[LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert?
> > hi Stuart, > > I remember the suggested guitar string being the 1st (the high e). I had > to add a piece of tape to the non-business end in order to keep a better > grip on it and to keep it from twisting around in my sweaty little digits > --and yes, to find it later. So it really helps to add something to it. > > I'm wondering also if I could use a zip-tie. Stop wondering and give it a go. Most are nylon I think, flexible when thin enough. Lots of sizes to try. Capable of marking the top tho. I would take a piece of leather, fold it, pierce twice thru the fold and thread a piece of gut. Couple of stiches to keep the fold tight and maybe guide the ends of the gut so the bight stayed constant. those who could keep a lute in strings might also have had the means to keep a hunting bird like a falcon; no shortage of feathers then. -- Dana Emery To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Early Music Forums?
Doe anyone here know of an early music forum in the USA? Doing a search, I find several in different areas of England seemingly designed to discuss the early music scene in those specific areas, but none in the USA. Some of the questions/observations I have about the part music I play on the lute relate to more general musical issues, which would be more appropiate on such a forum, I think. Thanks, Ned -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert?
hi Stuart, I remember the suggested guitar string being the 1st (the high e). I had to add a piece of tape to the non-business end in order to keep a better grip on it and to keep it from twisting around in my sweaty little digits --and yes, to find it later. So it really helps to add something to it. I'm wondering also if I could use a zip-tie. Also I remember the n-b end coming out between the 1st and middle fingers. Sean On Tuesday, October 06, 2009, at 01:27PM, "Stuart Walsh" wrote: > >> An E string (wire-wound multifilament) or e' string (rather limp nylon >> monofilament)? What is the advantage of attaching real feather? > >I've just been trying a guitar, third string g - as Guy has now >remembered. I'm not getting anywhere, but I'm not really getting >anywhere with a 'normal' type plectrum either. But I can see a very good >reason for tying _something_to a four inch length of nylon string: if >you put it somewhere it is almost invisible! > > >> As a >> routine user of plectra and quills (both natural and synthetic), this >> approach all seems a bit weird to me. >> >> Eugene >> > >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On >>> Behalf Of Guy Smith >>> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:48 AM >>> To: 'Stuart Walsh'; 'Lute Net' >>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? >>> >>> IIRC, from his 2008 class at LSA, it's a guitar E string or a similar >>> length >>> of nylon, with a bit of feather attached. He talked about using real >>> feathers, but they tend to break down fairly quickly. >>> >>> Guy >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On >>> Behalf >>> Of Stuart Walsh >>> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:36 AM >>> To: Lute Net >>> Subject: [LUTE] Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? >>> >>> Crawford Young gave a concert last night in London. I couldn't get to it. >>> >>> I'd be very interested to know anything about the polyphonic stuff with >>> psaltery and harp - like what instrument did what? And no percussion in >>> this? >>> >>> And - if anyone was sharp-eyed enough - what was he using as a plectrum? >>> (Crawford Young uses a bit of guitar string or the floppy end of a >>> feather for a plectrum, evidently!) >>> >>> >>> Stuart >>> >>> >>> >>> To get on or off this list see list information at >>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2417 - Release Date: 10/06/09 >> 06:50:00 >> >> > > > >
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
Roman, I think you should speak for yourself only. Me, I have nothing against technology, and I believe that that is true for other lutenists here. And I love atonal and experimental music as well as early music and have played music by Takemitsu, Stockhausen and Kagel with great pleasure, in the past. I think most people who love early music do not do so from technofobic reasons. Regards, Jelma van Amersfoort On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Roman Turovsky wrote: > Arto, > There a worldwide reaction to technology, manifesting inself in heightened > interest in handmaid and traditional things. > Interest in Early Music in general and in the lute in particular is part of > that same process. > RT > > > > - Original Message - From: "wikla" > To: "David Rastall" > Cc: "Roman Turovsky" ; "Lutelist" > > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:29 PM > Subject: [LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes > > >> >> This is something I strongly disagree! Roman said that "EM revival in >> general was a >> reaction to this type of (neo)modernism". I do not know, if Roman refers >> to >> 20's, 30's, >> 60's or 70's by the "EM revival", but in any of these cases I cannot see >> any reaction >> to "(neo)modernism". What I CAN see (at least in cases of 60's and 70's) >> is >> a reaction >> against the established style of making the 150th version of Beethoven's >> 5th - every >> time tuning the strings a little it higher... Or all the 1000's of cases >> playing Bach >> by piano or by symphony orchestra... At least in my experience the persons >> who preferred >> EM to the "establishment" were just the same who also enjoyed the modern >> music. >> >> Another matter is (luckily!) that nowadays our "EM" aesthetics are a >> "must", if you want >> to perform music of "Bach and before". But I still wait they'll do also >> Sibelius (et al.) >> in the "HIP" manner, in the way he heard it. That still is definitely not >> the case. >> >> Arto >> >> >> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:25:46 -0400, David Rastall >> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Roman Turovsky wrote: >>> EM revival in general was a reaction to this type of (neo)modernism. >>> >>> In that context, anything is possible. I knew a college professor >>> back in the day who was a composer. He called his work "radical-neo- >>> post-diatonicism." The weird thing was that he was deadly serious >>> about it. That's really how he wanted to be known! I have enough >>> trouble with Charles Mouton, without having to contend with neo-styro- >>> HIP. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> David Rastall >>> dlu...@verizon.net >>> www.rastallmusic.com >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> To get on or off this list see list information at >>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >> >> >> > > >
