the Netgate APU2/APU4 and pfSense store VK-T40E both based on the APU from PC Engines ? If yes: Is there a difference in the software (firmware image) Is there a difference in the bundled support. I would appreciate if this thread would NOT turn into a discussion about product pricing, my reason for asking this question is because I would like to see if this units fits into some of my customers support requirements. Customers who have been unable to benefit from pfSense because of missing commercial support until now. Med venlig hilsen, Best regards Ulrik Lunddahl Sales Manager - Salgschef PROconsult Data A/S - Rugårdsvej 15 - 5000 Odense C Tel: +45 6311 - Tel dir: +45 63113341 - Mobil: +45 26363341 - Fax: +45 63113344 E-mail: u...@proconsult.dkmailto:u...@proconsult.dk - Web site: www.proconsult.dkhttp://www.proconsult.dk/ ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
[pfSense] openbgpd No Buffer Space Available
Morning all, I received the following messages in routing.log today Aug 28 06:03:38 4slgbmernfw01 bgpd[18303]: neighbor 192.168.55.5 (AWS-DC MER Peer): sending notification: HoldTimer expired, unknown subcode 0 Aug 28 06:03:38 4slgbmernfw01 bgpd[18303]: neighbor 192.168.55.5 (AWS-DC MER Peer): state change Established - Idle, reason: HoldTimer expired Aug 28 06:04:08 4slgbmernfw01 bgpd[18303]: writev (6/80): No buffer space available Aug 28 06:04:09 4slgbmernfw01 bgpd[18303]: writev (8/120): No buffer space available Aug 28 06:04:09 4slgbmernfw01 bgpd[18303]: neighbor 192.168.55.5 (AWS-DC MER Peer): pfkey setup failed Aug 28 06:04:10 4slgbmernfw01 bgpd[18303]: Connection attempt from neighbor 192.168.55.5 (AWS-DC MER Peer) while session is in state Idle Aug 28 06:04:46 4slgbmernfw01 bgpd[18303]: Connection attempt from neighbor 192.168.55.5 (AWS-DC MER Peer) while session is in state Idle Aug 28 06:05:18 4slgbmernfw01 bgpd[18303]: Connection attempt from neighbor 192.168.55.5 (AWS-DC MER Peer) while session is in state Idle Bgpd stopped routing. I have restarted bgpd and everything is OK – but I would like to find out what happened or rather how to avoid it happening again – can anyone make any suggestions or point me in the right direction. Was it because of the hold timer expiry ?? Many thanks, Mark Relf Principal Consultant [cv_certified_engineer.gif] 4sl Group, 4 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2DJ t: +44 (0) 203 307 1053 m: +44 (0) 7868 842548 w: www.4sl.comhttp://www.4sl.com/ e: mark.r...@4sl.commailto:mark.r...@4sl.com Planned away dates: None [2013 Tech Track 100 logo - smaller] Legal Disclaimer: The information in this email and any attachment is confidential and may also be privileged. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender and delete the message and attachments from your system immediately. You are not entitled to retain, copy or use this email for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its content to any other person. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question
All I'm saying is that a normal SLC cell can handle about 10 times more writes then a MLC if everything else is the same. And as far as I ca tell, the ability to handle writes is the OPs main concern. A SLC based SDHC card will have about 10 times longer life span in that regard. If you want it perfect then sure there are better options and technologies. I'm just trying to make the choice a easy one based on what the OP asked. There is allways better cheaper and faster tech just around the corner. 27. aug. 2014 21:26 skrev Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com følgende: SD cards are storage, but not “disks” nor “drives”. Beyond m-SATA, eMMC is your best option. Not only are they faster than SD cards (speeds of the larger devices rival those of traditional SSDs, as well as supporting a “TRIM”-like operation, priority interruptible READ and ERASE operations, background operations, and riding the cost-curve of cellular handsets (growing) .vs consumer point-and-shoot cameras (shrinking), etc.) (This, by the way, is a huge, huge ‘hint’.) (You may wish read between the lines.) A lot of the SLC / MLC mythos is from before the days of JEDEC standards for endurance, advanced wear-leveling algorithms, and before a lof of the firmware engineers understood concepts such as “read disturbance”, “write disturbance”, and “ECC correction thresholds”. It’s certainly not as simple as you’re making it out to be. (This, again, is the big reason that Netgate stayed out of the early fracas around SSDs.) I’m not going to depend on what someone said in the forum over 3 years ago, since it’s unlikely to apply today. Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com wrote: For completeness sake. Just to clarify. You can get SDHC cards that are SLC based. Pretty much everything called industrial grade SD/SDHC will be a SLC SSD in SD format. Understood. Thank you for the clarification. Would it be possible to have the description updated on the sales page? It only says you can boot via SD through USB. -- Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com m. 651.373.5015 o. 612.568.2749 On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:24, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Yes, the system can be booted from an SD (or SDHC) card. Or from USB, or from the m-SATA. All of these require proper preparation of the requisite ‘disk’ (-like device). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: I understand *that* however it doesn't say on the features page it can be booted off the SD slot - is that true? If so I have to change a few quotes I have in play as they will need to get mSATA SSDs instead. On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:20, Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com wrote: The SD (SDHC describes some cards which work in the slot) card slot is a “base feature”. If people choose to fit a m-SATA drive, then they can. Or they can use the SD card socket. It’s not like we’re going to de-solder the SD card socket if it’s not going to be used. Neither are we going to carry two different SKUs (one with, one without). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Why not answer the question? On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:56, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Ryan, Don't troll. On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:33 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Wait, so the SDHC slot on this board is simply for show? On Aug 26, 2014, at 13:56, Sergii Cherkashyn ser...@accurategroup.com wrote: Thank you Espen, Squid is for filtering purpose only, not to save bandwidth. On Netgate they have only this SSD as an option. But I’ll keep your advice in mind. Best regards*,* *Sergii Cherkashyn* Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:45:46 +0200 From: Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com To: pfSense support and discussion list@lists.pfsense.org Subject: Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question Message-ID: caadq7-adzhlsv1p6rl7kwaaomaws1uqcet6fxa5ngdn8sl5...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I personally don't think you will have an issue with too many writes in a normal environment. Why squid tho? if its for filtering fine. For acceleration and 3-6 persons it will most likely not do you much good. Also check MLC vs SLC. SLC based SSD will last longer. Approximately 10 times longer. And even more with the right write leveling tech. Just my 2 cents. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question
And I'm saying that you have to evaluate these things as systems, not the base level tech. On Aug 28, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com wrote: All I'm saying is that a normal SLC cell can handle about 10 times more writes then a MLC if everything else is the same. And as far as I ca tell, the ability to handle writes is the OPs main concern. A SLC based SDHC card will have about 10 times longer life span in that regard. If you want it perfect then sure there are better options and technologies. I'm just trying to make the choice a easy one based on what the OP asked. There is allways better cheaper and faster tech just around the corner. 27. aug. 2014 21:26 skrev Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com følgende: SD cards are storage, but not “disks” nor “drives”. Beyond m-SATA, eMMC is your best option. Not only are they faster than SD cards (speeds of the larger devices rival those of traditional SSDs, as well as supporting a “TRIM”-like operation, priority interruptible READ and ERASE operations, background operations, and riding the cost-curve of cellular handsets (growing) .vs consumer point-and-shoot cameras (shrinking), etc.) (This, by the way, is a huge, huge ‘hint’.) (You may wish read between the lines.) A lot of the SLC / MLC mythos is from before the days of JEDEC standards for endurance, advanced wear-leveling algorithms, and before a lof of the firmware engineers understood concepts such as “read disturbance”, “write disturbance”, and “ECC correction thresholds”. It’s certainly not as simple as you’re making it out to be. (This, again, is the big reason that Netgate stayed out of the early fracas around SSDs.) I’m not going to depend on what someone said in the forum over 3 years ago, since it’s unlikely to apply today. Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com wrote: For completeness sake. Just to clarify. You can get SDHC cards that are SLC based. Pretty much everything called industrial grade SD/SDHC will be a SLC SSD in SD format. Understood. Thank you for the clarification. Would it be possible to have the description updated on the sales page? It only says you can boot via SD through USB. -- Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com m. 651.373.5015 o. 612.568.2749 On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:24, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Yes, the system can be booted from an SD (or SDHC) card. Or from USB, or from the m-SATA. All of these require proper preparation of the requisite ‘disk’ (-like device). