Re: Qt Creator changes format of .ui on save
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 10/01/2012 02:40 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: In Qt Creator 4.8, I went to Tools Options Text Editor Behavior and unchecked Clean whitespace. However, when making a small change in a .ui file, Qt Creator makes many superficial changes, such as - property name=sizeGripEnabled + property name=sizeGripEnabled This makes patches less readable so I ended up editing the .ui file manually to produce a clean diff. Is there an option that I'm missing? I've seen this kind of thing before. Usually, my solution is to do what you did: Edit the ui file manually. You could try posting this to the Qt Creator mailing list, though. The main developer of that program is a good friend of LyX. OK, I will research some more and if I can't find a solution I will post to the mailing list. If the minor changes it makes are predictable, I wonder if a script would do the job. Not ideal, but it might beat manual editing which could also lead to mistakes. Thanks for the advice, Scott rh
Re: Qt Creator changes format of .ui on save
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 10/01/2012 02:40 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> In Qt Creator 4.8, I went to Tools > Options > Text Editor > Behavior >> and unchecked "Clean whitespace". However, when making a small change >> in a .ui file, Qt Creator makes many superficial changes, such as >> >> - >> + >> >> This makes patches less readable so I ended up editing the .ui file >> manually to produce a clean diff. >> >> Is there an option that I'm missing? > > I've seen this kind of thing before. Usually, my solution is to do what you > did: Edit the ui file manually. You could try posting this to the Qt Creator > mailing list, though. The main developer of that program is a good friend of > LyX. OK, I will research some more and if I can't find a solution I will post to the mailing list. If the minor changes it makes are predictable, I wonder if a script would do the job. Not ideal, but it might beat manual editing which could also lead to mistakes. Thanks for the advice, Scott > > rh >
Qt Creator changes format of .ui on save
In Qt Creator 4.8, I went to Tools Options Text Editor Behavior and unchecked Clean whitespace. However, when making a small change in a .ui file, Qt Creator makes many superficial changes, such as - property name=sizeGripEnabled + property name=sizeGripEnabled This makes patches less readable so I ended up editing the .ui file manually to produce a clean diff. Is there an option that I'm missing? Thanks, Scott
Re: Qt Creator changes format of .ui on save
On 10/01/2012 02:40 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: In Qt Creator 4.8, I went to Tools Options Text Editor Behavior and unchecked Clean whitespace. However, when making a small change in a .ui file, Qt Creator makes many superficial changes, such as - property name=sizeGripEnabled + property name=sizeGripEnabled This makes patches less readable so I ended up editing the .ui file manually to produce a clean diff. Is there an option that I'm missing? I've seen this kind of thing before. Usually, my solution is to do what you did: Edit the ui file manually. You could try posting this to the Qt Creator mailing list, though. The main developer of that program is a good friend of LyX. rh
Qt Creator changes format of .ui on save
In Qt Creator 4.8, I went to Tools > Options > Text Editor > Behavior and unchecked "Clean whitespace". However, when making a small change in a .ui file, Qt Creator makes many superficial changes, such as - + This makes patches less readable so I ended up editing the .ui file manually to produce a clean diff. Is there an option that I'm missing? Thanks, Scott
Re: Qt Creator changes format of .ui on save
On 10/01/2012 02:40 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: In Qt Creator 4.8, I went to Tools > Options > Text Editor > Behavior and unchecked "Clean whitespace". However, when making a small change in a .ui file, Qt Creator makes many superficial changes, such as - + This makes patches less readable so I ended up editing the .ui file manually to produce a clean diff. Is there an option that I'm missing? I've seen this kind of thing before. Usually, my solution is to do what you did: Edit the ui file manually. You could try posting this to the Qt Creator mailing list, though. The main developer of that program is a good friend of LyX. rh
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:49:16PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 12/01/2011 06:41 PM, André Pönitz wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:36:33AM +0200, Nicu Tofan wrote: Hello! I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator to examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include the invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use it), it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an alternative official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. Creating fully functional .pro files would be a lot of work, and it's not needed to use Qt Creator. You can directly use the CMakeList.txt or (since yesterday ;-}) the Makefile.am. Can you explain quickly what this means? I have in the past just used the import facility of Qt Creator, and it seems to work fine. Then why change it? [We are probably talking about the same thing anyway] The autotools support was a contribution, and it seems to be rather basic when it comes to building, but seemingly parses the LyX Makefile.am's fine (which was actually used as sanity check before integration) Would be just File-Open File or Project, either lyx-devel/CMakeLists.txt or lyx-devel/Makefile.am. Or add that on the command line when starting Creator. [Btw I always recommend using sessions, even if they are still too clumsy to setup for my taste (use is easy later...)] Andre' PS: Better discuss this on qt-crea...@qt-project.org?