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
From: "David Rastall" On Oct 6, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Roman Turovsky wrote: From: "Stuart Walsh" Nowadays - in a different era - we easily laugh at this stuff and at the polystyrene scraping ( a much more jokey, Cagey thing anyway)?. I'm not so sure we would have been so easily laughing back then. Now all that - Stockhausen, Berio etc has almost all gone. In Britain, what have we got now? Classic FM, Classical Brit Awards with the latest orchestral work by McCartney, Karl Jenkins... You lucky Brits have Gavin Bryars, really nothing to complain about. You've got "Britain's Got Talent." What could be better than that? DR That show in now metasta. I mean franchised EVERYWHERE, including Ukraine. RT To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
On Oct 6, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Roman Turovsky wrote: From: "Stuart Walsh" Nowadays - in a different era - we easily laugh at this stuff and at the polystyrene scraping ( a much more jokey, Cagey thing anyway)?. I'm not so sure we would have been so easily laughing back then. Now all that - Stockhausen, Berio etc has almost all gone. In Britain, what have we got now? Classic FM, Classical Brit Awards with the latest orchestral work by McCartney, Karl Jenkins... You lucky Brits have Gavin Bryars, really nothing to complain about. You've got "Britain's Got Talent." What could be better than that? DR To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert?
An E string (wire-wound multifilament) or e' string (rather limp nylon monofilament)? What is the advantage of attaching real feather? I've just been trying a guitar, third string g - as Guy has now remembered. I'm not getting anywhere, but I'm not really getting anywhere with a 'normal' type plectrum either. But I can see a very good reason for tying _something_to a four inch length of nylon string: if you put it somewhere it is almost invisible! As a routine user of plectra and quills (both natural and synthetic), this approach all seems a bit weird to me. Eugene -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Guy Smith Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:48 AM To: 'Stuart Walsh'; 'Lute Net' Subject: [LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? IIRC, from his 2008 class at LSA, it's a guitar E string or a similar length of nylon, with a bit of feather attached. He talked about using real feathers, but they tend to break down fairly quickly. Guy -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Stuart Walsh Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:36 AM To: Lute Net Subject: [LUTE] Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? Crawford Young gave a concert last night in London. I couldn't get to it. I'd be very interested to know anything about the polyphonic stuff with psaltery and harp - like what instrument did what? And no percussion in this? And - if anyone was sharp-eyed enough - what was he using as a plectrum? (Crawford Young uses a bit of guitar string or the floppy end of a feather for a plectrum, evidently!) Stuart To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2417 - Release Date: 10/06/09 06:50:00
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
From: "Stuart Walsh" Nowadays - in a different era - we easily laugh at this stuff and at the polystyrene scraping ( a much more jokey, Cagey thing anyway)?. I'm not so sure we would have been so easily laughing back then. Now all that - Stockhausen, Berio etc has almost all gone. In Britain, what have we got now? Classic FM, Classical Brit Awards with the latest orchestral work by McCartney, Karl Jenkins... You lucky Brits have Gavin Bryars, really nothing to complain about. RT To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
Arto, There a worldwide reaction to technology, manifesting inself in heightened interest in handmaid and traditional things. Interest in Early Music in general and in the lute in particular is part of that same process. RT - Original Message - From: "wikla" To: "David Rastall" Cc: "Roman Turovsky" ; "Lutelist" Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:29 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes This is something I strongly disagree! Roman said that "EM revival in general was a reaction to this type of (neo)modernism". I do not know, if Roman refers to 20's, 30's, 60's or 70's by the "EM revival", but in any of these cases I cannot see any reaction to "(neo)modernism". What I CAN see (at least in cases of 60's and 70's) is a reaction against the established style of making the 150th version of Beethoven's 5th - every time tuning the strings a little it higher... Or all the 1000's of cases playing Bach by piano or by symphony orchestra... At least in my experience the persons who preferred EM to the "establishment" were just the same who also enjoyed the modern music. Another matter is (luckily!) that nowadays our "EM" aesthetics are a "must", if you want to perform music of "Bach and before". But I still wait they'll do also Sibelius (et al.) in the "HIP" manner, in the way he heard it. That still is definitely not the case. Arto On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:25:46 -0400, David Rastall wrote: On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Roman Turovsky wrote: EM revival in general was a reaction to this type of (neo)modernism. In that context, anything is possible. I knew a college professor back in the day who was a composer. He called his work "radical-neo- post-diatonicism." The weird thing was that he was deadly serious about it. That's really how he wanted to be known! I have enough trouble with Charles Mouton, without having to contend with neo-styro- HIP. Best, David Rastall dlu...@verizon.net www.rastallmusic.com -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
On Oct 5, 2009, at 5:41 AM, Christopher Stetson wrote: > Have we noticed that almost all of the world finds both lutes and >polyfoam musically boring and irrelevant, and therefore ignores > both? "Almost all the world" does not know what a lute is, and therefore could not be bored by it. I've never been told the lute is boring, unless that's what they mean when they say "relaxing." -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert?
