Re: Being gracious as a performer

2004-06-18 Thread Stephan Olbertz


Am 17 Jun 2004 um 20:44 hat Vance Wood geschrieben:

 If it is your obligation to speak to the performer you must realize
 that they also know they did not play that well.  

I'm not so sure about that ;-)

Stephan




Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-18 Thread Jon Murphy
Dear Stewart,

I couldn't agree with you more. Particularly about getting the beer in the
Pub. As you know I've not performed on the lute in public (which should be
considered a great benefit to the public), but have done a bit of time on
stage. The fellow performers will be more worried about their own perceived
mistakes. And those of the audience who loved you, if just for performing,
don't care. And those who are critical would be critical of anyone, as that
is their nature. To them I'd give answer 3 - I find xxxioni's
interpretation of this piece too slow/too fast, or mis-read. Then go for
your beer. Those who enjoyed it need no excuses, and those who didn't listen
to the song but only heard the technical details don't deserve an excuse
(let them play it). And one last thing, if you really blow a piece then
stop - make a really big smile - and say I'm starting this over so you can
hear it properly. The good people will love that, and the critics would be
critics anyway.

Best, Jon




 I have a couple of comments on the question of what to say to people
 after a performance:

 1) To other performers: Nothing. No post mortems, no criticisms,
 nothing. Pack your stuff away, get to the pub for a beer, and talk
 about things other than music. If there was anything during a
 performance which really warrants discussion, you can save it for
 next time you meet.

 2) To members of the audience: If someone praises you, say, Thank
 you. I'm pleased you enjoyed the performance. Do not mention
 mistakes, or other things which might have been of concern to the
 player. They are of no concern to the audience. Talking to a member
 of the audience is rather like an extension to the programme - a
 sort of encore - so you have to be positive. It's OK to say, It's
 lovely playing the lute in this 16th-century building with wood
 panelling on the walls, because the acoustic is so nice and
 resonant. It's not OK to say, It might have sounded better, if
 there weren't all those lousy carpets and curtains soaking up the
 sound.

 Best wishes,

 Stewart McCoy.


 - Original Message -
 From: Charles Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Candace Magner
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Lautenliste [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:03 PM
 Subject: RE: Being gracious as a performer.


  I think we should provide the audience with a copy of the music! I
 went into
  one festival, playing classical guitar, and the adjudicator said
 of my
  performance  that was a wonderful piece of music you played,
 unfortunately
  it bore no resemblance to the copy you handed in to me earlier!
  best wishes
  Charles Browne











Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Herbert Ward

I still do not have a gracious way to respond when someone compliments a
performance.

Often I say, Well, it really takes a lot of work., but that often seems 
deadening to the listeners enthusiasm.

Similarly, alluding to technical details (This piece sounds neat because 
of the unexpected minor 7ths.) often seems deadening.

A plain Thanks is sincere, but seems a little curt and uninformative.

Giving credit to the composer, of course, has merit, but often seems like
false modesty, since Dalza and Arcadelt are just names to 
non-lutenists.

With a larger audience, a bow seems to work well, but you can't bow to 
your brother's girl-friend.





Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread corun
Herbert wrote:
 
 I still do not have a gracious way to respond when someone compliments a
 performance.

Thank yuh. Thank yuh verra much. Always worked for the King.

Craig
 





Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Candace Magner
Singers (what I usually do) are notorious for demurring too much: Oh, I
wish that top Bb had been better, or I'm afraid I have a little bit of
allergies.

I try to remember what a horsemanship instructor told her star pupil, a shy
13-year-old. Just smile, say 'Thank you', and take the blue ribbon.

I think it is always appropriate to do the same after a performance: smile,
say thank you so much and perhaps add, I'm so glad you were able to
attend or I'm so glad you enjoyed the music.

And then, maybe, please stay for the reception or Great. Now let's go get
a drink! :-)

So here's a different question: What do you say to the performers when you
are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like the
performance all that much? Sopranos are apt to say What a fabulous dress!
Others might opt for that was a very ambitious program.

Candace



Dr. Candace A. Magner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
homepage http://clik.to/candace


- Original Message -
From: Herbert Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:26 AM
Subject: Being gracious as a performer.



 I still do not have a gracious way to respond when someone compliments a
 performance.

 Often I say, Well, it really takes a lot of work., but that often seems
 deadening to the listeners enthusiasm.

 Similarly, alluding to technical details (This piece sounds neat because
 of the unexpected minor 7ths.) often seems deadening.

 A plain Thanks is sincere, but seems a little curt and uninformative.

 Giving credit to the composer, of course, has merit, but often seems like
 false modesty, since Dalza and Arcadelt are just names to
 non-lutenists.

 With a larger audience, a bow seems to work well, but you can't bow to
 your brother's girl-friend.







Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread bill
words fail me...

sure did hear you...

boy, that was something!...

of course in america you can say that was just so... and shake your 
head as if you've been rendered speechless by the performance.  you can 
keep that up for quite a while: so...so...so...etc.  (try for a 
six-er) - which is better, i suppose, than some vacant-minded hyperbole 
like awesome!

wow! works.

as for receiving compliments, mostly i've performed with others which 
helps and on those few occasions when i've busked solo i'm usually so 
relieved to have got through the piece that i generally applaud them.

- bill


On Giovedì, giu 17, 2004, at 17:56 Europe/Rome, Candace Magner wrote:

 Singers (what I usually do) are notorious for demurring too much: Oh, 
 I
 wish that top Bb had been better, or I'm afraid I have a little bit 
 of
 allergies.

 I try to remember what a horsemanship instructor told her star pupil, 
 a shy
 13-year-old. Just smile, say 'Thank you', and take the blue ribbon.

 I think it is always appropriate to do the same after a performance: 
 smile,
 say thank you so much and perhaps add, I'm so glad you were able to
 attend or I'm so glad you enjoyed the music.

 And then, maybe, please stay for the reception or Great. Now let's 
 go get
 a drink! :-)

 So here's a different question: What do you say to the performers when 
 you
 are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like the
 performance all that much? Sopranos are apt to say What a fabulous 
 dress!
 Others might opt for that was a very ambitious program.

 Candace



 Dr. Candace A. Magner
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 homepage http://clik.to/candace


 - Original Message -
 From: Herbert Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:26 AM
 Subject: Being gracious as a performer.



 I still do not have a gracious way to respond when someone 
 compliments a
 performance.

 Often I say, Well, it really takes a lot of work., but that often 
 seems
 deadening to the listeners enthusiasm.

 Similarly, alluding to technical details (This piece sounds neat 
 because
 of the unexpected minor 7ths.) often seems deadening.

 A plain Thanks is sincere, but seems a little curt and 
 uninformative.

 Giving credit to the composer, of course, has merit, but often seems 
 like
 false modesty, since Dalza and Arcadelt are just names to
 non-lutenists.

 With a larger audience, a bow seems to work well, but you can't bow to
 your brother's girl-friend.










Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Thomas Schall
I just had thought about it: We were playing baroque lute duets recently
and I was thinking about the worst possible critic of the audience. I
thought something like 
3.nice looking instrumet(s), 
2.the accoustic in this room is difficult or 
1.one doesn't hear baroque lute duets very often would be the worst.  

but I also like that was a very ambitious program.

Another good question are the possible excuses for a bad performance: my
favorite was said by a player who didn't get through his piece and said:
the tuning didn't hold - funnily the tuning seems to have been more
stable in the first position and when playing a different (easier)
piece.

I personally would opt for earth magnetismn - this unexplored reason for
mistakes which could happen. When moving a bit while playing several
centers of earth magnetismn could apply to the sensible strings and
immediatly change the pitch. 
In combination with certain subterranean water strands this could have
desasterous effects on any performance.

Best wishes
Thomas


Am Don, 2004-06-17 um 17.56 schrieb Candace Magner:

 So here's a different question: What do you say to the performers when you
 are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like the
 performance all that much? Sopranos are apt to say What a fabulous dress!
 Others might opt for that was a very ambitious program.
 
 Candace
 
 
 
 Dr. Candace A. Magner
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 homepage http://clik.to/candace
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Herbert Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:26 AM
 Subject: Being gracious as a performer.
 
 
 
  I still do not have a gracious way to respond when someone compliments a
  performance.
 
  Often I say, Well, it really takes a lot of work., but that often seems
  deadening to the listeners enthusiasm.
 
  Similarly, alluding to technical details (This piece sounds neat because
  of the unexpected minor 7ths.) often seems deadening.
 
  A plain Thanks is sincere, but seems a little curt and uninformative.
 
  Giving credit to the composer, of course, has merit, but often seems like
  false modesty, since Dalza and Arcadelt are just names to
  non-lutenists.
 
  With a larger audience, a bow seems to work well, but you can't bow to
  your brother's girl-friend.
 
 
 

-- 
Thomas Schall
Niederhofheimer Weg 3   
D-65843 Sulzbach
06196/74519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss

--


RE: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Ron Fletcher
Usually, I am so relieved to have played through a piece without missing
too many notes, that I simply say, 'I'm sure it goes something like
that!