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
On 02.12.2011 20:25, André Pönitz wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:49:16PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 12/01/2011 06:41 PM, André Pönitz wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:36:33AM +0200, Nicu Tofan wrote: Hello! I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator to examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include the invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use it), it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an alternative official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. Creating fully functional .pro files would be a lot of work, and it's not needed to use Qt Creator. You can directly use the CMakeList.txt or (since yesterday ;-}) the Makefile.am. Can you explain quickly what this means? I have in the past just used the import facility of Qt Creator, and it seems to work fine. Then why change it? [We are probably talking about the same thing anyway] The autotools support was a contribution, and it seems to be rather basic when it comes to building, but seemingly parses the LyX It nicely calls autogen.sh, then configure, and then make. Do you miss the target list in the make dialog? Makefile.am's fine (which was actually used as sanity check before integration) Would be just File-Open File or Project, either lyx-devel/CMakeLists.txt or lyx-devel/Makefile.am. Or add that on the command line when starting Creator. [Btw I always recommend using sessions, even if they are still too clumsy to setup for my taste (use is easy later...)] AH, never tried session. The only way to restore breakpoints? Andre' PS: Better discuss this on qt-crea...@qt-project.org?
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:49:16PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 12/01/2011 06:41 PM, André Pönitz wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:36:33AM +0200, Nicu Tofan wrote: > >> Hello! > >> > >> I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, > >> while > >> looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use > >> QtCreator to > >> examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include > >> the > >> invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, > >> mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. > >> Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use > >> it), > >> it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an > >> alternative > >> official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no > >> official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. > > Creating fully functional .pro files would be a lot of work, and it's > > not needed to use Qt Creator. You can directly use the CMakeList.txt > > or (since yesterday ;-}) the Makefile.am. > > > Can you explain quickly what this means? I have in the past just used > the import facility of Qt Creator, and it seems to work fine. Then why change it? [We are probably talking about the same thing anyway] The autotools support was a contribution, and it seems to be rather basic when it comes to building, but seemingly parses the LyX Makefile.am's fine (which was actually used as sanity check before integration) Would be just File->Open File or Project, either lyx-devel/CMakeLists.txt or lyx-devel/Makefile.am. Or add that on the command line when starting Creator. [Btw I always recommend using sessions, even if they are still too clumsy to setup for my taste (use is easy later...)] Andre' PS: Better discuss this on qt-crea...@qt-project.org?
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
On 02.12.2011 20:25, André Pönitz wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:49:16PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 12/01/2011 06:41 PM, André Pönitz wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:36:33AM +0200, Nicu Tofan wrote: Hello! I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator to examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include the invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use it), it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an alternative official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. Creating fully functional .pro files would be a lot of work, and it's not needed to use Qt Creator. You can directly use the CMakeList.txt or (since yesterday ;-}) the Makefile.am. Can you explain quickly what this means? I have in the past just used the import facility of Qt Creator, and it seems to work fine. Then why change it? [We are probably talking about the same thing anyway] The autotools support was a contribution, and it seems to be rather basic when it comes to building, but seemingly parses the LyX It nicely calls autogen.sh, then configure, and then make. Do you miss the target list in the make dialog? Makefile.am's fine (which was actually used as sanity check before integration) Would be just File->Open File or Project, either lyx-devel/CMakeLists.txt or lyx-devel/Makefile.am. Or add that on the command line when starting Creator. [Btw I always recommend using sessions, even if they are still too clumsy to setup for my taste (use is easy later...)] AH, never tried session. The only way to restore breakpoints? Andre' PS: Better discuss this on qt-crea...@qt-project.org?
