[Lwip] Minutes @IETF90
Dear All, Please check the minutes below. Thank Ari again for help taking minutes. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-lwig let me know if there is any problems with the minutes. Best regards, zhen ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
[Lwip] Call for Agenda items
Hello Everyone, If you need a slot on Lwig@IETF90, could you please let us know before this Friday. Many thanks, Robert Zhen ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Re: [Lwip] The LWIG Challenge
Hi Hannes, The cellular document was indeed a memo when the authors started to work on communication protocols, the document is very useful for readers and implementers when they approach the problems. What did you learn when you read this document? At least for example, using of send-only model for sleeping nodes to save energy. Need of eliminating the role or acting as a COAP server or Waiting for COAP observation subscriptions. - Requirement document for constrained devices (sensors and gateway nodes) w.r.t. the IP layer functionalities. - A survey document of constrained device developers (some do that for IPv6), link layer, battery life, applications profiles and etc. Could you provide further details about what you think could go into such documents? For the survey, we circulate a survey for set of questions for implementers and have some summary results collected. What kind of devices (battery, chipset, linklayer, radio, apps, transport) they are working on and protocols they are using. Sounds good ? With best regards, zhen ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Re: [Lwip] Confirm consensus of adoption of lwig-coap
Dear ALL, Thank you for feedback. The adoption has been confirm, with supports from experts from both lwig and core. @Authors, Please submit the document as a wg document, with draft-ietf-lwig-... Thanks, Co-chairs. -Original Message- From: Lwip [mailto:lwip-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cao Zhen (CZ) Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:32 AM To: lwip@ietf.org Subject: [Lwip] Confirm consensus of adoption of lwig-coap Hello Everyone, During London meeting, we asked the working group opinion to adopt http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap-03.txt as a working group document. The room there indicated a clear positive voice. This message would like to confirm the consensus on the mailing list. Please help to feedback within one week, i.e., before next Wednesday, March 24, 2014. Support with and without comments are both welcome. Many thanks, Co-chairs ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
[Lwip] Confirm consensus of adoption of lwig-coap
Hello Everyone, During London meeting, we asked the working group opinion to adopt http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap-03.txt as a working group document. The room there indicated a clear positive voice. This message would like to confirm the consensus on the mailing list. Please help to feedback within one week, i.e., before next Wednesday, March 24, 2014. Support with and without comments are both welcome. Many thanks, Co-chairs ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
[Lwip] Call for agenda items @IETF89
Dear All, The Lwig working group will meet at London, Thursday of the week, for one and a half hour. If you need a slot, please send your request to lwig-cha...@tools.ietf.org with the following details. - Name of the draft - Topic/Items that would like to discuss (to justify the need of f2f meeting) - Presenter name Many thanks, Zhen ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Re: [Lwip] Fwd: IPsec/Diet-ESP for IoT and Minimal ESP
Hi , Daniel, What's the relationship with existing work on ikev2, and tls? Thanks, Zhen -Original Message- From: Lwip [mailto:lwip-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Migault Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 10:59 PM To: lwip@ietf.org Subject: [Lwip] Fwd: IPsec/Diet-ESP for IoT and Minimal ESP Hi, Please find our draft for minimal IPsec/ESP. Comment are welcome! BR, Daniel Name:draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp Revision:00 Title:Minimal ESP Document date:2014-01-31 Group:Individual Submission Pages:6 URL:http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp-00.txt Status:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp/ Htmlized:http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp-00 Abstract: This document describes a minimal version of the IP Encapsulation Security Payload (ESP) described in RFC 4303 which is part of the IPsec suite. ESP is used to provide confidentiality, data origin authentication, connectionless integrity, an anti-replay service (a form of partial sequence integrity), and limited traffic flow confidentiality. This document does not update or modify RFC 4303, but provides a compact description of the minimal version of the protocol. If this document and RFC 4303 conflicts then RFC 4303 is the authoritative description. -- Daniel Migault Orange Labs -- Security +33 6 70 72 69 58 ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
[Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-hex-lwig-energy-efficient-02
Hello Everyone, Berlin meeting witnessed a meeting room consensus to adopt the draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hex-lwig-energy-efficient-01, The results was many supports and no objection, but comments were there would be some more work to make it better. The authors update the draft to 02 version http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hex-lwig-energy-efficient-02 and presented it on Vancouver meeting again. And also we have a milestone in the wg: Nov 2013 - First version of the energy efficient implementation guidance document submitted This message would like to confirm the consensus on the mailing list. Please help to feedback within one week, i.e., before next Monday. Support with and without comments are both welcome. Many thanks, Co-chairs ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