 I still do not have a gracious way to respond when someone compliments
a
 performance.

 Often I say, Well, it really takes a lot of work., but that often
seems
 deadening to the listeners enthusiasm.

 Similarly, alluding to technical details (This piece sounds neat
because
 of the unexpected minor 7ths.) often seems deadening.

 A plain Thanks is sincere, but seems a little curt and
uninformative.

 Giving credit to the composer, of course, has merit, but often seems
like
 false modesty, since Dalza and Arcadelt are just names to
 non-lutenists.

 With a larger audience, a bow seems to work well, but you can't bow to
 your brother's girl-friend.













Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Herbert Ward

 So here's a different question: What do you say to the performers when
 you are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like
 the performance all that much?

This question is particulary difficult for me, as I value heartfeltness
and innate taste far above technique and formal training.  But I guess 
everyone feels that way.




Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Candace Magner
Herbert said:
 This question is particulary difficult for me, as I value heartfeltness
 and innate taste far above technique and formal training.  But I guess
 everyone feels that way.

Then a good thing to tell the performers would be I love how you put your
heart and soul into playing the music!

ever the optimist,
Candace


Dr. Candace A. Magner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
homepage http://clik.to/candace


- Original Message -
From: Herbert Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Being gracious as a performer.



  So here's a different question: What do you say to the performers when
  you are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like
  the performance all that much?







RE: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Charles Browne
I think we should provide the audience with a copy of the music! I went into
one festival, playing classical guitar, and the adjudicator said of my
performance  that was a wonderful piece of music you played, unfortunately
it bore no resemblance to the copy you handed in to me earlier!
best wishes
Charles Browne

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 17 juni 2004 18:24
To: Candace Magner
Cc: Lautenliste
Subject: Re: Being gracious as a performer.


I just had thought about it: We were playing baroque lute duets recently
and I was thinking about the worst possible critic of the audience. I
thought something like
3.nice looking instrumet(s),
2.the accoustic in this room is difficult or
1.one doesn't hear baroque lute duets very often would be the worst.

but I also like that was a very ambitious program.

Another good question are the possible excuses for a bad performance: my
favorite was said by a player who didn't get through his piece and said:
the tuning didn't hold - funnily the tuning seems to have been more
stable in the first position and when playing a different (easier)
piece.

I personally would opt for earth magnetismn - this unexplored reason for
mistakes which could happen. When moving a bit while playing several
centers of earth magnetismn could apply to the sensible strings and
immediatly change the pitch.
In combination with certain subterranean water strands this could have
desasterous effects on any performance.

Best wishes
Thomas


Am Don, 2004-06-17 um 17.56 schrieb Candace Magner:

 So here's a different question: What do you say to the performers when you
 are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like the
 performance all that much? Sopranos are apt to say What a fabulous
dress!
 Others might opt for that was a very ambitious program.

 Candace



 Dr. Candace A. Magner
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 homepage http://clik.to/candace


 - Original Message -
 From: Herbert Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:26 AM
 Subject: Being gracious as a performer.


 
  I still do not have a gracious way to respond when someone compliments a
  performance.
 
  Often I say, Well, it really takes a lot of work., but that often
seems
  deadening to the listeners enthusiasm.
 
  Similarly, alluding to technical details (This piece sounds neat
because
  of the unexpected minor 7ths.) often seems deadening.
 
  A plain Thanks is sincere, but seems a little curt and uninformative.
 
  Giving credit to the composer, of course, has merit, but often seems
like
  false modesty, since Dalza and Arcadelt are just names to
  non-lutenists.
 
  With a larger audience, a bow seems to work well, but you can't bow to
  your brother's girl-friend.
 
 
 

--
Thomas Schall
Niederhofheimer Weg 3
D-65843 Sulzbach
06196/74519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss

--




Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Brian and Ann Dunbar
Candace Magner wrote:
 I think it is always appropriate to do the same after a performance: smile,
 say thank you so much and perhaps add, I'm so glad you were able to
 attend or I'm so glad you enjoyed the music.

I agree, I always say Thank you! I'm so glad that you enjoyrd it!
Thanks so much for coming! It turns the situation around from them
expressing graditude, to you expressing it. People then feel a
sincerity. (who was it that siad Sincerity? I can give you sincerity!)

 So here's a different question: What do you say to the performers when you
 are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like the
 performance all that much?