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
Op 1-12-2011 5:36, Nicu Tofan schreef: Hello! I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator to examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include the invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use it), it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an alternative official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. Hi Nicu, Qt Creator is able to open the CMake files directly. It will generate a temporary .pro file itself. I guess this is the easiest way to use Qt Creator. Vincent
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:36:33AM +0200, Nicu Tofan wrote: Hello! I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator to examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include the invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use it), it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an alternative official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. Creating fully functional .pro files would be a lot of work, and it's not needed to use Qt Creator. You can directly use the CMakeList.txt or (since yesterday ;-}) the Makefile.am. Andre'
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
On 12/01/2011 06:41 PM, André Pönitz wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:36:33AM +0200, Nicu Tofan wrote: Hello! I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator to examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include the invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use it), it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an alternative official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. Creating fully functional .pro files would be a lot of work, and it's not needed to use Qt Creator. You can directly use the CMakeList.txt or (since yesterday ;-}) the Makefile.am. Can you explain quickly what this means? I have in the past just used the import facility of Qt Creator, and it seems to work fine. Richard
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
Op 1-12-2011 5:36, Nicu Tofan schreef: Hello! I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator to examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include the invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use it), it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an alternative official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. Hi Nicu, Qt Creator is able to open the CMake files directly. It will generate a temporary .pro file itself. I guess this is the easiest way to use Qt Creator. Vincent
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:36:33AM +0200, Nicu Tofan wrote: > Hello! > > I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while > looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator to > examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include the > invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, > mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. > Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use > it), > it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an > alternative > official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no > official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. Creating fully functional .pro files would be a lot of work, and it's not needed to use Qt Creator. You can directly use the CMakeList.txt or (since yesterday ;-}) the Makefile.am. Andre'
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
On 12/01/2011 06:41 PM, André Pönitz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:36:33AM +0200, Nicu Tofan wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I've created the attached .pro file from the source files in the trunk, while >> looking into CMakeLists. The purpose was for me to be able to use QtCreator >> to >> examine/change the source code. I have also tried for some time to include >> the >> invocation of mkres.sh script as a custom build step and failed. As such, >> mkres.sh must be run before attempting a build. >> Please note that this is for my personal use (and for whoever wants to use >> it), >> it's not a proposal/request to use qmake/QtCreator/.pro files as an >> alternative >> official build method. This implies that I am fully aware that LyX has no >> official .pro support and it was not designed to be constructed this way. > Creating fully functional .pro files would be a lot of work, and it's > not needed to use Qt Creator. You can directly use the CMakeList.txt > or (since yesterday ;-}) the Makefile.am. > Can you explain quickly what this means? I have in the past just used the import facility of Qt Creator, and it seems to work fine. Richard
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
gmail indentation was lost somewhere along the way. This is the folder structure. LyxFolder (name is not important) - lyx-devel - trunk - (the content of the trunk, like ABOUT-NLS, INSTALL, NEWS, ...) - build-lyx-trunk-qt (name is not important) - LyX.pro - mkres.sh - Resources.qrc (will be generated by mkres.sh) - Makefile (will be generated by qmake with LyX.pro) - tmp (will be created by qmake; will hold moc_, ui_ and .o files) - build (will be created by qmake; will hold the executable) Sorry about that. Also, the web form at http://post.gmane.org failed to post the message. Hopefully, this doesn't show up twice. (Not my lucky day? :) ) Nick
Re: LyX trunk builded with Qt creator on Ubuntu 11.10
gmail indentation was lost somewhere along the way. This is the folder structure. LyxFolder (name is not important) - lyx-devel - trunk - (the content of the trunk, like ABOUT-NLS, INSTALL, NEWS, ...) - build-lyx-trunk-qt (name is not important) - LyX.pro - mkres.sh - Resources.qrc (will be generated by mkres.sh) - Makefile (will be generated by qmake with LyX.pro) - tmp (will be created by qmake; will hold moc_, ui_ and .o files) - build (will be created by qmake; will hold the executable) Sorry about that. Also, the web form at http://post.gmane.org failed to post the message. Hopefully, this doesn't show up twice. (Not my lucky day? :) ) Nick
Re: Qt creator?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 19.11.2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4 and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. Wasn't he (Is still?) a vi-guy ;) There's FakeVim, you know... Btw, as the 'vi keystrokes for LyX' issue came up on the users list: I don't think it's impossible. The core of the FakeVim plugin is (intentionally) not tied to the IDE. It can operate on any QTextEdit or QPlainTextEdit derived class, and currently requires such, so it would not be a drop in, but the ties are rather weak, and it should be fairly straightforward to replace accesses the QTextDocument model by something else. The main challenge is probably to find a painless way to handle Cursor Up/Down, as the FakeVim model assumes fixed width fonts. Andre'
Re: Qt creator?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 19.11.2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: > >On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: > >>I'm learning Qt from "C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4" and am curious > >>if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt > >>Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing > >>to make communication and questions easier. > >> > >I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some > >extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers > >of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said > >on that score. > > Wasn't he (Is still?) a vi-guy ;) There's FakeVim, you know... Btw, as the 'vi keystrokes for LyX' issue came up on the users list: I don't think it's impossible. The core of the FakeVim plugin is (intentionally) not tied to the IDE. It can operate on any QTextEdit or QPlainTextEdit derived class, and currently requires such, so it would not be a "drop in", but the ties are rather weak, and it should be fairly straightforward to replace accesses the QTextDocument model by something else. The main challenge is probably to find a painless way to handle Cursor Up/Down, as the FakeVim model assumes fixed width fonts. Andre'
Re: Qt creator?
