Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] LXDM or Lightdm ?

2011-06-09 Thread Chris
Aloha oukou,

I agree with what Julian said about LightDM, on all mentioned
(dis)advantages. But the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages, as
Ubuntu and Xubuntu even have way more devs hanging around then Lubuntu.
Every error or bug we encounter we can put on launchpad and hopefully will
get sorted by one of the others. When we've got time to spare, we could
solve it ourselves of course and send our patch as solution.

So to recap, I'm pro on the switch.

With metta,

Chris Druif

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 03:33, Ian Gilfillan launch...@greenman.co.zawrote:

 Julien, just to clarify, LightDM uses 3.2Mb and LXDM 2.3 and not the other
 way around? This seems a trivial difference.

 You've mentioned before that support is important for a DM as it needs to
 be tested across many different configurations. LightDM seems far more
 active than LXDM, and in spite of being newer you say it's already more
 complete.

 I'd say go for the change - if there is a showstopper, or one gets
 introduced later, it should be relatively easy to revert. Also, if
 maintenance is being shared with Ubuntu (as opposed to being done by them),
 it should be possible to stop any issues being introduced that will
 negatively affect Lubuntu.

 The main risk seems to be one of bloat as LightDM gets more heavily
 developed, but LightDM was launched with the purpose of supporting LXDE
 (although not exclusively, like LXDM), so I'd feel confident about
 switching.

 --
 Ian Gilfillan
 www.greenman.co.za




 On 09/06/2011 00:26, Yorvyk wrote:

 On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:39:42 +0200
 Julien Lavergnegi...@ubuntu.com  wrote:

  Hi,

 I'm a bit late for that, but it still time to discuss such topic.

 LightDM [1] will be the next display manager for Ubuntu, and probably
 Xubuntu (maybe Kubuntu also !). It will replace GDM which have a tight
 dependency on GNOME.

 LightDM has the advantage to split the greeter (the UI part) and the
 core (which do all the black magic for users, consolkit etc ...). You
 can build a greeter which use GTK only, Qt, Webkit etc ... It's also
 heavily developed this cycle.

 Last cycle I tested LightDM, but found that it was not ready. Also, LXDM
 is now in a good shape. I tested it briefly on Oneiric, and it seems in
 better shape now, and with RAM usage similar to LXDM (3.2 vs 2.3 Mb)

 To summarize :

 Advantages:
 * More complete than LXDM
 * Maintenance shared with Ubuntu and Xubuntu
 * Heavily developed

 Disadvantages :
 * New and less tested in Lubuntu than LXDM
 * Dependant to Ubuntu team for changes : we are not free to modify the
 DM, and it's possible that Ubuntu team introduce a change which
 indirectly impact others flavors (remember Ubiquity changes for disk
 requierement last cycle)

 IMO, if items I mentioned at the UDS are managed by LightDM [2], we can
 try to switch for this cycle. If later in the cycle we discover that
 there are problems, we can still switch again to LXDM.

 What do you think ?

 Regards,
 Julien Lavergne

 [1] : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LightDM
 [2] : https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-o-lightdm


  I've been running Ubuntu Oneiric with lightdm for a while and it appears
 to behave it's self OK.
 Having had a bit of a read about it I don't see an advantage in either,
 from a user's point of view, and I'm a bit lost with the technical
 (dis)advantages.
 A few thoughts.  With the change to GTK3 and the potential problems to be
 resolved with that, are we adding another headache for the few competent
 devs we have.
 Or would having Lightdm give us one less problem, as others in the Ubuntu
 community would be dealing with it and we wouldn't have to worry about lxdm
 either.
 Would sticking with what we know be better as lxdm doesn't have any real
 problems and performs the function for which it is intended.



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] LXDM or Lightdm ?

2011-06-09 Thread Julien Lavergne
Le Wednesday 08 June 2011 à 23:26 +0100, Yorvyk a écrit :
 I've been running Ubuntu Oneiric with lightdm for a while and it
 appears to behave it's self OK.   
 Having had a bit of a read about it I don't see an advantage in
 either, from a user's point of view, and I'm a bit lost with the
 technical (dis)advantages. 
 A few thoughts.  With the change to GTK3 and the potential problems to
 be resolved with that, are we adding another headache for the few
 competent devs we have.
 Or would having Lightdm give us one less problem, as others in the
 Ubuntu community would be dealing with it and we wouldn't have to
 worry about lxdm either.
 Would sticking with what we know be better as lxdm doesn't have any
 real problems and performs the function for which it is intended. 

In the past, we discovered some bugs in LXDM which was quite painful to
investigate and fix. With a DM used by more people, and more developed,
we decrease this kind of risk.

Regards,
Julien Lavergne 


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] LXDM or Lightdm ?

2011-06-08 Thread Julien Lavergne

Hi,

I'm a bit late for that, but it still time to discuss such topic.

LightDM [1] will be the next display manager for Ubuntu, and probably
Xubuntu (maybe Kubuntu also !). It will replace GDM which have a tight
dependency on GNOME.

LightDM has the advantage to split the greeter (the UI part) and the
core (which do all the black magic for users, consolkit etc ...). You
can build a greeter which use GTK only, Qt, Webkit etc ... It's also
heavily developed this cycle.

Last cycle I tested LightDM, but found that it was not ready. Also, LXDM
is now in a good shape. I tested it briefly on Oneiric, and it seems in
better shape now, and with RAM usage similar to LXDM (3.2 vs 2.3 Mb) 

To summarize :

Advantages:
* More complete than LXDM
* Maintenance shared with Ubuntu and Xubuntu
* Heavily developed

Disadvantages :
* New and less tested in Lubuntu than LXDM
* Dependant to Ubuntu team for changes : we are not free to modify the
DM, and it's possible that Ubuntu team introduce a change which
indirectly impact others flavors (remember Ubiquity changes for disk
requierement last cycle)

IMO, if items I mentioned at the UDS are managed by LightDM [2], we can
try to switch for this cycle. If later in the cycle we discover that
there are problems, we can still switch again to LXDM.

What do you think ?

Regards,
Julien Lavergne

[1] : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LightDM
[2] : https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-o-lightdm


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp