Re: [pfSense] Unable to check for updates?
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 5:20 AM, Kemecsei Gábor wrote: > > "Unable to check for updates" > > It's ok? > > I use: > "2.3.1-RELEASE-p5 (i386) > built on Thu Jun 16 12:53:31 CDT 2016 > FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p3 " > > The Package Manager reply: > "Unable to retrieve package information." > > I have a bug or pfSense? Is this a DNS issue? Sounds like a problem I had until enabled DNS Forwarder on localhost: see https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=115197.msg641301#msg641301 <https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=115197.msg641301#msg641301> -- Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] Migrating existing install to another drive
> On Jul 16, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2016, at 4:00 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 15, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >>> >>> I have a NetGate APU2 running pfSense 2.3. It came pre-installed and I've >>> upgraded it over the past two years. >> >> Pretty sure you have an APU, not APU2. We never sold the APU2, and the >> re(4) NICs in your bootlog confirm. >> >> > > Jim, > > I agree. Here's the box label. I will amend. > > https://flic.kr/p/nF9EYN I think I know why I thought it was an APU2. The engraving says so https://www.flickr.com/photos/20922021@N04/14039487209/in/album-72157644741336761/ <https://www.flickr.com/photos/20922021@N04/14039487209/in/album-72157644741336761/> -- Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] Migrating existing install to another drive
Ahh. Just boot from a live thumb drive & use dd. I've done that. I've never looked at my /etc/fstab ... Cheers -- Dan Langille http://langille.org/ > On Jul 16, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Benjamin E. Nichols > wrote: > > Just clone the hard disk. Easy, simple, and works. > > >> On 7/16/2016 3:00 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> >>> On Jul 15, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >>> >>> I have a NetGate APU2 running pfSense 2.3. It came pre-installed and I've >>> upgraded it over the past two years. >> Pretty sure you have an APU, not APU2. We never sold the APU2, and the >> re(4) NICs in your bootlog confirm. >> >> Jim >> ___ >> pfSense mailing list >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > -- > Signed, > > Benjamin E. Nichols > http://www.squidblacklist.org > > 1-405-397-1360 > > ___ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] Migrating existing install to another drive
On Jul 16, 2016, at 4:00 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: > > > >> On Jul 15, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >> >> I have a NetGate APU2 running pfSense 2.3. It came pre-installed and I've >> upgraded it over the past two years. > > Pretty sure you have an APU, not APU2. We never sold the APU2, and the re(4) > NICs in your bootlog confirm. > > Jim, I agree. Here's the box label. I will amend. https://flic.kr/p/nF9EYN -- Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] Migrating existing install to another drive
> On Jul 15, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > - Oh, look at that in dmesg: If you agree with the license, set > legal.intel_ipw.license_ack=1 in /boot/loader.conf > Things seem to be working fine without that. What am I missing out on? I'm missing nothing, given I am not using Intel wifi, but to silence the messages, I added the entries to /boot/loader.conf.local re: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=40355.0 <https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=40355.0> -- Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
[pfSense] Migrating existing install to another drive
t 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-7 SATA 2.x device ada0: Serial Number YTAK13450285 ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: Command Queueing enabled ada0: 15258MB (31248704 512 byte sectors) ada0: Previously was known as ad4 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Timecounter "TSC" frequency 122078 Hz quality 800 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus6 target 0 lun 0 da0: Removable Direct Access SPC-2 SCSI device da0: Serial Number 058F63666485 da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 7580MB (15523840 512 byte sectors) da0: quirks=0x2 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ufs/pfsense1 [ro,sync,noatime]... re2: link state changed to DOWN vlan0: changing name to 're2_vlan2' vlan1: changing name to 're2_vlan3' vlan2: changing name to 're2_vlan4' vlan3: changing name to 're2_vlan5' vlan4: changing name to 're2_vlan6' re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP gif0: link state changed to UP tun2: changing name to 'ovpns2' pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled ovpns2: link state changed to UP gif0: link state changed to DOWN gif0: link state changed to UP ovpns2: link state changed to DOWN ovpns2: link state changed to UP re2: promiscuous mode enabled re2_vlan3: promiscuous mode enabled gif0: promiscuous mode enabled re2_vlan4: promiscuous mode enabled re2_vlan5: promiscuous mode enabled re1: promiscuous mode enabled re2: link state changed to UP re2_vlan2: link state changed to UP re2_vlan3: link state changed to UP re2_vlan4: link state changed to UP re2_vlan5: link state changed to UP re2_vlan6: link state changed to UP re2_vlan3: promiscuous mode disabled gif0: promiscuous mode disabled re2_vlan4: promiscuous mode disabled re2: promiscuous mode disabled re2_vlan5: promiscuous mode disabled re1: promiscuous mode disabled re2: promiscuous mode enabled re2_vlan3: promiscuous mode enabled gif0: promiscuous mode enabled re2_vlan4: promiscuous mode enabled re2_vlan5: promiscuous mode enabled re1: promiscuous mode enabled re0: link state changed to DOWN -- Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Jim Pingle wrote: > > On 02/09/2015 11:30 AM, Dan Langille wrote: >> There's been a bug open for 14 days regarding the configuration issues: >> >> https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307 >> >> I will try the packaged binaries again. > > FYI for others (Dan already knows from Twitter): > > Bacula should be OK now on 2.2, as of package version 1.0.6. > > The main problem was the paths being used for the various configuration > file and startup script references. Once those were fixed up things seem > to be OK. > > There is still some awkwardness in how to set the package GUI up but > that's the same as it always was. Have to add two directors, one local > for the firewall itself and another for the remote bacula server. > > There is still a lingering issue with the rc script not restarting > properly but we're looking into that as well. Not as critical as the > other issues at least. > > If anyone wants to work on making the GUI more intuitive, feel free to > collaborate and submit some patches. Thanks Jim. — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
Short version of this post: I removed the pkg, tried PBI, didn't work, installed pkg, worked. Here is what I just tried: * pkg delete bacula-client * install bacula-client via webgui * copy my working configuration file: cp /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf /usr/pbi/bacula-amd64/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf * /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/pbi/bacula-amd64/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf *status client=bast-fd Connecting to Client bast-fd at bast.int.unixathome.org:9102 Failed to connect to Client bast-fd. You have messages. *m 09-Feb 17:05 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: Unable to authenticate with File daemon at "bast.int.unixathome.org:9102". Possible causes: Passwords or names not the same or Maximum Concurrent Jobs exceeded on the FD or FD networking messed up (restart daemon). Please see http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Bacula_Freque_Asked_Questi.html#SECTION0026 for help. * To go back to the pkg binaries: * delete the PBI bacula via the webui * confirm it is no longer running / installed: ps auwx | grep bacula root 44932 0.0 0.4 61028 7748 - Ss4:58PM 0:00.02 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf root 71389 0.0 0.1 18884 2376 0 S+5:06PM 0:00.00 grep bacula [2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: Oh, it's still running after PBI removal. kill it: [2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: kill -TERM 44932 [2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: ps auwx | grep bacula root 68728 0.0 0.1 18884 2376 0 S+5:11PM 0:00.00 grep bacula [2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: Yes, it's really gone: ls -l /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd ls: /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd: No such file or directory And the conf file is still there, good: ls -l /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf -rw-r- 1 bacula bacula 493 Feb 8 22:17 /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf Now it's dead. Let's install via pkg: pkg install bacula-client Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The following 2 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: bacula-client: 7.0.5_2 lzo2: 2.08_1 The process will require 1 MiB more space. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [1/2] Installing lzo2-2.08_1... [1/2] Extracting lzo2-2.08_1: 100% [2/2] Installing bacula-client-7.0.5_2... ===> Creating users and/or groups. Using existing group 'bacula'. Using existing user 'bacula'. [2/2] Extracting bacula-client-7.0.5_2: 100% Message for bacula-client-7.0.5_2: NOTE: Sample files are installed in /usr/local/etc/bacula: bconsole.conf.sample, bacula-fd.conf.sample It's back: ls -l /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 225067 Jan 28 12:46 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd Start it: [2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf [2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: ps auwx | grep bacula root 50020 0.3 0.4 54288 7256 - Ss5:14PM 0:00.01 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf root 50266 0.0 0.1 18884 2376 0 S+5:14PM 0:00.00 grep bacula [2.2-RELEASE][ad...