A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
Seen in news:de.alt.sysadmin.recovery : http://www.frankwestphal.de/XPueberdieSchultergeschaut.html The poster thought it was satire; I'm not so sure. Anyway, if you understand German (or trust Babelfish), have a look at it. Enjoy! Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:37:25PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: Well it isn't English, but it's *almost* comprehensible... Sounds a bit like dadadodo, only it makes more sense :) Which does? :) -- Irrigation of the land with seawater desalinated by fusion power is ancient. It's called 'rain'. -- Michael McClary, in alt.fusion
RE: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
From: Robin Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Do you think it's possible to take XP too far? *Too* extreme? Sure it is. Having two people look at/develop a piece of code is better than one. Therefore having three people must be even better. But why stop there - why not four, five, six . . . Better yet - design/develop by committee! Rob --- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of IBNet Plc. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
From: Matthew Byng-Maddick [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 16 May 2001, Barbie wrote: sysadmin, being the shortsighted Solaris guru that he claims he is, has deemed outgoing and ingoing ports that aren't for HTTP, FTP be blocked :( dare I enquire how you sent this mail, then? :) Oh yeah and them. Apparently it's stop people using newsgroups and Napster. We didn't bother explaining that most of us use mailing lists and use ftp to download mp3s. Barbie
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:08:40PM +0100, Robert Thompson wrote: Having two people look at/develop a piece of code is better than one. Therefore having three people must be even better. But why stop there - why not four, five, six . . . Better yet - design/develop by committee! You've hit the fundamental problem with XP. Getting anything done requires two programmers to agree on something; this, as everyone knows, is impossible. -- So remember when you're feeling very small and insecure How amazingly unlikely is your birth, And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space, 'Cause there's bugger-all down here on Earth. (Monty Python)
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:27:19PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:08:40PM +0100, Robert Thompson wrote: Having two people look at/develop a piece of code is better than one. Therefore having three people must be even better. But why stop there - why not four, five, six . . . Better yet - design/develop by committee! You've hit the fundamental problem with XP. Getting anything done requires two programmers to agree on something; this, as everyone knows, is impossible. No it isn't! (sorry) jp
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
On Wed, 16 May 2001, James Powell wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:27:19PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: You've hit the fundamental problem with XP. Getting anything done requires two programmers to agree on something; this, as everyone knows, is impossible. No it isn't! You're right; it isn't. (Had to be done.) Tony
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
* at 16/05 15:22 +0100 Simon Cozens said: On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:41:58PM +0100, James Powell wrote: You've hit the fundamental problem with XP. Getting anything done requires two programmers to agree on something; this, as everyone knows, is impossible. No it isn't! That's not argument, it's just contradiction! must resist temptation struan
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
Simon Cozens wrote: That's not argument, it's just contradiction! I'm sorry; I'm not allowed to argue with you unless you've paid. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:31:18PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: Simon Cozens wrote: That's not argument, it's just contradiction! I'm sorry; I'm not allowed to argue with you unless you've paid. Ah, you going into consulting as well, eh? -- The elder gods went to Suggoth and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
At 03:22 PM 2001.05.16 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: That's not argument, it's just contradiction! Ahh, you must be looking for a different forum then. Try Castro's site. ;) -- Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
[snip] Leon -- Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/ Iterative Software...http://www.iterative-software.com/ ... 640K ought to be enough for anybody ...is that dollars or pounds... /Robert
Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
Robert Shiels wrote: Leon ... 640K ought to be enough for anybody ...is that dollars or pounds... Turkish lire? Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
RE: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf deutsch)
From: Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:52 PM At 03:22 PM 2001.05.16 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: That's not argument, it's just contradiction! Ahh, you must be looking for a different forum then. Try Castro's site. ;) Sorry, this is 'senseless abuse'. -- The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system.