There is always SOMETHING that you enjoyed! Great job! I especially
enjoyed: the Dowland/your use of tone/how comfortable you look.

Question: What is worse than singing out of tune?
Answer: Singing out of tune with feeling!
   Brian




Re: Being gracious as a performer.

2004-06-17 Thread Vance Wood
The reply: that was certainly an ambitious program ranks right up there with
She has a great personality when one is describing a blind date they have
arranged for you.  Of course this means the blind date probably weighs 350
pounds,  is missing both front teeth, has crossed eyes and is balding. Most
players know when they have had a bad performance, you telling them
something complimentary is not going to change that or make them feel
better.  On the other hand a good performance calls for you to speak your
heart if the opportunity presents itself.

On being gracious as a performer:  I don't think making excuses for a bad
performance is going to make it better, it was what it was.  If it was not
so bad as to make people get up and leave then at least don't remind them
how bad it was.  Thank them for staying and thinking enough of you to
approach you after the program.  If you make people feel that they are
important to you then they will think kindly of you even if the music
sucked.  Remember these bad moments when you have a good performance and
everybody is blown away.  You know when you played well and the crowd will
usually let you know with either applause that goes beyond courtesy or by
seeking you out after the concert.  Talk to them.  Let them know that you
enjoyed it too, one of those rare moments when the instrument, the audience,
and the music all clicked together and that you are glad they were there to
share it with you.  There is nothing wrong with letting people know that you
enjoy playing the Lute, and that you enjoyed playing it for them.

Vance Wood.
- Original Message - 
From: bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Candace Magner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: Being gracious as a performer.


 words fail me...

 sure did hear you...

 boy, that was something!...

 of course in america you can say that was just so... and shake your
 head as if you've been rendered speechless by the performance.  you can
 keep that up for quite a while: so...so...so...etc.  (try for a
 six-er) - which is better, i suppose, than some vacant-minded hyperbole
 like awesome!

 wow! works.

 as for receiving compliments, mostly i've performed with others which
 helps and on those few occasions when i've busked solo i'm usually so
 relieved to have got through the piece that i generally applaud them.

 - bill


 On Giovedì, giu 17, 2004, at 17:56 Europe/Rome, Candace Magner wrote:

  Singers (what I usually do) are notorious for demurring too much: Oh,
  I
  wish that top Bb had been better, or I'm afraid I have a little bit
  of
  allergies.
 
  I try to remember what a horsemanship instructor told her star pupil,
  a shy
  13-year-old. Just smile, say 'Thank you', and take the blue ribbon.
 
  I think it is always appropriate to do the same after a performance:
  smile,
  say thank you so much and perhaps add, I'm so glad you were able to
  attend or I'm so glad you enjoyed the music.
 
  And then, maybe, please stay for the reception or Great. Now let's
  go get
  a drink! :-)
 
  So here's a different question: What do you say to the performers when
  you
  are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like the
  performance all that much? Sopranos are apt to say What a fabulous
  dress!
  Others might opt for that was a very ambitious program.
 
  Candace
 
 
 
  Dr. Candace A. Magner
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  homepage http://clik.to/candace
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Herbert Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:26 AM
  Subject: Being gracious as a performer.
 
 
 
  I still do not have a gracious way to respond when someone
  compliments a
  performance.
 
  Often I say, Well, it really takes a lot of work., but that often
  seems
  deadening to the listeners enthusiasm.
 
  Similarly, alluding to technical details (This piece sounds neat
  because
  of the unexpected minor 7ths.) often seems deadening.
 
  A plain Thanks is sincere, but seems a little curt and
  uninformative.
 
  Giving credit to the composer, of course, has merit, but often seems
  like
  false modesty, since Dalza and Arcadelt are just names to
  non-lutenists.
 
  With a larger audience, a bow seems to work well, but you can't bow to
  your brother's girl-friend.
 
 
 
 
 








Being gracious as a performer

2004-06-17 Thread Vance Wood
The question has been asked: What do you say to the performers when you
are obligated to talk to them afterward but you didn't really like the
performance all that much? Sopranos are apt to say What a fabulous dress!
Others might opt for that was a very ambitious program.

If it is your obligation to speak to the performer you must realize that
they also know they did not play that well.  If you think it is your job to
make them feel better let them know you appreciate them coming to play.
Nothing you can say is going to make them feel as though farting in a bath
tub sounded like the Bells of St. Mary's.  If they come at you with excuses
then you can address those issues.  But, really, in cases like this the less
said the better, and offering up empty compliments will do nothing but make
you look condescending at patronizing.

Vance Wood.