[pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2
Hi, i'm fiddling with bacula-client on upgraded pfsense 2.2. i don't see any error in the logs, i don't see any error with bacula-fd -f (run in foreground) -d 10 (debug level 10) i even don't see it spitting out errors as the config file isn't existant [2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ls /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf ls: /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf: No such file or directory [2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ps aux | grep bacula root59559 0.0 0.2 56420 7364 - Ss1:50PM 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf root99408 0.0 0.1 18884 2384 0 S+1:50PM 0:00.00 grep bacula netstat doesn't show it listening too: Active Internet connections Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) tcp4 0 0 pfsense.https 10.0.1.14.38261TIME_WAIT tcp4 0 0 pfsense.38791 10.0.1.14.40513 ESTABLISHED tcp6 0 0 localhost.3493 localhost.56539 ESTABLISHED tcp6 0 0 localhost.56539localhost.3493 ESTABLISHED udp4 0 0 192.168.100.1.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.4.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.1.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.3.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 pfsense.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::d227:88ff:.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.2.1.ntp*.* udp4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.1194 *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp-proxy *.* icm4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.* *.* any hints to solve this? thanks!! ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2
You don't mention if you had fd working on the earlier version of pf. You must have checked the config file for password and dir settings. The upgrade might have changed it because this might be a fresh install of fd. You say it is not listening, that sounds like there is an attempt at a new install. Check for multiple installs. Yudhvir ਯੁਧੱਵੀਰ408 915 9709 -- Original message--From: J. EchterDate: Sun, Feb 8, 2015 4:56 AMTo: pfSense support and discussion;Subject:[pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2Hi,i'm fiddling with bacula-client on upgraded pfsense 2.2.i don't see any error in the logs, i don't see any error with bacula-fd-f (run in foreground) -d 10 (debug level 10)i even don't see it spitting out errors as the config file isn't existant[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ls/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.confls: /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf: No such file or directory[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ps aux | grep bacularoot59559 0.0 0.2 56420 7364 - Ss1:50PM 0:00.00/usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.confroot99408 0.0 0.1 18884 2384 0 S+1:50PM 0:00.00 grepbaculanetstat doesn't show it listening too:Active Internet connectionsProto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state)tcp4 0 0 pfsense.https 10.0.1.14.38261 TIME_WAITtcp4 0 0 pfsense.38791 10.0.1.14.40513 ESTABLISHEDtcp6 0 0 localhost.3493 localhost.56539 ESTABLISHEDtcp6 0 0 localhost.56539localhost.3493 ESTABLISHEDudp4 0 0 192.168.100.1.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.4.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.1.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.3.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 pfsense.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::d227:88ff:.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.2.1.ntp*.* udp4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.1194 *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp-proxy *.* icm4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.* *.*any hints to solve this?thanks!!___pfSense mailing listhttps://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/listSupport the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2
Yes it was working on the old pfsense, i checked the config and it still shows the same contents. How do i check for a double install? i already removed and reinstalled the package. thanks Am 08.02.2015 um 18:39 schrieb mehmasa...@gmail.com: You don't mention if you had fd working on the earlier version of pf. You must have checked the config file for password and dir settings. The upgrade might have changed it because this might be a fresh install of fd. You say it is not listening, that sounds like there is an attempt at a new install. Check for multiple installs. Yudhvir ਯੁਧੱਵੀਰ 408 915 9709 tel:408%C2%A0915%C2%A09709 -- Original message-- *From: *J. Echter *Date: *Sun, Feb 8, 2015 4:56 AM *To: *pfSense support and discussion; *Subject:*[pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2 Hi,i'm fiddling with bacula-client on upgraded pfsense 2.2.i don't see any error in the logs, i don't see any error with bacula-fd-f (run in foreground) -d 10 (debug level 10)i even don't see it spitting out errors as the config file isn't existant[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local mailto:[root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ls/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.co http://bacula-fd.confls: /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.co http://bacula-fd.conf: No such file or directory[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local mailto:[root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ps aux | grep bacularoot 59559 0.0 0.2 56420 7364 tel:59559%20%20%200.0%20%200.2%20%2056420%20%207364 - Ss1:50PM 0:00.00/usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.co http://bacula-fd.confroot99408 0.0 0.1 18884 2384 0 tel:99408%20%20%200.0%20%200.1%20%2018884%20%202384%20%200 S+1:50PM 0:00.00 grepbaculanetstat doesn't show it listening too:Active Internet connectionsProto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state)tcp4 0 0 pfsense.ht http://pfsense.https 10.0.1.14 http://10.0.1.14.38261TIME_WAITtcp4 0 0 pfsense.38791 10.0.1.14 http://10.0.1.14.40513 ESTABLISHEDtcp6 0 0 localhost.3493 localhost.56539 ESTABLISHEDtcp6 0 0 localhost.56539localhost.3493 ESTABLISHEDudp4 0 0 192.168.100.1 http://192.168.100.1.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.4.1 http://192.168.4.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.1.1 http://192.168.1.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.3.1 http://192.168.3.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 pfsense.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::d227:88ff:.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.2.1 http://192.168.2.1.ntp*.