On 19/11/2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4 and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. I could have said exactly the same :-) Abdel.
Re: Qt creator?
On 19.11.2011 10:10, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 19/11/2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4 and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. I could have said exactly the same :-) Has anybody tried QtCreator under Windows with Msvc and cdb? Is it a serious alternative to Studio? Peter
Re: Qt creator?
On 19.11.2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4 and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. Wasn't he (Is still?) a vi-guy ;) And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. rh
Re: Qt creator?
Great, thanks for all of the advice! I just noticed a .ui folder in the source code, which I think suggests using Creator(?). In any case, I'm convinced. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote: On 19.11.2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4 and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. Wasn't he (Is still?) a vi-guy ;) And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. rh
Re: Qt creator?
On 11/19/2011 01:30 PM, Xu Wang wrote: Great, thanks for all of the advice! I just noticed a .ui folder in the source code, which I think suggests using Creator(?). In any case, I'm convinced. Those are normally edited using Qt Designer, which is integrated into Qt Creator, but you can also use it separately. Richard On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net mailto:syntheti...@gmx.net wrote: On 19.11.2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4 and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. Wasn't he (Is still?) a vi-guy ;) And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. rh
Re: Qt creator?
On 19/11/2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from "C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4" and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. I could have said exactly the same :-) Abdel.
Re: Qt creator?
On 19.11.2011 10:10, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 19/11/2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from "C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4" and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. I could have said exactly the same :-) Has anybody tried QtCreator under Windows with Msvc and cdb? Is it a serious alternative to Studio? Peter
Re: Qt creator?
On 19.11.2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from "C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4" and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. Wasn't he (Is still?) a vi-guy ;) And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. rh
Re: Qt creator?
Great, thanks for all of the advice! I just noticed a .ui folder in the source code, which I think suggests using Creator(?). In any case, I'm convinced. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Peter Kümmel <syntheti...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 19.11.2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: >> >>> I'm learning Qt from "C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4" and am curious >>> if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt >>> Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing >>> to make communication and questions easier. >>> >>> I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some >> extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers >> of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said >> on that score. >> > > Wasn't he (Is still?) a vi-guy ;) > > > And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE >> that isn't there in Qt Creator. >> >> rh >> >> >>
Re: Qt creator?
On 11/19/2011 01:30 PM, Xu Wang wrote: > Great, thanks for all of the advice! I just noticed a .ui folder in > the source code, which I think suggests using Creator(?). In any case, > I'm convinced. > Those are normally edited using Qt Designer, which is integrated into Qt Creator, but you can also use it separately. Richard > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Peter Kümmel <syntheti...@gmx.net > <mailto:syntheti...@gmx.net>> wrote: > > On 19.11.2011 04:45, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: > > I'm learning Qt from "C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4" and > am curious > if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text > editor or Qt > Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others > are doing > to make communication and questions easier. > > I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably > depends to some > extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead > developers > of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something > to be said > on that score. > > > Wasn't he (Is still?) a vi-guy ;) > > > And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE > that isn't there in Qt Creator. > > rh > > >
Qt creator?
I'm learning Qt from C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4 and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. Thanks, Xu
Re: Qt creator?
On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: I'm learning Qt from C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4 and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. rh
Qt creator?
I'm learning Qt from "C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4" and am curious if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing to make communication and questions easier. Thanks, Xu
Re: Qt creator?
On 11/18/2011 07:44 PM, Xu Wang wrote: > I'm learning Qt from "C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4" and am curious > if most LyX developers write Qt C++ code using a text editor or Qt > Creator? I would like to get used to doing whatever others are doing > to make communication and questions easier. > I don't know that there is any standard choice. Probably depends to some extent on the platform. But I will say this: One of the lead developers of Qt Creator is a long-time LyX coder, so there's something to be said on that score. And, speaking for me, there's not much I want in an IDE that isn't there in Qt Creator. rh