Thanks for reply, Guy. Eugene > -Original Message- > From: Guy Smith [mailto:guy_m_sm...@comcast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 1:18 PM > To: 'Eugene C. Braig IV'; 'Lute Net' > Subject: RE: [LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? > > That's what I get for trusting my memory. I located my notes, and it was a > nylon G string, which makes more sense. AFAIK, the feather was just a > decoration. As for detailed reasons, you'd best direct your question to > Crawford. FWIW, he might well be on the faculty again at the 2010 LSA (not > sure if they are that far along yet). > > Guy > > -Original Message- > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > Behalf > Of Eugene C. Braig IV > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:43 AM > To: 'Lute Net' > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? > > An E string (wire-wound multifilament) or e' string (rather limp nylon > monofilament)? What is the advantage of attaching real feather? As a > routine user of plectra and quills (both natural and synthetic), this > approach all seems a bit weird to me. > > Eugene > > > > -Original Message- > > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > > Behalf Of Guy Smith > > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:48 AM > > To: 'Stuart Walsh'; 'Lute Net' > > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? > > > > IIRC, from his 2008 class at LSA, it's a guitar E string or a similar > > length > > of nylon, with a bit of feather attached. He talked about using real > > feathers, but they tend to break down fairly quickly. > > > > Guy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > > Behalf > > Of Stuart Walsh > > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:36 AM > > To: Lute Net > > Subject: [LUTE] Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? > > > > Crawford Young gave a concert last night in London. I couldn't get to > it. > > > > I'd be very interested to know anything about the polyphonic stuff with > > psaltery and harp - like what instrument did what? And no percussion in > > this? > > > > And - if anyone was sharp-eyed enough - what was he using as a plectrum? > > (Crawford Young uses a bit of guitar string or the floppy end of a > > feather for a plectrum, evidently!) > > > > > > Stuart > > > > > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >
[LUTE] Re: Lute and Flute Concert
Mindy and Ronn go back a long way. I remember the first incarnations of the Renaissance Ensemble of Baltimore/Baltimore Consort w/ the two of them (and others) at near freezing rehearsals in a heatless row house. Sean On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:22 AM, nedma...@aol.com wrote: Thanks for posting the McFarlane & Rosenfield youtube site, DS (were you there?). Really wonderful playing with a great rapport between the two. Ned -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Lute and Flute Concert
Thanks for posting the McFarlane & Rosenfield youtube site, DS (were you there?). Really wonderful playing with a great rapport between the two. Ned -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert?
