Test from uuencode boy
BDY.RTF Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
Re: Test from uuencode boy
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. thats perfect as far as i'm concerned (mutt user) -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
Re: Test from uuencode boy
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:41 PM Subject: Test from uuencode boy test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Snip I recieved that one as the usual signature main body, with 2 attachments this time, one plain text signature (again), and an attatched rtf file with the main body.. Outlook express (until I can get my adsl online with linux) Gareth Harper
Re: Test from uuencode boy
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, you wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. works for me .. theres stuff I dont need, but since it identifies whats what in the headers I can read it fine in Kmail -- Robin Szemeti The box said "requires windows 95 or better" So I installed Linux!
Re: Test from uuencode boy
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Okay, you have a 17-line corporate .signature. This means that every post from you must contain at least 17 lines of Perl/Buffy-related discussion or you'll get killfiled ;-) Surely s/you/that address/ ? And as I would assume that it's mandatory that anything coming from an ubsw.com address has that sort of disclaimer on it, wouldn't it be easier to obtain an address outside ubsw.com so that you can avoid having the disclaimer in the first place? Otherwise at least 17 lines of on-topic discussion per message is going to unacceptably increase the signal to noise on this list, I'd guess. Nicholas Clark -- ENOJOB: http://plum.flirble.org/~nick/CV.html
Re: Test from uuencode boy
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Your message looks like this : I 1 no description [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 3.4K] I 2 |-no description[text/plain, quoted, ISO-8859-1, 1.1K] I 3 +-no description [multipa/mixed, 7bit, 1.9K] A 4 |-BDY.RTF [applica/rtf, base64, 0.5K] I 5 +-Legal Disclaimer [text/plain, 7bit, us-ascii, 0.9K] Amazing powers of obfuscation in Outlook. -- Merijn Broeren| My hat to keep the Martian brain rays out works just fine. Software Geek | It's really *good* tin foil. | And stop staring at me like that.
Re: Test from uuencode boy
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Sort of - pine seems to prefer the disclaimer over the body of the message as an alternative part but I have just installed it and the configuration may be shagged ... /J\