@bast.int.unixathome.org]/root: and test it: *status client=bast-fd Connecting to Client bast-fd at bast.int.unixathome.org:9102 bast-fd Version: 7.0.5 (28 July 2014) amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0 freebsd 10.0-RELEASE-p9 Daemon started 09-Feb-15 17:14. Jobs: run=0 running=0. Heap: heap=0 smbytes=186,074 max_bytes=186,221 bufs=52 max_bufs=53 Sizes: boffset_t=8 size_t=8 debug=0 trace=0 mode=0,0 bwlimit=0kB/s Running Jobs: Director connected at: 09-Feb-15 17:14 No Jobs running. Terminated Jobs: JobId LevelFiles Bytes Status FinishedName === 198845 Full 6115.6 K OK 08-Feb-15 23:07 bast_pfsense_config.xml 198850 Incr 1113.5 K OK 09-Feb-15 05:55 bast_pfsense_config.xml * > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Brady, Mike wrote: > > Yes backups run successfully. Easiest thing to do while testing is to just > run a status client command in bconsole. Once that works you should be good > to go. > > On 2015-02-10 00:46, Dan Langille wrote: >> Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've >> successfully run a backup? >> -- >> Dan Langille >> http://langille.org/ >>> On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike wro
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
PLEASE NOTE: Once I removed the PBI binaries and tried pkg binaries, I was then able to run status client and run backups. This was done *without* modifying the configuration files on the client. > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Brady, Mike wrote: > > Yes backups run successfully. Easiest thing to do while testing is to just > run a status client command in bconsole. Once that works you should be good > to go. > > On 2015-02-10 00:46, Dan Langille wrote: >> Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've >> successfully run a backup? >> -- >> Dan Langille >> http://langille.org/ >>> On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: >>> The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum >>> post that I referenced. >>>> On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote: >>>>> On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: >>>>> It isn't you or the binaries. >>>> I also think it's the binaries. >>>>> The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a >>>>> while. Even prior to 2.2. >>>> I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui >>>> packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, >>>> with the same configuration file. >>>>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 >>>> It was broken long before that. :) >>>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 >>> ___ >>> pfSense mailing list >>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold >> ___ >> pfSense mailing list >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > ___ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
No mixed binaries were used in this endeavor. > On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Porter > wrote: > > I'd just like to point out, that the Webui installs binaries via PBI > into different locations, than the pkg installer does, and this is likely to > cause problems mixing them. Installing packages via pkg that are > already in the pfsenes package repo is likely to cause a lot of grief > down the road. If the official package doesn't work, please open a > ticket on https://redmind.pfsenes.org under Packages. There are a > number of broken ones, we're working on getting fixed. > > On 2/8/2015 10:07 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: >> The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the >> forum post that I referenced. >> >> On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote: >>> On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It isn't you or the binaries. >>> >>> I also think it's the binaries. >>> >>>> The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been >>>> for a while. Even prior to 2.2. >>> >>> I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui >>> packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, >>> with the same configuration file. >>> >>>> >>>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 >>> >>> It was broken long before that. :) >>> >>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 >>> >>> >> ___ >> pfSense mailing list >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > ___ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
There's been a bug open for 14 days regarding the configuration issues: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307 I will try the packaged binaries again. > On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Porter > wrote: > > I'd just like to point out, that the Webui installs binaries via PBI > into different locations, than the pkg installer does, and this is likely to > cause problems mixing them. Installing packages via pkg that are > already in the pfsenes package repo is likely to cause a lot of grief > down the road. If the official package doesn't work, please open a > ticket on https://redmind.pfsenes.org under Packages. There are a > number of broken ones, we're working on getting fixed. > > On 2/8/2015 10:07 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: >> The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the >> forum post that I referenced. >> >> On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote: >>> On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It isn't you or the binaries. >>> >>> I also think it's the binaries. >>> >>>> The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been >>>> for a while. Even prior to 2.2. >>> >>> I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui >>> packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, >>> with the same configuration file. >>> >>>> >>>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 >>> >>> It was broken long before that. :) >>> >>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 >>> >>> >> ___ >> pfSense mailing list >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > ___ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
