[LUTE] Re: Blessed be that Maid Marie

2012-11-23 Thread David Smith
The Lute Society of America has a microfilm of MS D.1.21 that is available
to members but the quality is pretty bad.

Regards
David

-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
Of Christopher Stetson
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 10:03 AM
To: Lute List
Subject: [LUTE] Blessed be that Maid Marie

   Hello, all,

   While looking for seasonal material, a singer I work with mentioned
   Blessed Be That Maid Marie, wondering if anyone had made an
   arrangement for lute?.  I admit I'd never heard of it, but an internet
   search revealed that the music (is) from William Ballet's Lutebook
   (Trinity College MS  D.1.21), but apparently that book has not been
   made available in facsimile or digitally.  Would anyone have the music
   of this particular song, or a link thereto?

   Apologies if this has been discussed before, and thanks in advance for
   any help.

   Best of wishes for the holiday season,

   Chris.

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] Re: Swedish lute songs?

2012-11-23 Thread David Smith
This still appears corrupt and the page I get has warnings from Apache. The
links do not work on that page.
This link looks like it works for all the parts:
http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource.php?Select_Dnr=294

For some reason the =29 becomes ) in your email. 
Regards
David

-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
Of Jan Johansson
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 10:21 AM
To: 'lute list'
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Swedish lute songs?

   Hi,
   to get to the full set of parts this is the link
   http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr)4
   It was corrupt in my previous mail
   /Jan
   On 23 nov 2012 19:13 Daniel F. Heiman [1]heiman.dan...@juno.com
   wrote:

 Ed:
 I am with you -- the link given in the message below does not
 function for
 me either.
 However, if you work through the search function the part does come
 up. The
 link for the page I arrived at looks like:
 [2]http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/browsePart.php?Select_Part
 Select_Dnr)4c
 ommand=restart
 Just in case that gets mangled in transmission through the list
 server, here
 is a link to the link:
 [3]http://bit.ly/U2hxmx
 Greetings,
 Daniel
 -Original Message-
 From: [4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
 Of Ed Durbrow
 Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 03:45
 To: lute list
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Swedish lute songs?
 I really am curious to see the parts but I've tried several times
 and can't
 figure out how to access them.
 On Nov 22, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Jan Johansson [5]j...@horseforce.se
 wrote:

 Hi therobo b.c. fans,
 Andreas Schlegel was kind enough to direct me to the correct
 Buxtehude piece, Fuerchtet euch nicht, where we have both the
 basso continuo parts and a tiorba part (labeled th) written at
 the end of the 17th century probably by one of the lute players of
 the Hofkapelle in Stockholm. It can perhaps be interesting to
 compare
 the figured bc with the theorbo implementation.
 Here it is:
 [6]http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr)
 4
 Regards
 /Jan
 --
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

 Ed Durbrow
 Saitama, Japan
 [8]http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
 [9]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/

   --

References

   1. mailto:heiman.dan...@juno.com
   2.
http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/browsePart.php?Select_PartSelect_Dnr)4c
   3. http://bit.ly/U2hxmx
   4. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:j...@horseforce.se
   6. http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr
   7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   8. http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
   9. http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/




