RE: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org - Confirmation Request
Kevin J. Lennon Lake Area Webs 227 Firetower Road Milford, Pa 18337 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lakeareawebs.com http://www.mysticwarriorsofrage.com -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony David Pritchard Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:05 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org - Confirmation Request This message was created automatically by my Spam Filtering System at Actrix Networks. Sorry, but you (wsg@webstandardsgroup.org) are not on my list of pre-approved contacts, so your message (attached) has been put on hold. If you need to get that message to me urgently, or would just like me to receive it, please send a blank reply to this e-mail. This will release your original message to my mailbox. By doing this you will confirm that your message is legitimate, and not spam/junkmail. However, if you wish to be added to my list of pre-approved contacts permanently, so that future e-mails from you can reach me unhindered, please e-mail me again and ask. For more information on Actrix security services go to: http://www.actrix.co.nz/domestic/security/ If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 1 month, your message will not be delivered. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org - Confirmation Request; SEC=UNCLASSIFIED
-Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony David Pritchard Sent: Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:05 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org - Confirmation Request This message was created automatically by my Spam Filtering System at Actrix Networks. Sorry, but you (wsg@webstandardsgroup.org) are not on my list of pre-approved contacts, so your message (attached) has been put on hold. If you need to get that message to me urgently, or would just like me to receive it, please send a blank reply to this e-mail. This will release your original message to my mailbox. By doing this you will confirm that your message is legitimate, and not spam/junkmail. However, if you wish to be added to my list of pre-approved contacts permanently, so that future e-mails from you can reach me unhindered, please e-mail me again and ask. For more information on Actrix security services go to: http://www.actrix.co.nz/domestic/security/ If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 1 month, your message will not be delivered. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
On 12/18/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kay Smoljak wrote: At least you will know where to look, instead of trying to work out which combination of backslashes and asterisks fixed the particular issue for which version. One would hope that this information would already be somewhere in your head when you implemented the hack. I suspect that in essence we're agreeing, Barney, but I would point out that sure, you might remember what hack was implemented for a particular problem now - but what about in two years time or when you're working with someone else's code? If I had the choice of a hack or a more verbose but blatently obvious conditional comment, I'll take the comment every time. -- Kay Smoljak business: www.cleverstarfish.com standards: kay.zombiecoder.com coldfusion: kay.smoljak.com personal: goatlady.wordpress.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Thierry Koblentz wrote: Erwin Heiser wrote: !--[if gt IE 6] link rel=stylesheet href=ie7.css media=screen ![endif]-- !--[if lte IE 6] link rel=stylesheet href=ie6.css media=screen ![endif]-- Why not going with !--[if IE 7] rather than !--[if gt IE 6] That way you don't have to worry about IE 8 :) This is precisely the problem with conditional comments: You don't know in advance if any given bug will be fixed in IE8, so you can't know which conditional you will need. If you get it wrong, and the bug fix is still needed in IE8 (or is not needed in 7.5 !), then you will have to change all your CCs. It doesn't future-proof your code any more than a well chosen CSS hack will, and you will have many more pages to fix. Geoff. == The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or copyright material. It is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. The ABC does not represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free. Before opening any attachment you should check for viruses. The ABC's liability is limited to resupplying any email and attachments == *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
On 12/18/06, Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is precisely the problem with conditional comments: You don't know in advance if any given bug will be fixed in IE8, so you can't know which conditional you will need. If you get it wrong, and the bug fix is still needed in IE8 (or is not needed in 7.5 !), then you will have to change all your CCs. It doesn't future-proof your code any more than a well chosen CSS hack will, and you will have many more pages to fix. At least you will know where to look, instead of trying to work out which combination of backslashes and asterisks fixed the particular issue for which version. -- Kay Smoljak business: www.cleverstarfish.com standards: kay.zombiecoder.com coldfusion: kay.smoljak.com personal: goatlady.wordpress.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Erwin Heiser wrote: !--[if gt IE 6] link rel=stylesheet href=ie7.css media=screen ![endif]-- !--[if lte IE 6] link rel=stylesheet href=ie6.css media=screen ![endif]-- Why not going with !--[if IE 7] rather than !--[if gt IE 6] That way you don't have to worry about IE 8 :) --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Scroll down Bruce Prochnau - Original Message - From: Carla Drago [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 7:11 PM Subject: [WSG] RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org How do I unsubscribe from this list? carla drago| producer| massive v +61-2 9331 8400 | f +61-2 9331 8699 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.massive.com.au massive | integrated solutions for screen-based media -Original Message- From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 21 August 2006 3:33 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org From: Tina Starnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:23:09 -0700 Subject: GRR IE Help Please I am trying to do a fixed layout for a site and no matter what I do I cannot figure out why it isn't displaying correct in IE for me. I am attempting to use css to act like a frame - wherein all content on that div will scroll: auto if it is longer than the container. Now this is working perfect in FF - but for the life of me IE will not display proper. You can see the action here : http://heavenly.crsdesignsinc.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6 Mind you this is only a mock up - so the header and such are not accurate - heck it isn't even close yet to done. But before I continue I would like to fix this issue. Can someone please give me a hand. I am about to say to heck with it - but this client defintely wants this look :( Thanks! Tina ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