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: I understand *that* however it doesn't say on the features page it can be booted off the SD slot - is that true? If so I have to change a few quotes I have in play as they will need to get mSATA SSDs instead. On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:20, Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com wrote: The SD (SDHC describes some cards which work in the slot) card slot is a “base feature”. If people choose to fit a m-SATA drive, then they can. Or they can use the SD card socket. It’s not like we’re going to de-solder the SD card socket if it’s not going to be used. Neither are we going to carry two different SKUs (one with, one without). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Why not answer the question? On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:56, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Ryan, Don't troll. On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:33 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Wait, so the SDHC slot on this board is simply for show? On Aug 26, 2014, at 13:56, Sergii Cherkashyn ser...@accurategroup.com wrote: Thank you Espen, Squid is for filtering purpose only, not to save bandwidth. On Netgate they have only this SSD as an option. But I’ll keep your advice in mind. Best regards, Sergii Cherkashyn Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:45:46 +0200 From: Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com To: pfSense support and discussion list@lists.pfsense.org Subject: Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question Message-ID: caadq7-adzhlsv1p6rl7kwaaomaws1uqcet6fxa5ngdn8sl5...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I personally don't think you will have an issue with too many writes in a normal environment. Why squid tho? if its for filtering fine. For acceleration and 3-6 persons it will most likely not do you much good. Also check MLC vs SLC. SLC based SSD will last longer. Approximately 10 times longer. And even more with the right write leveling tech. Just my 2 cents. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List
Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question
As a photographer of many many years - the SD cards on the market for us exceed the life span of CF. HOWEVER CF has a much larger potential capacity. If you spend $10 on a card that has a higher end build for $50 you should know your data will fail sooner rather than later. On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:12, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: And I'm saying that you have to evaluate these things as systems, not the base level tech. On Aug 28, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com wrote: All I'm saying is that a normal SLC cell can handle about 10 times more writes then a MLC if everything else is the same. And as far as I ca tell, the ability to handle writes is the OPs main concern. A SLC based SDHC card will have about 10 times longer life span in that regard. If you want it perfect then sure there are better options and technologies. I'm just trying to make the choice a easy one based on what the OP asked. There is allways better cheaper and faster tech just around the corner. 27. aug. 2014 21:26 skrev Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com følgende: SD cards are storage, but not “disks” nor “drives”. Beyond m-SATA, eMMC is your best option. Not only are they faster than SD cards (speeds of the larger devices rival those of traditional SSDs, as well as supporting a “TRIM”-like operation, priority interruptible READ and ERASE operations, background operations, and riding the cost-curve of cellular handsets (growing) .vs consumer point-and-shoot cameras (shrinking), etc.) (This, by the way, is a huge, huge ‘hint’.) (You may wish read between the lines.) A lot of the SLC / MLC mythos is from before the days of JEDEC standards for endurance, advanced wear-leveling algorithms, and before a lof of the firmware engineers understood concepts such as “read disturbance”, “write disturbance”, and “ECC correction thresholds”. It’s certainly not as simple as you’re making it out to be. (This, again, is the big reason that Netgate stayed out of the early fracas around SSDs.) I’m not going to depend on what someone said in the forum over 3 years ago, since it’s unlikely to apply today. Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com wrote: For completeness sake. Just to clarify. You can get SDHC cards that are SLC based. Pretty much everything called industrial grade SD/SDHC will be a SLC SSD in SD format. Understood. Thank you for the clarification. Would it be possible to have the description updated on the sales page? It only says you can boot via SD through USB. -- Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com m. 651.373.5015 o. 612.568.2749 On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:24, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Yes, the system can be booted from an SD (or SDHC) card. Or from USB, or from the m-SATA. All of these require proper preparation of the requisite ‘disk’ (-like device). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: I understand *that* however it doesn't say on the features page it can be booted off the SD slot - is that true? If so I have to change a few quotes I have in play as they will need to get mSATA SSDs instead. On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:20, Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com wrote: The SD (SDHC describes some cards which work in the slot) card slot is a “base feature”. If people choose to fit a m-SATA drive, then they can. Or they can use the SD card socket. It’s not like we’re going to de-solder the SD card socket if it’s not going to be used. Neither are we going to carry two different SKUs (one with, one without). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Why not answer the question? On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:56, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Ryan, Don't troll. On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:33 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Wait, so the SDHC slot on this board is simply for show? On Aug 26, 2014, at 13:56, Sergii Cherkashyn ser...@accurategroup.com wrote: Thank you Espen, Squid is for filtering purpose only, not to save bandwidth. On Netgate they have only this SSD as an option. But I’ll keep your advice in mind. Best regards, Sergii Cherkashyn Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:45:46 +0200 From: Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com To: pfSense support and discussion list@lists.pfsense.org Subject: Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question Message-ID: caadq7-adzhlsv1p6rl7kwaaomaws1uqcet6fxa5ngdn8sl5...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I personally don't think you will have an issue with too many writes in a normal environment. Why squid tho? if its for filtering fine. For acceleration and 3-6 persons it will most likely not do you much good. Also check MLC vs SLC. SLC based SSD will last longer. Approximately 10 times longer. And even more with the right write leveling tech. Just my
Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question
So it doesn't need to be in the description really... Yes that's what was throwing me. It implies you can only boot from SD by adding it to a USB adapter. On Aug 27, 2014, at 13:25, Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com wrote: If I may... I think Ryan is confused about the usb part. The SD slot is a onboard slot but its not connnected/wired to IDE/SATA bus, but rather it is connected to the USB bus just as a external usb card reader would be, but offcource its onboard and hardwired. Thus the confusion I assume. 27. aug. 2014 20:01 skrev Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com følgende: Ryan, I’m not sure what you’re asking. This thread started off with Sergii Cherkashyn asking if running on an SSD was advisable. Obviously, it works, or we wouldn’t offer it. (The thread Sergii pointed-to is from early 2011. Netgate did not ship SSDs for several years because the reliability *then* was so poor. The situation changed, and, once quality SSDs were available (*with power-fail capacitors, etc.*), we began offering same. Then you jumped in asking (is) “SDHC slot on this board is simply for show?” I honestly though you were trolling. Since there is a configuration of the APU units available for sale both at the Netgate store *and* the pfSense store (http://store.pfsense.org) that does not include a m-sata drive, how else could the system boot pfSense? Now you post on a public list, (a list about pfSense), asking me to change an unspecified page on (I assume), the Netgate site. Setting aside the whole issue of why we’re talking about this on-list, I can’t find the text that confused you. Here is what I found on the Netgate site: http://store.netgate.com/APU1C4.aspx says: Boot from SD card (connected through USB), external USB or m-SATA SSD.” http://store.netgate.com/APU1C.aspx says: Boot from SD card (connected through USB), external USB or m-SATA SSD. You may wish to note that this language exactly matches that found on the PC Engines site: Boot from SD card (connected through USB), external USB or m-SATA SSD.” ref: http://pcengines.ch/apu.htm, and http://pcengines.ch/apu1c.htm, and page 9 of the schematic for the APU (http://pcengines.ch/schema/apu1c.pdf) clearly shows that the “SD card interface” runs through a Alcore Micro AU6465 (http://www.alcormicro.com/en_content/c_product/product_01b.php?CategoryID=7IndexID=19) to USB6 on the AMD T40 SoC. If you will be so kind