[LUTE] Re: Rolled chords

2012-11-23 Thread David Tayler
This is an interesting question, musicologically, and this is my
   opinion--everyone is free to disagree!
   Evidence: The evidence is that you either pluck the notes at the same
   time, or out of order. AFAIK, there are no other choices.
   First off, the derivation of the lute is from the viola, or vihuela
   (you may use your own generic term here) played with a bow or quill.
   With a bow or quill, you must roll. Yes, you can have a flat bridge,
   but you won't get far without being able to change strings once in a
   while. So the lute starts out rolled. You could maybe argue that no one
   ever played chords, but then the rolling is moot, or mute.
   Keyboard evidence: as far the surviving evidence being out of
   regulation, and all harpsichords made now based on historical models
   being out of regulation, I suppose that is a possibility, but one that
   is unlikely to change. This includes all organs as well, since the
   chiff is regulated and sounds at a different time than the
   fundamental--exactly like the octave string on a lute, or the four foot
   on a harpsichord. The organ pedals of course sound either rolled or not
   rolled depending on where you are sitting, and there is no way to line
   up the pedals so they are unrolled--can't be done. So every Sunday,
   rolled chords in church. One can say they are all wrong, but that would
   be considered pretty radical. It may be true, of course, I think for
   sure the rolling built in to the harpsichords can be pretty extreme.
   But it sounds very odd when you don't stagger the jacks--I've tried it,
   others have as well. And no one makes them that way because it doesn't
   sound right.
   However, the basic model is one in which we have to show that people
   did not roll the chords, since it is difficult to do so, and we know
   that the lute started out rolled. Analysis of high speed video shows
   that people almost always roll the chords, even if they try not to, and
   there is also the possibility that one might think one is not rolling
   when in fact one is rolling. So the burden of proof is to show that
   people didn't, which is difficult because people did--after all, it is
   impossible to play a chord with a quill while not rolling.
   There is a great deal more evidence in the form of iconography, because
   if you look at stop frames of the lute plucking motion of different
   players you will see the no roll has the same place setup as roll
   but a different release profile (except for the two-fingered snap pluck
   described in treatises). If you look at the release profile, you will
   see that fingers form a line, and you rarely see this sort of line in
   iconography. Instead you often see the release points splayed, just as
   in a roll. Artistic license? Maybe, but I think not--too much variance;
   too many examples. Try it for yourself; see where the fingers naturally
   wind up each way.
   Speaking of the snap pluck, where in a six or seven note chord the
   index finger (or other finger) snaps the top three or four course and
   the thumb snaps the lower two or three courses, these chords are of
   course rolled from both ends as we used to say in the '60s. Just to
   be clear: these chords are rolled in two directs because only two
   fingers are used, just like a quill brushing sequentially over strings.
   So rolling is historical, documented, impossible to avoid, shows up in
   other instruments, is notated and appears to be quite common in
   iconography. That's a lot of evidence.
   But historical evidence is subject to interpretation, so you can go
   through these and interpret them differently. That's the beauty of
   Early Music--there's many opinions on the source material.
   Why do harps have to roll? Because it sounds good, of course, but there
   is a reason: the strings range farther than the span of the hand--just
   like a player with small hands has to roll tenths or even octaves on
   the keyboard.
   Drums rolled, snares rolled, harps rolled, keyboards rolled, citterns
   rolled, guitars rolled, violins, gambas and cellos rolled (they have
   too, actually). But the lutes were the lone holdout? Where is the
   evidence that people did NOT roll? That's the question here, since the
   lute comes from the quill, and unless you are Edward Scissorhands,
   there is only one way to quill: sequentially.
   dt
   --- On Fri, 11/23/12, Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

 From: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Rolled chords
 To: lute lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Friday, November 23, 2012, 4:29 AM

  You write that  'A rolled chord is an arpeggio, literally, like a
   harp,
  and these go
 back to the Early Renaissance. ' - what's your evidence for this?
  Further, what do you mean by this ' A careful analysis of
   harpsichord
  registration indicates that in double  manual instruments the plucks
  were 

[LUTE] Re: Swedish lute songs?

2012-11-23 Thread Jan Johansson
   Hi again,
   for some reason the link gets incorrect in the mail again, it looks OK
   when I send it.
   The final part should look like
   Select_Dnr)4 (e.g. Select_Dnrequalsign294)
   Is there any reason that the list machine does not like equalsign?
   /Jan
   On 23 nov 2012 19:20 Jan Johansson [1]j...@horseforce.se wrote:

 Hi,
 to get to the full set of parts this is the link
 [2]http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr)
 4
 It was corrupt in my previous mail
 /Jan
 On 23 nov 2012 19:13 Daniel F. Heiman [1]heiman.dan...@juno.com
 wrote:
 Ed:
 I am with you -- the link given in the message below does not
 function for
 me either.
 However, if you work through the search function the part does come
 up. The
 link for the page I arrived at looks like:
 [2]http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/browsePart.php?Select_Part
 Select_Dnr)4c
 ommand=restart
 Just in case that gets mangled in transmission through the list
 server, here
 is a link to the link:
 [3]http://bit.ly/U2hxmx
 Greetings,
 Daniel
 -Original Message-
 From: [4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
 Of Ed Durbrow
 Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 03:45
 To: lute list
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Swedish lute songs?
 I really am curious to see the parts but I've tried several times
 and can't
 figure out how to access them.
 On Nov 22, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Jan Johansson [5]j...@horseforce.se
 wrote:
 Hi therobo b.c. fans,
 Andreas Schlegel was kind enough to direct me to the correct
 Buxtehude piece, Fuerchtet euch nicht, where we have both the
 basso continuo parts and a tiorba part (labeled th) written at
 the end of the 17th century probably by one of the lute players of
 the Hofkapelle in Stockholm. It can perhaps be interesting to
 compare
 the figured bc with the theorbo implementation.
 Here it is:
 [6]http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr)
 4
 Regards
 /Jan
 --
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 Ed Durbrow
 Saitama, Japan
 [8]http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
 [9]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/
 --
 References
 1. mailto:heiman.dan...@juno.com
 2.
 [3]http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/browsePart.php?Select_PartSelect_D
 nr)4c
 3. [4]http://bit.ly/U2hxmx
 4. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 5. mailto:j...@horseforce.se
 6.
 [5]http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr
 7. [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 8. [7]http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
 9. [8]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/

   --

References

   1. mailto:j...@horseforce.se
   2. http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr
   3. http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/browsePart.php?Select_PartSelect_Dnr
   4. http://bit.ly/U2hxmx
   5. http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   7. http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
   8. http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/