Status client was failing. That is what I spent hours upon. > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Brady, Mike wrote: > > Yes backups run successfully. Easiest thing to do while testing is to just > run a status client command in bconsole. Once that works you should be good > to go. > > On 2015-02-10 00:46, Dan Langille wrote: >> Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've >> successfully run a backup? >> -- >> Dan Langille >> http://langille.org/ >>> On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: >>> The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum >>> post that I referenced. >>>> On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote: >>>>> On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: >>>>> It isn't you or the binaries. >>>> I also think it's the binaries. >>>>> The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a >>>>> while. Even prior to 2.2. >>>> I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui >>>> packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, >>>> with the same configuration file. >>>>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 >>>> It was broken long before that. :) >>>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 >>> ___ >>> pfSense mailing list >>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold >> ___ >> pfSense mailing list >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > ___ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
Before I go down that road again: by working, do you mean you've successfully run a backup? -- Dan Langille http://langille.org/ > On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: > > The Webui binaries are working for me when I do what I said in the forum post > that I referenced. > >> On 2015-02-09 15:02, Dan Langille wrote: >>> On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: >>> It isn't you or the binaries. >> I also think it's the binaries. >>> The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a >>> while. Even prior to 2.2. >> I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui >> packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, >> with the same configuration file. >>> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 >> It was broken long before that. :) >> https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 > ___ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Brady, Mike wrote: > > It isn't you or the binaries. I also think it's the binaries. > The configuration and startup scripts are just broken and have been for a > while. Even prior to 2.2. I agree those are broken. However, I am unable to get the webui packages binaries to work. However, installing via pkg works fine, with the same configuration file. > > https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=85265.0 It was broken long before that. :) https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66385.0 > > On 2015-02-09 11:57, Dan Langille wrote: >> Let me add my voice to the post at >> http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html >> I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2. >> pfSense creates a mangled configuration file. I filed a bug: >> https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307 >> Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating >> /usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that >> directory. >> I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate. >> At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries. >> Installing and running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration >> file. >> Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD >> maintainer for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice, >> but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong. >> — >> Dan Langille >> http://langille.org/ >> ___ >> pfSense mailing list >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > _______ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
[pfSense] problem with bacula-client 7.0.5 binaries on pfsense 2.2
Let me add my voice to the post at http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/list/2015-February/008038.html I was running daily backups prior to my upgrade to 2.2. pfSense creates a mangled configuration file. I filed a bug: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4307 Today, I managed to get bacula-fd running by manually creating /usr/local/etc/bacula and placing a valid bacula-fd.conf file in that directory. I am unable to get bacula-fd to authenticate. At this point, I'm beginning to suspect the bacula binaries. Installing and running via pkg succeeds with the same configuration file. Disclosure: I am a committer on the Bacula project and the FreeBSD maintainer for the Bacula ports. I'm not a Bacula novice, but I would like it if someone showed me what I am doing wrong. — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