* udp4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.1194 tel:62-245-238-.1194 *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tf http://localhost.tftp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tf http://localhost.tftp-proxy *.* icm4 0 0 host-62-245-238 tel:62-245-238-.* *.* any hints to solve this?thanks!!___pfSense mailing listhttps://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/listSupport the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.msg467805#msg467805 On 2015-02-09 01:53, J. Echter wrote: Hi, i'm fiddling with bacula-client on upgraded pfsense 2.2. i don't see any error in the logs, i don't see any error with bacula-fd -f (run in foreground) -d 10 (debug level 10) i even don't see it spitting out errors as the config file isn't existant [2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ls /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf ls: /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf: No such file or directory [2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ps aux | grep bacula root59559 0.0 0.2 56420 7364 - Ss1:50PM 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf root99408 0.0 0.1 18884 2384 0 S+1:50PM 0:00.00 grep bacula netstat doesn't show it listening too: Active Internet connections Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) tcp4 0 0 pfsense.https 10.0.1.14.38261 TIME_WAIT tcp4 0 0 pfsense.38791 10.0.1.14.40513 ESTABLISHED tcp6 0 0 localhost.3493 localhost.56539 ESTABLISHED tcp6 0 0 localhost.56539localhost.3493 ESTABLISHED udp4 0 0 192.168.100.1.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.4.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.1.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.3.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 pfsense.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::d227:88ff:.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.2.1.ntp*.* udp4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.1194 *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp-proxy *.* icm4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.* *.* any hints to solve this? thanks!! ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.2 (i386) - Soekris 6501-70 - Crashing once a day or so
On Feb 6, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote: On 29/01/2015 12:47, Giles Coochey wrote: I was running pfsense 2.1.5 (i386) on my Soekris 6501-70 with an mSata disk drive without any problems. I recently upgraded to pfsense2.2 (i386) and it appears to be crashing once a day or so. Now that I've disabled read-only /var /tmp it reports upon logging in whether I want to send the crash dumps to the developers - for which I'm saying 'yes' to. Apart from that, I'm at a loss as to what the problem is, I can't read the crashdump lingo, but I wonder if these crash dumps are being received, and whether anyone else is experiencing an issue with Soekris 6501 hardware and pfsense 2.2 (i386)? Well... no response to the mailing lists, one offline response effectively telling me that 2.2 is no good. My Soekris eventually crashed and did not manage to boot up again, so I'm going to revert to 2.1.5. I have tried installing 2.2 i386 onto my mSata drive, but it doesn't even post after the image is put to the mSata drive, so can only assume that 2.2 doesn't support the soekris 6501 hardware, or at least the mSATA ports. ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold For what it’s worth, I also have a Soekris 6501-70 with mSata. My upgrade to 2.2 went fairly smoothly. I got no logs after the upgrade and had to clear/restart logging to get logs again. Also, the reboot didn’t go well (I got the red error light) and I had to pull the power to get it to restart (possibly not related to the 2.2 upgrade). Cheers, John___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2
1. Another thing to compare the version of your dir and fd to see if they are close enough. old fd and new dir do not mix. old dir and new fd are ok unless they versions are too far apart. 2. The /usr/pbi/bacula-i386/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf - check to see if the name password matches with dir. 3. In the pf console, type bconsole and see if it connects with the dir. If not, check it's conf file: /usr/pbi/bacula-i386/local/etc/bacula/bconsole.conf 4. I COULD see bacula-fd in top when I first started it. Now I cannot - that's good news because I can find the fault for you. You will have to wait till tomorrow. Yudhvir On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:15 AM, mehmasa...@gmail.com mehmasa...@gmail.com wrote: i'd use find and there is also a pseudo config file in a bin directory which points to the actual fd executable that t find. You can edit the top section of that to reflect your install. I'll take a look on my system and get back to you. Yudhvir ਯੁਧੱਵੀਰ 408 915 9709 408%C2%A0915%C2%A09709 -- Original message-- *From: *J. Echter *Date: *Sun, Feb 8, 2015 10:17 AM *To: *list@lists.pfsense.org; *Subject:*Re: [pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2 Yes it was working on the old pfsense, i checked the config and it still shows the same contents. How do i check for a double install? i already removed and reinstalled the package. thanks Am 08.02.2015 um 18:39 schrieb mehmasa...@gmail.com: You don't mention if you had fd working on the earlier version of pf. You must have checked the config file for password and dir settings. The upgrade might have changed it because this might be a fresh install of fd. You say it is not listening, that sounds like there is an attempt at a new install. Check for multiple installs. Yudhvir ਯੁਧੱਵੀਰ 408 915 9709 408%C2%A0915%C2%A09709 -- Original message-- *From: *J. Echter *Date: *Sun, Feb 8, 2015 4:56 AM *To: *pfSense support and discussion; *Subject:*[pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2 Hi,i'm fiddling with bacula-client on upgraded pfsense 2.2.i don't see any error in the logs, i don't see any error with bacula-fd-f (run in foreground) -d 10 (debug level 10)i even don't see it spitting out errors as the config file isn't existant[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ls/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.confls: /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf: No such file or directory[2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ps aux | grep bacularoot59559 0.0 0.2 56420 7364 - Ss1:50PM 0:00.00/usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c/usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.confroot99408 0.0 0.1 18884 2384 0 S+1:50PM 0:00.00 grepbaculanetstat doesn't show it listening too:Active Internet connectionsProto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state)tcp4 0 0 pfsense.https 10.0.1.14.38261TIME_WAITtcp4 0 0 pfsense.38791 10.0.1.14.40513 ESTABLISHEDtcp6 0 0 localhost.3493 localhost.56539 ESTABLISHEDtcp6 0 0 localhost.56539 localhost.3493ESTABLISHEDudp4 0 0 192.168.100.1.