[Lwip] Minutes of IETF88
Hi All, Please check the minutes for the Vancouver 88 meeting http://tools.ietf.org/wg/lwig/minutes thanks Matthias, Carsten and Dominique for the collaborative editing. Regards, Zhen ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Re: [Lwip] Agenda for IETF88
Hi All, Updated the agenda to 01 version. It seems that the meeting will finish in 1 hour http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/agenda/agenda-88-lwig 1300-1310 Introduction, Agenda Bashing and Document Status 1310-1315 Update of lwig-minimal-ikev2 after WGLC 1315-1330 IESG review update of lwig-terminology 1330-1340 draft-hex-lwig-energy-efficient-02.txt 1340-1350 Constrained Group Authentication Problem Statement regards, zhen From: Kovatsch Matthias [mailto:kovat...@inf.ethz.ch] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 11:43 AM To: Cao Zhen (CZ); lwip@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Lwip] Agenda for IETF88 Dear Zhen I am confused that draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap-01 was scheduled. As written earlier, I did not receive any comments or updates from the other authors and did not have the time to improve on my sections. There is basically no status update to report. With the changes to –observe and –block, there will probably be some major updates for IETF 89, though. Best regards Matthias From: lwip-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:lwip-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cao Zhen (CZ) Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 15:26 To: lwip@ietf.org Subject: [Lwip] Agenda for IETF88 Hi All Please check the agenda to see if that’s appropriate for everything. Let me know if you need any changes. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/agenda/agenda-88-lwig Thanks, zhen ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
[Lwip] Agenda for IETF88
Hi All Please check the agenda to see if that’s appropriate for everything. Let me know if you need any changes. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/agenda/agenda-88-lwig Thanks, zhen ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
[Lwip] Call for adoption of draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-minimal-03
Hello Everyone, Berlin meeting witnessed a meeting room consensus to adopt the DTLS minimal implementation guidance draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-minimal-03.txt This message would like to confirm the consensus on the mailing list. Please help to feedback within one week, i.e., next Thursday, 8/29. Support with and without comments are both welcome. Many thanks, -cz ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
[Lwip] Review of the lwig-terminology draft
Dear authors, As individual, I do support the working group work on this direction of writing a terminology draft. Here I am sending my comments on the draft. 1. section 2.1, 'N=1,2' should be N=0,1,2, to be aligned with section 3. 2. section 2.3.2, the LowPAN AND 6LowPAN terms are not explicitly explained as in other sections. 3. section 2.2.1, it seems that 'Delay tolerant networks' is a more acceptable word for what stems from academic 4. section 2.*, 'constrained network' seems already covers 'constrained node network', does any case we need to use the _constrained node networks_ alone? 5. how about specify a term on the _constrained link_, because it emphasizes the link characteristic, while 'constrained nodes' emphasizes the constraint on the node, and 'constrained network is a composition of nodes and links, either of them being constrained' Best regards, zhen -Original Message- From: lwip-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:lwip-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cao Zhen (CZ) Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:27 AM To: lwip@ietf.org Subject: [Lwip] Call for adoption of the lwig-terminology draft Dear All, At Atlanta, we discussed the lwig terminology draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-lwig-terms-00.txt), which is short but immediate catch of the terminologies used in IETF works on lightweight protocols. We have discussed with area directors about adding this to the mile stones of the working group. As its characteristics, we would like to push the document forward to make it officially referable to the industrial. This message starts a one-week call for adoption of this document. Please feedback your opinion before Next Tuesday. Thank you very much -Zhen Robert ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://w ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Re: [Lwip] Minutes of Lwig @ietf85
-Original Message- From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:c...@tzi.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 6:18 PM To: Cao Zhen (CZ) Cc: lwip@ietf.org; robert.cra...@gridmerge.com Cragie Subject: Re: [Lwip] Minutes of Lwig @ietf85 Please find the minutes of lwig session at ietf85. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/minutes/minutes-85-lwig Thanks. PDF notes are not very easy to fix; I can't just send you a patch... Readable but not easy to fix, I upload a txt version: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/minutes/minutes-85-lwig Anyway, these notes are not very explicit about what we said about the terminology draft. By the way, the call for WG adoption for draft-bormann-lwig-terms hasn't happened on the WG list, either? We are working on to change the milestones. I do not think we can adopt a document before there is a m.s. I was hoping to develop this further as a WG document. So do I. thank you Grüße, Carsten ___ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