That's what I get for trusting my memory. I located my notes, and it was a nylon G string, which makes more sense. AFAIK, the feather was just a decoration. As for detailed reasons, you'd best direct your question to Crawford. FWIW, he might well be on the faculty again at the 2010 LSA (not sure if they are that far along yet). Guy -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Eugene C. Braig IV Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:43 AM To: 'Lute Net' Subject: [LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? An E string (wire-wound multifilament) or e' string (rather limp nylon monofilament)? What is the advantage of attaching real feather? As a routine user of plectra and quills (both natural and synthetic), this approach all seems a bit weird to me. Eugene > -Original Message- > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > Behalf Of Guy Smith > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:48 AM > To: 'Stuart Walsh'; 'Lute Net' > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? > > IIRC, from his 2008 class at LSA, it's a guitar E string or a similar > length > of nylon, with a bit of feather attached. He talked about using real > feathers, but they tend to break down fairly quickly. > > Guy > > -Original Message- > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > Behalf > Of Stuart Walsh > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:36 AM > To: Lute Net > Subject: [LUTE] Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? > > Crawford Young gave a concert last night in London. I couldn't get to it. > > I'd be very interested to know anything about the polyphonic stuff with > psaltery and harp - like what instrument did what? And no percussion in > this? > > And - if anyone was sharp-eyed enough - what was he using as a plectrum? > (Crawford Young uses a bit of guitar string or the floppy end of a > feather for a plectrum, evidently!) > > > Stuart > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
The piece reminded me of an ultra-low budget rip-off/ allusion/hommage of Stockhausen's Mikrophonie 1 (1964). Here's part of it (only 81/2 mins!) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnkPtb9B69o&feature=related But you can see more details of the performers and what they are doing to the poor tam-tam here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-3m5ulM2oM&feature=related Mikrophonie 1 is from 1964 and in those days many people found it - and its ilk - really unsettling. Earnest Marxists thought it was bourgeois decadence but most people, I think, were almost horrified. Nowadays - in a different era - we easily laugh at this stuff and at the polystyrene scraping ( a much more jokey, Cagey thing anyway)?. I'm not so sure we would have been so easily laughing back then. Now all that - Stockhausen, Berio etc has almost all gone. In Britain, what have we got now? Classic FM, Classical Brit Awards with the latest orchestral work by McCartney, Karl Jenkins... To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert?
An E string (wire-wound multifilament) or e' string (rather limp nylon monofilament)? What is the advantage of attaching real feather? As a routine user of plectra and quills (both natural and synthetic), this approach all seems a bit weird to me. Eugene > -Original Message- > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > Behalf Of Guy Smith > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:48 AM > To: 'Stuart Walsh'; 'Lute Net' > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? > > IIRC, from his 2008 class at LSA, it's a guitar E string or a similar > length > of nylon, with a bit of feather attached. He talked about using real > feathers, but they tend to break down fairly quickly. > > Guy > > -Original Message- > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > Behalf > Of Stuart Walsh > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:36 AM > To: Lute Net > Subject: [LUTE] Anyone see Crawford Young's concert? > > Crawford Young gave a concert last night in London. I couldn't get to it. > > I'd be very interested to know anything about the polyphonic stuff with > psaltery and harp - like what instrument did what? And no percussion in > this? > > And - if anyone was sharp-eyed enough - what was he using as a plectrum? > (Crawford Young uses a bit of guitar string or the floppy end of a > feather for a plectrum, evidently!) > > > Stuart > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
I'm OK with that concept. The possibility for which, in part, is why my guess at the composer's/performers' intent was stated as being a guess. Best, Eugene > -Original Message- > From: Guy Smith [mailto:guy_m_sm...@comcast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:34 AM > To: 'Eugene C. Braig IV'; 'Lutelist' > Subject: RE: [LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes > > Have you considered the possibility that it's actually somebody's thesis > research on human gullibility... > > Guy > > -Original Message- > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > Behalf > Of Eugene C. Braig IV > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:12 AM > To: 'Lutelist' > Subject: [LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes > > I loved it, but I'm guessing not for the reasons the composers/performers > want me to. I haven't laughed so hard in a very long time. I love the > intent look of the performers and the crumbs that accumulate on their pant > legs...and the commentary posted to Youtube. > > Eugene > > > > -Original Message- > > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > > Behalf Of Roman Turovsky > > Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 8:54 AM > > To: Lutelist > > Subject: [LUTE] The reason we play lutes > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3506Ex097uY > > > > RT > > > > > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
Have you considered the possibility that it's actually somebody's thesis research on human gullibility... Guy -Original Message- From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Eugene C. Braig IV Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:12 AM To: 'Lutelist' Subject: [LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes I loved it, but I'm guessing not for the reasons the composers/performers want me to. I haven't laughed so hard in a very long time. I love the intent look of the performers and the crumbs that accumulate on their pant legs...and the commentary posted to Youtube. Eugene > -Original Message- > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > Behalf Of Roman Turovsky > Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 8:54 AM > To: Lutelist > Subject: [LUTE] The reason we play lutes > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3506Ex097uY > > RT > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: The reason we play lutes
I loved it, but I'm guessing not for the reasons the composers/performers want me to. I haven't laughed so hard in a very long time. I love the intent look of the performers and the crumbs that accumulate on their pant legs...and the commentary posted to Youtube. Eugene > -Original Message- > From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On > Behalf Of Roman Turovsky > Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 8:54 AM > To: Lutelist > Subject: [LUTE] The reason we play lutes > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3506Ex097uY > > RT > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Lute and Flute Concert
Ronn McFarlane and Mindy Rosenfeld gave a wonderful concert this past weekend spanning Negri to Dowland to Weiss, Handel and Bach. Select videos are available here: [1]http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FB69FBF1664A1CBA Enjoy! DS -- References 1. http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FB69FBF1664A1CBA To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