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *. * udp4 0 0 192.168.4.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.1.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.3.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 pfsense.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::d227:88ff:.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.2.1.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.1194 *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp-proxy *.* icm4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.* *.*any hints to solve this?thanks!!___pfSense mailing listhttps://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/listSupport the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___pfSense mailing listhttps://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/listSupport the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
[pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
Let me add my voice to the post at http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2. pfSense creates a mangled configuration file. I filed a bug: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307 Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating /usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that directory. I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate. At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries. Installing and running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration file. Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD maintainer for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice, but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong. — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
It isn't you or the binaries. The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a while. Even prior to 2.2. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 On 2015-02-09 11:57, Dan Langille wrote: Let me add my voice to the post at http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2. pfSense creates a mangled configuration file. I filed a bug: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307 Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating /usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that directory. I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate. At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries. Installing and running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration file. Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD maintainer for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice, but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong. — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote: It isn't you or the binaries. I also think it's the binaries. The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a while. Even prior to 2.2. I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, with the same configuration file. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 It was broken long before that. :) https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 On 2015-02-09 11:57, Dan Langille wrote: Let me add my voice to the post at http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2. pfSense creates a mangled configuration file. I filed a bug: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307 Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating /usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that directory. I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate. At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries. Installing and running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration file. Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD maintainer for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice, but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong. — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] bacula-client 7.0.5 on pfsense 2.2
Am 08.02.2015 um 22:37 schrieb Brady, Mike: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.msg467805#msg467805 On 2015-02-09 01:53, J. Echter wrote: Hi, i'm fiddling with bacula-client on upgraded pfsense 2.2. i don't see any error in the logs, i don't see any error with bacula-fd -f (run in foreground) -d 10 (debug level 10) i even don't see it spitting out errors as the config file isn't existant [2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ls /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf ls: /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf: No such file or directory [2.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.workgroup.local]/conf: ps aux | grep bacula root59559 0.0 0.2 56420 7364 - Ss1:50PM 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf root99408 0.0 0.1 18884 2384 0 S+1:50PM 0:00.00 grep bacula netstat doesn't show it listening too: Active Internet connections Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) tcp4 0 0 pfsense.https 10.0.1.14.38261 TIME_WAIT tcp4 0 0 pfsense.38791 10.0.1.14.40513 ESTABLISHED tcp6 0 0 localhost.3493 localhost.56539 ESTABLISHED tcp6 0 0 localhost.56539localhost.3493 ESTABLISHED udp4 0 0 192.168.100.1.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.4.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.1.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.3.1.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 pfsense.ntp*.* udp6 0 0 fe80::21b:21ff:f.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.ntp *.* udp6 0 0 fe80::d227:88ff:.ntp *.* udp4 0 0 192.168.2.1.ntp*.* udp4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.1194 *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp *.* udp4 0 0 localhost.tftp-proxy *.* icm4 0 0 host-62-245-238-.* *.* any hints to solve this? thanks!! ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold I can confirm that this way works on my machine. I created the conf file the webui service would start, this doesn't work. ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum post that I referenced. On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote: It isn't you or the binaries. I also think it's the binaries. The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a while. Even prior to 2.2. I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, with the same configuration file. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 It was broken long before that. :) https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