as to make a specific request for change of the language you found confusing, I’ll take a look at it. You might even send such a request to me in-private, so as not to further clutter the list. Right now, I can’t find a problem. JIm On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Understood. Thank you for the clarification. Would it be possible to have the description updated on the sales page? It only says you can boot via SD through USB. -- Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com m. 651.373.5015 o. 612.568.2749 On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:24, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Yes, the system can be booted from an SD (or SDHC) card. Or from USB, or from the m-SATA. All of these require proper preparation of the requisite ‘disk’ (-like device). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: I understand *that* however it doesn't say on the features page it can be booted off the SD slot - is that true? If so I have to change a few quotes I have in play as they will need to get mSATA SSDs instead. On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:20, Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com wrote: The SD (SDHC describes some cards which work in the slot) card slot is a “base feature”. If people choose to fit a m-SATA drive, then they can. Or they can use the SD card socket. It’s not like we’re going to de-solder the SD card socket if it’s not going to be used. Neither are we going to carry two different SKUs (one with, one without). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Why not answer the question? On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:56, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Ryan, Don't troll. On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:33 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Wait, so the SDHC slot on this board is simply for show? On Aug 26, 2014, at 13:56, Sergii Cherkashyn ser...@accurategroup.com wrote: Thank you Espen, Squid is for filtering purpose only, not to save bandwidth. On Netgate they have only this SSD as an option. But I’ll keep your advice in mind. Best regards, Sergii Cherkashyn Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:45:46 +0200 From: Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com To: pfSense support and discussion list@lists.pfsense.org Subject: Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question Message-ID: caadq7-adzhlsv1p6rl7kwaaomaws1uqcet6fxa5ngdn8sl5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question
By that logic neither is compact flash On Aug 27, 2014, at 14:25, Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com wrote: SD cards are storage, but not “disks” nor “drives”. Beyond m-SATA, eMMC is your best option. Not only are they faster than SD cards (speeds of the larger devices rival those of traditional SSDs, as well as supporting a “TRIM”-like operation, priority interruptible READ and ERASE operations, background operations, and riding the cost-curve of cellular handsets (growing) .vs consumer point-and-shoot cameras (shrinking), etc.) (This, by the way, is a huge, huge ‘hint’.) (You may wish read between the lines.) A lot of the SLC / MLC mythos is from before the days of JEDEC standards for endurance, advanced wear-leveling algorithms, and before a lof of the firmware engineers understood concepts such as “read disturbance”, “write disturbance”, and “ECC correction thresholds”. It’s certainly not as simple as you’re making it out to be. (This, again, is the big reason that Netgate stayed out of the early fracas around SSDs.) I’m not going to depend on what someone said in the forum over 3 years ago, since it’s unlikely to apply today. Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com wrote: For completeness sake. Just to clarify. You can get SDHC cards that are SLC based. Pretty much everything called industrial grade SD/SDHC will be a SLC SSD in SD format. Understood. Thank you for the clarification. Would it be possible to have the description updated on the sales page? It only says you can boot via SD through USB. -- Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com m. 651.373.5015 o. 612.568.2749 On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:24, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Yes, the system can be booted from an SD (or SDHC) card. Or from USB, or from the m-SATA. All of these require proper preparation of the requisite ‘disk’ (-like device). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: I understand *that* however it doesn't say on the features page it can be booted off the SD slot - is that true? If so I have to change a few quotes I have in play as they will need to get mSATA SSDs instead. On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:20, Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com wrote: The SD (SDHC describes some cards which work in the slot) card slot is a “base feature”. If people choose to fit a m-SATA drive, then they can. Or they can use the SD card socket. It’s not like we’re going to de-solder the SD card socket if it’s not going to be used. Neither are we going to carry two different SKUs (one with, one without). Jim On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Why not answer the question? On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:56, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote: Ryan, Don't troll. On Aug 27, 2014, at 7:33 AM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: Wait, so the SDHC slot on this board is simply for show? On Aug 26, 2014, at 13:56, Sergii Cherkashyn ser...@accurategroup.com wrote: Thank you Espen, Squid is for filtering purpose only, not to save bandwidth. On Netgate they have only this SSD as an option. But I’ll keep your advice in mind. Best regards, Sergii Cherkashyn Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:45:46 +0200 From: Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com To: pfSense support and discussion list@lists.pfsense.org Subject: Re: [pfSense] Netgate APU2 SSD module question Message-ID: caadq7-adzhlsv1p6rl7kwaaomaws1uqcet6fxa5ngdn8sl5...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I personally don't think you will have an issue with too many writes in a normal environment. Why squid tho? if its for filtering fine. For acceleration and 3-6 persons it will most likely not do you much good. Also check MLC vs SLC. SLC based SSD will last longer. Approximately 10 times longer. And even more with the right write leveling tech. Just my 2 cents. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org
[pfSense] Fwd: [Announce] 2.1.5 Release
FYI. Begin forwarded message: From: Jeremy Porter jpor...@electricsheepfencing.com Date: August 28, 2014 at 15:24:08 CDT To: annou...@lists.pfsense.org Subject: [Announce] 2.1.5 Release Reply-To: Receive important notifications from the project administrators annou...@lists.pfsense.org 2.1.5 RELEASE Now Available https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=1401 Release Notes: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/2.1.5_New_Features_and_Changes Security Fixes pfSense-SA-14_14.openssl See http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140806.txt Updated to OpenSSL 0.9.8zb and 1.0.1i pfSense-SA-14_15.webgui pfSense-SA-14_16.webgui pfSense-SA-14_17.webgui Other Fixes Handle a missing DHCPD config section properly during a configuration upgrade Fix a regression that broke CARP+IP alias VIP functionality Fix the Pass, Block, Reject and Interface filters in the Firewall Logs Widget #3725 Use HTTPS for dyndns providers that support it Avoid resetting the firewall hostname from a WAN DHCP server #3746 Add missing qlimit keyword in some shaper rules Change Cancel button to call history.back() when editing firewall aliases to fix issues with IE 11 #3728 Allow hostnames in bulk import since they are valid entries in a network type alias Fix input validation logic on diag_testport.php, escape more shell arguments for good measure Escape the individual dnsmasq advanced/custom options Encode the detail field of an alias entry before displaying its contents back to the user Encode interface/VIP descriptions before displaying them on the NTP daemon settings, and GIF/GRE interfaces Per the dhcpd.conf man page and other documentation from ISC, mclt must not be defined on the secondary Shorten the wait at reload in startup wizard to 5 seconds from 60 Do not execute DNS lookups on GET, only pre-fill Host box so the user can press the button to execute Turn alias creation links from DNS lookups into submit buttons for POST Remove javascript alert DNS resolution action from the firewall log view. It was already removed from 2.2, and it's better not to allow a GET action to perform that action Require click-through POST confirmation when restoring or deleting a configuation from the backup history page Avoid a Cannot use string offset as an array error if the packages section of the config is missing Avoid generating an invalid IPsec (racoon) config if the user specified a mobile pool that is too small IPsec phase 2 pinghost was not used if the source IP was a virtual IP address #3798 Move dhcp6c log to dhcpd.log #3799 Do not reset source and destination port range values when it's an associated rule created by NAT port forward. #3778 Added filter.so to list of extensions loaded for filter_var() support. The pfSense PHP module was setting the subnet mask of lo0 to /0, which could break some routes and cause other unintended routing side effects. ___ Announce mailing list annou...@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/announce ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Fwd: [Announce] 2.1.5 Release
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote: FYI. Oh, hey - sweet! I didn't even realize I wasn't subscribed to announce@ ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
