On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 06:16:05AM +, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> On Thursday, June 29, 2017 13:30 JST, Stéphane Graber
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, so that just proves that we really more systematic testing of the
> > way we handle all that mess in "lxc file push".
> >
> > For this particular case, my feeling is that LXD 2.5's behavior is
> > correct.
>
> OK, I can see we can restore "2.14 behaviour" with an asterisk, i.e.:
>
> lxc file push -r /tmp/testdir/* container/tmp
>
> Which makes "lxc file push -r" in 2.15 behave similar like cp.
>
>
> Before, 2.14 behaved similar like rsync.
>
>
> So can we assume, going forward, the behaviour won't change anymore? :)
Yeah, it should be safe to assume that "lxc file push" will behave like
"cp", if it doesn't, we'll consider it a bug and fix :)
--
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users