Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition (NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06
Hi Acee, I have read the latest version of the document. It's just an informational document and describes a way for using IS-IS MT implement SR based NRP, it gives an informative reference to the operators and implementors who have interests. I think it's a useful document and ready for publication. Best regards, Mach > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 6:50 AM > To: Lsr > Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of IS-IS > Multi-Topology > (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition (NRP)" - > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06 > > This begins a two week LSR Working Group last call for the “Applicability of > IS-IS > Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition > (NRP)”. Please express your support or objection prior to Tuesday, January > 23rd, > 2024. > > Thanks, > Acee > ___ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
Hi, I have read the draft, it describes how to leverage existing TLVs to implement SR VTN, it can be an useful informational document. Hence, I support the adoption. Best regards, Mach From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 7:28 AM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03 This information draft describes how MT could be used for VTN segmentation. The authors have asked for WG adoption. This begins a three week LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03. I’m giving it three weeks due to the IETF next week. Please register your support or objection on this list prior to the end of the adoption poll on 3/24/2020. Thanks, Acee ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] [Teas] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis
Hi, There was an IPR disclosure against RFC 5316, it should apply to this document as well. Except this, I am not aware of any IPR related to this document. Best regards, Mach > -Original Message- > From: Teas [mailto:teas-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 11:30 PM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Cc: Christian Hopps ; teas-cha...@ietf.org; > teas-...@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org > Subject: [Teas] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis > > Hi LSR and TEAS, > > This begins a joint WG last call for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/ > > Please discuss any issues on the LSR mailing list. The WGLC will end March 3, > 2021. > > Authors, please indicate wether you are aware of any IPR related to this > document to the list. > > Thanks, > Chris, Acee, (Lou and Pavan). ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02
As one of co-authors of the draft, I support the adoption. Best regards, Mach From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 10:43 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02 This is simple BIS update to RFC 5316 is required to support IS-IS Inter-AS TE in IPv6 only networks. The authors have asked for WG adoption. This begins a two week LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for “ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering” - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02. The poll will end at 12:00 AM UTC on November 7th, 2020. Please indicate your support of objection on this list prior to the end of the adoption poll. Thanks, Acee ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] IPR Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02
Hi Acee, I knew that there was an IPR disclosure on RFC 5316, since this is the bis version of that RFC, the IPR disclosure should apply to this draft as well. Except for that, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document. Best regards, Mach From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 10:50 PM To: draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] IPR Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02 Hi Mach, Les, Stefano, Xiaodong, Are you aware of any IPR associated with the subject draft. If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thanks, Acee ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
